1of16.win - Blockchain game with easy-to-follow rules.

[1of16.game]

Blockchain game with easy-to-follow rules.

 

http://1of16.win

16 bets - winner takes all!

You select the last digit of the block and bet a fixed amount of BTC 0.005 on it.
The winning number determines the blockchain after all 16 bets from 16 players have been made.
The winning player wins all 16 bets; 16x ฿ 0.005 =BTC 0.08


 Please keep in mind that you are playing a game of chance for pleasure. You should never invest something that you cannot afford to lose. This service charges a commission of 7% of the winnings + network transaction. Is an internet  room, not a casino. That means you never play against the house, only against other players.

The fall of the number is not controlled by us. Everything happens in automatic mode and the number loss cannot be known in advance. The entire history of winning numbers is available for testing at all times.

FAQ

1. I sent Bitcoin to the generated address, but the transaction is not displayed. Why?
Do not worry. If the transaction does not appear immediately, it will appear as soon as the confirmation is received.

2. My transaction is confirmed, but the system still does not show it. Why?
 The transaction will be visible as soon as it receives 2 confirmations.

3. My transaction has been confirmed, when will the winner be determined?
 As soon as all 16 bets from 16 players are made.

4. Can I send more bets?
Yes, you can make multiple bets on different block numbers.

5. Is there a minimum or maximum amount of Bitcoin that should be sent?
 Yes. You must send a flat rate of 0.005. All bets that are above or below this threshold will be considered a donation.

6. What is the benefit of this service?
This service charges a commission of 7% of the winnings + network transaction.


 

Play to Win

[1713598448]

1713598448

[1713598448]

1713598448

[Bitinity]

There is another thread about this site https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2279496.0
Are you the same person with the one who created above thread or you have just bought the site? If you are the same with the previous thread so lock one  and keep one. Why moderated thread?
Your site is not even have SSL certificate, how could you make sure that it will be safe to play on your site?

[1of16.game]

There is another thread about this site https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2279496.0
Are you the same person with the one who created above thread or you have just bought the site? If you are the same with the previous thread so lock one  and keep one. Why moderated thread?
Your site is not even have SSL certificate, how could you make sure that it will be safe to play on your site?

Yes, it's about our service. One player posted. Thank you, ask the moderator to delete.
The SSL certificate will be installed in a couple of days.

[1of16.game]

the round ended, the winner received a win.
Proof https://blockchain.info/tx/4877e9eb96b25accaaf621c14d09f2d9e10092c49bea840d9eaef2646ae87fa1

[bias]

the round ended, the winner received a win.
Proof https://blockchain.info/tx/4877e9eb96b25accaaf621c14d09f2d9e10092c49bea840d9eaef2646ae87fa1

How will know that the winner is not someone that you know and it's not a fixed win?
There isn't much of transperancy to this game-site of yours. I think that you should try harder to convince us.

[1of16.game]

the round ended, the winner received a win.
Proof https://blockchain.info/tx/4877e9eb96b25accaaf621c14d09f2d9e10092c49bea840d9eaef2646ae87fa1

How will know that the winner is not someone that you know and it's not a fixed win?
There isn't much of transperancy to this game-site of yours. I think that you should try harder to convince us.

Because the system is automated, we will not be able to make changes in sending prize to the winner. We guarantee, the winner,  will get his prize.

What proof would you like to see?

[1of16.game]

Dear friends!
Due to the bitcoin growth, we lowered the rate to 0.003. Successful games.

[Reid]

Okay a nice game. Just like what I played when I was a kid.
But do you have only one batch of it?
I mean what if there are 160 players? So there will be like 10 batches of this right?
Or first come, first serve and only 16 players can gamble?

[BTCevo]

Okay a nice game. Just like what I played when I was a kid.
But do you have only one batch of it?
I mean what if there are 160 players? So there will be like 10 batches of this right?
Or first come, first serve and only 16 players can gamble?

First, they do not have that many players because of this is a new site so they still gathering more players to play. Second, I do not think that it is needed to have some batch, because they are based on blockchain so everytime there is 16 players, blockchain will generate new winner for them so of there is 160 players that means it will have 16 winners but of course it is plan as first come first pick

[milewilda]

the round ended, the winner received a win.
Proof https://blockchain.info/tx/4877e9eb96b25accaaf621c14d09f2d9e10092c49bea840d9eaef2646ae87fa1

How will know that the winner is not someone that you know and it's not a fixed win?
There isn't much of transperancy to this game-site of yours. I think that you should try harder to convince us.

Because the system is automated, we will not be able to make changes in sending prize to the winner. We guarantee, the winner,  will get his prize.

What proof would you like to see?

We would like to see if those users who deposited are not belonged to the owners which would just lure in some people to play because of spot securing. This game is actually like https://www.chain-bet.com/ but having an another system on picking winners. I do see some flaw on this one.

[1of16.game]

Okay a nice game. Just like what I played when I was a kid.
But do you have only one batch of it?
I mean what if there are 160 players? So there will be like 10 batches of this right?
Or first come, first serve and only 16 players can gamble?

There is only one round of 16 bets at the same time. (You can bet on several values in one lot). The games are very fast with a large number of players. And since the game is fully automated, winnings to winners are sent immediately after the end of the round.

[MinerHQ]

Okay a nice game. Just like what I played when I was a kid.
But do you have only one batch of it?
I mean what if there are 160 players? So there will be like 10 batches of this right?
Or first come, first serve and only 16 players can gamble?

There is only one round of 16 bets at the same time. (You can bet on several values in one lot). The games are very fast with a large number of players. And since the game is fully automated, winnings to winners are sent immediately after the end of the round.

This is just my opinion that 7% commission looks quite high for the service you provide for each round.

Maybe for the first few days, you may run some promotions like reduce the minimum amount of bet to 0.001BTC and provide first few people one-time free amount 0.001 BTC then you get more players to the site. If people like the game then they may continue playing with their money.

Also, for the first few days either you reduce your house edge or remove completely.

[sasharaul]

it is really similar, but it seems to me more reliable, because the win is guaranteed by the players' betting, unlike https://www.chain-bet.com/ where the wallet doesn't always have money for payments judging by the reports in their thread on the forum

[panjul07]

Okay a nice game. Just like what I played when I was a kid.
But do you have only one batch of it?
I mean what if there are 160 players? So there will be like 10 batches of this right?
Or first come, first serve and only 16 players can gamble?

There is only one round of 16 bets at the same time. (You can bet on several values in one lot). The games are very fast with a large number of players. And since the game is fully automated, winnings to winners are sent immediately after the end of the round.

This is just my opinion that 7% commission looks quite high for the service you provide for each round.

Maybe for the first few days, you may run some promotions like reduce the minimum amount of bet to 0.001BTC and provide first few people one-time free amount 0.001 BTC then you get more players to the site. If people like the game then they may continue playing with their money.

Also, for the first few days either you reduce your house edge or remove completely.

He should not reduce the the available game, but he should add more games. So there will be more games with different minimum bet, starting from 0.001, 0.002, and so on. So people may choose which one is more suitable for them based on their own funds, they can join all games as well.
Promotion is always good, but I'm not really sure what would be a good promo for this game. Probably free bet?

[mdexm]

Why isn't the winning number based on the last character of the block hash of the last bet placed in the group? The way I understand that you've designed this is extremely open to fixing - your system "randomly" picks a number once all the bets are in? How is that provably fair? What stops you from betting in each group and picking your own number?

If that's not the way it works, you should do a better job of explaining because "The winning number determines the blockchain" isn't proper English.

[adaseb]

The problem with these sites, especially when they are new is not the provably fair aspect because we can all verify the hashed block and we know that its impossible to game these results.

But the problem is that after a while, when the sites gains popularity there is no protection that the owner will just stop all winning transfers and keep all the BTC.

Hence these types of games should instead be run on the Ethereum blockchain as an smart contract.

Then everybody can look at the open source script and since the contract can't hold any funds, they can't steal anyones money.

[akamit]

Okay a nice game. Just like what I played when I was a kid.
But do you have only one batch of it?
I mean what if there are 160 players? So there will be like 10 batches of this right?
Or first come, first serve and only 16 players can gamble?

There is only one round of 16 bets at the same time. (You can bet on several values in one lot). The games are very fast with a large number of players. And since the game is fully automated, winnings to winners are sent immediately after the end of the round.

This is just my opinion that 7% commission looks quite high for the service you provide for each round.

Maybe for the first few days, you may run some promotions like reduce the minimum amount of bet to 0.001BTC and provide first few people one-time free amount 0.001 BTC then you get more players to the site. If people like the game then they may continue playing with their money.

Also, for the first few days either you reduce your house edge or remove completely.

He should not reduce the the available game, but he should add more games. So there will be more games with different minimum bet, starting from 0.001, 0.002, and so on. So people may choose which one is more suitable for them based on their own funds, they can join all games as well.
Promotion is always good, but I'm not really sure what would be a good promo for this game. Probably free bet?

I would like to add one point which I think would be best for all gamblers.
The point is, it could be more better if there is at least 3 winners out of 16 instead of 1. By doing this, they may get more gamblers to their site.

Gamblers may take risk when they will see more win probabilities (3 or more) instead of 1.

And of course they should have multiple options to bet from minimum amount BTC0.0005 to maximum amount "?".

[MinerHQ]

Okay a nice game. Just like what I played when I was a kid.
But do you have only one batch of it?
I mean what if there are 160 players? So there will be like 10 batches of this right?
Or first come, first serve and only 16 players can gamble?

There is only one round of 16 bets at the same time. (You can bet on several values in one lot). The games are very fast with a large number of players. And since the game is fully automated, winnings to winners are sent immediately after the end of the round.

This is just my opinion that 7% commission looks quite high for the service you provide for each round.

Maybe for the first few days, you may run some promotions like reduce the minimum amount of bet to 0.001BTC and provide first few people one-time free amount 0.001 BTC then you get more players to the site. If people like the game then they may continue playing with their money.

Also, for the first few days either you reduce your house edge or remove completely.

He should not reduce the the available game, but he should add more games. So there will be more games with different minimum bet, starting from 0.001, 0.002, and so on. So people may choose which one is more suitable for them based on their own funds, they can join all games as well.
Promotion is always good, but I'm not really sure what would be a good promo for this game. Probably free bet?

I would like to add one point which I think would be best for all gamblers.
The point is, it could be more better if there is at least 3 winners out of 16 instead of 1. By doing this, they may get more gamblers to their site.

Gamblers may take risk when they will see more win probabilities (3 or more) instead of 1.

And of course they should have multiple options to bet from minimum amount BTC0.0005 to maximum amount "?".

Yes, it is a good suggestion to consider because as you said as gambler got a more chance to win then many people may try their luck instead just one winner.  Either fix the equal amount to all three winners or can make different % prices are these three winners.

Also, gambling site needs good promotions to attract many gamblers.

[1of16.game]

Why isn't the winning number based on the last character of the block hash of the last bet placed in the group? The way I understand that you've designed this is extremely open to fixing - your system "randomly" picks a number once all the bets are in? How is that provably fair? What stops you from betting in each group and picking your own number?

If that's not the way it works, you should do a better job of explaining because "The winning number determines the blockchain" isn't proper English.

the choice of the winner is extremely simple. As soon as the 16th round bet is confirmed, the next hash determines the winner. This happens automatically and can be traced to the blocking info (links to all actions in the statistics at the end of the site)

[Caladonian]

Why isn't the winning number based on the last character of the block hash of the last bet placed in the group? The way I understand that you've designed this is extremely open to fixing - your system "randomly" picks a number once all the bets are in? How is that provably fair? What stops you from betting in each group and picking your own number?

If that's not the way it works, you should do a better job of explaining because "The winning number determines the blockchain" isn't proper English.

the choice of the winner is extremely simple. As soon as the 16th round bet is confirmed, the next hash determines the winner. This happens automatically and can be traced to the blocking info (links to all actions in the statistics at the end of the site)

i like the idea but i'm also worried about your statement that its a automatically choose by the system do you have any proofs that the winners
didn't came from your side as you are still starting the business you should provide more proofs that the system is fair and all the transactons
are legit just for my own opinion dev.