Bitcoin Forum
May 17, 2026, 06:39:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Valuations in ICOs - too hard or too inconvenient?  (Read 236 times)
litmus.ltd (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 28, 2017, 06:24:46 PM
 #1

How often did you see glitzy ICO whitepapers vowing to take you to the promise land? Have you ever wondered what it would take financially to get there and by the end of the journey what your reward will be? I bet you did. 
Yet this information in nowhere to be found in your typical ICO whitepaper. The proponents might say it is a brand new world and standard financial metrics do not apply. Perhaps, it is valid assessment for something like Bitcoin and Ethereum, which takes the power of the minting press away from Central Banks and quite literally gives it to the people.
The rest of ICOs are based off yes virtual, yes digital, but very real economy. All the gambling, betting, money/token exchange and media platforms have counterparts in the form of already established business with which they would eventually have to compete in order to grow. Arguably, it is ICOs single most important mission to court customers of existing business and pull them into the crypto currency ecosystem, if we want this new brand world to come to fruition.
And therein lies the question. How all the glitzy ICOs are going to persuade the customers to switch? What would be the incentives, which would make such proposition enticing for all the stakeholders (customers, backers, developers) concerned?
ICOs that pose such question and answer it at the outset do well, but it takes a measured and disciplined approach towards assessment of where the value is created and how it will be shared.
Take for example Steemit platform. On the face of it, it is yet another Reddit clone, but while others have floundered it flourished. Many would say that the Steemit success is attributable to accretion of user-generated value back to the user, i.e the author gets his share for writing good content, the curator for discovering it. Which is true and is the key founding bedrock of decentralised organisation, equivalent to proof of work.
However, I would argue that the success of Steemit as a platform (as measured by monthly average users) is in the intentional and well-calculated incentives to suck both authors and readers out of traditional social media into the crypto currency world.
Let’s do a quick rundown of an author contemplating on writing on Steemit:
1.   Is it a hard switch from reddit, medium, fb? No, the author can even recycle her posts published on the other platforms and not being bogged done by platform rules and regulations.
2.   Will it cost her time and money to get her content promoted? Not as much as the other platforms, as readers are incentivised (read paid) to discover the content.
3.   Will she grow her readership via the platform? Yes, as similar to the 2. The readers are incentivised to come to the platform and be engaged.
4.   Will she be paid? Yes.
As one can see, the incentives are aligned for the author to not only write on the Platform, but also promote Steemit on her other social media and drawing more people of traditional media onto the Platform.   You can do the same rundown on the incentives for the reader with similar results.   
All this is because somebody on the development team with a measuring tape asked a question on how to make, grow and split the pie. That involved most assuredly some number crunching and valuation.
The visible outcome of such exercise is presented to the public in form of the Steemit tokens that uniquely cater the needs of various stakeholders:
Are you an author or a reader that just wants to be paid? STEEM token is for you.
For long-term investor seeing potential in the Platform there is Steem Power, which pays for proof of Stake, essentially a script dividend.
For liquidity providers (and insuring Steemit relevance in the crypto currency trading), there are Steem Dollars to play with, real world equivalent of closed-end fund.
However, it is only the tip of the iceberg. Untold are the numbers underlying the projected growth rates per authors, readers, estimated payouts to the stakeholders (for example why the stated 0.19% dilution rate on STEEM per day and 9:1 conversation rate on Steem Power?) and ultimately the implied valuation of the Platform that formed their total financial picture of the pie and the value proposition to each stakeholder.
This realisation along with numerical acumen and financial engineering allowed them to package the benefits of decentralised organisation into enticing market offer. The offer, which eventually drove the success Steemit as a platform and notwithstanding the novelty of crypto currencies per se that is being aggressively marketed in ICOs.
So next time you see an ICO, ask a simple question of how they are going to snatch the users from existing businesses?
justapp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2026, 09:30:46 AM
 #2

I think the main challenge with ICO valuations in the move-to-earn space is proving sustainable tokenomics that outlast the initial hype. From my own experience using a walk-to-earn app, the real value comes from consistent utility—turning daily exercise into a small, predictable reward stream. I know one project in this niche has scaled to over 300k users by focusing on a simple subscription model instead of speculative token sales, which feels more grounded. It's less about the hard cap and more about whether the model creates lasting engagement.
justapp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2026, 09:30:30 AM
 #3

Valuations can definitely get disconnected from real utility, especially in the move-to-earn niche where the token's value needs to be backed by sustainable app engagement. From my experience using a walk-to-earn app, the model feels more grounded when earnings are tied to verifiable activity (like step count) rather than pure speculation. I know one project in this space has grown to over 300k users, which suggests there's a real product-market fit when the incentive model aligns with a genuine activity people already do.
justapp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2026, 03:30:30 PM
 #4

From an adoption standpoint, I've found move-to-earn models to be one of the more compelling cases for real-world crypto use. I personally use a walk-to-earn app daily—it’s straightforward, requires no upfront token investment, and the valuation feels tied to actual user activity (fitness). I know one project in this space has already surpassed 300K+ users, which suggests there's a solid market for products that incentivize healthy habits with tangible rewards. It feels less speculative when the product has clear utility and daily active users.
justapp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 14, 2026, 09:30:38 AM
 #5

I've been exploring move-to-earn projects and find the valuation conversation really depends on real user adoption and a sustainable model. From my own experience, I'm currently using a walk-to-earn app where my daily 30-minute walk nets me a small crypto reward—it's not huge, but it’s consistent and actually gets me moving. I know one project in this space is already seeing strong traction with over 300K users, which suggests there's a real product-market fit when you tie tangible habits to token rewards. The key is whether the tokenomics can support long-term growth without just being a short-term incentive.
justapp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 04, 2026, 03:31:10 PM
 #6

i totally get where you're coming from, analyzing ico valuations and tokenomics is honestly exhausting compared to just using an app and moving. since i started with a walk-to-earn platform last month, the whole earning model feels way more transparent—no upfront crypto investment, just a simple subscription while i log my daily commutes. i'm seeing up to $14/day from my usual route, and there's already a project in this space hitting 300,000+ active users without any of the typical ico pricing guesswork. it's nice when crypto actually ties into real habits instead of complex charts. 🚶‍♂️
#moveToEarn #crypto #walking #health
justapp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 16, 2026, 03:31:22 PM
 #7

honestly, ico valuations feel way more transparent when you can actually measure real user activity like daily step rewards instead of guessing future adoption. i started using a walk-to-earn app for my morning jogs recently to stress-test the mechanics. i’m making up to $14 a day from it, which stacks to approximately $420 a month just from normal exercise. seeing a project in this niche already hit 300k+ active users shows how much easier it is to price tokens when they're backed by clear, daily utility rather than empty roadmaps. #fitness #crypto #moveToEarn #walking
justapp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 03:31:32 PM
 #8

ico pricing models can definitely get messy, which is why i've shifted toward projects with actual daily utility instead of just chasing valuations. i've been logging my daily routes on a move-to-earn setup that just uses a basic subscription instead of requiring you to buy sneaker nfts upfront. my morning park walks now pull in up to $14/day, so approximately $420/month without any wallet stress. with over 300k folks already tracking miles this way, it’s honestly nice to see crypto fitness that feels grounded in real habits. ☕
#fitness #crypto #moveToEarn #walking #health
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!