Bitcoin Forum
February 21, 2018, 04:07:24 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: A Simple Suggestion  (Read 807 times)
libert19
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 224
Merit: 101


Sandblock - Customer satisfaction on blockchain


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 04:01:49 AM
 #1

http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4838/45zwaizm_png.htm

As you can see in image that I have posted two replies back to back and sometimes that can be considered as spam.

So my suggestion is that why not merge replies when same user replies back to back. I think that would be really simple to do and would be effective.

What are your thoughts?

Sandblock    Decentralized consortium of brands and customers
▬▬▬▬▬▬       Whitepaper    ❱    Telegram   ❱   Ann Thread       ▬▬▬▬▬▬
PRE-SALE February 28
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1293


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 04:32:29 AM
 #2

http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4838/45zwaizm_png.htm

As you can see in image that I have posted two replies back to back and sometimes that can be considered as spam.

So my suggestion is that why not merge replies when same user replies back to back. I think that would be really simple to do and would be effective.

What are your thoughts?

Maybe move this (lower left) to the New Software section.  Smiley

I'm into creating universes, smiting people, writing holy books and listening to Prayer Messages (PMs).
I will ignore your Prayer Messages unless you donate to 1CDyx8AUTiYXS1ThcBU3vy4SJWQq6pdFMH
BitcoinTalk Public Information Project (BPIP) - NOW TRACKING MERIT! (Refresh your profile at any time)
libert19
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 224
Merit: 101


Sandblock - Customer satisfaction on blockchain


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 04:34:47 AM
 #3

http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4838/45zwaizm_png.htm

As you can see in image that I have posted two replies back to back and sometimes that can be considered as spam.

So my suggestion is that why not merge replies when same user replies back to back. I think that would be really simple to do and would be effective.

What are your thoughts?

Maybe move this (lower left) to the New Software section.  Smiley

I have no power sir Sad


Sandblock    Decentralized consortium of brands and customers
▬▬▬▬▬▬       Whitepaper    ❱    Telegram   ❱   Ann Thread       ▬▬▬▬▬▬
PRE-SALE February 28
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1293


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 04:48:04 AM
 #4

http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4838/45zwaizm_png.htm

As you can see in image that I have posted two replies back to back and sometimes that can be considered as spam.

So my suggestion is that why not merge replies when same user replies back to back. I think that would be really simple to do and would be effective.

What are your thoughts?

Maybe move this (lower left) to the New Software section.  Smiley

I have no power sir Sad



You do, using the control at the lower left that says "Move Thread"  Smiley

I'm into creating universes, smiting people, writing holy books and listening to Prayer Messages (PMs).
I will ignore your Prayer Messages unless you donate to 1CDyx8AUTiYXS1ThcBU3vy4SJWQq6pdFMH
BitcoinTalk Public Information Project (BPIP) - NOW TRACKING MERIT! (Refresh your profile at any time)
libert19
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 224
Merit: 101


Sandblock - Customer satisfaction on blockchain


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 04:55:44 AM
 #5

http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4838/45zwaizm_png.htm

As you can see in image that I have posted two replies back to back and sometimes that can be considered as spam.

So my suggestion is that why not merge replies when same user replies back to back. I think that would be really simple to do and would be effective.

What are your thoughts?

Maybe move this (lower left) to the New Software section.  Smiley

I have no power sir Sad



You do, using the control at the lower left that says "Move Thread"  Smiley

Ah got it, thank you very much.

Newbie to forums's UI  Tongue

Sandblock    Decentralized consortium of brands and customers
▬▬▬▬▬▬       Whitepaper    ❱    Telegram   ❱   Ann Thread       ▬▬▬▬▬▬
PRE-SALE February 28
xandry
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1009


Bitcore (BTX) - Your Payment Coin


View Profile
September 18, 2017, 01:58:02 PM
 #6

Good idea, but how then users will be bumping their threads?

     ╔═╗ ╦ ═╦═╔══╔══╗╔══╗╔══          OFFICIAL WEBSITE | TWITTER  | FACEBOOK
==== ╠═╝╗║  ║ ║  ║  ║╠═╔╝╠══ ====    OFFICIAL F.A.Q.  | TELEGRAM | TECHCHART    
     ╚══╝╩  ╩ ╚══╚══╝╚ ╚═╚══          10 MB, segwit, BTC -> BTX, airdrops +++
libert19
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 224
Merit: 101


Sandblock - Customer satisfaction on blockchain


View Profile WWW
September 19, 2017, 08:20:26 AM
 #7

Good idea, but how then users will be bumping their threads?

Put 24 hr gap.

If user posts after 24 hrs, it should not be merged.


Sandblock    Decentralized consortium of brands and customers
▬▬▬▬▬▬       Whitepaper    ❱    Telegram   ❱   Ann Thread       ▬▬▬▬▬▬
PRE-SALE February 28
Aventhe
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 108


View Profile
September 19, 2017, 11:45:45 AM
 #8

Not a bad idea to be honest. However what if the user would like to reply to a new person, or bring up a new point that he or she would like to be differentiated from all the rest of the previous posts?

I do not think that if you are creating quality posts and have a reason to make another post in the same topic, you will be considered as a spammer. It all depends on the actions and style of writing for every individual. You always have access to the "Edit" button if you want to ever add more to your previous post.
libert19
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 224
Merit: 101


Sandblock - Customer satisfaction on blockchain


View Profile WWW
September 20, 2017, 02:22:44 AM
 #9

Not a bad idea to be honest. However what if the user would like to reply to a new person, or bring up a new point that he or she would like to be differentiated from all the rest of the previous posts?

I do not think that if you are creating quality posts and have a reason to make another post in the same topic, you will be considered as a spammer. It all depends on the actions and style of writing for every individual. You always have access to the "Edit" button if you want to ever add more to your previous post.

I am talking about back to back comments here. 🙂

Sandblock    Decentralized consortium of brands and customers
▬▬▬▬▬▬       Whitepaper    ❱    Telegram   ❱   Ann Thread       ▬▬▬▬▬▬
PRE-SALE February 28
Aventhe
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 108


View Profile
September 20, 2017, 05:01:00 AM
 #10

Not a bad idea to be honest. However what if the user would like to reply to a new person, or bring up a new point that he or she would like to be differentiated from all the rest of the previous posts?

I do not think that if you are creating quality posts and have a reason to make another post in the same topic, you will be considered as a spammer. It all depends on the actions and style of writing for every individual. You always have access to the "Edit" button if you want to ever add more to your previous post.

I am talking about back to back comments here. 🙂

Oh, well yes, then it would make much more sense. (By the way, love the Android smiley 😉)

I wish the new forum would be announced soon, the community has been waiting for some time now. However, I guess it's theymos' call, not ours.
Renzyp
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 13, 2017, 04:03:19 AM
 #11

Short reply would be easy and also direct to the point question and answer , but that’s my own openion
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!