What the hell, i only bought this account and now lauda give me neg trust

[Decoded]

You already admitted here that you bought the account so that you could earn money. That's not what this forum is for. It is for educating and sharing knowledge about bitcoin, the blockchain and the surrounding community. Signature campaigns are here to support posters that contribute, not those that post just to make money.

Not many people understand that.

Lauda and Lutpin are two very different people, that I can assure you.

One is more grumpy than the other. However, is that sufficient evidence for your claim

You're still on DT, I'm still on DT, I think BTC-Graphicdesigns might be onto something there.
Also, both names start with a L, that can't be a coincidence.

both have some shit with defcon 

[1713887559]

1713887559

[1713887559]

1713887559

[1713887559]

1713887559

[1713887559]

1713887559

[1713887559]

1713887559

[blackmagician]

You already admitted here that you bought the account so that you could earn money. That's not what this forum is for. It is for educating and sharing knowledge about bitcoin, the blockchain and the surrounding community. Signature campaigns are here to support posters that contribute, not those that post just to make money.

Not many people understand that.

Lauda and Lutpin are two very different people, that I can assure you.

One is more grumpy than the other. However, is that sufficient evidence for your claim

You're still on DT, I'm still on DT, I think BTC-Graphicdesigns might be onto something there.
Also, both names start with a L, that can't be a coincidence.

both have some shit with defcon 

Lets say that i bought the account and join in a campaign, is that the reason for lauda to give me negative trust  because im the new owner of that account? I always read about bitcoin just to fit in this forum , sharing knowledge ,ideas, and with that fucking made by the seller my account got compromise.

[Vod]

Lets say that i bought the account and join in a campaign, is that the reason for lauda to give me negative trust

Yes.

[blackmagician]

I dont know why dt members dont give second chances to those peopel who is starting in bitcoin.
There are even some members who are worst than what i did. I only bought this account and  didnt scammed anyone, but those scammers  are still in this forum and enjoying what they are doing without getting any negative trust.  Be fair,  youre allowing the bad doings of other members unless youre protecting them .

[aTriz]

I dont know why dt members dont give second chances to those peopel who is starting in bitcoin.

People who buy accounts to abuse signature campaigns don't deserve a second chance

There are even some members who are worst than what i did. I only bought this account and  didnt scammed anyone, but those scammers  are still in this forum and enjoying what they are doing without getting any negative trust.  Be fair,  youre allowing the bad doings of other members unless youre protecting them .

Proof? The words of a butthurt spammer. So sad, didn't get a chance to join any campaign 

[blackmagician]

I dont know why dt members dont give second chances to those peopel who is starting in bitcoin.

People who buy accounts to abuse signature campaigns don't deserve a second chance

There are even some members who are worst than what i did. I only bought this account and  didnt scammed anyone, but those scammers  are still in this forum and enjoying what they are doing without getting any negative trust.  Be fair,  youre allowing the bad doings of other members unless youre protecting them .

Proof? The words of a butthurt spammer. So sad, didn't get a chance to join any campaign 

Any proof that i abuse signature campaigns, i was only the owner of this account last month.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I dont know why dt members dont give second chances to those peopel who is starting in bitcoin.
There are even some members who are worst than what i did. I only bought this account and  didnt scammed anyone, but those scammers  are still in this forum and enjoying what they are doing without getting any negative trust.  Be fair,  youre allowing the bad doings of other members unless youre protecting them .

Those scammers get negged, too, so quit your excuse making--nobody wants to hear it.

I deal with drug addicts who say "but but but but but but" all day long and make the most immature decisions, even with no substances on board, and they're shocked and defensive when there are consequences.   That's life, fuck-o.  You learned the hard way.

[actmyname]

Any proof that i abuse signature campaigns, i was only the owner of this account last month.

Buying an account is akin to buying reputation. Buying reputation is akin to buying trust. Nobody likes someone who wants to buy trust. Thus, nobody likes someone who wants to buy reputation. Thus, nobody likes someone who wants to buy an account. Q.E.D.

[HCP]

Any proof that i abuse signature campaigns, i was only the owner of this account last month.

Simply by buying an account at a rank higher than what you really are and then trying to claim a spot in one or more campaigns is effectively "abusing" sig campaigns.

They generally pay higher rates for higher ranking members with good quality posts. By short cutting that process and jumping straight to a "Sr. Member" account by buying it, you are effectively claiming to be a Sr. Member when you are in fact a newbie (Jr. Member at best after 1 month). That's definitely misrepresentation... and borderline fraud.

There is a reason why a number of the DT members tag account sellers and buyers.

[Barcode_]

Buying an account with a high rank on this forum to take part in signature campaigns is not the proper way to earn money, most of this actions result in a lot of accounts spamming this forum with nonsense posts, so it is better to build up your own account and assist the community in a better way.