How to automate Bounty campaign?

[J. Cooper]

I don't think this would work out nicely for your campaign, especially if you want to have good results.
First of all, it's going to be incredibly hard to pull of a system that counts all the post, not to mention being a judge in declaring a post quality and another spam. You also have the risk that participants will find ways around the bot. So I would just recommend to hire a campaign manager, this way you're sure you're getting quality posts and you're contributing to the whole ecosystem at the same time.

[1713916934]

1713916934

[1713916934]

1713916934

[1713916934]

1713916934

[EugeneAS]

In general, we are talking on a complex automation SaaS, which is generally not effective to build for a one-time use.
So we can only use some tools to do part of a job.
For example, I can suggest using google analytics and generating UTM links (for example with btt user id in them).
Than you can track every user's link clicks.
But this can be spoofed as well.

[blockman]

I have read something like that with bitdice social media campaign but I have never visited their thread again and don't have an idea. Since you said about "posted,shared,retweeted" so this is mostly for the social media campaign's. It's hard to do this since it's not just a simple software and you have to consult a developer and it will cost you money. My suggestion is it is better if you'll do the counting manually and do the style of yahoo which he requires to post those links of those posts on his twitter campaign for each participant.

[saleenasmith]

A bounty campaign is a PR event, where project is being promoted by its members, not by special team. Usually a term “bounty campaign” is being used in ICO (Initial Coin Offering) crowdsale campaigns. The membership in such campaigns is being rewarded with blockchain tokens offered for sale during ICO

[EugeneAS]

Also, check this tool out https://www.integromat.com/
It is similar to IFTTT, but mush easier to use with greater possibilities. Can integrate telegram chat with google sheets, for example.

[Blake_Last]

The only automated bounty campaign program I know of is that of the Bounty Portal created by Irfan. You should ask him if you want to use his program. However, as far as I know, his service is also included in it. So if you want to use it, you have to hire him to manage the campaign for you and pay him according to how much he charges to handle a campaign.

If you're interested, you can contact or sent him a message on his website here.

[BenR]

thanks for the additional suggestions!

[Ankorus]

I'm currently working on a bounty campaign.

Trying to get the bounty campaign in several languages. I would suggest encouraging people in the bounty campaign as community managers and then get the to translate the bounty campaign in that language.

If anyone has any other ideas I'd love to hear. Trying to get our message out.

[buwaytress]

I think I know just the service you're looking for. I tried it out myself, with limited success, but it seems to do exactly what you're looking for. An automated manager of sorts for specific use on Bitcointalk bounty campaigns. It only needs a one-time entry of forum profile information and then automatically updates on user activity. It's free too, so why not try it?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2207187.0

Not my link or service, just helping out.

[Norihiro]

I'm fully supporting the position which states that using such an automated decision or bot will strongly decrease the quality of the bounty campaign - even self-educative platforms cannot fully analyze if the post(for example) is decent or it's just a spam. As the consequence - we will have lot's of "automated bounty" projects and tons of spam, even more than we have today.
However, bounty managers may vary as well, so the existence of such a bot may affect the "standarts" of a good bounty manager, that's pretty good for the community.

[bobitza]

I"m looking for a way to check on the bounty campaign - to make sure that people who signed up actually posted, shared, retweeted, etc.

Taking suggestions, please - thanks!

I want to know why you need to automate a bounty campaign? I think it's not necessary, because management requires a lot of elements that a BOT can not do, the quality of the work can not be determined by the BOT, it needs a real person with a lot of experience.

[btvGainer]

I am also looking for a similar tool

[Suzobo]

I think this is good but definitely bad news for campaign managers, for me the disadvantage of this will be the manual checking of post quality per participant. the bct forum will be full of non quality post if ever coz the checking will be automated. i think that's only my opinion just saying though

[boakyei]

Is not easy as you think. U need to be experience programmer and develop a not to do that automatically for you.You can hire a computer engineer of course or a freelancer to assist you for a fee.

[buwaytress]

I'm fully supporting the position which states that using such an automated decision or bot will strongly decrease the quality of the bounty campaign - even self-educative platforms cannot fully analyze if the post(for example) is decent or it's just a spam. As the consequence - we will have lot's of "automated bounty" projects and tons of spam, even more than we have today.
However, bounty managers may vary as well, so the existence of such a bot may affect the "standarts" of a good bounty manager, that's pretty good for the community.

I doubt any serious campaign manager will leave it to full automation as the final decision in determining qualification. But the type of automation such as the one I posted above helps in eliminating human mistakes often made by even the best bounty managers. If you have a bot or tool that checks, among other things, for:

1. Minimum posts, post bursting, within specific cut off times
2. Unqualified posts, for example, in sections that don't count
3. Copy pasting/ plagiarism
4. Correct sig code
5. Correct application, including valid wallets, profile link

Then the human manager only needs to validate and check quality. You get increased quality, quicker validation, more time for manager to focus on improving participant quality.