Bitcoin Core 0.15.0.1 Released

[usorin]

A lot of advantage with the new wallet. Day by day the news are better and better. Keep it on and thank for the update.

[1713977552]

1713977552

[1713977552]

1713977552

[1713977552]

1713977552

[CryptoNewKey]

Does anyone know how do I download the original Bitcoin first?

[cyberpitstop]

Is there some up and coming changes planned for BitCoin that is going to cause another split???

[Lauda]

Does anyone know how do I download the original Bitcoin first?

"Original Bitcoin"? This is the *original Bitcoin*.

Is there some up and coming changes planned for BitCoin that is going to cause another split???

No. There is a planned altcoin by a malicious group of corporate baboons called Segwit2x.

[Loni]

I'm interested, if on old laptops the speed of synchronization will be higher too

[Lauda]

I'm interested, if on old laptops the speed of synchronization will be higher too

Yes. The speedup of 0.15.0 is more noticeable on slower systems, and those that use the default dbcache size.

[okae]

I don't know why you didn't include it, but from my point of view is a good idea to include the SHA256SUMS text in this topic, of course, people should always research it for themself but at least they will have one more site to contrast his info.

Code:

b1ac0cd472f98040fbce9cea79348da2c6140a452427f9fe56d060413ec67f2d  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
7fb2290464ff056213593878cac1d111422204e81b1ccb93f95b145c309895c5  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
061bdd552fdc048a98e04ab436165b121346ecd989e1bc91db0246888fcadf7d  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz
23a36e28295ef05faf67d41be0610d5f5f1059d904aa74efca7a6700a82d6dc2  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-osx64.tar.gz
9f90a5b5623287b762e3280fd86fc7adc7180a071513d5d663133f030452b1dd  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-osx.dmg
b57e9e756018e4082f5557a4216195b0cd197c5a62473b6fe0509a0aa71e519b  bitcoin-0.15.0.1.tar.gz
f3e7ef9ac9d510a185efb0f0253dc1f49d627768999a66f13e86de4c38854680  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-win32-setup.exe
49578a464d043f278805b145cd8f59b115e6f41cd56de0a90049da1781df9d59  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-win32.zip
f0aebade2b43e253ad66fd920e00524048f5a9b9933936e735844d316433791a  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-win64-setup.exe
25efad99a4128d9f197d7eb1c175e7597478ae39e3d05805f14e9c01392b41ae  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-win64.zip
ae3efa47bf87a694a5368cd6fea96c9942fe9be7856720b5027c8902e46a88d1  bitcoin-0.15.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz

[Mr.GottaGo]

I actualy feel stupid when I realize how little I know compared to u guys damn ...

[OmegaStarScream]

The developers are not taking this seriously or I'm missing something? I mean how could they implement SegWit without a making standard for verifying and signing messages? I didn't knew this until saw a couple of Reddit posts about Trezor and Ledger nano S.

[achow101]

The developers are not taking this seriously or I'm missing something? I mean how could they implement SegWit without a making standard for verifying and signing messages? I didn't knew this until saw a couple of Reddit posts about Trezor and Ledger nano S.

There already is a standard: the one that we have been using for the past several years. Messages shouldn't really be "signed with an address" or verify to an address since addresses really correspond to a specific output script whereas signed messages (signed anything really) corresponds to a public key. P2PKH and P2WPKH addresses also happen to correspond to a public key so people found it simpler to abstract "signed with public key" to "signed with a public key that corresponds with this address". P2PKH addresses can easily be translated to a P2WPKH. But message signing and verification really shouldn't have anything to do with addresses, rather it is all about key hashes which P2PKH and P2WPKH both use.

[Ayaancool]

the new version is much more better than the old.Now it is much more faster [so, there is no room for waiting],and the new features makes it much more elegent.i am very glad that they fixed almost bugs in the old version.

[BTC Turkiye]

I don`t see much of a speed change

[Lauda]

I don`t see much of a speed change

If you think that, then you have very bad perception and you have no idea how to benchmark. v0.15.0 is faster on any kind of hardware by a significant margin that can be easily confirmed with a test (e.g. IBD or reindex time).

[HYIPcoinDEV]

I love core team, this is why segwit2x has no support. As far as i can tell just big businesses trying to control btc

[Carlton Banks]

Apparently so. MeshCollider and achow101 are both technically well informed in general, and I also checked their explanations made sense to me, which they did.

[Gulnora]

There's probably going to be another split between bitcoin legacy and SegWit2X version of bitcoin.

[IsotopeDeveloper]

Once again the bitcoin affiliate consumer does not base it on the core but the constant flow. It pertains to the actual bitcoin to cash out after all.

[Lauda]

There's probably going to be another split between bitcoin legacy and SegWit2X version of bitcoin.

That is irrelevant and will just be another altcoin. Make sure to proceed with caution as it has no replay protection, thus spending it might be dangerous.

[fromcoins]

Amidst all this, but I kind of think all this fork thing is propagated by some sole developers who wants gain for the selves even though community benefits little somehow.

Which ever fork, BITCOIN remains BTC

[maryannabon]

Is there any possibility that the bitcoin will going down after segwit?