KNK
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2014, 07:41:03 AM |
|
Modified stats (uploaded to git) - ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs18.postimg.org%2F5mpsy28n9%2FScreen5a.jpg&t=665&c=q8lBQvzS5AFWAQ) And easy 3GH per chip with 56 bits clock - ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs22.postimg.org%2Fkfx5dwpzx%2FScreen5b.jpg&t=665&c=tV0Xe7E6NmXraA)
|
|
|
|
loshia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2014, 07:49:24 AM |
|
Modified stats (uploaded to git) - ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs18.postimg.org%2F5mpsy28n9%2FScreen5a.jpg&t=665&c=q8lBQvzS5AFWAQ) And easy 3GH per chip with 56 bits clock - ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs22.postimg.org%2Fkfx5dwpzx%2FScreen5b.jpg&t=665&c=tV0Xe7E6NmXraA) Super:) What about trying with 60-62 Bits Rev 1 was having an issues with OC higher that 56 if i remember... Thank you for sharing your results ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2014, 08:07:22 AM |
|
Rev1 at 4.94GH/s (stock or OC'ed?) combined to 5.40GH/s (OC'ed) combined is only a 10% improvement - should be able to get more than that, or is the hash rate readout quite correct yet?
|
|
|
|
KNK
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2014, 08:37:19 AM |
|
What about trying with 60-62 Bits Rev 1 was having an issues with OC higher that 56 if i remember...
Not yet, the code is unchanged from rev 1, so i have 56 as hard limit. Rev1 at 4.94GH/s (stock or OC'ed?) combined to 5.40GH/s (OC'ed) combined is only a 10% improvement - should be able to get more than that, or is the hash rate readout quite correct yet?
The miner was just started, so the hashrate was not stable yet, but if you look at the 'expected' then they are calculated based on the cores count = 864/756 = ~14% increase expected. All tests made at the same voltage and the chips are consuming almost the same current (rev 2 a bit lower ~3-4%). 3GH achieved at 0.62W/GH and 0.81V per chip, but a full string (@12V) requires a bit more current and will rise to 0.75W/GH I have not pushed the chip yet to higher voltage and clocks
|
|
|
|
vs3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2014, 11:29:08 AM |
|
Out of curiosity - has anyone tried IOVDD over 1.8V? Would it survive 2.5-2.8V?
|
|
|
|
KNK
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2014, 11:33:21 AM |
|
Out of curiosity - has anyone tried IOVDD over 1.8V? Would it survive 2.5-2.8V?
Yes, 2.5V for sure, but didn't dare to go higher.
|
|
|
|
vs3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2014, 11:38:06 AM |
|
Out of curiosity - has anyone tried IOVDD over 1.8V? Would it survive 2.5-2.8V?
Yes, 2.5V for sure, but didn't dare to go higher. Oh, nice! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I just got an idea on how to chain the chips without having to use the CMQ/CMMINUS/CMPLUS pins ... let's see how many chips am I going to fry while testing ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
LordTheron
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 07, 2014, 06:34:02 PM |
|
Hi Guys, been testing my Yellow Jacket on Rev2 chips. 56 bits works really well and very stable, 0 HW errors. Im gonna do some more testing tonight. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FJw1ZK0A.jpg&t=665&c=BNyRasBGl5fm5Q) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FXnqOqKF.jpg&t=665&c=eBJehESHkDKJOg) This is what I get after it settles down after few hours. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FqvC3e2f.jpg&t=665&c=9B78DtQgF4d2-A) Edit: Sorry for this big pictures, no idea how to upload them smaller.
|
|
|
|
Gator-hex
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 11, 2014, 07:59:15 PM Last edit: March 13, 2014, 11:50:30 AM by Gator-hex |
|
Technobit/Marto74 has a 16x board running at 61.65GH which is 3.85GH per chip. 406k accepted so ran long enough to be a reliable average. That's a 37% improvement on the old chips but he is running it with 100mV(11%) more power this time. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=307897.msg5640531#msg5640531![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs21.postimg.org%2F8f11ok56f%2FBit_Fury2_60_GHs.png&t=665&c=tA7FW2-THU7jeA)
|
|
|
|
pinkfloyd11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 10:16:25 AM |
|
Hello
chip samples are already stock out!!
When next stock arrive?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 16, 2014, 10:13:09 AM |
|
The WPC will be sending out our prototype design of our BF2 Wasp next week for fabrication. The WPC has completed the Hive (BP-1. Rev 0.) which will house a modular of up to an 8 board array of 32 chips per BF2 Wasp. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi230.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fee106%2FPFC4L1FE%2FIMG_4826_zpsa896c155.jpg&t=665&c=j05o8kWWgZVf0Q) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi230.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fee106%2FPFC4L1FE%2FIMG_48251_zpsd1625a2b.jpg&t=665&c=5QDd-k57A7aTkw) Buck regulator region on the BF2 Wasp. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi230.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fee106%2FPFC4L1FE%2Fbuck-controller_zps7766cf7d.png&t=665&c=Ka91FnnOo11pIg)
|
|
|
|
sobe-it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 12:31:02 AM |
|
do you have to bake the samples or what am i reading on their site?
|
|
|
|
Taugeran
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 04:19:10 AM |
|
do you have to bake the samples or what am i reading on their site?
its best practice
|
Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1 Come join Coinbase
|
|
|
sobe-it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 12:53:53 PM |
|
Ok, building my first diyer and I don't wanna rune them. So say in a gas or electric oven for 24 hrs or what's best?
|
|
|
|
Taugeran
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 05:26:31 PM |
|
Ok, building my first diyer and I don't wanna rune them. So say in a gas or electric oven for 24 hrs or what's best?
Not sure what industry uses. I'd just use what ya got. Flux will clean any oxidation when soldered
|
Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1 Come join Coinbase
|
|
|
Tyger
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 05:38:57 PM |
|
industry has rules about baking them, dephending on how long they are exposed to moisture (air). Chips get a MSL level to indicate what they can handle, no idea what level these are, if they have one. http://www.siliconfareast.com/msl.htmthere are better tables about this, including temperature. but for diy i would not wurry to much about it.
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 05:42:29 PM |
|
Ok, building my first diyer and I don't wanna rune them. So say in a gas or electric oven for 24 hrs or what's best?
Not sure what industry uses. I'd just use what ya got. Flux will clean any oxidation when soldered I would use an electric over or small toaster over over a gas oven. better temperature control and no open flame (i might be wrong though, is a gas oven open flame?)
|
|
|
|
sobe-it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 07:11:31 PM |
|
Yea but the flame is far away and I'd use a cookie sheet and alum foil... but i have toaster ovens as well. Just wanted to make sure before I ordered the chips. I don't have much money at all but interested in learning and testing. Maybe at some point figureout how to get a real pcb made so my project looks clean instead of a hackjob in perfboard. I'm not looking for resale... just a hobby off of the bitcoin hobby. Once you set up you miner and get it working 100% u just watch the pool and flashing lights.
|
|
|
|
bitcminter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/question.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 08:27:36 PM |
|
Hi, Could you help ? I have an H-board v1.2 and rpi and M-board 2.3. It's working but after my sd card is crashing. I make another from V1 img. And now it's not working.... for example when i running the chainminer program: pi@bitfury /opt/bitfury/chainminer $ sudo ./miner INIT: 16 chips detected ^Cpi@bitfury /opt/bitfury/chainminer $ i make a new chainminer install and make, but same answer ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) i have no chip.conf and no best.cnf ... is it problem ?
|
|
|
|
Taugeran
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 19, 2014, 08:59:41 PM |
|
Hi, Could you help ? I have an H-board v1.2 and rpi and M-board 2.3. It's working but after my sd card is crashing. I make another from V1 img. And now it's not working.... for example when i running the chainminer program: pi@bitfury /opt/bitfury/chainminer $ sudo ./miner INIT: 16 chips detected ^Cpi@bitfury /opt/bitfury/chainminer $ i make a new chainminer install and make, but same answer ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) i have no chip.conf and no best.cnf ... is it problem ? Mboard 2.3 and newer can't use the v1 image due to the way the slots are connected and activated by chainminer You might also tryout bfgminer On the note of sdcard corruption. If you have a spare 8Gb+ flash drive laying around you can follow this guide http://www.raspberrypi.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=44177Shows you how to move rootfs onto a USB drive that way the only time sdcard is touched is at boot. After that it's all from usb
|
Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1 Come join Coinbase
|
|
|
|