Vikingbet.io launched this week.

[Wiwo]

-snip-  Is this being regulated by the country you are setting up? To be honest, lots of potential customers are lost with this implementation alone; I do hope that you at least create a compromise where customers would be able to recover or at least receive a compensation for this.

Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.

Maybe it's because of state regulations because we don't know and so there's no compromise for this KYC because I don't know if they have a lot of customers with this KYC implementation?
I'll see some feedback from other people who have played on vikingbet to comment on this so I guess a lot of people are still debating it including myself, for me small users certainly won't take a look at it.

Operating regulated casino has a lot of responsibility and most comply to some state requirement before being given a certificate to operate KYC I a must to many of such casinos, but most crypto users don't feel free giving out their identity to a third party which is why KYC compliance discourages a lot of anonymous players.
But we also have some regulated casinos with a lot of users who have gone through the KYC process and gotten verified.

[1714208489]

1714208489

[1714208489]

1714208489

[1714208489]

1714208489

[TheEconomists]

-snip-  Is this being regulated by the country you are setting up? To be honest, lots of potential customers are lost with this implementation alone; I do hope that you at least create a compromise where customers would be able to recover or at least receive a compensation for this.

Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.

Maybe it's because of state regulations because we don't know and so there's no compromise for this KYC because I don't know if they have a lot of customers with this KYC implementation?
I'll see some feedback from other people who have played on vikingbet to comment on this so I guess a lot of people are still debating it including myself, for me small users certainly won't take a look at it.

You are very much correct that small users will not want to expose their private information just because they want play gambling particularly since they already have an existing account with other gambling site for which they are good with the gambling company. I wish them well with their KYC policy.

[toast]

The Know Your Customer policy is not something every site would like to implement. However, they are bound by licenses and laws and regulations and often have no other choice. Failure to follow this procedure may result in the license being revoked by the licensee. That is of course the very last thing you want as a gambling site, especially in the beginning when you are just operating. Experienced gamblers certainly the high stakes gamblers will have no problems with the KYC at least that's what I think once verified, everything is fine isn't it? It only gets annoying when they keep doing it repeatedly to delay payouts.

[dustboy]

Previously OP was inactive for almost a month then came back a week ago in this thread, now he is back inactive for a week already. Will he come back again to update and reply in this thread in the next few weeks? It does not look really good because most people will think that vikingbet is not really serious in advertising the casino in this forum.

[nakamura12]

You are very much correct that small users will not want to expose their private information just because they want play gambling particularly since they already have an existing account with other gambling site for which they are good with the gambling company. I wish them well with their KYC policy.

I would say that those small users who will pass the KYC is out of their mind. If there's a breach of personal information then their at their loss if ever theit identity would be use to do illegal things. I wouldn't also gamble in their site. Take a look at the op, it's been too long since the thread is posted and the op didn't seem to update the thread and did not even make the ann thread presentable plus I don't see any copper membership that will help make a presentable announcement thread then that means that they are not serious enough to make their gambling site competitive to other gambling sites.

[Chikito]

When I look at the last post, Look yes, but I don't know yet what kind of promotion. maybe signature campaign concurrently with games also.

I can`t understand. It seems that they are planning bounty campaign, but the same time it looks like that they want to get someone to help with the site only. So the best way is to ask.

Seems like he asking for several Manager campaigns but still didn't fix yet. As we can see he is rarely active on this forum, maybe the PM has piled up and didn't answer yet.

..It does not look really good because most people will think that vikingbet is not really serious in advertising the casino in this forum.

True,  this is quite ironic when compared with the casino. They have many games with a lot of providers and licenses, and they have also many payments like MasterCard and Visa. I think they must recruit for new marketing events and have active interaction with people.

[ipanks]

snip

snip

Small users may already know that they do not need to register on a gambling site that requires KYC because it is not worth the information they will provide. It is better to look for other gambling sites that are not too strict so they can play gambling without verifying their account. The @OP himself may be busy maintaining the site and we don't know when the @OP will be back but hopefully they will be back soon.