|
eeX (OP)
|
 |
February 02, 2018, 04:57:02 PM |
|
AWS m5.24xlarge EC2 instance @ OREGON with 96 cores will cost you about 4.6 USD/hour.
May you suggest how to calculate thread number. Does your miner needs 2MB L3 cache per thread? I have tried m4.16xlarge with 64 cores for 1 hour. Best hash ratio that i have seen was 6.2 khs. I was able to reach this hash ratio by using 45 treads. I had two xeons with hyperthreading enabled and 90 MB of L3 in total. So it shows that I'm right according assigning 2 MB per thread. yes, you are right! and 6.2 KH/s seems very impresive. I suppose you should get about 20 SLD during this hour. If I'm correct, SLD should cost more than USD 0.25 to mining be profitable renting AWS.... At least now.... |
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Jegu.Samana
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
February 02, 2018, 06:51:01 PM |
|
I suppose you should get about 20 SLD during this hour.
If I'm correct, SLD should cost more than USD 0.25 to mining be profitable renting AWS....
To be honest I got only 13 SLD. Basically miner was restarted tens times by me because I wanted to test various thread settings. Also I have made mistake and server was build somewhere in USA. Can be that latency was higher because of that. And finally I have chosen Windows server 2012 R2. Not sure how this affects mining performance - newer used server for mining. I have noticed that miner was frozen for some time and not returned any results till restart. BTW m5.24xlarge servers are build with two Xeon Platinum 8175M inside. This means that L3 cache is 66 MB in total. Highest stable result (5.13 KH/s) was achieved by using 34 threads. |
|
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 02, 2018, 11:11:58 PM |
|
In any case thanks a lot for you benchmarking contribute to Soldo mining stats!!!
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
mkilla
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2018, 07:08:12 PM |
|
Hey eeX,
What does the Locked Amount represent?
|
|
|
|
|
awmyhr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2018, 11:28:40 PM |
|
Very rough benchmarks (for 2 threads on each system): CPU GHz KH/s Host OS
i7-5600U 2.6 0.48 Fedora 27
i7-5600U 2.6 0.48 Fedora Atomic Host
i5-3340M 2.7 0.33 Fedora 27
i5-2500S 2.7 0.64 macOS 10.11
A10-9700 2.4 0.21 Fedora 27 I run the daemon (sldd) in its own container on the AMD system, then the miner (sldm) in a container on each system pointed to the daemon host. Small update: Today i upgraded my AMD system from the A10 to a Ryzen 1700. Aside from letting the BIOS 'auto-overclock', I haven't done much tuning on it. With 2 threads, I'm getting about 0.82 KH/s. With 7 threads I'm getting about 2.30 KH/s! (I didn't run 8 threads cuz my boy is using one core for Minecraft, lol...) |
|
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 04, 2018, 07:33:38 PM |
|
What does the Locked Amount represent?
Exactly what you see - you have a coins in the wallet but can't use it until hour X. |
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
Jegu.Samana
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
February 05, 2018, 05:33:21 AM
Last edit: February 05, 2018, 05:20:04 PM by Jegu.Samana |
|
With 7 threads I'm getting about 2.30 KH/s! (I didn't run 8 threads cuz my boy is using one core for Minecraft, lol...)
results are really impressive! I can provide two values which were collected by using poor guys hardware: Xeon E5 2603 V3 (original) - 0.62 KH/s Xeon E5 2637 V3 ES QEYT (default overclocking in bios) - 1.08 KH/s BTW I was able to catch 1000 SLD block by using Xeon E5 2603 v3  |
|
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 05, 2018, 10:22:56 AM |
|
With 7 threads I'm getting about 2.30 KH/s! (I didn't run 8 threads cuz my boy is using one core for Minecraft, lol...)
results are really impressive! I can provide two values which were collected by using poor guys hardware: Xeon E5 1603 v3 (original) - 0.62 KH/s Xeon E5 2637 V3 ES QEYT (default overclocking in bios) - 1.08 KH/s BTW I was able to catch 1000 SLD block by using Xeon E5 1603 v3 Seems we need collect all benchmarking data together and publish at first page... |
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
Jayjay04
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1364
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 05, 2018, 11:13:01 AM |
|
I keep supporting this coin by mining it ! Waiting for updates patiently, keep the good work and innovative features going ! Think outside the box |
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 05, 2018, 11:24:32 AM |
|
Hello again,
we have the second investor!!!
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 05, 2018, 11:56:45 AM |
|
And third one already!!!
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 05, 2018, 01:06:55 PM |
|
One more again  |
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
Perog2
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 11
Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.
|
|
February 05, 2018, 01:32:31 PM |
|
great news! I wish you a successful listing |
|
|
|
|
httpb
|
|
February 05, 2018, 03:04:29 PM |
|
Seems we need collect all benchmarking data together and publish at first page...
Here is my contribution: i7 7700K - 3 threads - Win10 - around 1k/s i3 4170 - 2 threads - Win10 - around 350h/s |
|
|
|
|
Jegu.Samana
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
February 05, 2018, 05:28:03 PM |
|
Seems we need collect all benchmarking data together and publish at first page...
This is really good idea. But please pay attention - I have made mistake and modified my post few sec ago. 1603 was changed to 2603. |
|
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 06, 2018, 12:18:01 PM |
|
Hello guys,
we have to implement code fork to prevent low difficulty attacks.
The problem is all nodes must be update before hour X.
So - when to start fork - at block 400R or earlier, at 375K???
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
Perog2
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 11
Branding and graphic design on the blockchain.
|
|
February 06, 2018, 12:35:39 PM |
|
Hello guys,
we have to implement code fork to prevent low difficulty attacks.
The problem is all nodes must be update before hour X.
So - when to start fork - at block 400R or earlier, at 375K???
if all people need to download a new version of the miner, it is better to allocate more time for this. those. I vote for 400k |
|
|
|
Slonik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2018, 01:26:44 PM |
|
I vote for 400k
I vote for 400k to |
|
|
|
|
AlistairJ
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
|
|
February 06, 2018, 01:28:01 PM |
|
"The emission model is very interesting - it reminds us of the natural distribution of resources, when you know that there is gold in the mine, but who gets a big piece from the miners, and who is small with luck) while everything looks in the spirit of Satoshi Nakamoto's ideals - decentralized as much as possible - until the complexity is high in solo on processors, when there is a need for pools, the reward system will motivate to split into small pools for the maximum lottery award (with less to share)" Vdizaine
|
|
|
|
|
|
eeX (OP)
|
|
February 06, 2018, 02:43:07 PM |
|
Ok, seems start @ 400K is preferable.
|
Soldo [SLD] @ Soldo.IN
|
|
|
|
Poll
