Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 11:13:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 155 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [Cast XMR] high speed XMR/CryptoNight miner for RX Vega GPUs (2 KHash/s)  (Read 206335 times)
uDwcHYO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 07:32:51 PM
 #821

how many do you have outdated shares because of job change ? I have 7% is this normal or I need try to change pool or something else?

zzz
1711624409
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711624409

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711624409
Reply with quote  #2

1711624409
Report to moderator
1711624409
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711624409

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711624409
Reply with quote  #2

1711624409
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711624409
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711624409

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711624409
Reply with quote  #2

1711624409
Report to moderator
thilan29
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 07:36:01 PM
 #822

Quote
xmr-stak is open-source software, can you point me the place in source code where it is (fast/slow mode depending on drivers version)?

See above post.  Stak is slower (~1100h/s) with the 17.11.4 driver vs the blockchain driver.

I don't believe that's what they are talking about... Of course the blockchain drivers hash more than 17.11.4

All Red was saying is if you want to play around with the 17.11.4 drivers - XMR-Stak doesn't do a driver check vs Cast which may

I don't know if Stak does or doesn't do a "check" but the end result is the same, which is that it is slower, and that's what started the conversation in the first place (whether these programs can work with newer drivers and have good hash rates).
rednoW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 07:37:07 PM
 #823

Quote
xmr-stak is open-source software, can you point me the place in source code where it is (fast/slow mode depending on drivers version)?

See above post.  Stak is slower (~1100h/s) with the 17.11.4 driver vs the blockchain driver.

I don't believe that's what they are talking about... Of course the blockchain drivers hash more than 17.11.4

All Red was saying is if you want to play around with the 17.11.4 drivers - XMR-Stak doesn't do a driver check vs Cast which may
Thanks for explanation. I wouldn't do better ))
ninjam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 09:18:13 PM
 #824

how many do you have outdated shares because of job change ? I have 7% is this normal or I need try to change pool or something else?
Yes, exactly the same percentage, "job not found" on nicehash.
rambetiko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 10:14:59 PM
 #825

my cast xmr fast (1950 h/s) but i see very slow on the pool site (1200-1600 h/s) Why?
entity279
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 10:36:51 PM
 #826

my cast xmr fast (1950 h/s) but i see very slow on the pool site (1200-1600 h/s) Why?

This is a general thing in mining. The miner counts the hashes (the speed you are searching) while the pool only knows how many valid shares you've sent (so it counts the results).

The two are equivalent only when avereaging on a very large time interval
wolverine5pl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 427
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 10:56:15 PM
 #827

my cast xmr fast (1950 h/s) but i see very slow on the pool site (1200-1600 h/s) Why?

This is a general thing in mining. The miner counts the hashes (the speed you are searching) while the pool only knows how many valid shares you've sent (so it counts the results).

The two are equivalent only when averaging on a very large time interval
plug it into nicehash. nicehash has nice graphs with average hashrate on longer periods. i woudnt worry about it too much. its not easy tho. we all would love to see highest hashrate on pools all the time

               ,,╓▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄µ,.               
           ,╔▄▓▓██████████████▓▄▄,           
        ╓╗▓▓██████████████████████▓▄µ       
      ╔▄████████████████████████████▓▓╦     
    ╔╣▓████████▀` ▀███████▀` ╙█████████▌m   
   ╔▓████████▌`     ▀██▓▀      ▐████████▓N   
  ╔▓██████████▓▄      └      ,███████████▓N 
 ╔▓█████▓▀▀█████▓▄         ╓██████▓`▓█████▓H
 ╫█████╨   `█████▀         ▓████▀     ▀████▒
,╫████▄      `▓▀             ▀▀      ,▓████▌H
:╣██████▄           ,▓██           ╓███████▓H
 ╫████████K        ▓█████Ñ        ╫████████▌`
 ╠▓█████▀`          ╙██▓           `▀██████Ñ
 `╫███▀`      ▄▄            ,▄▄       ▀███▌`
  `╣██▓▄    ▄████▄        ,▓████▄    ,▄██▌` 
   `╨███▓▄▓████████▌    ╓█████████▄▄▄███▀`   
     ╙▀██████████████▌▄███████████████▀╨     
       ╙▀██████████████████████████▓▀╨`     
         `╨▀▓███████████████████▓▀╨`         
            ``╨▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀╨``           
                   ```````
AdultChain
   ██   
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
   ██   
Discord
ANN
       ████▓▄▄▐████╒▄▄▓███▌
       `██████▐████▐█████▀
          ╙▀▀▀▐████`▀▀▀`
              ▐████
        ▄▓████▐████▐███▓▄
       ▓██████▐████▐██████▄
       ████    ▀▓▀┘   ▓████
       ████    ███    ▓████
       ████   ▐███▄   ▓████
       ████  ║█████M  ▓████
       ████  ▐M███▌   ▓████
       ████  ▄████    ▓████
       ████  ████▓    ▓████     
       ████  ▓█ ▀█▌   ▓████
       ████  ▓█  ╙█∩  ▓████
       ████  █▌   ▀█  ▓████
       ████  ▀⌐    ▀▄ ▓████
       ████  ║▌    ╓█ ▓████
       ███████████████████▀
        ▀▓██████████████▀
   ██   
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
█  ██  █
uDwcHYO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 01:04:18 AM
 #828

I've already seen similar questions about null hashes, but I did not find an answer

Code:
[05:59:47] GPU0 | 47°C | Fan 1327 RPM | 924.4 H/s
[05:59:47] GPU1 | 46°C | Fan 1348 RPM | 925.7 H/s
[05:59:47] GPU2 | 46°C | Fan 1318 RPM | 900.6 H/s
[05:59:47] GPU3 | 45°C | Fan 1288 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:49] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1326 RPM | 924.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU1 | 46°C | Fan 1347 RPM | 925.3 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU2 | 46°C | Fan 1314 RPM | 899.3 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU3 | 46°C | Fan 1285 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1326 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU1 | 47°C | Fan 1350 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU2 | 45°C | Fan 1313 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU3 | 45°C | Fan 1285 RPM | 235.3 H/s
[05:59:53] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1327 RPM | 921.3 H/s
[05:59:53] GPU1 | 46°C | Fan 1344 RPM | 923.7 H/s
[05:59:53] GPU2 | 46°C | Fan 1317 RPM | 896.8 H/s
[05:59:53] GPU3 | 45°C | Fan 1286 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:55] New job received. Avg Job Time: 31.0 sec
[05:59:55] GPU0 | 47°C | Fan 1329 RPM | 921.7 H/s
[05:59:55] GPU1 | 46°C | Fan 1343 RPM | 921.7 H/s
[05:59:55] GPU2 | 46°C | Fan 1318 RPM | 895.9 H/s
[05:59:55] GPU3 | 46°C | Fan 1288 RPM | 0.0 H/s

can I  do something with this problem? it can be with 1 card or 2 or 3. With the same settings, alternative miners work stably but give 7-9% less

zzz
hozerdev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 01:18:11 AM
 #829

Trying to run this miner on RX 580 rigs.
Getting "Error CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND calling clGetDeviceIDs for number of devices", tried different options like --opencl 0 /1. In device manager no integrated graphics, only rx 580s. Happens on all my rigs.
Any advise please?
uDwcHYO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 01:31:01 AM
 #830

try using this data in command line  -G 0,1,2,3 -O 1 , where -G num id cards , it helped me, had the same problem

zzz
hozerdev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 01:57:29 AM
 #831

try using this data in command line  -G 0,1,2,3 -O 1 , where -G num id cards , it helped me, had the same problem
Thanks, it worked. Apparently --opencl doesn't work in 0.7. Getting just 60h/s more then claymore's miner. Overall 920 h/s per card.
duyquang06
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 03:06:22 AM
 #832

Can someone post complete list of configuration options, please  : (

I pull --help in bat file but nothing happens....Sadly

Really need readme.txt file Sad(

Thanks u guys.
MickDaster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 167
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 03:06:34 AM
 #833

try using this data in command line  -G 0,1,2,3 -O 1 , where -G num id cards , it helped me, had the same problem
Thanks, it worked. Apparently --opencl doesn't work in 0.7. Getting just 60h/s more then claymore's miner. Overall 920 h/s per card.

that is not that bad, which card is it again??

and what driver?
gregzinho
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 03:17:39 AM
 #834

Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE

How i solve this issue?
xeridea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
December 06, 2017, 04:12:20 AM
 #835

Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE

How i solve this issue?
Make your pagefile huge

Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/charts

BTC:  bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC:  LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth:  0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
hozerdev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 04:28:41 AM
 #836

that is not that bad, which card is it again??
and what driver?
Blockchain driver, Sapphire Rx580 Nitro SE, they hold 1200/2250 with 850v on core and memory.

I've already seen similar questions about null hashes, but I did not find an answer
Code:
...
[05:59:50] GPU3 | 46°C | Fan 1285 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1326 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU1 | 47°C | Fan 1350 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU2 | 45°C | Fan 1313 RPM | 0.0 H/s
...

can I  do something with this problem? it can be with 1 card or 2 or 3. With the same settings, alternative miners work stably but give 7-9% less
I have it too, v0.7. It doesn't seem cause any problem apart that it spams into a console.
eafindme
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 06:34:22 AM
 #837

Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE

How i solve this issue?
Make your pagefile huge

Make your virtual memory multiples of your GPU's VRAM, eg, 5 pcs RX570 4G will need 5*4 = 20GB virtual memory on hard disk.
eafindme
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 06:49:08 AM
 #838

that is not that bad, which card is it again??
and what driver?
Blockchain driver, Sapphire Rx580 Nitro SE, they hold 1200/2250 with 850v on core and memory.

I've already seen similar questions about null hashes, but I did not find an answer
Code:
...
[05:59:50] GPU3 | 46°C | Fan 1285 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1326 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU1 | 47°C | Fan 1350 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[05:59:50] GPU2 | 45°C | Fan 1313 RPM | 0.0 H/s
...

can I  do something with this problem? it can be with 1 card or 2 or 3. With the same settings, alternative miners work stably but give 7-9% less
I have it too, v0.7. It doesn't seem cause any problem apart that it spams into a console.

Yeah, it keeps spamming the console even though the statistics show that the GPU still running...

Code:
...
[Hash Rate Avg: 3147.9 H/s]
  717.4 H/s GPU0
  827.7 H/s GPU1
  805.1 H/s GPU2
  797.8 H/s GPU3

[Shares Found: 4 | Avg Search Time: 65.0 sec]
   4 (100%) Accepted
   0 (  0%) Rejected by pool
   0 (  0%) Invalid result computation failed
   0 (  0%) Could not be submit because of network error
   0 (  0%) Outdated because of job change

[14:44:04] GPU0 | 48°C | Fan 1639 RPM | 0.0 H/s
[14:44:04] GPU1 | 54°C | Fan 1879 RPM | 827.1 H/s
[14:44:04] GPU2 | 59°C | Fan 2070 RPM | 803.3 H/s
[14:44:04] GPU3 | 54°C | Fan 2025 RPM | 793.4 H/s
...
errata
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 10:28:41 AM
 #839

Hi all!

I wonder how does Cast XMR enumerate GPUs? Does it have any relation with OverdriveNTool? For example, OverdriveNTool reports cards in my system in this way:

Code:
0: iGPU
1: Nvidia
2: Vega 64
3: Vega 64
4: Vega 56
5: Vega 56
6: Vega 56

and I'm running Cast XMR like this:

Code:
cast_xmr-vega.exe --remoteaccess -S pool:7777 -u address -p pass --opencl 2 -G 0,1,2,3,4

Once CAST XMR starts, I can see the list of cards:

Code:
GPU0: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units
GPU1: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units
GPU2: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units
GPU3: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units
GPU4: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units

but how can I tell exactly which GPUs are Vega 64s and which ones are 56s?
otidar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 10:36:00 AM
 #840

Hello,

i got the following issue:

initially i got average around 1900h/s and after some time, it can be minutes or hours, i drops to 1500-1600h/s

Anyone having such issue and eventually a solution ?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 155 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!