|
bilbilon
|
 |
November 05, 2017, 01:11:12 PM |
|
Thank you!
But could you please open Twitter spreadsheet for public view? All other are ok, just twitter is blocked.
Yes sir same concern here i would like to see the twitter spreadsheet too, i want to know if i'm qualified to recieve payment from viuly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Aegean Skipper
|
|
November 05, 2017, 03:37:38 PM |
|
If will be payed like was planned, than:
You will receive 2% of the total amount of VIU tokens (20,000,000)
For example twitter: 15%. 20,000,000 *0,15 =3 000 000
Total stakes in twitter campaign 774740
Token/stake 3 000 000/ 774 740 = 3,8723
2,000 VIU = 1 ETH
2000 / 3,8723 = 516,49 stakes = 1 ETH, or 1 stake aprox. 0,58$
Precious info kewlc3s Also thanking you. Apart from this... Sylon is one of the best moderators inside this forum! I will always follow you on your projects |
|
|
|
|
Sylon (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1169
|
|
November 06, 2017, 04:29:22 AM |
|
We apologize for this twitter spreadsheet problem. We put it back in public mode!  Also, we removed fraudulent twitter accounts from the spreadsheet. Keep in mind that bots will never get paid! Thus, real participants will receive more bounties tokens!  |
|
|
|
|
|
LadyCoin
|
|
November 06, 2017, 10:57:02 AM |
|
We apologize for this twitter spreadsheet problem. We put it back in public mode! Also, we removed fraudulent twitter accounts from the spreadsheet. Keep in mind that bots will never get paid! Thus, real participants will receive more bounties tokens! Hi Sir Sylon, Please answer me, Why the number of retwett only "1" Sir, I do all the task more than that Plase check Sir, I hope it Sir  "Likes" 82 but retwet only "1" I'm on sheet line 591 https://twitter.com/LuveLifePostThankyou Sir |
|
|
|
|
|
MakersONE
|
|
November 06, 2017, 01:31:54 PM
Last edit: November 06, 2017, 01:50:38 PM by MakersONE |
|
You say that you have an API that counts all the posts. But it works in a completely wrong way. The Viuly campaign in which I participated throughout the campaign and regularly did retweets, 2 to 3 times a day. In the initial calculations in your table, I had 70 retweets 69 likes, although in fact I counted them manually at about 80. Now, on recounting, I found 39 retweets and 69 likes. What kind of nonsense is this? I fulfilled all the requirements well and honestly. And since my registration in viuli, more than 2000 thousand retweets have not been made. What problems can there be? Because of such situations, I can not be sure that all my efforts will not be in vain. I am disappointed.  My #434 in spreadsheets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F9rnand0
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 102
Bounty Manager
|
|
November 06, 2017, 08:51:58 PM |
|
You say that you have an API that counts all the posts. But it works in a completely wrong way. The Viuly campaign in which I participated throughout the campaign and regularly did retweets, 2 to 3 times a day. In the initial calculations in your table, I had 70 retweets 69 likes, although in fact I counted them manually at about 80. Now, on recounting, I found 39 retweets and 69 likes. What kind of nonsense is this? I fulfilled all the requirements well and honestly. And since my registration in viuli, more than 2000 thousand retweets have not been made. What problems can there be? Because of such situations, I can not be sure that all my efforts will not be in vain. I am disappointed. My #434 in spreadsheets. Unfortunately, Twitter itself removes retweets, one like remains from retweets. Twitter does this if you just do that retweet and nothing more |
|
|
|
|
Dimosscolorist
|
|
November 06, 2017, 09:07:20 PM |
|
You say that you have an API that counts all the posts. But it works in a completely wrong way. The Viuly campaign in which I participated throughout the campaign and regularly did retweets, 2 to 3 times a day. In the initial calculations in your table, I had 70 retweets 69 likes, although in fact I counted them manually at about 80. Now, on recounting, I found 39 retweets and 69 likes. What kind of nonsense is this? I fulfilled all the requirements well and honestly. And since my registration in viuli, more than 2000 thousand retweets have not been made. What problems can there be? Because of such situations, I can not be sure that all my efforts will not be in vain. I am disappointed. My #434 in spreadsheets. Unfortunately, Twitter itself removes retweets, one like remains from retweets. Twitter does this if you just do that retweet and nothing more In fact of the matter. Advertising works. People see retweets during the promotion of the project. But this work is not taken into account by the pat. It seemed that this was not at all. It's a bit not fair. |
|
|
|
|
|
MakersONE
|
|
November 06, 2017, 10:09:15 PM |
|
You say that you have an API that counts all the posts. But it works in a completely wrong way. The Viuly campaign in which I participated throughout the campaign and regularly did retweets, 2 to 3 times a day. In the initial calculations in your table, I had 70 retweets 69 likes, although in fact I counted them manually at about 80. Now, on recounting, I found 39 retweets and 69 likes. What kind of nonsense is this? I fulfilled all the requirements well and honestly. And since my registration in viuli, more than 2000 thousand retweets have not been made. What problems can there be? Because of such situations, I can not be sure that all my efforts will not be in vain. I am disappointed. My #434 in spreadsheets. Unfortunately, Twitter itself removes retweets, one like remains from retweets. Twitter does this if you just do that retweet and nothing more In fact, this is not so. Twitter does not delete any reposts at all. Just the size of the wall in Twitter is limited to 1000 messages. Using the API system, you can pull out about 3 thousand. But if you delete these 3,000 tweets and retweets, your old retweets will be restored on the wall. Therefore, this does not cancel all the work done by people. The advertisement was made. Views in the news are received, additional participants are involved. So if the capabilities of the API are limited, then already the problems of Twitter itself and the API, which need to be addressed. And bona fide participants of the campaign bounty are not at all to blame for this, and they should not suffer from this. |
|
|
|
|
cchub
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 101
Migranet ITO
|
|
November 07, 2017, 01:26:14 AM |
|
You say that you have an API that counts all the posts. But it works in a completely wrong way. The Viuly campaign in which I participated throughout the campaign and regularly did retweets, 2 to 3 times a day. In the initial calculations in your table, I had 70 retweets 69 likes, although in fact I counted them manually at about 80. Now, on recounting, I found 39 retweets and 69 likes. What kind of nonsense is this? I fulfilled all the requirements well and honestly. And since my registration in viuli, more than 2000 thousand retweets have not been made. What problems can there be? Because of such situations, I can not be sure that all my efforts will not be in vain. I am disappointed. My #434 in spreadsheets. Unfortunately, Twitter itself removes retweets, one like remains from retweets. Twitter does this if you just do that retweet and nothing more In fact, this is not so. Twitter does not delete any reposts at all. Just the size of the wall in Twitter is limited to 1000 messages. Using the API system, you can pull out about 3 thousand. But if you delete these 3,000 tweets and retweets, your old retweets will be restored on the wall. Therefore, this does not cancel all the work done by people. The advertisement was made. Views in the news are received, additional participants are involved. So if the capabilities of the API are limited, then already the problems of Twitter itself and the API, which need to be addressed. And bona fide participants of the campaign bounty are not at all to blame for this, and they should not suffer from this. The same happened to me and probably to nearly everyone else who regularly did all the promotional tasks. I don't think there is a solution other than living with it. All in all, we are almost settled because it happened to many people. As a matter of fact, even with only around 40 retweets and likes counted in, one could make more money than some ridiculous ones like Dovu (20 times more!). The fairest thing to do in the current situation is just leave it as it is, otherwise stakes would be biased towards people who complains, which wouldn't be fair as well with the other participants. |
|
|
|
Sylon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1169
|
|
November 07, 2017, 05:08:02 AM |
|
You say that you have an API that counts all the posts. But it works in a completely wrong way. The Viuly campaign in which I participated throughout the campaign and regularly did retweets, 2 to 3 times a day. In the initial calculations in your table, I had 70 retweets 69 likes, although in fact I counted them manually at about 80. Now, on recounting, I found 39 retweets and 69 likes. What kind of nonsense is this? I fulfilled all the requirements well and honestly. And since my registration in viuli, more than 2000 thousand retweets have not been made. What problems can there be? Because of such situations, I can not be sure that all my efforts will not be in vain. I am disappointed. My #434 in spreadsheets. Unfortunately, Twitter itself removes retweets, one like remains from retweets. Twitter does this if you just do that retweet and nothing more Exactly. Especially if like most of twitter campaign participants, your account is only used to retweet bounty campaign tweets, Twitter will certainly try to make you in trouble since you behave like a bot, and Twitter hates bots. You say that you have an API that counts all the posts. But it works in a completely wrong way. The Viuly campaign in which I participated throughout the campaign and regularly did retweets, 2 to 3 times a day. In the initial calculations in your table, I had 70 retweets 69 likes, although in fact I counted them manually at about 80. Now, on recounting, I found 39 retweets and 69 likes. What kind of nonsense is this? I fulfilled all the requirements well and honestly. And since my registration in viuli, more than 2000 thousand retweets have not been made. What problems can there be? Because of such situations, I can not be sure that all my efforts will not be in vain. I am disappointed. My #434 in spreadsheets. Unfortunately, Twitter itself removes retweets, one like remains from retweets. Twitter does this if you just do that retweet and nothing more In fact, this is not so. Twitter does not delete any reposts at all. Just the size of the wall in Twitter is limited to 1000 messages. Using the API system, you can pull out about 3 thousand. But if you delete these 3,000 tweets and retweets, your old retweets will be restored on the wall. Therefore, this does not cancel all the work done by people. The advertisement was made. Views in the news are received, additional participants are involved. So if the capabilities of the API are limited, then already the problems of Twitter itself and the API, which need to be addressed. And bona fide participants of the campaign bounty are not at all to blame for this, and they should not suffer from this. Did you read Twitter API code ? I don't think so. Again, I don't trust you, I only trust what Twitter API tells me. The problem comes from you and the way you're using Twitter. A lot of Twitter campaign participants seem to don't even understand how the platform they use work.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Natali77874
|
|
November 07, 2017, 09:00:11 AM |
|
Hello sir. tokens did not charge extra me for a twitter company, although I looked spreadsheets and was among participating in your Twitter company. why? my Nik is in twitter Maria770033.
|
|
|
|
|
MakersONE
|
|
November 07, 2017, 07:12:59 PM |
|
Did you read Twitter API code ? I don't think so. Again, I don't trust you, I only trust what Twitter API tells me. The problem comes from you and the way you're using Twitter. A lot of Twitter campaign participants seem to don't even understand how the platform they use work. In that case, tell me, why do the participants in the campaign have to worry about how the Twitter API works? You work as a bounty manager, and your job is to figure out all the stacks of participants. At the same time, personally you have chosen for yourself such a way of counting, in order to simplify your life. It's all very well, you call yourself the best manager and take a lot of projects under your control. But at the same time you can not cope with your work. Why should campaigners do the work for free, because the manager decided not to check everything with his own hands, but relies on software? What kind of nonsense is this? I have nothing against you, but this is a very strange situation, which incidentally touched me not so much as many participants. Some guy honestly participated, made about 80 retweets, and counted only 1. What is this craziness in general? And all the rest are just afraid to honestly tell it to you, because you are leading many companies at once, and probably are afraid that they can not get anything at all because of a quarrel with you. But I think this is not right, and these problems need to be resolved, all together. I saw that you influenced the situation with the Specter, perhaps after my huge message (for which, for some reason, no one responded), I hope that I managed to convey my thoughts to you and at least you will reconsider your attitude. I repeat once more that the participants of the campaign are ordinary people who just try to earn some money, because they do not live richly. I fully support that none of the participants should be spammed and it is necessary to do their work on conscience. But at the same time hard work should be adequately rewarded. And it would be worthwhile to direct your efforts to the search for abusive and ungrateful participants who do 10 to 200 retweets in a row. I also see a solution to this problem in simply reexamining the terms of participation in campaigns, limiting their daily number for example, or something like that. |
|
|
|
|
Sylon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1169
|
|
November 08, 2017, 01:45:05 AM |
|
Did you read Twitter API code ? I don't think so. Again, I don't trust you, I only trust what Twitter API tells me. The problem comes from you and the way you're using Twitter. A lot of Twitter campaign participants seem to don't even understand how the platform they use work. In that case, tell me, why do the participants in the campaign have to worry about how the Twitter API works? You work as a bounty manager, and your job is to figure out all the stacks of participants. At the same time, personally you have chosen for yourself such a way of counting, in order to simplify your life. It's all very well, you call yourself the best manager and take a lot of projects under your control. But at the same time you can not cope with your work. Why should campaigners do the work for free, because the manager decided not to check everything with his own hands, but relies on software? What kind of nonsense is this? I have nothing against you, but this is a very strange situation, which incidentally touched me not so much as many participants. Some guy honestly participated, made about 80 retweets, and counted only 1. What is this craziness in general? And all the rest are just afraid to honestly tell it to you, because you are leading many companies at once, and probably are afraid that they can not get anything at all because of a quarrel with you. But I think this is not right, and these problems need to be resolved, all together. I saw that you influenced the situation with the Specter, perhaps after my huge message (for which, for some reason, no one responded), I hope that I managed to convey my thoughts to you and at least you will reconsider your attitude. I repeat once more that the participants of the campaign are ordinary people who just try to earn some money, because they do not live richly. I fully support that none of the participants should be spammed and it is necessary to do their work on conscience. But at the same time hard work should be adequately rewarded. And it would be worthwhile to direct your efforts to the search for abusive and ungrateful participants who do 10 to 200 retweets in a row. I also see a solution to this problem in simply reexamining the terms of participation in campaigns, limiting their daily number for example, or something like that. 1) This API question was asked to you, not to every participant. 2) May I ask you who are you ? Why are you giving me orders ? You think I owe you something ? Sorry buddy, but I owe you no-thing.  3) "you have chosen for yourself such a way of counting, in order to simplify your life" That one killed me! For real! I decided to use softwares because human counting could imply errors. Machines don't make errors; except when they are built with bad quality code. Here we are talking about Twitter API, not a random API found on the internet, but the official API from Twitter, Inc.! So no, I did not chose this way of counting because it makes my life more simple: I chose it because it gives the best and more accurated reports. A lot of people whine because they used to earn a lot of money through campaigns managed by other managers who counted retweets/likes in a weird way, but now that the gold age is over they all complain. Keep in mind that I only trust Twitter API! 4) "Some guy honestly participated" How do you know that ? Did you check all the participants accounts ? Did you check all of their profiles and counted all of their retweets/likes ? I don't think so. Do you always behave like this, like if you had total knownledge on everything and could make judgements about every person ? In addition, are you aware that humans lie ? That's not because one guy wrote that he retweeted 50 tweets that he made it. 5) More generally, I don't care at all about what you (or any other person) think of me! If you're not happy with my work, there is one extremely simple rule to solve this issue: don't join my campaigns again/leave them! Other participants will gladly take your place. |
|
|
|
|
|
MakersONE
|
|
November 08, 2017, 01:31:17 PM
Last edit: November 08, 2017, 05:10:12 PM by MakersONE |
|
1) This API question was asked to you, not to every participant. 2) May I ask you who are you ? Why are you giving me orders ? You think I owe you something ? Sorry buddy, but I owe you no-thing. 3) "you have chosen for yourself such a way of counting, in order to simplify your life" That one killed me! For real! I decided to use softwares because human counting could imply errors. Machines don't make errors; except when they are built with bad quality code. Here we are talking about Twitter API, not a random API found on the internet, but the official API from Twitter, Inc.! So no, I did not chose this way of counting because it makes my life more simple: I chose it because it gives the best and more accurated reports. A lot of people whine because they used to earn a lot of money through campaigns managed by other managers who counted retweets/likes in a weird way, but now that the gold age is over they all complain. Keep in mind that I only trust Twitter API! 4) "Some guy honestly participated" How do you know that ? Did you check all the participants accounts ? Did you check all of their profiles and counted all of their retweets/likes ? I don't think so. Do you always behave like this, like if you had total knownledge on everything and could make judgements about every person ? In addition, are you aware that humans lie ? That's not because one guy wrote that he retweeted 50 tweets that he made it. 5) More generally, I don't care at all about what you (or any other person) think of me! If you're not happy with my work, there is one extremely simple rule to solve this issue: don't join my campaigns again/leave them! Other participants will gladly take your place. Hey. If this question was addressed to me, then I really didnt have a general idea of how the Twitter API works, because I never tried to figure it out. In that case, could you at least partially explain how this works? I think this would be useful for all participants. I am an ordinary person, still a beginner in the field of crypto-currency. And this means that you do not understand me correctly. I do not order, but only say my thoughts about this situation, I advise in a friendly manner. I also do not tell you that you owe me something. But at the same time you are the representative of the campaign for which you take responsibility. So it's you who are responsible for the correct distribution of the stakes, and no matter how it's done, right? So please do not take my words wrong. I decided to write all this just because others doubt or are afraid to do it. Just because I'm worried because of this injustice. That is why I would like to understand this, so that in the future such problems simply did not arise. I will give a simple example, because I dont understand. What is the difference between these member accounts? I filtered all the participants in the spreadsheets by the number of counted retweets, I chose several for an example. Some of them already wrote about this topic. These participants in the recounting of the stacks received 1 retweet and 82 likes: - get 435 stakes https://twitter.com/LuveLifePost | https://twitter.com/dzmitry_zayats | https://twitter.com/erickquiapAnd these participants in recounting the stacks received 82 retweets and 82 likes: - get 2055 stakes https://twitter.com/LakingBitcoin | https://twitter.com/sebatascahaya | https://twitter.com/alfen_larkYou are right, I do not understand how the Twitter API works, but just explain to me, how do these accounts differ? Honestly I'll tell you, I would prefer the first 3, because they look more alive than the last. They do less reposts in a row, but more often and in my opinion they make better advertising for the project. But with this and the second 3 accounts do not stand out, all the usual people. Just compare, not as a bounty manager, but as a person. I want to know why the first got 5 times less than the second? What are they worse? You say, "In general, I do not care what you (or any other person) think of me!" But why? Does your loyalty mean nothing to you? Personally, I like many projects in which you are a bounty manager, so I'm not ready to give them up. I just, like many, want to understand how to properly conduct their social network, so that there are no such situations. P.S. And one more question that I also do not have an answer for. If the API Twitter is the perfect machine to trust, then I want to understand how it counts the number of retweets and likes more than they already exist on the account? For example, the REGA campaign, they have only 182 tweets, including retweets, which should not give stacks. At the same time, for some of the participants, the API considers the number more than there are any. How is possible? Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZVvFvxwTVMy5gb5cofTbl5kvxYhc563Qs8GQbIdR5q8/edit#gid=289828385 |
|
|
|
|
ElenaZotova
Member
Offline
Activity: 214
Merit: 10
|
|
November 08, 2017, 01:51:37 PM |
|
Good afternoon!
Looked at the table, that I will be credited with tokens. Thank you.) I would like to know when they will be transferred to the wallet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bolo_young
|
|
November 08, 2017, 07:02:06 PM |
|
1) This API question was asked to you, not to every participant. 2) May I ask you who are you ? Why are you giving me orders ? You think I owe you something ? Sorry buddy, but I owe you no-thing. 3) "you have chosen for yourself such a way of counting, in order to simplify your life" That one killed me! For real! I decided to use softwares because human counting could imply errors. Machines don't make errors; except when they are built with bad quality code. Here we are talking about Twitter API, not a random API found on the internet, but the official API from Twitter, Inc.! So no, I did not chose this way of counting because it makes my life more simple: I chose it because it gives the best and more accurated reports. A lot of people whine because they used to earn a lot of money through campaigns managed by other managers who counted retweets/likes in a weird way, but now that the gold age is over they all complain. Keep in mind that I only trust Twitter API! 4) "Some guy honestly participated" How do you know that ? Did you check all the participants accounts ? Did you check all of their profiles and counted all of their retweets/likes ? I don't think so. Do you always behave like this, like if you had total knownledge on everything and could make judgements about every person ? In addition, are you aware that humans lie ? That's not because one guy wrote that he retweeted 50 tweets that he made it. 5) More generally, I don't care at all about what you (or any other person) think of me! If you're not happy with my work, there is one extremely simple rule to solve this issue: don't join my campaigns again/leave them! Other participants will gladly take your place. Hey. If this question was addressed to me, then I really didnt have a general idea of how the Twitter API works, because I never tried to figure it out. In that case, could you at least partially explain how this works? I think this would be useful for all participants. I am an ordinary person, still a beginner in the field of crypto-currency. And this means that you do not understand me correctly. I do not order, but only say my thoughts about this situation, I advise in a friendly manner. I also do not tell you that you owe me something. But at the same time you are the representative of the campaign for which you take responsibility. So it's you who are responsible for the correct distribution of the stakes, and no matter how it's done, right? So please do not take my words wrong. I decided to write all this just because others doubt or are afraid to do it. Just because I'm worried because of this injustice. That is why I would like to understand this, so that in the future such problems simply did not arise. I will give a simple example, because I dont understand. What is the difference between these member accounts? I filtered all the participants in the spreadsheets by the number of counted retweets, I chose several for an example. Some of them already wrote about this topic. These participants in the recounting of the stacks received 1 retweet and 82 likes: - get 435 stakes https://twitter.com/LuveLifePost | https://twitter.com/dzmitry_zayats | https://twitter.com/erickquiapAnd these participants in recounting the stacks received 82 retweets and 82 likes: - get 2055 stakes https://twitter.com/LakingBitcoin | https://twitter.com/sebatascahaya | https://twitter.com/alfen_larkYou are right, I do not understand how the Twitter API works, but just explain to me, how do these accounts differ? Honestly I'll tell you, I would prefer the first 3, because they look more alive than the last. They do less reposts in a row, but more often and in my opinion they make better advertising for the project. But with this and the second 3 accounts do not stand out, all the usual people. Just compare, not as a bounty manager, but as a person. I want to know why the first got 5 times less than the second? What are they worse? You say, "In general, I do not care what you (or any other person) think of me!" But why? Does your loyalty mean nothing to you? Personally, I like many projects in which you are a bounty manager, so I'm not ready to give them up. I just, like many, want to understand how to properly conduct their social network, so that there are no such situations. P.S. And one more question that I also do not have an answer for. If the API Twitter is the perfect machine to trust, then I want to understand how it counts the number of retweets and likes more than they already exist on the account? For example, the REGA campaign, they have only 182 tweets, including retweets, which should not give stacks. At the same time, for some of the participants, the API considers the number more than there are any. How is possible? Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZVvFvxwTVMy5gb5cofTbl5kvxYhc563Qs8GQbIdR5q8/edit#gid=289828385Just bounty manager need to do calculations at least once every two weeks, he does calculations when he is comfortable! I think this approach to calculations is not correct and many bounty campaign participants do not receive full payment for their work! |
|
|
|
|
|
kewlc3s
|
|
November 08, 2017, 07:58:51 PM |
|
There are probably nothing more to discuss about stake distribution. Even I am not fully agree as well. I believe it is closed. Now main question when will be token distribution? I want to get my VIU ASAP  |
|
|
|
|
|
Dimosscolorist
|
|
November 09, 2017, 01:31:02 AM |
|
1) This API question was asked to you, not to every participant. 2) May I ask you who are you ? Why are you giving me orders ? You think I owe you something ? Sorry buddy, but I owe you no-thing. 3) "you have chosen for yourself such a way of counting, in order to simplify your life" That one killed me! For real! I decided to use softwares because human counting could imply errors. Machines don't make errors; except when they are built with bad quality code. Here we are talking about Twitter API, not a random API found on the internet, but the official API from Twitter, Inc.! So no, I did not chose this way of counting because it makes my life more simple: I chose it because it gives the best and more accurated reports. A lot of people whine because they used to earn a lot of money through campaigns managed by other managers who counted retweets/likes in a weird way, but now that the gold age is over they all complain. Keep in mind that I only trust Twitter API! 4) "Some guy honestly participated" How do you know that ? Did you check all the participants accounts ? Did you check all of their profiles and counted all of their retweets/likes ? I don't think so. Do you always behave like this, like if you had total knownledge on everything and could make judgements about every person ? In addition, are you aware that humans lie ? That's not because one guy wrote that he retweeted 50 tweets that he made it. 5) More generally, I don't care at all about what you (or any other person) think of me! If you're not happy with my work, there is one extremely simple rule to solve this issue: don't join my campaigns again/leave them! Other participants will gladly take your place. Hey. If this question was addressed to me, then I really didnt have a general idea of how the Twitter API works, because I never tried to figure it out. In that case, could you at least partially explain how this works? I think this would be useful for all participants. I am an ordinary person, still a beginner in the field of crypto-currency. And this means that you do not understand me correctly. I do not order, but only say my thoughts about this situation, I advise in a friendly manner. I also do not tell you that you owe me something. But at the same time you are the representative of the campaign for which you take responsibility. So it's you who are responsible for the correct distribution of the stakes, and no matter how it's done, right? So please do not take my words wrong. I decided to write all this just because others doubt or are afraid to do it. Just because I'm worried because of this injustice. That is why I would like to understand this, so that in the future such problems simply did not arise. I will give a simple example, because I dont understand. What is the difference between these member accounts? I filtered all the participants in the spreadsheets by the number of counted retweets, I chose several for an example. Some of them already wrote about this topic. These participants in the recounting of the stacks received 1 retweet and 82 likes: - get 435 stakes https://twitter.com/LuveLifePost | https://twitter.com/dzmitry_zayats | https://twitter.com/erickquiapAnd these participants in recounting the stacks received 82 retweets and 82 likes: - get 2055 stakes https://twitter.com/LakingBitcoin | https://twitter.com/sebatascahaya | https://twitter.com/alfen_larkYou are right, I do not understand how the Twitter API works, but just explain to me, how do these accounts differ? Honestly I'll tell you, I would prefer the first 3, because they look more alive than the last. They do less reposts in a row, but more often and in my opinion they make better advertising for the project. But with this and the second 3 accounts do not stand out, all the usual people. Just compare, not as a bounty manager, but as a person. I want to know why the first got 5 times less than the second? What are they worse? You say, "In general, I do not care what you (or any other person) think of me!" But why? Does your loyalty mean nothing to you? Personally, I like many projects in which you are a bounty manager, so I'm not ready to give them up. I just, like many, want to understand how to properly conduct their social network, so that there are no such situations. P.S. And one more question that I also do not have an answer for. If the API Twitter is the perfect machine to trust, then I want to understand how it counts the number of retweets and likes more than they already exist on the account? For example, the REGA campaign, they have only 182 tweets, including retweets, which should not give stacks. At the same time, for some of the participants, the API considers the number more than there are any. How is possible? Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZVvFvxwTVMy5gb5cofTbl5kvxYhc563Qs8GQbIdR5q8/edit#gid=289828385Pritenzii about the result of our work, obviously hurt the ego of the manager. In a place to understand the problem, the manager behaves like a child. It is not pleasant for me to observe such a situation. I counted on professionalism. Especially from a man with such a high rank. I thought that it was to such people that they could cover themselves with complex questions. And that such people can always find answers. But in the place of support and help I met with discrimination and indifference. I must admit that I was wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
