|
Leather
|
 |
November 19, 2017, 12:14:26 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the
first distributed timestamping system.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
hikky22
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:15:38 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors |
|
|
|
|
|
Leather
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:16:32 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors Nah, usually they are trying to abuse the system to gain more profit |
|
|
|
|
|
hikky22
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:18:43 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors Nah, usually they are trying to abuse the system to gain more profit I guess thats the part of security problem is there any others? |
|
|
|
|
|
Leather
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:23:02 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors Nah, usually they are trying to abuse the system to gain more profit I guess thats the part of security problem is there any others? Welp I guess there is no secure and easy way to invest in a crypto-basket with full market exposure in exchange for a single token exists. By introducing project infrastructure, investors will gain full access to the expertise of our highly experienced group of crypto-portfolio managers, allowing the profits to be shared. |
|
|
|
|
|
hikky22
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:24:31 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors Nah, usually they are trying to abuse the system to gain more profit I guess thats the part of security problem is there any others? Welp I guess there is no secure and easy way to invest in a crypto-basket with full market exposure in exchange for a single token exists. By introducing project infrastructure, investors will gain full access to the expertise of our highly experienced group of crypto-portfolio managers, allowing the profits to be shared. Lol It looks more like a socialism market right there |
|
|
|
|
|
Leather
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:26:25 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors Nah, usually they are trying to abuse the system to gain more profit I guess thats the part of security problem is there any others? Welp I guess there is no secure and easy way to invest in a crypto-basket with full market exposure in exchange for a single token exists. By introducing project infrastructure, investors will gain full access to the expertise of our highly experienced group of crypto-portfolio managers, allowing the profits to be shared. Lol It looks more like a socialism market right there Do you mean the perfect ecosystem for profits to be shared? |
|
|
|
|
|
hikky22
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:28:50 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors Nah, usually they are trying to abuse the system to gain more profit I guess thats the part of security problem is there any others? Welp I guess there is no secure and easy way to invest in a crypto-basket with full market exposure in exchange for a single token exists. By introducing project infrastructure, investors will gain full access to the expertise of our highly experienced group of crypto-portfolio managers, allowing the profits to be shared. Lol It looks more like a socialism market right there Do you mean the perfect ecosystem for profits to be shared? Yeah, thats neat. I like the concept itself but do you think it is really going to work? |
|
|
|
|
|
Leather
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:30:27 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors Nah, usually they are trying to abuse the system to gain more profit I guess thats the part of security problem is there any others? Welp I guess there is no secure and easy way to invest in a crypto-basket with full market exposure in exchange for a single token exists. By introducing project infrastructure, investors will gain full access to the expertise of our highly experienced group of crypto-portfolio managers, allowing the profits to be shared. Lol It looks more like a socialism market right there Do you mean the perfect ecosystem for profits to be shared? Yeah, thats neat. I like the concept itself but do you think it is really going to work? Sure, why not? If there`s an expertise of our highly experienced group of crypto-portfolio managers working what could go wrong? |
|
|
|
|
lokkiill
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:32:01 AM |
|
The layout for this thread is quite messy. Hard to see the useful information. Good luck devs
|
|
|
|
|
|
hikky22
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:35:48 AM |
|
The project seems to need really big funds just look at ths
''trading fees, broker-assisted fees, account maintenance fees, account transfer fees, selling fees and commission fees''
It is really cool that pre-sale has ended so fast, it means they already have what they need to start the project, or maybe 90% of it
but how how MarAnalysis really works?
Do you mean market analysis for this project? Yea thats the thing Im really interested in potential spending of the project This is just a standard costs to consider when buying real-world assets through a retail broker. In addition to the complexity of determining which costs apply to which assets, minimum fees apply that make investing small amounts unprofitable and exclude lower income groups from participating in the market. Percentage-wise, a user that can only invest $100 in an ETF pays a significantly higher fee than a professional trader investing $100,000 - they think its unfair so devs are trying to bring more ppl to the project. I dunno seems fair to me, I mean thats why professionals are being called this way But doncha think it would be better if anyone could get as much as professionals do It sounds great as a concept, but I thought that any project needs professionals more then normal investors Nah, usually they are trying to abuse the system to gain more profit I guess thats the part of security problem is there any others? Welp I guess there is no secure and easy way to invest in a crypto-basket with full market exposure in exchange for a single token exists. By introducing project infrastructure, investors will gain full access to the expertise of our highly experienced group of crypto-portfolio managers, allowing the profits to be shared. Lol It looks more like a socialism market right there Do you mean the perfect ecosystem for profits to be shared? Yeah, thats neat. I like the concept itself but do you think it is really going to work? Sure, why not? If there`s an expertise of our highly experienced group of crypto-portfolio managers working what could go wrong? I dont know, there are many feedback about the economic problems of this project |
|
|
|
|
|
geronimo77
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:41:53 AM |
|
The layout for this thread is quite messy. Hard to see the useful information. Good luck devs
Why wont you look at the first post? It is being updated all the time so if you need any new information about the project check the post. People are just trying to discuss the upcoming problems of the project so the devs would fix them |
|
|
|
|
|
Mrbee
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:45:56 AM |
|
The layout for this thread is quite messy. Hard to see the useful information. Good luck devs
It is a forum after all, if you want any useful info check the whitepaper |
|
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:50:30 AM |
|
If any investor can get access to the expertise group of crypto-portfolio managers Im in, good luck devs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
okaypool
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:55:35 AM |
|
Is there any way to through cpu?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kaito
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:57:23 AM |
|
Is there any way to through cpu?
Yes you can but it doesnt makes sense because algorithm using ASIC miner |
|
|
|
|
|
okaypool
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:59:30 AM |
|
Is there any way to through cpu?
Yes you can but it doesnt makes sense because algorithm using ASIC miner Really? ASIC? Most of the devs dont even like to use that stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
kaito
|
|
November 19, 2017, 01:02:12 AM |
|
Is there any way to through cpu?
Yes you can but it doesnt makes sense because algorithm using ASIC miner Really? ASIC? Most of the devs dont even like to use that stuff They only said that there is no need to purchase ASIC for profit, I dont think they hate the idea |
|
|
|
|
|
okaypool
|
|
November 19, 2017, 01:06:02 AM |
|
Is there any way to through cpu?
Yes you can but it doesnt makes sense because algorithm using ASIC miner Really? ASIC? Most of the devs dont even like to use that stuff They only said that there is no need to purchase ASIC for profit, I dont think they hate the idea Whats the best option to buy ASIC then? |
|
|
|
|
|
kaito
|
|
November 19, 2017, 01:08:10 AM |
|
Is there any way to through cpu?
Yes you can but it doesnt makes sense because algorithm using ASIC miner Really? ASIC? Most of the devs dont even like to use that stuff They only said that there is no need to purchase ASIC for profit, I dont think they hate the idea Whats the best option to buy ASIC then? You can get one on amazon, sorry I dont have any info. I just dont use it |
|
|
|
|
|
