|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
 |
July 28, 2013, 11:13:40 AM |
|
ok mate hope you got some .
cheers .
how do you find the new client ?
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 28, 2013, 01:08:58 PM
Last edit: July 28, 2013, 01:30:57 PM by jjiimm_64 |
|
The only thing I noticed about this picture is that your mining primecoin!! |
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
July 28, 2013, 01:54:14 PM |
|
The only thing I noticed about this picture is that your mining primecoin!! Nothing in politics happens for no reason . but you can put a cross though "Bottelcaps" soon as I sent 1100 odd to Cryptsy and they went to never never land. I don't want to be rude , but it all just looks like bad management, not Verns fault but this is why we didn't rush to move to PoS. plus how could i not mine a symbol so close to digitalindusty. how are we all finding the new client ? |
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
captainfuture
|
|
July 28, 2013, 03:11:13 PM |
|
NZVNRTPxTdCwaPCefw3gRgaVaovjyyMcLU Thnx  |
|
|
|
|
|
Damnsammit
|
|
July 28, 2013, 03:45:53 PM |
|
Just downloaded and am mining solo... gonna go for at least a few days and hopefully snag a block with my 750KH/s "rig"
NPBBDcooT5hKshork8tQHct51swXwrd1Xc
|
|
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
July 28, 2013, 05:02:07 PM |
|
No worries - great to see new miners !
keep me up to date if there are any client issues !
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
July 28, 2013, 05:56:41 PM |
|
updated config file on topic -
if syncs occur please notify - will be adding to these nodes .
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2013, 03:52:34 PM
Last edit: August 02, 2013, 01:35:57 AM by digitalindustry |
|
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
July 31, 2013, 03:54:11 PM
Last edit: August 01, 2013, 06:54:48 AM by digitalindustry |
|
We have a resolution and a v0.6.5.2 released more checkpoints and fixes, source and binaries updated -
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
philipkdick
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
August 01, 2013, 06:58:02 AM |
|
We have a resolution and a v0.6.5.2 released more checkpoints and fixes, source and binaries updated -
Great to see ! ! |
|
|
|
|
|
ISAWHIM
|
|
August 01, 2013, 08:10:33 PM |
|
This is going to sound odd... but check that your variables are matched correctly...
28337 is what it seems stuck at...
See that all ints, units, longs, floats, doubles, etc... actually give what you expect in ranges.
Same with shift commands and masks... It is obviously related to processing of a "valid block"... Unless it is screwing-up the NONCE or the wrong value for the initial genesis-seed/block is being used. (Thus, rejecting all our work, because it is all invalid.)
I would bet that it is something silly, like cramming an int into a uint, and reading it back out as an int. (That alters the value when it shifts the byte for the negative-switch, to the last bit. Safe for small numbers but once you reach half-int, it changes.)
Though, it seems to be letting me mine. Will be sad if these blocks just disappear too... like my last days work mining.
As I typed, I found block 28338... now it says I am synched... I fixed it! lol... or just gonna eat my coins again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISAWHIM
|
|
August 01, 2013, 08:17:07 PM |
|
lol... spoke too soon... I think...
Says I found a block, but nothing in my wallet... seems orphaned.
If I am on the right chain, and the other is the wrong one, then it should show later, once this one grows-up past the incorrect one. I assume that the other one my wallet sees is invalid, or it would have me mining on it. It must see it, or it would have added the found block to my wallet.
so... does that mean the other block is invalid... or it just isn't selecting the correct taller chain? (Could that be the bug? That it is selecting the second largest chain, or that the other guys are just not "talking", sending the taller chain, but still reporting the height?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 01, 2013, 10:06:23 PM
Last edit: August 01, 2013, 10:16:29 PM by digitalindustry |
|
would like to thank Maxpower for the Mac client thank you very much Max https://www.dropbox.com/s/0eptl596hxnjpl0/nibble-qt-0.6.5.2-Mac.zipgo mad and post your NBL address here ! ISAWHIM : can you confirm if it was orphan or not? as far as we looked the chain is not forked , but i don't discount this possibility i will start to test now. can i ask where you mined or did you solo mine ? is it possible for you to register here?: http://nbl.pnwminer.comIf you mine a block here as a test - I will give you a block so that we may help resolve this . |
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
ISAWHIM
|
|
August 02, 2013, 02:26:42 AM |
|
My wallet count went up by one block, the chain went up by one block... the cgminer reported it as "approved"... (Nothing indicates "orphaned" blocks in the wallet. I would have to dig through the wallet to actually "see" the block info.)
The block I found was the one listed above, 28338. Even the coin-choose website indicated that was the new block-height, after I found it. (The one that I stated was just found, as I was typing.)
It could have just been a one-time orphan. I switched to another coin after that.
Testing again tonight...
If it orphans again, then there is a fork, and I am just on the wrong side of it. (Not sure how that works, if the wallet is the mining access, and the network it is talking to has identified it as an orphan, it should be moving me to the correct chain.)
The only thing weird I noticed, is that the wallet still said, "not synched", while I was mining that block. The block-height was the one listed on all the coin pages, to I took a risk and mined. Once it found that block, the orphan, my wallet finally said it was synced...
I will try registering on a pool later. It does not show you approved or rejected blocks, only approved or rejected shares. If that pool is on the right chain, then it would show with the other miners, since they are all mining to the same wallet for the same chain. (The pools wallet).
brb, trying to mine it again.
P.S. I am not worried about loosing one block, after the 60+ blocks (3000+ coins), I lost from the days of mining it after the 27th to the 29th... all those disappeared from my wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
maxpower
|
|
August 02, 2013, 02:28:59 AM |
|
Hey, thanks! My Nibble addr is NQLHoxpzrrsPhoYsDiBNVcDA3L1J4GBG6K -- any problems with the Mac wallet, post here or PM me and I'll see what I can do. |
|
|
|
|
ISAWHIM
|
|
August 08, 2013, 11:53:10 AM |
|
I still can't connect to anything that runs...
Latest block is 28353, 4 days ago, as the wallet reports it. Never gets past that point.
Starts downloading saying the block-height is 28224... Goes up to 28353 then dies...
No IPs in the list ever go past that block... Yet, someone is mining.
NOTE: This is the windows build (v0.6.5.2-g397646f-nibble)
Might be why the coin is taking a nose-dive in value. Still waiting for a fix. Not sure how anyone can be trading if the coins can't be sent to anyone...
|
|
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 08, 2013, 12:06:46 PM |
|
I still can't connect to anything that runs...
Latest block is 28353, 4 days ago, as the wallet reports it. Never gets past that point.
Starts downloading saying the block-height is 28224... Goes up to 28353 then dies...
No IPs in the list ever go past that block... Yet, someone is mining.
NOTE: This is the windows build (v0.6.5.2-g397646f-nibble)
Might be why the coin is taking a nose-dive in value. Still waiting for a fix. Not sure how anyone can be trading if the coins can't be sent to anyone...
I'll test it but as far as Ive seen its functioning all be it slowly after the diff hike - i'll check it out . everything i have says 28353 - so i'll investigate - the market drop is a part of the market mechanism why would people want to buy high into selling multipools ? , i don't see this as an overall negative in fact on/close to next diff change I will try to inform the market as to pull any large buy orders , in the effect to make these guys sell lower . but that's up to the market again . the miners are serving a purpose and the buyers want to buy cheap , why not? for DGC, i'd advise number 1 on the list of things to do would be a Dynamic hardened check point system , for Nibble we of course would roll back or stop the BC but for DGC it would do a lot of damage , if i were the DGC Dev that's what i'd be spending my funds on , or not of course.... its an interesting political environment. If i were DGC I'd Checkpoint every 1000 blocks - without a worry in the world. why they have not done this or even updated the broken client , I'm not sure ? perhaps they are giving up on it ? but I'll make these suggestions to them. |
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
ISAWHIM
|
|
August 08, 2013, 01:58:59 PM |
|
everything i have says 28353 - so i'll investigate -
Exactly, it has been block 28353 for days... I still can't connect to anything that runs...
Latest block is 28353, 4 days ago, as the wallet reports it. Never gets past that point.
Goes up to 28353 then dies...
My comment about buying wasn't about "why are they buying it"... as in... "why spend money on it"... My comment was about... "why would they buy a coin that can not be sent"... since it is "stuck" on that block, there is no possibility of "getting any transactions"... since a transaction requires a block to be solved, to transmit the coin. |
|
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry (OP)
|
|
August 08, 2013, 02:19:23 PM |
|
indeed - i hear your concerns .
looking into it.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
