Antminer L3+ Blissz firmware (14/01/2018 v1.02 stable)

[KougarLOB]

What would be an ideal HW error rate for D3 or L3+?  Instructions say to raise the frequency until you see a "few" HW errors an hour but that's subjective.  Would ideal be .03%?  .05? .1? .5%?
Anyone have suggestions on what one should define an acceptable rate?

For example, the Futurebit Moonlander2 guy suggested adjusting his miners until it hit about 1-2% error rate.

[1713883284]

1713883284

[1713883284]

1713883284

[bitsolutions]

Still waiting for a response, btw.

What's the word on making the GPL3 source code available for review, Blissz?

To add some encouragement to getting this released, I'll be issuing a DMCA takedown to have bitcointalk remove this thread for copyright violations in 24 hours if the complete corresponding source code to the distributed firmware binaries is not uploaded by then. I am a one of a number of cgminer copyright holders.

[greyday]

Still waiting for a response, btw.

What's the word on making the GPL3 source code available for review, Blissz?

To add some encouragement to getting this released, I'll be issuing a DMCA takedown to have bitcointalk remove this thread for copyright violations in 24 hours if the complete corresponding source code to the distributed firmware binaries is not uploaded by then. I am a one of a number of cgminer copyright holders.

As a fellow rights representative (in the music industry, but still), I completely respect your intentions and your rights here. What I would suggest for the community's sake is requesting that the thread be locked and the download link be removed until the situation is resolved, so that people already using the firmware can still access the conversation (for support purposes).

Also I noticed in the D3 thread that the author did eventually address similar concerns, so maybe giving more than 24hrs? I don't know how long you've been trying to contact him/her, however, just a though.

[Littledragons]

Still waiting for a response, btw.

What's the word on making the GPL3 source code available for review, Blissz?

To add some encouragement to getting this released, I'll be issuing a DMCA takedown to have bitcointalk remove this thread for copyright violations in 24 hours if the complete corresponding source code to the distributed firmware binaries is not uploaded by then. I am a one of a number of cgminer copyright holders.

Yeah man. Definitely take a breather. The guys probably got a day job and f doing this on the side. He's done some great work, I do understand where you're coming from, but the only other people in the space want 40+ dollars per machine to download their firmware.
Having a decently open dev working on this is pretty nice for all if us.

[blissz]

Hi all,

As you might have noticed there is some discussion going on about the GPL license of the cgminer software that's used in my firmware.
I was not aware of this GPL license, but I am now, and I am quite sure the source should be published.
As I don't have enough time to do it now and want to do it properly I decided to temporary remove the download link to the modified firmware and lock the topic until this GPL issue is resolved. This will prevent that this topic get's locked / removed for ever and valuable information gets lost.
I hope I can resolve this issue as soon as possible. Sorry for the inconvenience,

ciao Blissz

ps. Please respect this and don't PM me for links to the firmware.