The job goes to likely the lowest bidder.
That is true, and mostly why CasioK was firstly hired from Give Coin and banana coin.
A free market with zero rules and regulation does not work, something that theymos apparently does not understand.
I understand your point of view, of course all DT members can be trusted, but people would most likely be thinking that you are monopolizing the campaign management industry.
So what? Their complaints would be nothing more other than the unfounded whining that we see daily here.
I don't want users thinking I am only making the post for personal gain.
That's probably a smart move, because that's exactly what people would think.
Sigh. I think that Yahoo is pretty stretched thin with campaigns as is, so I don't see how this could be *for personal gain*.
I don't agree that managers should all be on DT, because some of them turn out to be pretty good, like Edwardard.
Neither do I. However, let's be real here. (I'm going with your claim that Edwardard is good / have not stated my opinion on him) How many of them turn out to be pretty good like him? There is likely less than 10 people capable of properly managing campaigns. The majority: 1) Are low balling and not doing their jobs properly. 2) Something other malicious (see Windpower, CasioK et. al.).
I haven't looked into this joker, who's the object of this thread, but I'll take OP's word on it that he's a complete tool.
I have left them a neutral rating. If they don't address this soon, I'll change it into negative. Better safe than sorry; lessons have been learned.
To be perfectly honest, managing campaigns is more of a *public service* than it is a job. The pay comes down to a low $/h rate if you're actually doing the job properly, which unfortunately is not something we see with plenty of these managers.
