Bitcoin Forum
December 14, 2024, 05:29:52 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 [149] 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 ... 265 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)  (Read 530702 times)
varun555
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 01:58:26 PM
 #2961

wow - our difficulty has hit 4792 !!! We are under "Attack" :-)

at least somebody loves us

Are the devs aware?
gunzeon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 10


There's a new king in the streets


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 02:08:21 PM
 #2962

last time it happened there was there was talk of a more adaptable difficulty calc, but nothing's actually broken, everything's working as it should:
 - the intense hash rate increases the difficulty
 - when it's taken away the difficulty is still high so blocks take a lot of time until the difficulty subsides


BTC: 1gunzeo8X7iYznsnmgveUQDuRj6vhzyK6 ~~~
SmokingSkull
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 02:12:28 PM
 #2963

last time it happened there was there was talk of a more adaptable difficulty calc, but nothing's actually broken, everything's working as it should:
 - the intense hash rate increases the difficulty
 - when it's taken away the difficulty is still high so blocks take a lot of time until the difficulty subsides



Well yeah, though last time it wasn't so much GHs added ... the patch day is still far away Sad

Most Coins are Shitcoins
varun555
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 02:49:41 PM
 #2964

last time it happened there was there was talk of a more adaptable difficulty calc, but nothing's actually broken, everything's working as it should:
 - the intense hash rate increases the difficulty
 - when it's taken away the difficulty is still high so blocks take a lot of time until the difficulty subsides



Well yeah, though last time it wasn't so much GHs added ... the patch day is still far away Sad
What is this "patch" and how far is it?

Sorry, I don't know anything about it.
SmokingSkull
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 02:55:40 PM
 #2965

last time it happened there was there was talk of a more adaptable difficulty calc, but nothing's actually broken, everything's working as it should:
 - the intense hash rate increases the difficulty
 - when it's taken away the difficulty is still high so blocks take a lot of time until the difficulty subsides



Well yeah, though last time it wasn't so much GHs added ... the patch day is still far away Sad
What is this "patch" and how far is it?

Sorry, I don't know anything about it.

The different mining algos Smiley it's about ... 1 month away I guess.

Most Coins are Shitcoins
varun555
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 03:03:42 PM
 #2966

last time it happened there was there was talk of a more adaptable difficulty calc, but nothing's actually broken, everything's working as it should:
 - the intense hash rate increases the difficulty
 - when it's taken away the difficulty is still high so blocks take a lot of time until the difficulty subsides



Well yeah, though last time it wasn't so much GHs added ... the patch day is still far away Sad
What is this "patch" and how far is it?

Sorry, I don't know anything about it.

The different mining algos Smiley it's about ... 1 month away I guess.
Is it about AUXPOW ?
niteglider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100

Lean into the curves.


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 03:07:59 PM
 #2967

Ever notice that when most people say, 'no offense,' they are totally being offensive?

So, Gnosis has already addressed the idea.  In the future, if/when we need to expand security, there can simply be a message added to wallets, wiki, forums, websites, etc. which warns zANC holders that they must redeem their coins before a specified date.

And with certain agencies already crowing about the increased security of apple and android, it's sure that wise persons will want to protect their privacy.

A nice solution.

Keep up the good work, gentlemen.  You are actually helping to make the world a better place.

varun555
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 03:24:32 PM
 #2968

wow - our difficulty has hit 4792 !!! We are under "Attack" :-)

at least somebody loves us

Are the devs aware?

The devs are aware of these attacks since weeks.
The attackers use a power of more than 150 Gh/s (99% attack Shocked). They can fork ANC as they want or shutdown it.

Thanks for the info..
SmokingSkull
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 03:32:56 PM
 #2969



EDIT: Such a power can come only from a big organization or a state. If the same attack our RSA keys, they will broke them in few days!

No^^ they won't just break the keys with this. 150 GHs is not that much Wink

Anyway, if you read about these kind of things (its still possible that there is no attack at all) an "attacker" can't do much to the network, or to the coins that already have been transferred.

Most Coins are Shitcoins
Chooseusername
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2014, 04:07:33 PM
 #2970

wow - our difficulty has hit 4792 !!! We are under "Attack" :-)

at least somebody loves us

Are the devs aware?

The devs are aware of these attacks since weeks.
The attackers use a power of more than 150 Gh/s (99% attack Shocked). They can fork ANC as they want or shutdown it.

Thanks for the info..
And this is why anoncoin do need PoS along with PoW to become true and ultimate cryptocurrency.
varun555
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 05:38:22 PM
 #2971

IS THERE ANY COMMUNICATION FROM THE DEVS WITH REGARDS TO THIS (SUPPOSED) ATTACK ?
entertheabyss
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 508



View Profile
September 27, 2014, 06:04:19 PM
Last edit: September 27, 2014, 06:21:24 PM by entertheabyss
 #2972

What about the 158 GH of network hashrate !!!! Is it clear whether or not is there an attack going on. Is there any credible  info ?

just to clearify,

 there appears to be a larger multipool which periodically mining our coin. I roughly estimate the hashrate of this multipool is 5-6gigahashes per seconds approximately 60% of our total average hashrate. combined with a fluctuation in miner interest and a shitty difficulty targeting algo (kgw), there will be some sporadic periods of block finding delays until we switch to AuxPoW. Just to get an idea of the size of this mining pool, a Zues ASIC Miner is 300Mh/s and the Viper Litecoin ASIC Miner is 50 Mh/s so this mining pool is equlivant to about 20-100 ASICs,

158Gh/s is equivalent to the total LiteCoin hashrate, which would bring our difficulty orders of magnitudes higher than it is now. Nobody would spend that kind of hashrate on us with malicious intent when they could fork us without wasting hundreds of millions.

*EDIT* 158Gh/s is equivalent to 17% of the total LiteCoin hashrate but still more then $5,000,000USD
matthewh3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003



View Profile WWW
September 27, 2014, 06:04:24 PM
 #2973

last time it happened there was there was talk of a more adaptable difficulty calc, but nothing's actually broken, everything's working as it should:
 - the intense hash rate increases the difficulty
 - when it's taken away the difficulty is still high so blocks take a lot of time until the difficulty subsides



Well yeah, though last time it wasn't so much GHs added ... the patch day is still far away Sad
What is this "patch" and how far is it?

Sorry, I don't know anything about it.

The different mining algos Smiley it's about ... 1 month away I guess.
Is it about AUXPOW ?

Yes they are planning on either a three or five chain auxPoW myriad.

niteglider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100

Lean into the curves.


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 06:13:22 PM
 #2974

What about the 158 GH of network hashrate !!!! Is it clear whether or not is there an attack going on. Is there any credible  info ?

just to clearify,

 there appears to be a larger multipool which periodically mining our coin. I roughly estimate the hashrate of this multipool is 5-6gigahashes per seconds approximately 60% of our total average hashrate. combined with a fluctuation in miner interest and a shitty difficulty targeting algo (kgw), there will be some sporadic periods of block finding delays until we switch to AuxPoW. Just to get an idea of the size of this mining pool, a Zues ASIC Miner is 300Mh/s and the Viper Litecoin ASIC Miner is 50 Mh/s so this mining pool is equlivant to about 20-100 ASICs,

158Gh/s is equivalent to the total LiteCoin hashrate, which would bring our difficulty orders of magnitudes higher than it is now. Nobody would spend that kind of hashrate on us with malicious intent when they could fork us without wasting hundreds of millions.

Yes, when the value of a coin doubles in a week, you can expect quite a bit of mining interest.  

If there were an attack, we'd all know it, without a doubt by now, I think.

The increased mining interest would possibly indicate that our beloved troll's efforts have failed.... miserably.

matthewh3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003



View Profile WWW
September 27, 2014, 06:17:19 PM
 #2975

What about the 158 GH of network hashrate !!!! Is it clear whether or not is there an attack going on. Is there any credible  info ?

just to clearify,

 there appears to be a larger multipool which periodically mining our coin. I roughly estimate the hashrate of this multipool is 5-6gigahashes per seconds approximately 60% of our total average hashrate. combined with a fluctuation in miner interest and a shitty difficulty targeting algo (kgw), there will be some sporadic periods of block finding delays until we switch to AuxPoW. Just to get an idea of the size of this mining pool, a Zues ASIC Miner is 300Mh/s and the Viper Litecoin ASIC Miner is 50 Mh/s so this mining pool is equlivant to about 20-100 ASICs,

158Gh/s is equivalent to the total LiteCoin hashrate, which would bring our difficulty orders of magnitudes higher than it is now. Nobody would spend that kind of hashrate on us with malicious intent when they could fork us without wasting hundreds of millions.

Yes, when the value of a coin doubles in a week, you can expect quite a bit of mining interest.  

If there were an attack, we'd all know it, without a doubt by now, I think.

The increased mining interest would possibly indicate that our beloved troll's efforts have failed.... miserably.

Well the homepage and wiki have both been down for over twentyfour hours now.

varun555
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 06:23:45 PM
 #2976

wiki page is still down !!!!!
entertheabyss
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 508



View Profile
September 27, 2014, 06:31:42 PM
 #2977

What about the 158 GH of network hashrate !!!! Is it clear whether or not is there an attack going on. Is there any credible  info ?

just to clearify,

 there appears to be a larger multipool which periodically mining our coin. I roughly estimate the hashrate of this multipool is 5-6gigahashes per seconds approximately 60% of our total average hashrate. combined with a fluctuation in miner interest and a shitty difficulty targeting algo (kgw), there will be some sporadic periods of block finding delays until we switch to AuxPoW. Just to get an idea of the size of this mining pool, a Zues ASIC Miner is 300Mh/s and the Viper Litecoin ASIC Miner is 50 Mh/s so this mining pool is equlivant to about 20-100 ASICs,

158Gh/s is equivalent to the total LiteCoin hashrate, which would bring our difficulty orders of magnitudes higher than it is now. Nobody would spend that kind of hashrate on us with malicious intent when they could fork us without wasting hundreds of millions.

If this is not malicious, then who have the power to mine ANC with 500x Zeus ASIC Miner 300Mh/s (total value: 799.500,00$ to mine ANC Shocked):
https://zeusminer.com/product/zeusminer-volcano-300mhs1000wscrypt-asic-miner/

And they are in pre-order only!

Well i'm not sure how to respond to that other then by saying,


1) Currently our MarketCap is $ 707,647 so its kind of stupid
2)Those Miners are in --> PREORDER <-- ie not yet released
3)We are switching to AuxPoW
4) Once ZC testnet goes live hashrate will go up my at least a factor of ten
5) All those miners are not being sold to one entity and will inevitably increase the average hashrate of all coins not just ANC

but other than that, ya i guess were about as screwed as every other scrypt coin ATM
entertheabyss
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 508



View Profile
September 27, 2014, 06:33:33 PM
 #2978

What about the 158 GH of network hashrate !!!! Is it clear whether or not is there an attack going on. Is there any credible  info ?

just to clearify,

 there appears to be a larger multipool which periodically mining our coin. I roughly estimate the hashrate of this multipool is 5-6gigahashes per seconds approximately 60% of our total average hashrate. combined with a fluctuation in miner interest and a shitty difficulty targeting algo (kgw), there will be some sporadic periods of block finding delays until we switch to AuxPoW. Just to get an idea of the size of this mining pool, a Zues ASIC Miner is 300Mh/s and the Viper Litecoin ASIC Miner is 50 Mh/s so this mining pool is equlivant to about 20-100 ASICs,

158Gh/s is equivalent to the total LiteCoin hashrate, which would bring our difficulty orders of magnitudes higher than it is now. Nobody would spend that kind of hashrate on us with malicious intent when they could fork us without wasting hundreds of millions.

Yes, when the value of a coin doubles in a week, you can expect quite a bit of mining interest.  

If there were an attack, we'd all know it, without a doubt by now, I think.

The increased mining interest would possibly indicate that our beloved troll's efforts have failed.... miserably.

Well the homepage and wiki have both been down for over twentyfour hours now.

There is no doubt that we suffer a very well organized attack from certainly a big organization or state. Check the difficulty chart:
http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/anoncoin

The difficulty increase is a little more than 90% Shocked

A big Organization of state that wanted to attack us could 51% the chain with 6Gh/s, so no its not an attack.
varun555
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 06:39:20 PM
 #2979

On the dot. lack of dev response is rather baffling.

Is the homepage and wiki being down for one whole day just a coincidence?

The network hashrate is CONSTANT at 158.37Gh /s for quite some time now. this is freaky because it should continuously hem and haw in my imo.
Simcom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 06:45:12 PM
 #2980

It looks like it may take up to a week to crack this block if the miners get unlucky.  Maybe we will get lucky and break it in less than 24 hours.  Is this the largest mining pool?  http://anc.cryptotroll.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool

This pool will find a block every 131 hours at current difficulty and hashrate.

Someone claimed that we are moving to auxpow or a different retargeting algo - is this something that is already in the code or just something the devs have talked about.  If it is already in the code, what block do the changes take effect?
Pages: « 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 [149] 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 ... 265 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!