Nexchange.io too many suspicious activity

[giveen]

Someone or the other would surely make this post one day or another I'm mainly going to focus on the signature campaign for now and on the exchange just a suspicion.
They recently started a signature camapaign and giving payments per month without doing anything. I posted this on there thread and obviously knew it would get removed : https://imgur.com/a/LSYij plus i never got my reply all participating in their campingn please don't cry later for not getting paid not saying they are going to scam you just informing you that there might be a chance of you getting scammed.
Secondly about the exchange most thread are self moderated and they are removing any questions asked and it's not fine because they are a exchange and money is involved most people on this forum might never use it but there are still many newbies out there who might miss judge it.
Again i don't have any proof that it is a scam but please use any servies with caution because recently a bit simlar site weimixer did the same campaign thing but paid and disappeared with many people's fund.

[shursight]

They are deleting all people's posts, this is surely a scam, they lowered the rates from 0.05 bitcoins a week to 0.0005 a week, is this seriously? 0.002 a month for a member user?
that is not fair.. they dont ask for any requirement, only wear the signature and get paid once a month, but even $60 a month is low for a sr member, since all other campaings give at least that amount per week.
It doesnt matter at all, but they are deleting all posts from people, and people is still joining that campaing.
They dont reply to private messages.
If they dont reply this accussation, then that exchanger is obviously a scam, dont put your funds in that exchanger never.

[bL4nkcode]

Secondly about the exchange most thread are self moderated and they are removing any questions asked

They even created multiple campaign threads which I guess 5th time already. Except of deleting posts of those who asked they have also hired a Brand new account campaign manager which is probably an alt of the owner of the exchange.
Really suspicious.

[unyil]

I also suspect him after he made some signature campaign threads then deleted it and then made it again with the same rules and my comments have also been removed by him. I also follow the signature contest he made and to my knowledge they will be using a new signature on Monday when the first round finishes in their first signature campaign, but the first signature campaign with 50mBTC payments per week is closed before completing the first round and replace it with a new signature campaign with very low payouts per month. although I've get paid for it for signature design, but please be careful with nexchange.io.

[betudontbet]

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

I'm not applying, but I'd like to say I greatly respect your tough standards
 for participants.  More campaigns should be this strict.  Good luck
with your campaign.

Although better standards should be added to other campaigns 275 length post is not really relative to be constructive and that's the whole meaning of the paid by posts campaign. Be constructive  , also recently to be more exact a day ago one  campaign participant was discovered owning many alt accounts and one of them is on negative trust for been rude upon rejecution on campaigns managed by Yahoo, Lutpin and  Lauda. Reference - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg21773985#msg21773985

I'm not doing this because I wasn't accepted in your campaign but to express my opinion also as Pearls did.

Success  for you and the Nexchange.io team.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Reserved

Our new campaign manager is google23.

Why you delete reasonable questions ? Why don't you escrow funds ? You don't care that people thinks this is complete scam ? Please reply instead of deleting questions.

And I sent this message :

Why my post got deleted? elaborate please.

Never got a reply and keeps deleting any post that question he's behaviors I was about to post about this issues well done OP.

[torry28]

Never got a reply and keeps deleting any post that question he's behaviors I was about to post about this issues well done OP.

It's obviously a shady behaviour. They keep changing their campaign rates only in 1 or 2 days after it started. At first time they make an announcement for very high pay rates (up 0.05 btc in a week) then changed the thread by created  new one but with lower pay rates (in USD)

Edit : how could he hired a newbie account as their campaign manager while they have hired a legendary member? Forgot the name. Well, his account got negative trust from yahoo now.

[Nexchange.co.uk]

Hi folks,

First of all, we'd like you to know that we are a legitimate business.

We have our faces on the website and are exposing everything to the public, that is part of our strategy and belief system.

We take scam accusations very seriously, which is why we had to take action on our campaigns remove what was wrong.

Please check this thread for more info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2179882.0

[figmentofmyass]

Hi folks,

First of all, we'd like you to know that we are a legitimate business.

We have our faces on the website and are exposing everything to the public, that is part of our strategy and belief system.

We take scam accusations very seriously, which is why we had to take action on our campaigns remove what was wrong.

Please check this thread for more info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2179882.0

that's a self-moderated thread, so you can just remove any negative feedback. and that's what you are accused of doing in your various threads in the services section. the fact that you keep opening these types of threads suggests you are scammers looking for fast exposure.

this is beginning to look very much like the scam bitzure pulled a few weeks ago: 1) show up in the services forum appearing to offer the possibility of a signature campaign. this gets you exposure. 2) exit scam.

see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140512.0;all
and read through to the end: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2126606.0;all

come think of it, their bitcointalk account really needs to be tagged as well....

anyway, you try to give the appearance of a paying campaign, but your removal of a reputable campaign manager, the blatant self-escrow attempt, and ending 2 campaigns within a week (without paying anyone) show that this is very likely to be a scam.

a campaign manager that registered to the forum 3 days ago? this will not fly. changing the terms of your campaign every 2 days, with no escrow, no proof of payments? this is not how a legitimate business operates.

[Nexchange.co.uk]

Hi folks,

First of all, we'd like you to know that we are a legitimate business.

We have our faces on the website and are exposing everything to the public, that is part of our strategy and belief system.

We take scam accusations very seriously, which is why we had to take action on our campaigns remove what was wrong.

Please check this thread for more info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2179882.0

that's a self-moderated thread, so you can just remove any negative feedback. and that's what you are accused of doing in your various threads in the services section. the fact that you keep opening these types of threads suggests you are scammers looking for fast exposure.

this is beginning to look very much like the scam bitzure pulled a few weeks ago: 1) show up in the services forum appearing to offer the possibility of a signature campaign. this gets you exposure. 2) exit scam.

see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140512.0;all
and read through to the end: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2126606.0;all

come think of it, their bitcointalk account really needs to be tagged as well....

anyway, you try to give the appearance of a paying campaign, but your removal of a reputable campaign manager, the blatant self-escrow attempt, and ending 2 campaigns within a week (without paying anyone) show that this is very likely to be a scam.

a campaign manager that registered to the forum 3 days ago? this will not fly. changing the terms of your campaign every 2 days, with no escrow, no proof of payments? this is not how a legitimate business operates.

Hey, legit claims, we understand your concerns. Thankfully we can rebuke most.

1. First of all, we have some good news. We have just paid everyone who participated in our closed campaigns. Here is the spreadsheet with all the info, incl TX ids of payments: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Vnoj9zIMIaKvAooEqUmL5O_g36S-7S1PuhdWvc6zfZo/edit?usp=sharing

2. Our current campaign is now active with us managing it ourselves. Spreadsheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hqd5SYd2lvrFCeSV3i7M1XgV9Xg435M4Ip8k4Lb1lKg/edit#gid=0
We are not accepting more people (except for participants of the previous campaign who would like to continue with us).

3. We did not kick a reputable manager. google23 is an alt account of the same manager we had. We are unsure why he felt it necessary to create an alt account to run the new campaign, but it was what it was.

4. Our previous campaign manager encouraged us to open self-moderated posts and managed them as he saw fit. Going forward, we are no longer doing that.

[Patatas]

1.They way they reply to the participants,doesn't look like they're a legit business at all.
2.OP sis right about the suspicious activities,the way they have had things coming since their signature campaign.
3.You should start doubting the business especially if they claim to be,

First of all, we'd like you to know that we are a legitimate business.

4.Don't think they're using escrow anywhere in their project ?

[game-protect]

This exchange operates fully anonymously and considering the theater they have delivered in the service section with their countless signature campaign threads moving from up to 0.05 BTC per week to a laughable amount per month for doing nothing, I higly recommend to not use this service!

A reputable exchange would never act this way.

[oxygen88]

it seems that they remake the spreadsheet removing all previous campaign participants again with another announcement in their new signature campaign thread.

[Nexchange.co.uk]

it seems that they remake the spreadsheet removing all previous campaign participants again with another announcement in their new signature campaign thread.

Not true.

Here are all the participants spread across two spreadsheets.

1. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Vnoj9zIMIaKvAooEqUmL5O_g36S-7S1PuhdWvc6zfZo/edit?ts=59bbd407#gid=0
These guys were all paid (with TX ids), this campaign was closed.

2. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hqd5SYd2lvrFCeSV3i7M1XgV9Xg435M4Ip8k4Lb1lKg/edit#gid=0
This campaign is running.

Nobody was removed without a. paying them for their time. b. Talking to them about it first.

[DGulari]

3. We did not kick a reputable manager. google23 is an alt account of the same manager we had. We are unsure why he felt it necessary to create an alt account to run the new campaign, but it was what it was.

So google23 is alt of Razick?

  I am campaign manager of Nexchange.io.
 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2165922.msg21739644#msg21739644

[Razick]

3. We did not kick a reputable manager. google23 is an alt account of the same manager we had. We are unsure why he felt it necessary to create an alt account to run the new campaign, but it was what it was.

So google23 is alt of Razick?

  I am campaign manager of Nexchange.io.
 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2165922.msg21739644#msg21739644

I got fired by Nexchange. It is my understanding (they told me) they were contacted by other managers to run their campaign for as little as 0.015 BTC. I am guessing the new manager created an alt for some reason.

Thank you Nexchange for the opportunity. I tried my best, but unfortunately it was not good enough. Wish you success in the future.

[DGulari]

I got fired by Nexchange. It is my understanding (they told me) they were contacted by other managers to run their campaign for as little as 0.015 BTC. I am guessing the new manager created an alt for some reason.

Weird. They said google23 is an alt of campaign manager they had.

3. We did not kick a reputable manager. google23 is an alt account of the same manager we had.

So, the reason why you got fired as manager because you want higher rates than their offers?

We are unsure why he felt it necessary to create an alt account to run the new campaign, but it was what it was.

AFAIK no one *reputable* manager would using new account to manage the campaign. This is really a shady and suspicious from nexchange. I advice don't join on their campaign or join at your own risk.

Prove me wrong by telling your reputable manager to post with his main account on here, Nexchange!

[giveen]

4.Don't think they're using escrow anywhere in their project ?

They are not and making the payments for previous members doesn't make a big difference.

A reputable exchange would never act this way.

The reason i opened this accusation all the activities in past were spam and suspicious plus lying about many things.

Nobody was removed without a. paying them for their time. b. Talking to them about it first

You did make the payments but that doesn't mean you are not a scammer you have tried to lie about Razick alt you didn't say it directly but were trying to use his reputation.

AFAIK no one *reputable* manager would using new account to manage the campaign. This is really a shady and suspicious from nexchange. I advice don't join on their campaign or join at your own risk.

The new manger is surely a kid i remember one of his reply when someone said him to use yahoo as manger
'Yahoo is slow google is fast ' and some other stuffs.

Nexechange I'm not closing this thread as you asked me there are still many unanswered questions which i will post soon after some more research.

Edit : Waiting for him to sign a proper message with correct address will close thread after that's done until if any of you have anything to say please post.

[figmentofmyass]

Hi folks,

First of all, we'd like you to know that we are a legitimate business.

We have our faces on the website and are exposing everything to the public, that is part of our strategy and belief system.

We take scam accusations very seriously, which is why we had to take action on our campaigns remove what was wrong.

Please check this thread for more info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2179882.0

that's a self-moderated thread, so you can just remove any negative feedback. and that's what you are accused of doing in your various threads in the services section. the fact that you keep opening these types of threads suggests you are scammers looking for fast exposure.

this is beginning to look very much like the scam bitzure pulled a few weeks ago: 1) show up in the services forum appearing to offer the possibility of a signature campaign. this gets you exposure. 2) exit scam.

see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2140512.0;all
and read through to the end: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2126606.0;all

come think of it, their bitcointalk account really needs to be tagged as well....

anyway, you try to give the appearance of a paying campaign, but your removal of a reputable campaign manager, the blatant self-escrow attempt, and ending 2 campaigns within a week (without paying anyone) show that this is very likely to be a scam.

a campaign manager that registered to the forum 3 days ago? this will not fly. changing the terms of your campaign every 2 days, with no escrow, no proof of payments? this is not how a legitimate business operates.

Hey, legit claims, we understand your concerns. Thankfully we can rebuke most.

1. First of all, we have some good news. We have just paid everyone who participated in our closed campaigns. Here is the spreadsheet with all the info, incl TX ids of payments: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Vnoj9zIMIaKvAooEqUmL5O_g36S-7S1PuhdWvc6zfZo/edit?usp=sharing

2. Our current campaign is now active with us managing it ourselves. Spreadsheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hqd5SYd2lvrFCeSV3i7M1XgV9Xg435M4Ip8k4Lb1lKg/edit#gid=0
We are not accepting more people (except for participants of the previous campaign who would like to continue with us).

i think it's customary at this point, given the shenanigans around opening several threads and ending campaigns after a day, that you put the funds into escrow. the least you can do to prove to the community that this isn't a scam is to put one month's salaries at risk. see a list of trusted forum escrows here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855778.0

3. We did not kick a reputable manager. google23 is an alt account of the same manager we had. We are unsure why he felt it necessary to create an alt account to run the new campaign, but it was what it was.

it seems that you are deceiving people here. Razick was your campaign manager prior to google23. but he says:

I got fired by Nexchange.

4. Our previous campaign manager encouraged us to open self-moderated posts and managed them as he saw fit. Going forward, we are no longer doing that.

your current campaign thread is self-moderated...

i still stand by my original assessment. if you are indeed innocent here, then next time around, get a plan and stick to it. don't start a signature/avatar campaign without signatures and avatars. have a reputable campaign manager and stick to it. put the funds in escrow. if these things had been done to begin with, in one thread, no one would be accusing you of anything.

but now we have to seriously question the legitimacy of your service....

[Coiner_]

On the one hand they admit or allude to the fact that they are google23:

Hi folks,

[-- snip --]

2. We are admittedly inexperienced on this forum, and that ended up costing us. We are unfortunately accused of things we did not do. That is not the purpose of this campaign.

[-- snip --]

Lastly, we have a campaign that is still running! We are currently managing it ourselves, stay tuned for updates.

[-- snip --]

[-- snip --]

When you rank up PM our campaign manager google23 to be upgraded.

[-- snip --]

And on the other they claim Razick is google23 but he's denied that. Either they had another unknown campaign manager between Razick and their eventual take over or they're lying. Naming the owner of the google23 alt will help clear things up because right now, I'm more likely to believe the latter.

[abhinav_thakur01]

To all stupidity spread out there I strictly contradict this scam accusation as I have been paid and nexchange.io is damn legit. The amount conversion from huge to low may be due to lack of their budget but its upon you. If you want to join, do that and if not please leave ! I am damn sure about the reason they made self - moderated thread . It is just because in Razick's thread many people went mad when only 14 got selected and started posting crap posts. You should not get surprised of the multiple threads as it may be due to the lack of experience of campaign management . I think we should bear with them and not ruin their efforts .