Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 09:20:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Etherscan Vs Ethplorer  (Read 265 times)
xianbits (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 257



View Profile
November 04, 2017, 06:24:28 AM
 #1

Pardon if it has already been ask. Please inform me if there are threads for this already as I can't find one.
Okay, I know that these are useful ethereum blockchain explorers but I am quiet confused to why are these two sites give different estimated values of tokens? Which one can be considered more accurate than other?

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▌                          ▐
▌      ███████████████     ▐
▌      ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀     ▐
▌      ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄         ▐
▌      █████████████▄      ▐
▌      ████      ▀███▌     ▐
▌      ████       ▐███     ▐
▌      ████      ▄███▌     ▐
▌      █████████████▀      ▐
▌      ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀         ▐
▌      ████                ▐
▌      ████                ▐
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

ERSISTENCE
BUILDING THE BRIDGE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Protocol Powering
Next-Gen Financial Products
/            ━━━
Buy XPRT
\               ▄▄▄▄
          ▄██▀▀▀▀██▄
     ▄▄▄▄██▀      ▀██
  ▄██▀▀▀██▀        ▐█▌
 ██▀     █▀  ▄    ▄██
▐█▌        ▄██▄▄▄██▀
 ██▄      ▄██▀▀▀▀
  ▀██▄▄▄▄██▀ 
     ▀▀▀▀   
DeFi
 
   ▄██▄  ▀████████▄
 ▄██▀▀██▄        ▀██▄
███    ▀██▄        ███
 ▀██▄    ▀██▄    ▄██▀
   ▀██▄    ▀██▄▄██▀
     ▀██▄    ▀██▀
       ▀██▄▄██▀
         ▀██▀
NFT
 

                    ▄██▄
                  ▄██▀▀██▄
       ▄██▄     ▄██▀    ▀██▄
     ▄██▀▀██▄ ▄██▀        ▀██▄
   ▄██▀    █████            ▀██▄
 ▄██▀    ▄██▀ ▀██▄            ▀██▄
██▀    ▄███▄▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▄
PoS

ANN | Twitter | Medium | GitHub
Reddit | YouTube | Discord
Telegram ANN | Telegram Community
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713993611
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713993611

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713993611
Reply with quote  #2

1713993611
Report to moderator
1713993611
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713993611

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713993611
Reply with quote  #2

1713993611
Report to moderator
1713993611
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713993611

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713993611
Reply with quote  #2

1713993611
Report to moderator
nomad1109
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


Medichain: The Medical Big-Data Platform


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 08:16:48 AM
 #2

Well ethplorer prices my 5M eDoge with above 49k dollars. That's about 99,99% wrong, as it nearly has no value at all. So there's a bug in there somewhere. Etherscan doesn't give a price for it at all. It seems like Etherscan takes their prices straight off Etherdelta. I'm not sure what the fuck ethplorer does.

Glory90
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 101


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 10:03:00 AM
 #3

different estimated values of tokens but this is normal because Etherscan and Ethplorer was developed with different team, different estimation values of tokens caused by:
  • use of APIs from different exchanges
  • BUG in Etherscan or Ethplorer

Which one can be considered more accurate than other?

I think etherscan is more accurate than ethplore



▰▰▰   Ex-Bounty Hunter   ▰▰▰
27_Mikhail_27
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 100


A New Exchange Era


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 10:04:35 AM
 #4

By Ethplorer it's easier to add a token to your wallet. In my opinion, Etherscan shows a more accurate price for tokens, but it does not do it for all tokens. Yes, and the price is average, and the market has a variance! Therefore, I always keep track of prices for tokens directly on stock exchanges, not in my wallet Wink

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!