Why Moslems Cannot Assimilate Into Canada, America, Europe and Western Countries

[BADecker]

Why Moslems Cannot Assimilate Into Canada, America, Europe and Western Countries

Frosty Wooldridge

Voltaire on Islam

"The Quran teaches fear, hatred, contempt for others, murder as a legitimate means for the dissemination and preservation of this satanic doctrine. It talks ill of women, classifies people into classes, calls for blood and ever more blood. Yet, that Muhammad, a camel trader, sparks uproar in his tribe, that he wants to make his fellow citizens believe that he talked to the archangel Gabriel; that he boasted about being taken up into heaven and receiving a part of that indigestible book there, which can shake common sense on every page, that to gain respect for this work, he covers his country with fire and iron, that he strangles fathers, drags away daughters, that he leaves the beaten a free choice between death and his faith; now this is certainly something that no one can excuse, unless he came as a Turk into the world, unless superstition has stifled any natural light of reason in him." Voltaire 1694-1788

With worldwide Moslem terror events becoming regular front-page news, leaders of Western countries might ask themselves why they promote Moslem immigration.

Where Islam gains a foothold in any host country, conflict ensues at the local level until it boils over onto the national stage.  While Moslems lay low in the beginning stages of their "hijrah" ('seeding' as advocated by the Quran to spread Islam) of host countries, as their numbers grow, they push for Sharia Law.

Already in the United Kingdom after 25 years of intense Moslem immigration, Islam features 3,000 mosques, 130 Sharia courts, 50 Muslim Sharia Councils and dozens of 'no go zones' where Moslem 'Sharia' patrols ensure no one disobeys Sharia Law.

Read more at http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Opinion/227755-2017-10-23-why-moslems-cannot-assimilate-into-canada-america-europe-and-western.htm.

[1713510556]

1713510556

[1713510556]

1713510556

[1713510556]

1713510556

[1713510556]

1713510556

[1713510556]

1713510556

[Peter789]

Yep.Thats about right.

[BADecker]

The failure of the various countries is that they don't want to have children. Muslims do. So the Muslim population increases way faster than everyone else, until they take over the vote.

[yoseph]

The problem with moslems is that wherever they go, they are loud and they try to behave that they own the place and try to impose their will on the people already living there and these Europeans don't want that at all. Eventually assimilating Moslems in the western countries is a recipe for disaster and it's going to happen very soon.

[Sithara007]

The failure of the various countries is that they don't want to have children. Muslims do. So the Muslim population increases way faster than everyone else, until they take over the vote.

The world is already over-populated and the Europeans are doing the right thing. And it is not like the population is decreasing. The native European population is stable and in some of the countries such as Ireland and Iceland, it is still growing. The Muslims on the other hand are famous for their demographic jihad. They want to convert Europe to Eurabia and this is one of their major weapons.

[MoonIsBlue]

I don't agree:

Muhammed was a generally peacefull man, he fought when others fought him. He himself would seek a non-violent approach first.
The Qu'ran does not endorse killing. Ji-had can mean two tings:

1. Inner Ji-had to take the battle upon with yourself, to become less greedy, fearfull etc.
2. Outer Ji-had which means to stand up for your right to practice islam.

That a bunch of extremists and people with low IQ completely ignored this is not the fault of the general populace practicing Islam.

Go to countries like Jordan, Iran (70's.. since ayatollah its a mess) see how emancipated those people are and still practice Islam. You'd fit right in as a westerner (if you aren't a biggot).

The Burkah for example as explained by woman from Jordan was because there's a ton of sand in the desert, so it is used as a good way to cover up and not get everything in your hair, eyes and face. And doesn't have anything to do with being a sexual object, even so as explained by these same woman, times we're a lot different then. But to still view it from their pov in time would just be sexualizing yourself and not because others do so.

Now what Voltaire said about Islam can equally be said about Christians, how many christians suffer from guilt of existance and sexuality?
How many times does the bible say god-fearing man, or ''you should fear god''.
Haven't there been terrorist attacks in Ireland aswell in the name of christianity? You don't see the whole world generalizing over that mainly because in the western world christianity is still the pre-dominant religion and everyone can see that this a small group of extremists.

Its all the fucking same, so stop bashing religions as the problem and just recognize the problem in yourself (jihad).
Religion is created by man, so I can't blame religion which is a concept, whether the concept is biased or not only tells that man himself is biased (and a moron).

''The eyes are the windows of the soul'' - Qu'ran (and plato) - Now why would Allah want you to cover up everything when he made you beautifull?

[Kotone]

Why Moslems Cannot Assimilate Into Canada, America, Europe and Western Countries

Frosty Wooldridge

Voltaire on Islam

"The Quran teaches fear, hatred, contempt for others, murder as a legitimate means for the dissemination and preservation of this satanic doctrine. It talks ill of women, classifies people into classes, calls for blood and ever more blood. Yet, that Muhammad, a camel trader, sparks uproar in his tribe, that he wants to make his fellow citizens believe that he talked to the archangel Gabriel; that he boasted about being taken up into heaven and receiving a part of that indigestible book there, which can shake common sense on every page, that to gain respect for this work, he covers his country with fire and iron, that he strangles fathers, drags away daughters, that he leaves the beaten a free choice between death and his faith; now this is certainly something that no one can excuse, unless he came as a Turk into the world, unless superstition has stifled any natural light of reason in him." Voltaire 1694-1788

With worldwide Moslem terror events becoming regular front-page news, leaders of Western countries might ask themselves why they promote Moslem immigration.

Where Islam gains a foothold in any host country, conflict ensues at the local level until it boils over onto the national stage.  While Moslems lay low in the beginning stages of their "hijrah" ('seeding' as advocated by the Quran to spread Islam) of host countries, as their numbers grow, they push for Sharia Law.

Already in the United Kingdom after 25 years of intense Moslem immigration, Islam features 3,000 mosques, 130 Sharia courts, 50 Muslim Sharia Councils and dozens of 'no go zones' where Moslem 'Sharia' patrols ensure no one disobeys Sharia Law.

Read more at http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Opinion/227755-2017-10-23-why-moslems-cannot-assimilate-into-canada-america-europe-and-western.htm.

I disagree. Painting muslims on a bad light actually soeaks for us rather than them. Muslims are peace loving people and everything that we think we know is branded by us from the difference that we have however I know a lot of muslim people who have assimilated themselves greatly and with grace to where they belong.

[JungleJim65]

I don't agree:

Muhammed was a generally peacefull man, he fought when others fought him. He himself would seek a non-violent approach first.
The Qu'ran does not endorse killing. Ji-had can mean two tings:

1. Inner Ji-had to take the battle upon with yourself, to become less greedy, fearfull etc.
2. Outer Ji-had which means to stand up for your right to practice islam.

That a bunch of extremists and people with low IQ completely ignored this is not the fault of the general populace practicing Islam.

Go to countries like Jordan, Iran (70's.. since ayatollah its a mess) see how emancipated those people are and still practice Islam. You'd fit right in as a westerner (if you aren't a biggot).

The Burkah for example as explained by woman from Jordan was because there's a ton of sand in the desert, so it is used as a good way to cover up and not get everything in your hair, eyes and face. And doesn't have anything to do with being a sexual object, even so as explained by these same woman, times we're a lot different then. But to still view it from their pov in time would just be sexualizing yourself and not because others do so.

Now what Voltaire said about Islam can equally be said about Christians, how many christians suffer from guilt of existance and sexuality?
How many times does the bible say god-fearing man, or ''you should fear god''.
Haven't there been terrorist attacks in Ireland aswell in the name of christianity? You don't see the whole world generalizing over that mainly because in the western world christianity is still the pre-dominant religion and everyone can see that this a small group of extremists.

Its all the fucking same, so stop bashing religions as the problem and just recognize the problem in yourself (jihad).
Religion is created by man, so I can't blame religion which is a concept, whether the concept is biased or not only tells that man himself is biased (and a moron).

''The eyes are the windows of the soul'' - Qu'ran (and plato) - Now why would Allah want you to cover up everything when he made you beautifull?

I want to specifically address your (rhetorical) question asking "haven't there been terrorist attacks in Ireland aswell in the name of Christianity?"

No, there haven't been any terrorist attacks in Ireland(majority were in the U.K.) in the name of Christianity. I assume you're referring to the IRA which was one of many organizations dedicated to Irish Nationalism. Irish Nationalism asserts that all people of Ireland belong to the same nation and as such it is dedicated  to uniting the Republic of Ireland with Northern Ireland. The fact that the majority of the early IRA were Catholic and their opponents were Protestant was not the cause for the fighting. There were actually Protestants who were members of the IRA and other Irish Nationalist organizations.. In the late 60's, many of the IRA branches became Marxist organizations. Members of Marxist organizations are generally atheist. Besides that, the IRA almost always gave warnings prior to their bombs being detonated as to give the authorities time to evacuate civilians. I'm honestly so sick of hearing Muslim apologists bringing up the IRA as an attempt to excuse the multitude of  recent atrocities committed by Muslims. I have a question for you now. Can you find me a video similar to the one I linked below, a montage of barbaric executions/terrorist attacks in the name of religion, but with Christians, or Jews, or Buddhists, or Sikhs, or Hindus, etc. instead of Muslims? If you can't, then it's not "all the fucking same."

 https://track5.mixtape.moe/dzmliw.mp4

[Sithara007]

I disagree. Painting muslims on a bad light actually soeaks for us rather than them. Muslims are peace loving people and everything that we think we know is branded by us from the difference that we have however I know a lot of muslim people who have assimilated themselves greatly and with grace to where they belong.

Yeah... yeah... sure... The Muslims are all angels and we are the ones who demonize them without any solid reason. 

But I have one doubt though. So far in this year, there have been tens of thousands of religion-based terrorist incidents in the world. And coincidentally or not, 99.99% of the time, the perpetrator happens to be Muslim. Why is it so? Why the Christians or Hindus are not engaging in terrorism?

[salinizm]

I disagree. Painting muslims on a bad light actually soeaks for us rather than them. Muslims are peace loving people and everything that we think we know is branded by us from the difference that we have however I know a lot of muslim people who have assimilated themselves greatly and with grace to where they belong.

Yeah... yeah... sure... The Muslims are all angels and we are the ones who demonize them without any solid reason. 

But I have one doubt though. So far in this year, there have been tens of thousands of religion-based terrorist incidents in the world. And coincidentally or not, 99.99% of the time, the perpetrator happens to be Muslim. Why is it so? Why the Christians or Hindus are not engaging in terrorism?

I completely agree with your ideas . Islamic beliefs tell muslim people kill the non-muslim people. Muslim terrorists think that non-muslim ones are evil and they deserve to be killed . This is obviously brutal.

[johny1512]

This is ridiculous to say that Muslims gave birth to many children. Lame excuse for this argument because Muslims are not giving life or they are not the creator of these children. Creator is Almighty and whose soul has been made he/she would surely come for their time which has been decided by God.

[merchantofzeny]

This is quite embarrassing considering it coming from someone from the 16th century. But no, nobody listened and look what happened now. They only have themselves to blame for.

It looks like resistance is building now though. Even Austria that criticized Hungary for building barriers on their borders has now elected an anti-immigration PM.

The failure of the various countries is that they don't want to have children. Muslims do. So the Muslim population increases way faster than everyone else, until they take over the vote.

The world is already over-populated and the Europeans are doing the right thing. And it is not like the population is decreasing. The native European population is stable and in some of the countries such as Ireland and Iceland, it is still growing. The Muslims on the other hand are famous for their demographic jihad. They want to convert Europe to Eurabia and this is one of their major weapons.

Yup, demographic jihad is a thing. Even if they just keep to 2 kids, if that would be per wife, they'd soon outnumber non-Muslims. Look at Lebanon. It was Christian-majority when it was founded. What is it famous for now?

This is ridiculous to say that Muslims gave birth to many children. Lame excuse for this argument because Muslims are not giving life or they are not the creator of these children. Creator is Almighty and whose soul has been made he/she would surely come for their time which has been decided by God.

No. Your comment is what's ridiculous here. Europeans can spit out as many babies as Muslims if they choose to. They just don't, that's why they use contraceptives and stuff. They actually care for their children's future and not leaving it to luck. Now look at those Muslim countries in Africa, no family planning whatsoever. And then they complain they're poor.

[Oroplata]

Why they cannot assimilate, the answer is simple, look at the Quran, the answer is there. The true Muslim is the one who follow the true teaching of the Quran.

[spongegar]

I don't agree:

Muhammed was a generally peacefull man, he fought when others fought him. He himself would seek a non-violent approach first.
The Qu'ran does not endorse killing. Ji-had can mean two tings:

1. Inner Ji-had to take the battle upon with yourself, to become less greedy, fearfull etc.
2. Outer Ji-had which means to stand up for your right to practice islam.

That a bunch of extremists and people with low IQ completely ignored this is not the fault of the general populace practicing Islam.

Go to countries like Jordan, Iran (70's.. since ayatollah its a mess) see how emancipated those people are and still practice Islam. You'd fit right in as a westerner (if you aren't a biggot).

The Burkah for example as explained by woman from Jordan was because there's a ton of sand in the desert, so it is used as a good way to cover up and not get everything in your hair, eyes and face. And doesn't have anything to do with being a sexual object, even so as explained by these same woman, times we're a lot different then. But to still view it from their pov in time would just be sexualizing yourself and not because others do so.

Now what Voltaire said about Islam can equally be said about Christians, how many christians suffer from guilt of existance and sexuality?
How many times does the bible say god-fearing man, or ''you should fear god''.
Haven't there been terrorist attacks in Ireland aswell in the name of christianity? You don't see the whole world generalizing over that mainly because in the western world christianity is still the pre-dominant religion and everyone can see that this a small group of extremists.

Its all the fucking same, so stop bashing religions as the problem and just recognize the problem in yourself (jihad).
Religion is created by man, so I can't blame religion which is a concept, whether the concept is biased or not only tells that man himself is biased (and a moron).

''The eyes are the windows of the soul'' - Qu'ran (and plato) - Now why would Allah want you to cover up everything when he made you beautifull?

Yes, i totally agree. Islam is a peaceful religion and the bottom line is the religion is not at fault. Besides, i known alot is Muslims who actually assimilated in Western countries and actually convinced others to join in on their faith. Now what this article talks about happens but it won't justify generalizing the whole Islamic community.