Being a Smart Person or Strategic

[ArIMy11]

Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?

For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.

Yes I agree with you.I prefer both. If you are a smart person but you have no strategies in life you cant make money and not be successful. If you have work it does not end in that. You must know how to budget the money you will earn. If it is spend in different things and be dedicated in unimportant things you will not be a successful person.

Being smart without strategy is I think you will just excel in school and not in life after graduating in college. We dont really need to be in the first place un school. The important is we are in first place in our life so we will not be poor and we earn big amount of money.

[1713960023]

1713960023

[1713960023]

1713960023

[1713960023]

1713960023

[goldade]

Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?

For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.

Everybody cannot want same thing in life while some are not contended with an average life, others are very comfortable in waking up in the morning and getting something to eat when this is being met, every other thing does not matter but they should not be cast out but should be left to lead their lives because that is what they choose normal for me. But in my own case, I chose more than that and working towards it on a daily basis.

[fishbonez11]

What do you mean by smart? If you are pertaining to the level of education or quantity of knowledge, then I can say that it is not enough. People can be full of knowledge without knowing how to use that knowledge.

On the otherhand, smart can also mean that one can analyze well, then I guess I could say that being smart can lead you to be strategic.

[ss890]

Don't know why but some people will always find their way out in proper financial balance even though they are not smart. They will just have strategies for life and applying that gets their job done. I'm not very smart (reality is reality) but what I do is just try to be little concerned about the management. I read stuff about finances and try to manage everything in balanced portfolio. We don't really have to be smart about it but with strategies being clever one will work. That's not the balance of two but it's the way which works for me.

[BTCevo]

Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?

For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.

I think it is really depends on what you doing right now and it also depends on what job you have for your living. Most of them are sure need to be smart to manage their lives but they need to manage their strategy on how to live it. Mean while others do not have this chance to have this kind of live so they need to find some strategy to giving the best on their living

[misterj]

Being smart or being a strategic person has both advantages and disadvantages. For a smart person knowing that it is well educated and moves accordingly to the guides he learned or red. This makes him look for the safest investment in life. While a strategic person grows in experience and time. He learned the hard way which makes him stronger mentally and physically in making life decision or investment. It is either you avoid loss or pain by learning it first or embrace it so you can remeber the lesson more.

[audaciousbeing]

Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?

For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.

I would also agree that its a combination of both being smart and strategic because the determination of being smart to be is a function of being strategic on some specific things among the importance which include financial freedom and source of this is different and several people manage it differently the moment they are able to keep it together, then they are good at it.

[thepolarbear]

I think if your smart then you are strategic too as well, I think they are just the same. I think being smart is not what is seems to working fine in every moment but also be wise is what others are capable to and it is also a good personality in life.

But everything also should be balanced in order not to cause loss for their money.

I agreed. I also think that if you're smart then you can be strategic too. I prefer the both because being smart only won't help to survive same as not being strategic. I think this two should be a partner so that you will be successful in life. Smart does'nt mean you know all the things academically but being knowledgable about the basic things that can improve your strategic skills but ofcourse it should be balance so that you will not struggle in deciding.

[WinBeast]

In our value-based capitalistic economy, intelligence and financial intelligence go hand in hand.

In the vast majority of cases, they are both required to achieve success on a large scale although they rarely come in hand.

Intelligence is found in all financially intelligent people whereas financial intelligence is not found in all intelligent people. The combination of both intelligence and financial intelligence is a profound asset in succeeding financially.

[TrueCryptonaire]

I think if your smart then you are strategic too as well, I think they are just the same. I think being smart is not what is seems to working fine in every moment but also be wise is what others are capable to and it is also a good personality in life.

But everything also should be balanced in order not to cause loss for their money.

I agreed. I also think that if you're smart then you can be strategic too. I prefer the both because being smart only won't help to survive same as not being strategic. I think this two should be a partner so that you will be successful in life. Smart does'nt mean you know all the things academically but being knowledgable about the basic things that can improve your strategic skills but ofcourse it should be balance so that you will not struggle in deciding.

Absolutely! It is the same as people say about hard work and smart work, you will not get good marks just by hard work, you should also work smart for better grades. So yeah a person should be both smart and strategic too in order to achieve great success in his life.

[Fundalini]

I think that if you are a strategic person, you are already smart since you are already dealing with several contingencies and if you are smart, you are already strategic because your can comprehend the situation and act accordingly . That is the feeling I get when I hear those words together--they can't be mutually exclusive.

[entrepmind23]

In our value-based capitalistic economy, intelligence and financial intelligence go hand in hand.

In the vast majority of cases, they are both required to achieve success on a large scale although they rarely come in hand.

Intelligence is found in all financially intelligent people whereas financial intelligence is not found in all intelligent people. The combination of both intelligence and financial intelligence is a profound asset in succeeding financially.

We can observe that not all people who are book smart are rich because of lack of financial education and there are people who are not that smart but rich because they are street smart. There are ones who are both book smart and street smart and they are the ones who usually are more successful than people who are either book or street smart.

When I am still studying, I thought those who graduated with honors will automatically have a successful life because of what they achieved and then those who almost flop may not be that successful but then life has a way of showing that this is not the order since I have observed that there are some who graduated with honors but still struggling in their jobs and some who almost flop are filthy rich because they are smart in a different way and more educated financially.

[Wildwest]

Being smart is not always strategic and being strategic is not always smart. Sometimes both need each other, you need both to perfect it.

[uraharasan]

Being smart is not always strategic.

the person who makes the strategy is the smart one.

being strategic is not always smart.

the person who makes the strategy is definitely smart, the fool will not make a strategy.

you need both to perfect it.

yes, you need both.

[severaldetails]

I think that every smart person is strategic.
If a smart person does not care about his money, then because he knows that he can generate more when it is necessary.
That is part of his strategy, and the strategy works.
A strategic person on the othere hand does not have to be smart. He has a strategy, yes.
But only because a strategy exist, it does not have to be a smart one.

[syaripudin]

Of course intelligence is a gift that should be grateful to everyone who does have the gift of intelligence. but I do not think every smart person has a wise person. not a few smart people who just fool people who are still lay, so I think not enough just to be smart there must be a wise soul. with two things that are owned then it will always always get the strategy. and I think his strategy will always lead to success. so I guess between the smart and the strategy can not be separated. it just needs to be equipped with policy.

[LuanX3]

Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?

For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.

It should be both, I think. What is the point of being smart if you don't strategically use it? What is the point of being strategic in just one thing you do but you do not innovate because that is all you know? Both situation has it's disadvantage but if both are present then it creates a lot more opportunity for that person. Profiting is something hard to equate. There is no one formula to it.

[kryptqnick]

Well for me smart person is better than a strategic person, Because we all know that smart can easily learn how to be strategic. So for me smart is better.

I think it's harder than that. Sometimes one has to be smart enough to realize there's no use in strategy as well. For example, in gambling (especially, in dice) strategy (martingale) is likely to make you lose what you had, whereas being smart enough not to care about gambling with a strategy might be a savior. On the other hand, I'm sure there are situations when strategy is more important. For instance, one can be smart to buy a perspective currency but lack strategy to decide when to finally sell it and make real profit.

[xuan87]

We need to be smart and strategical to survive and to get a better future, we need to be smart in every situation so we know what is the best decisions to take, not only in investment but decisions for our lives and we need to have strategy for our future, we need to be able to anticipate the problem that maybe occured

[micher143]

I think there are different kinds of smarts, and ultimately it comes down to your goals. Someone who is a mathematical genius may not be 'smart' with their money, and could end up broke.

It is true that often we choose to do decision base on our goals and need so basically we are capable on being a strategic person rather than to be  smart person. But in terms of decisions it could be better if we are going to be practical and deal with transactions that we have experience before or simply learn from our mistake so we could develop also as a person, investor or as a trader.