User Lauda Blackmailed us even after getting 2.4 BTC

[Lauda]

Isnt this kind of behavior banneable here at the forum?

Not really, no.

[OgNasty]

Isnt this kind of behavior banneable here at the forum?

Not really, no.

It should be.

[Lauda]

Isnt this kind of behavior banneable here at the forum?

Not really, no.

It should be.

I fully agree, especially in *extremely* obvious cases of bullshit like this one. However, you know how things are around here. A lot of stuff that should be, isn't; stuff that shouldn't be, is.

[miguelmorales85]

Isnt this kind of behavior banneable here at the forum?

Not really, no.

It should be.

I fully agree, especially in *extremely* obvious cases of bullshit like this one. However, you know how things are around here. A lot of stuff that should be, isn't; stuff that shouldn't be, is.

This could end up being like some kind of wild wild west (or 4chan)

[Aventhe]

This guy created fake lauda account on slack which can you see from his pictures.

Damn, I didn't even notice that. OP, are you retarded?

Looks like it.. I didn't notice that myself just until now. We should have a facepalm emoji just for these occasions.

What benefit do you have as a Newbie of framing Lauda. Maybe you are the alt amount of a scammer?

[Quickseller]

https://s26.postimg.org/3o8js7do9/Screenshot_217.png
https://s26.postimg.org/nwvxdxczd/Screenshot_218.png
https://s26.postimg.org/ltli69d6h/Screenshot_219.png
https://s26.postimg.org/tnm3rnkzd/Screenshot_220.png

This guy created fake lauda account on slack which you can see from his pictures.

I cant believe someone is as dumb as this guy.
Isnt this kind of behavior banneable here at the forum?

I don't think he is really all that dumb....his accusation was designed to crumble upon close inspection

[Spoetnik]

Funny FAIL here  ..Next time do better guy. 

[Quickseller]

Funny FAIL here  ..Next time do better guy. 

It was not a FAIL. It was intended to crumble upon close inspection

[Lauda]

Funny FAIL here  ..Next time do better guy. 

It was not a FAIL. It was intended to crumble upon close inspection

In that case, it was likely orchestrated by yourself.

[Quickseller]

Funny FAIL here  ..Next time do better guy. 

It was not a FAIL. It was intended to crumble upon close inspection

In that case, it was likely orchestrated by yourself.

Yea, it's too bad this would improve your reputation.

[minifrij]

In that case, it was likely orchestrated by yourself.

Yea, it's too bad this would improve your reputation.

So you are behind this? I can't say I'm surprised.

[Quickseller]

In that case, it was likely orchestrated by yourself.

Yea, it's too bad this would improve your reputation.

So you are behind this? I can't say I'm surprised.

No. learn how to read jackass.

[Tesorex]

One idiot starts this thread with one post and goes away laughing at all of us, I don't know why lauda with a lower case L is reporting him/herself. moreover I don't know why Quickseller is still active despite so many negative ratings? dude time to move on and forget about this account.

[minifrij]

No. learn how to read jackass.

Lauda - This was likely done by Quickseller.
Quickseller (In reply) - Yeah. Shame it will likely make you look better.


I'm paraphrasing, but I don't think I'm the one with the English issues in this situation, as you have shown multiple times.