Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 09:46:34 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 3% faster mining with phoenix+phatk for everyone  (Read 35272 times)
hughes
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
July 01, 2011, 12:02:49 PM
 #141

Before: 353 MHps
After:  364 MHps
Difference: 11 MHps (3.0%)

Thanks!
1480758394
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480758394

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480758394
Reply with quote  #2

1480758394
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480758394
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480758394

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480758394
Reply with quote  #2

1480758394
Report to moderator
1480758394
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480758394

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480758394
Reply with quote  #2

1480758394
Report to moderator
redcodenl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12



View Profile WWW
July 01, 2011, 12:31:57 PM
 #142

Krypta:

I've seen that before as well, I didn't change it, but it sure looks like it shouldn't even compile!
I haven't tried the alterations yet, but will do so when I come home!

UPDATE: It works great, increase on both 6870's from 287 to 296 (> 3%!)
Jen4538
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 167


View Profile
July 01, 2011, 12:52:55 PM
 #143

thank you very much , this has increased my rate


Jen
msb8r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile WWW
July 01, 2011, 01:48:27 PM
 #144

Anyone tried this using guiminer?  I can see the file but not sure if I just edit the portion:

// Ma can also be implemented in terms of BFI_INT...
   #define Ma(x, y, z) amd_bytealign((y), (x | z), (z & x))

This patch works fine with guiminer as well. And yes, just edit the portion you posted.

New Bitcoin directory @ http://btcdir.org/
Fiyasko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Okey Dokey Lokey


View Profile
July 01, 2011, 04:34:36 PM
 #145

Seeing all these success stories makes me wonder if the file i downloaded was actually assembled correctly.
When apply this little 'tweak'
my mh/sec rate increses by seeming 2mhash/s per 6870 core But, the value at what im hashing at jumps all the fuck over the place. like 20-150-270-279-410-4-89.
It's rediculos

http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=DingoRabiit&sign=ANY&type=RECV <-My Ratings
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.0 GAWminers and associated things are not to be trusted, Especially the "mineral" exchange
Fiyasko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


Okey Dokey Lokey


View Profile
July 01, 2011, 04:41:52 PM
 #146

Seeing all these success stories makes me wonder if the file i downloaded was actually assembled correctly.
When apply this little 'tweak'
my mh/sec rate increses by seeming 2mhash/s per 6870 core But, the value at what im hashing at jumps all the fuck over the place. like 20-150-270-279-410-4-89.
It's rediculos

Yup, T'was compiled wrong.

Everyone update your GUIminer client
This beautiful tweak fix has been intergrated into the newest update, No weird fiddling required

And i can confirm that i've gained 10mh/s/core now 6870BE

http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=DingoRabiit&sign=ANY&type=RECV <-My Ratings
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.0 GAWminers and associated things are not to be trusted, Especially the "mineral" exchange
ercolinux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910



View Profile WWW
July 01, 2011, 11:06:50 PM
 #147

It works really well:: +3MHs on my 5770 at stock frequencies.

Bitrated user: ercolinux.
bitless
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
July 02, 2011, 04:24:53 AM
 #148

Krypta - it looks like r0() and r1() aren't used; try deleting them if you like.

Note that they aren't used by the phatk kernel that I've got, and even though I can't think of circumstances in which r0() will compile correctly, still, be careful if your kernel is different!

Krypta
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
July 02, 2011, 06:20:46 AM
 #149

Thank you bitless, it seems you are right, they are never used, so I really don't know why these modifications halved my stales.

Here's another strange thing:

Code:
256 Vals[0]=H[0];
257 Vals[1]=H[1];
258 Vals[2]=H[2];
259 Vals[3]=H[3];
260 Vals[4]=H[4];
261 Vals[5]=H[5];
262 Vals[6]=H[6];
263 Vals[7]=H[7];
264
265 Vals[7] = 0xb0edbdd0 + K[0] + W[64] + 0x08909ae5U;
266 Vals[3] = 0xa54ff53a + 0xb0edbdd0 + K[0] + W[64];

I think we can comment out

Code:
259 //Vals[3]=H[3];
263 //Vals[7]=H[7];

because they are changed on lines 265 and 266 before they are used, am I right?

Thanks.
Krypta
bitless
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
July 02, 2011, 06:28:16 AM
 #150

You may be right. May I suggest you run the kernel analyzer and see the disasm of both versions and see if the generated code is any different?

(This is because things like x=1; x=2; x=3; are easily converted by the compiler to just x=3;  )
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
July 02, 2011, 06:43:37 AM
 #151

put my 5830 up to 323.6.. very nice

mooo for rent
Krypta
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
July 02, 2011, 07:03:06 AM
 #152

You may be right. May I suggest you run the kernel analyzer and see the disasm of both versions and see if the generated code is any different?

(This is because things like x=1; x=2; x=3; are easily converted by the compiler to just x=3;  )
You are right, it's the same  Wink

No improvement then...

K.
Palmdetroit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882


PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting


View Profile WWW
July 02, 2011, 07:13:14 AM
 #153

Thanks boosted mah 6770s ~3%

karoshi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11



View Profile
July 02, 2011, 08:38:29 AM
 #154

wow, thanks.

each of my cards is making 357 now instead of 347. I thought these kernels were optimized to the max.

BIM - Bitcoin Income Monitor (http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=26323.0)
dafuq
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
July 02, 2011, 09:20:11 AM
 #155

hehe will try it Cheesy thx
Gui_0
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41


View Profile
July 02, 2011, 08:37:18 PM
 #156

my GPU usage (and thus hashrate) has always fluctuated like a small sine wave from 99% - 90% , after this patch, they all stay a straight line 99% , so that's way more than a 3% increase in hashrate for me.
What's weird, mine went from 90%-96% to 96% straight but the added performance adds 1.5C to the temperature, I might have to clock down a bit to get tot he previous 90C stable line, which means I am forfeiting the benefits of the above optimization. At least I use less energy, the Earth will thank us all...

You're still being more efficient and saving money by using less energy. His optimization made your load a constant 96% instead of 90%-96%, so your GPU has less time to cool. You should still get as many hashes as you did before, if not more, plus less energy Cheesy
Diapolo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 769



View Profile WWW
July 02, 2011, 10:40:40 PM
 #157

Did you guys try my phatk kernel-mod from here: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0
I really would like to get some feedback Smiley.

Thanks,
Dia

Liked my former work for Bitcoin Core? Drop me a donation via:
1PwnvixzVAKnAqp8LCV8iuv7ohzX2pbn5x
bitcoin:1PwnvixzVAKnAqp8LCV8iuv7ohzX2pbn5x?label=Diapolo
Alan Lupton
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42



View Profile
July 04, 2011, 07:10:40 AM
 #158

Did anybody experience more rejected packages? I used to be a 99.xx% guy, but now I'm down to 96.5 - 97%. I'm talking about 6 workers on 2 different systems. Coincidence?
xurious
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 11:44:40 AM
 #159

This worked for me on all my cards. Roughly 2-4% on 3x 6850's, 5870, and 5770. Thanks!

SiaMining.com -- First PPS SiaMining Pool! 3%, VarDiff, Stratum Support
Rob P.
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84



View Profile WWW
July 05, 2011, 12:37:41 PM
 #160

put my 5830 up to 323.6.. very nice

Hmmm, that's a helluva rate for a 5830.  Can you share your voltage, GPU, and RAM clocks please?

--

If you like what I've written here, consider tipping the messenger:
1GZu4CtHa6ai8iWoWiVFxV5VVoNte4SkoG

If you don't like what I've written, send me a Tip and I'll stop talking.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!