BitcoinEXpress (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
|
 |
June 17, 2013, 05:24:52 PM
Last edit: May 30, 2016, 11:09:02 AM by BitcoinEXpress |
|
delete
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
|
June 17, 2013, 05:27:22 PM |
|
Well, the gauntlet has been thrown down! Let the games begin!
|
more or less retired.
|
|
|
bitdwarf
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
The cryptocoin watcher
|
|
June 17, 2013, 05:47:22 PM |
|
Let the games begin!
 |
𝖄𝖆𝖈: YF3feU4PNLHrjwa1zV63BcCdWVk5z6DAh5 · 𝕭𝖙𝖈: 12F78M4oaNmyGE5C25ZixarG2Nk6UBEqme
Ɏ: "the altcoin for the everyman, where the sweat on one's brow can be used to cool one's overheating CPU" -- theprofileth
|
|
|
|
FiiNALiZE
|
|
June 17, 2013, 05:57:44 PM |
|
Damn shits gonna hit the fan soon. I'll get my popcorn ready  |
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:07:42 PM |
|
It will take me a couple of days to get a block explorer up and going.
The main point of attack will be 51% utilizing several botnets and a pool.
Needlessss to say the DGC pools will be DDoS'd into oblivion to reduce the hash rate below 500M/s.
The second point of attack that is just as lethal that I haven't used on a chain in a while will be a modified version of that genius kid Artforz time travel exploit. As my old nemesis Coinhunter would say, time for me to channel Artforz (rip), dig up my Teletubbies, put on my Artforz tin foil hat and bring it on.
Time frame to call DGC dead, 7-10 days.
~BCX~
It's so rare that a person gets to say "time travel" especially when planning an attack. |
more or less retired.
|
|
|
|
rbdrbd
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:11:42 PM |
|
I am wondering why among DGC and ARG, neither has a POS featureset. Not like it would help before 30 days of them being out, but if anything having POS blocks could go a long way towards strengthening the coins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gica_contra
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:15:35 PM |
|
do it for the lulz
|
|
|
|
|
|
FiiNALiZE
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:17:51 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
It's called: overconfidence. |
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:20:44 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
Well, thems da' breaks I guess. At least when people wanted to 51% Terracoin I asked politely for people not to. :-) |
more or less retired.
|
|
|
|
nearmiss
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:21:01 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
don't DDoS mah pool please!  |
Profit-Switching Pool w/ Vardiff -> http://hashco.ws Optionally keep the alts we mine or auto-trade for BTC. In addition can be paid out in any of: 365, AC, BC, BTC, C2, CINNI, COMM, FAC, HBN, MINT, PMC, QRK, RDD, WC, XBC |
|
|
|
|
|
rbdrbd
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:27:39 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
It's called: overconfidence. I'm inclined to agree...I think it's a bit premature to throw a 1GH attack against the coin, especially when most/much of the miners are sitting in vulnerable pushpools. The wallet does have up to date checkpoints, but you'll still be 51%ing the network. ...one where the coin has no POS, a 20 second block time with only 5 confirms required. I hold a decent amount of DGC currently (half mined, half bought) and this has me a bit concerned. |
|
|
|
|
|
FiiNALiZE
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:29:21 PM |
|
Still the dev did openly challenge anyone to 51% his coin so...
|
|
|
|
|
BazkieBumpercar
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:29:40 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
It's just a remark made in the sense of, 'you'd need a large botneed to do so, probably not going to happen', not an *actual challenge*. That idiots here pick it up like that and are going to try to kill it, that's because people suck, not because the dev actually expected that to happen. Threads like these are the reason I am a misantrope. |
|
|
|
|
|
FiiNALiZE
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:31:48 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
It's just a remark made in the sense of, 'you'd need a large botneed to do so, probably not going to happen', not an *actual challenge*. That idiots here pick it up like that and are going to try to kill it, that's because people suck, not because the dev actually expected that to happen. Threads like these are the reason I am a misantrope. Misantropes are hypocrites because they themselves are human  |
|
|
|
|
BazkieBumpercar
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:32:50 PM |
|
Why, maybe I actually hate myself for being human |
|
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:32:59 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
Marketing tactic? Were all talking about it now |
|
|
|
|
nearmiss
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:33:35 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
don't DDoS mah pool please! Do you have a DGC pool? ~BCX~ I do  |
Profit-Switching Pool w/ Vardiff -> http://hashco.ws Optionally keep the alts we mine or auto-trade for BTC. In addition can be paid out in any of: 365, AC, BC, BTC, C2, CINNI, COMM, FAC, HBN, MINT, PMC, QRK, RDD, WC, XBC |
|
|
|
FiiNALiZE
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:33:54 PM |
|
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
Marketing tactic? Were all talking about it now lol marketing tactic...until it backfires and the community takes you seriously. |
|
|
|
Oldminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:35:15 PM |
|
ok...
|
|
|
|
|
