Bitcoin Forum
March 30, 2024, 05:33:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Online Payment Systems Have Been Decimated  (Read 3155 times)
Kazu (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 01:16:50 AM
 #1

I cannot believe this has not had a significant upward effect on the Bitcoin price. The entire online payment systems network that isn't bitcoin or paypal-ish has been utterly destroyed with the shut down of Liberty Reserve.

Its not just Liberty Reserve. Its all the exchangers that went with it.

If I have money in one of the centralized e-currencies like Perfect Money. How am I going to get it out, exactly? There is no easy way. Aurumxchange is there, thats pretty much it. And it only exchanges, it doesn't allow redemption for a Bank Wire. I have to take multiple steps to get from something like Payza (paypal-ish) to Bitcoin. Egopay has gone derp and won't let anybody log in. Perfect Money won't allow US Residents to use it.

Online payments as of now are basically dead unless you are using an e-currency like Paypal with built-in consumer 'protection'. Other than Bitcoin, that is. How are people not making the switch? Is it because all the exchangers are dead? When the wires suddenly start clearing, will the Bitcoin price go on some crazy jump upwards? Or are people just freaked out of online payments entirely and are leaving?

CoinLenders - Bitcoin Bank Script / Demo
1v.io/kazu - 15ccW7m6RxDFWEKc3P1NdwWpX1N1pU7gZ8
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711776811
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711776811

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711776811
Reply with quote  #2

1711776811
Report to moderator
1711776811
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711776811

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711776811
Reply with quote  #2

1711776811
Report to moderator
1711776811
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711776811

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711776811
Reply with quote  #2

1711776811
Report to moderator
smoothie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473


LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 01:21:18 AM
 #2

Times are changing ...and changing fast.

With change comes a roller coaster. Hang on.

███████████████████████████████████████

            ,╓p@@███████@╗╖,           
        ,p████████████████████N,       
      d█████████████████████████b     
    d██████████████████████████████æ   
  ,████²█████████████████████████████, 
 ,█████  ╙████████████████████╨  █████y
 ██████    `████████████████`    ██████
║██████       Ñ███████████`      ███████
███████         ╩██████Ñ         ███████
███████    ▐▄     ²██╩     a▌    ███████
╢██████    ▐▓█▄          ▄█▓▌    ███████
 ██████    ▐▓▓▓▓▌,     ▄█▓▓▓▌    ██████─
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─  
     ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩    
        ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀       
           ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀`          
                   ²²²                 
███████████████████████████████████████

. ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM        My PGP fingerprint is A764D833.                  History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ .
LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS.
 
Kazu (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 01:57:03 AM
 #3

Its downright insane. I never thought I'd see anything quite so insane as this. They literally shut down every single exchanger that was remotely trustworthy that allowed you to buy Liberty Reserve. Thats insane.

CoinLenders - Bitcoin Bank Script / Demo
1v.io/kazu - 15ccW7m6RxDFWEKc3P1NdwWpX1N1pU7gZ8
Frozenlock
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:01:19 AM
 #4

While this can be good for Bitcoin, I weep for humanity.
mgio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:51:51 AM
 #5

This is very very bad for bitcoin because it means bitcoin is next.


Well not bitcoin directly but any bank or service that deals with bitcoin could be shut down at any moment.


How much do you thnk bitcoin would be worth if you can't exchange fiat for it?
cp1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


Stop using branwallets


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:55:40 AM
 #6

If no one can put money in to buy bitcoin then the price won't be going up anytime soon.

Guide to armory offline install on USB key:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241730.0
BitcoinAshley
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:28:11 AM
 #7

This is very very bad for bitcoin because it means bitcoin is next.


Well not bitcoin directly but any bank or service that deals with bitcoin could be shut down at any moment.


How much do you thnk bitcoin would be worth if you can't EDIT: [legally] exchange fiat for it?


A lot more. Artificially repressed supply means price will go up, and I fail to see how repressed supply AUTOMATICALLY leads to lower demand. People didn't stop buying drugs because the government made it harder to buy them; people didn't stop downloading torrents because a few torrent download sites were shut down. And bitcoin is a heck of a lot more intrinsically useful than drugs; I'm sure even the silk road cocaine addicts among us would agree.
Just because supply is repressed doesn't mean people will automatically go "oh darn, they're harder to get; all of a sudden I don't want them anymore."

If no one can put money in to buy bitcoin then the price won't be going up anytime soon.


PLEASE FOLKS, follow your logic through. If the goobermint shut off legacy banking access to bitcoin (closed down exchanges, bank wires, funding options, etc) this means that people can't easily get fiat into exchanges - but it also means people can't easily get fiat out of exchanges. There wouldn't be a significant imbalance, and certainly not on the sell side since the last thing large holders want to do is pay 20% of their fiat profits in capital gains tax.

Not only will you have to resort to localbitcoins or IRC-OTC/escrow to buy bitcoins, you would have to do the same to sell them. Not a significant imbalance.

Plus, bitcoin has anti-fragile properties. This means that the more it is attacked by goobermints, the more appealing it becomes to those trying to escape tyranny.
Some people think that Bitcoin will only succeed long-term if Grandma can go to the gas station and buy cigarettes and petrol with bitcoins on her iPhone. I say phooey!
Crypt_Current
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Shame on everything; regret nothing.


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 05:04:41 AM
 #8

This is very very bad for bitcoin because it means bitcoin is next.


Well not bitcoin directly but any bank or service that deals with bitcoin could be shut down at any moment.


How much do you thnk bitcoin would be worth if you can't EDIT: [legally] exchange fiat for it?


A lot more. Artificially repressed supply means price will go up, and I fail to see how repressed supply AUTOMATICALLY leads to lower demand. People didn't stop buying drugs because the government made it harder to buy them; people didn't stop downloading torrents because a few torrent download sites were shut down. And bitcoin is a heck of a lot more intrinsically useful than drugs; I'm sure even the silk road cocaine addicts among us would agree.
Just because supply is repressed doesn't mean people will automatically go "oh darn, they're harder to get; all of a sudden I don't want them anymore."

If no one can put money in to buy bitcoin then the price won't be going up anytime soon.


PLEASE FOLKS, follow your logic through. If the goobermint shut off legacy banking access to bitcoin (closed down exchanges, bank wires, funding options, etc) this means that people can't easily get fiat into exchanges - but it also means people can't easily get fiat out of exchanges. There wouldn't be a significant imbalance, and certainly not on the sell side since the last thing large holders want to do is pay 20% of their fiat profits in capital gains tax.

Not only will you have to resort to localbitcoins or IRC-OTC/escrow to buy bitcoins, you would have to do the same to sell them. Not a significant imbalance.

Plus, bitcoin has anti-fragile properties. This means that the more it is attacked by goobermints, the more appealing it becomes to those trying to escape tyranny.
Some people think that Bitcoin will only succeed long-term if Grandma can go to the gas station and buy cigarettes and petrol with bitcoins on her iPhone. I say phooey!

This, again, still, RLY??   Shocked Roll Eyes Grin
+1 Ashley

10% off at CampBX for LIFE:  https://campbx.com/main.php?r=C9a5izBQ5vq  ----  Authorized BitVoucher MEGA reseller (& BTC donations appreciated):  https://bitvoucher.co/affl/1HkvK8o8WWDpCTSQGnek7DH9gT1LWeV5s3/
LTC:  LRL6vb6XBRrEEifB73DiEiYZ9vbRy99H41  NMC:  NGb2spdTGpWj8THCPyCainaXenwDhAW1ZT
mgio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 05:22:01 AM
 #9

This is very very bad for bitcoin because it means bitcoin is next.


Well not bitcoin directly but any bank or service that deals with bitcoin could be shut down at any moment.


How much do you thnk bitcoin would be worth if you can't EDIT: [legally] exchange fiat for it?


A lot more. Artificially repressed supply means price will go up, and I fail to see how repressed supply AUTOMATICALLY leads to lower demand. People didn't stop buying drugs because the government made it harder to buy them; people didn't stop downloading torrents because a few torrent download sites were shut down. And bitcoin is a heck of a lot more intrinsically useful than drugs; I'm sure even the silk road cocaine addicts among us would agree.
Just because supply is repressed doesn't mean people will automatically go "oh darn, they're harder to get; all of a sudden I don't want them anymore."

If no one can put money in to buy bitcoin then the price won't be going up anytime soon.


PLEASE FOLKS, follow your logic through. If the goobermint shut off legacy banking access to bitcoin (closed down exchanges, bank wires, funding options, etc) this means that people can't easily get fiat into exchanges - but it also means people can't easily get fiat out of exchanges. There wouldn't be a significant imbalance, and certainly not on the sell side since the last thing large holders want to do is pay 20% of their fiat profits in capital gains tax.

Not only will you have to resort to localbitcoins or IRC-OTC/escrow to buy bitcoins, you would have to do the same to sell them. Not a significant imbalance.

Plus, bitcoin has anti-fragile properties. This means that the more it is attacked by goobermints, the more appealing it becomes to those trying to escape tyranny.
Some people think that Bitcoin will only succeed long-term if Grandma can go to the gas station and buy cigarettes and petrol with bitcoins on her iPhone. I say phooey!

I feel like we've had this discussion before. Yes, you won't be able to get fiat in or out of exchanges. That means volume would fall drastically. People would no longer be able to spend their bitcoins on anything and so they would look to change it into fiat as quickly as possibly (perhaps they'd use localbitcoins). But few people would be buying bitcoins because they know they are going to be hard to sell. Bitcoins would cease to be useful as a currency. And it would cease to be useful as a store of value. Therefore, the price would crash.

Yes, it would continue to be appealing to those trying to escape tyranny but that is not what has been driving the price the past 6+ months. If the govt attacked bitcoin, we'd lose the general public, we'd lose the startups, we'd lose the institutional investors. BItcoin would go back to the sub-10$ range.

Recall that bitcoin has gone up with governments attack fiat (like in cyprus). If governments attack bitcoin, fiat (and gold) are likely to go up in response.
mgio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 05:32:52 AM
 #10

Here is a little thought experiment for you:

Let's say the government shut down all the methods to get fiat in and out of the bitcoin exchanges but the exchanges themselves weren't touched.

Let's say that there was only one method you could move cash in and out but you were limited to $10 a day. It was still free, instant, and unlimited to move bitcoins in and out of the exchange.

What do you think would happen to the price?

Even if bitcoins were very desirable, eventually the price would plateau because there wouldn't be enough fiat in the system to boost the price up. When the last dollar that could be sent to the exchange that day was spent, there would be no one to buy your bitcoin that you had for sale and the market would stagnate and price would crash.

Also remember that there are 3,600 bitcoins mined each day. There needs to be enough fiat added to the system to balance out these bitcoins. Otherwise there will be an excess of bitcoins and a shortage of fiat causing bitcoins to crash relative to fiat.

In other words, it is essential that we be able to move fiat into the exchanges to keep the bitcoin market working and keep the prices stable and high. If the US govt were to attack bitcoin, they'd focus on the how the banks send and receive money from the exchanges and they'd block that. And we'd be in the hypothetical situation I described above.
bernard75
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 08:41:52 AM
 #11

Sorry to bump into this thread but this is all from Americas point of view.
In Europe there are still no problems getting funds in or out, even instantly.
And when Europe starts a more aggressive approach, btc will just move on.
steamboat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 648
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 08:57:53 AM
 #12

Here is a little thought experiment for you:

Let's say the government shut down all the methods to get fiat in and out of the bitcoin exchanges but the exchanges themselves weren't touched.

Let's say that there was only one method you could move cash in and out but you were limited to $10 a day. It was still free, instant, and unlimited to move bitcoins in and out of the exchange.

What do you think would happen to the price?

Even if bitcoins were very desirable, eventually the price would plateau because there wouldn't be enough fiat in the system to boost the price up. When the last dollar that could be sent to the exchange that day was spent, there would be no one to buy your bitcoin that you had for sale and the market would stagnate and price would crash.

Also remember that there are 3,600 bitcoins mined each day. There needs to be enough fiat added to the system to balance out these bitcoins. Otherwise there will be an excess of bitcoins and a shortage of fiat causing bitcoins to crash relative to fiat.

In other words, it is essential that we be able to move fiat into the exchanges to keep the bitcoin market working and keep the prices stable and high. If the US govt were to attack bitcoin, they'd focus on the how the banks send and receive money from the exchanges and they'd block that. And we'd be in the hypothetical situation I described above.

This assumes a fixed userbase, and doesn't address OTC sales.

At a glance I can see people selling their $10 a day exchange quota for a profit.

ASIC miners available for purchase

Those who serve best, profit most.
b!z
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 09:35:57 AM
Last edit: June 04, 2013, 09:51:44 AM by b!z
 #13

I cannot believe this has not had a significant upward effect on the Bitcoin price. The entire online payment systems network that isn't bitcoin or paypal-ish has been utterly destroyed with the shut down of Liberty Reserve.

Its not just Liberty Reserve. Its all the exchangers that went with it.

If I have money in one of the centralized e-currencies like Perfect Money. How am I going to get it out, exactly? There is no easy way. Aurumxchange is there, thats pretty much it. And it only exchanges, it doesn't allow redemption for a Bank Wire. I have to take multiple steps to get from something like Payza (paypal-ish) to Bitcoin. Egopay has gone derp and won't let anybody log in. Perfect Money won't allow US Residents to use it.

Online payments as of now are basically dead unless you are using an e-currency like Paypal with built-in consumer 'protection'. Other than Bitcoin, that is. How are people not making the switch? Is it because all the exchangers are dead? When the wires suddenly start clearing, will the Bitcoin price go on some crazy jump upwards? Or are people just freaked out of online payments entirely and are leaving?

previous LR users are looking for a better payment system. PM and WM are possible alternatives, except they may both share LR's fate one day. HD Money is another site that I recently learned about, some people say exchanges will accept it soon. looks like a scam to me. Bitcoin is a possible alternative, but many people don't like BTC due to the volatility.

I don't see Bitcoin becoming a real alternative to LR any time soon.
wopwop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 09:41:46 AM
 #14

bitpay.com and mtgox.com are NEXT

imagine how much money is being laundered through them... must be hundreds of millions
BitcoinAshley
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 12:52:56 PM
 #15

As steamboat so aptly pointed out - mgio - your bitcoin crashing doomsday scenario assumes a lot. First, you are totally obviously extremely AMERICAN. There are many countries that have not attacked their exchanges, many countries whose funding options have not been affected, and many countries that did not have any fancy funding options in the first place.

And yes, you assume centralized exchanges are the be-all end-all of Bitcoin price. There is a thriving market on Bitcoin-OTC. I can find someone, verify through WoT, and buy bitcoins through any one of dozens of payment methods. It's not hard to learn how this works. If people were willing to install a client, wait a week for the blockchain to download, learn how bitcoin works enough to trust it - they're willing to sign up with WoT and transact with individuals with good community reputation (in the same way that now, you interact with incorporated exchanges that have good community reputation.) In fact, I would imagine that the float rate is much higher for individuals, so that you have less of a chance of losing your money in an exchange shutdown using that method.

Should exchanges fail, there is no doubt you'd see a divergence from the "official" MtGox price and the ask price on IRC-OTC and similar exchanges. Feel free to bash OTC as an unrealistic risky alternative that no one will ever use... we'll see about that  Wink


EDIT: Oh yeah, Technocash (australian payment provider) is disabling payments to MtGox as of June 15. Another one bites the dust (or, rather, gets out of the game before being forced to bite the dust by goobermint regulators.)
ehoffman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 01:14:26 PM
 #16

In fact, 'the next one' here is WM-Center.

Well, as they did in the past for a few sites they can't seize because they are off-shore, they seize the domain name (so people can't go to that site anymore).

Another reason why no-one should use a .com, .net, .org or other TLD that are under U.S. control.

Like my comments?  Cheer me up at 137s1qFV63M6SXWhKkwjaZKEeZX23pq1hw
Don't like my comments, donate to the BCRT (better comment research team) here at 1A1PbZypjEe7yanj69ApVS1FhK8UMW7Wdc Smiley
Rygon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 01:38:47 PM
 #17

The real risk to price is if we can't decide on a benchmark exchange rate. It's effectively MtGox now, but if the volume decreases for whatever reason and a mix of other exchanges (large, small, local, etc) start taking over, what will sellers decide to use as the benchmark? What will Bitpay use? Will it be a volume-weighted average price? If the community can't decide on a consistent way to track exchange rates, the price will plummet because sellers won't have a lot of faith that they can exchange BTC for local fiat.

On the plus side, all it takes is one major or semi-major economy to allow their currency to be exchanged to BTC, without crazy fees for fiat-fiat transactions. Even if it's impossible everywhere else to do BTC-fiat, one passthrough will be enough to establish a price.
jago25_98
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 900
Merit: 1000


Crypto Geek


View Profile WWW
June 04, 2013, 01:44:30 PM
 #18

I don't where conspiracy theory starts in what I am about to say.

AFAIK it seems to work a bit like this. I'd like to know a more accurate view of how it works.

The USA tends to lead the world in everything. It's still very dominant. AFAIK laws tend to be formed in the US usually under pressure from a cartel and very powerful interests and companies. This then gets exported off to the UK, pushed into the UK and then to the commonwealth and former commonwealth (like Australia), somewhere along the lines countries which have less obvious ties, less historical ties then may follow suit; countries like Chile.

Meanwhile you still have countries which don't follow suit. Argentina, Iran, China and so on. These countries could carry on using Bitcoin... but would they and would they be enough? - would they be enough to support and at what price?
Looking at where the trade is Bitcoin is still very much in the influence of the USA.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Map
http://www.thegenesisblock.com/mapping-bitcoin-adoption-a-global-perspective/

The significant ones look like China & Russia. If it wasn't for this I would be more bearish. Seems amazing there's not more Bitcoin in South America.

Has anyone got a better view of how politics tend to fan out around the globe? I'm no expert, just the impression I get from the news and propaganda.

I guess countries not aligned with the USA could attack Bitcoin independently of course but my point is that the USA is a big question for Bitcoin - we are expecting the USA to attack it and when that happens we can expect many but not all countries to follow suit.

Bitcoiner since the early days. Crypto YouTube Channel: Trading Nomads | Analyst | News Reporter | Bitcoin Hodler | Support Freedom of Speech!
ehoffman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:35:49 PM
 #19

I think the large dumps we are seeing lately are from people (large investors) fearing that they won't be able to exchange for fiat in the near future.

So, imagine if this intensify.  Basically I think the U.S. has every reason to destroy Bitcoins taking the least actions possible, just by letting FUD do it's work...

For sure, if you can't exchange BTC for fiat, then BTC is worthless (monetarily speaking).

Like my comments?  Cheer me up at 137s1qFV63M6SXWhKkwjaZKEeZX23pq1hw
Don't like my comments, donate to the BCRT (better comment research team) here at 1A1PbZypjEe7yanj69ApVS1FhK8UMW7Wdc Smiley
jinni
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 255
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:45:57 PM
 #20

I don't where conspiracy theory starts in what I am about to say.

AFAIK it seems to work a bit like this. I'd like to know a more accurate view of how it works.

The USA tends to lead the world in everything. It's still very dominant. AFAIK laws tend to be formed in the US usually under pressure from a cartel and very powerful interests and companies. This then gets exported off to the UK, pushed into the UK and then to the commonwealth and former commonwealth (like Australia), somewhere along the lines countries which have less obvious ties, less historical ties then may follow suit; countries like Chile.

Meanwhile you still have countries which don't follow suit. Argentina, Iran, China and so on. These countries could carry on using Bitcoin... but would they and would they be enough? - would they be enough to support and at what price?
Looking at where the trade is Bitcoin is still very much in the influence of the USA.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Map
http://www.thegenesisblock.com/mapping-bitcoin-adoption-a-global-perspective/

The significant ones look like China & Russia. If it wasn't for this I would be more bearish. Seems amazing there's not more Bitcoin in South America.

Has anyone got a better view of how politics tend to fan out around the globe? I'm no expert, just the impression I get from the news and propaganda.

I guess countries not aligned with the USA could attack Bitcoin independently of course but my point is that the USA is a big question for Bitcoin - we are expecting the USA to attack it and when that happens we can expect many but not all countries to follow suit.
This.

If the US attacks Bitcoin it will be a historic buying opportunity for people in Non-US-aligned countries. It will also be an opportunity of geopolitical magnitude for developing countries to break the US hegemony.

Just imagine if China and Russia were backing a currency outlawed in the US. By shutting down US-based services, the services would just move to other countries and the US government would lose what little influence they have over Bitcoin atm. One could easily and anonymously connect to a Chinese-hosted e-wallet through a VPN on a mobile and use it to transfer funds without government being able to step in. It would be the perfect currency for anti-government people in the US to use as a means of exchange and also a new way for the Chinese to make money from subverting the US government. If the US tries to criticise China for this, China could simply claim it's a matter of freedom of speech as Bitcoin is simply code...the US would look fascist whereas China would look increasingly liberal.

As for Europe, one thing is influencing the individual national governments of NATO member states, but another is to convince the European parliament of a blanket ban of Bitcoin. My prediction is that most of Europe would stall any decisions. That would be a perfect opportunity for China to meddle in European politics. Already they are investing in Greece, and as we know Greek politicians can easily be bought. If Europe would go against the US and not ban Bitcoin, that would create a deep chasm between Europe and the US, further decimating US power.

My whole point is that if the US moves to ban Bitcoin, then Bitcoin will become the kind of crowbar that Non-US-aligned countries have long had wet dreams about using to apply soft power to break the US hegemony (which is based on hard power).

I'm not saying that this will influence US policymakers, as it seems like the US has shot itself in the foot many times before. But it does make it likely that US would think twice before they would try to shut down Bitcoin.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!