Bitcoin Forum
July 16, 2018, 09:03:50 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 [381] 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 ... 456 »
  Print  
Author Topic: BiblePay | Masternodes | Sanctuaries | POBH - ASIC Resistant | 10% ORPHANS  (Read 85829 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
slovakia
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 08, 2018, 06:14:35 PM
 #7601

jaapgvk we see that nobody want your bbp  Grin Grin

🕇 BiblePay | Masternodes | CPU only | ROSETTA@HOME Curing diseases | 10% goes to charity 🕇

BiblePay (BBP) | Reddit - Twitter - Forum - Slack - Discord | C-CEX - CoinsMarkets
1531731830
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531731830

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531731830
Reply with quote  #2

1531731830
Report to moderator
1531731830
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531731830

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531731830
Reply with quote  #2

1531731830
Report to moderator
1531731830
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531731830

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531731830
Reply with quote  #2

1531731830
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1531731830
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531731830

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531731830
Reply with quote  #2

1531731830
Report to moderator
noxpost
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 08, 2018, 06:45:22 PM
 #7602

Also: if anyone wants to write a few words for me about how it's like to write orphans (for the coming new website) I'll be very thankful!

Just sent you something via PM. Hopefully it will help.
noxpost
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 08, 2018, 08:55:49 PM
 #7603

I noticed some funky values for BiblePay on CoinMarketCap:
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/biblepay/
It looks like Lich BiblePay Central Explorer might be reindexing?
https://explorer.biblepay-central.org/

Yes, my Explorer is still indexing. Which is weird, as it does this for 3 days now. It is really slow, but the system is idling a lot. It imports around 1 transaction per second, which might take a long time until it is done, but I can't find a problem. Except that it is slow.

Does anybody has an idea?

Info: I just added http://explorebiblepay.com/ to biblepay-central.
BUT: We should really try to make all explorer HTTPS only. It simply looks way better then plain http for a crypto website Smiley

By the way, http://explorer.biblepay.org:3001/ is stuck, too, for some hours.


Hmm - is the machine reasonably busy? Maybe try renice-ing the index job, and ensuring that you aren't doing a lot of swapping out of the mongodb back and forth? What is the system doing when the index job is idling?

As for the HTTPS - you are probably right, I suppose. I'll add that to my todo list.

https://explorebiblepay.com is now utilizing HTTPS. Yay. Smiley
cryptocadxyz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 08, 2018, 10:02:55 PM
 #7604

Hey guys, I just noticed something odd. In the last superblock, my ARM wallet for some reason didn't receive anything. It has been working fine for weeks, then at 45510, the UTXOWeight dropped to 0 in the pool superblock view. It is listed as unbanked, the task weight is 100%, it had 211 staked with 1101 RAC. I checked exec testvote and I see that the wallet is in the next superblock, but just curious if anyone has an idea how to diagnose what happened? Seems like a one-off behaviour. Here's a copy of the report from the pool superblock view. Thanks!

45510   5/8/2018 4:28:45 PM   cryptocadxyzARM   5b24af355537cdfea716340c3b6745c4   0.135   0   100   1   211   1101   0   1101   3   16
sunk818
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 110


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 03:41:52 AM
 #7605

Hey guys, I just noticed something odd. In the last superblock, my ARM wallet for some reason didn't receive anything. It has been working fine for weeks, then at 45510, the UTXOWeight dropped to 0 in the pool superblock view. It is listed as unbanked, the task weight is 100%, it had 211 staked with 1101 RAC. I checked exec testvote and I see that the wallet is in the next superblock, but just curious if anyone has an idea how to diagnose what happened? Seems like a one-off behaviour. Here's a copy of the report from the pool superblock view. Thanks!

45510   5/8/2018 4:28:45 PM   cryptocadxyzARM   5b24af355537cdfea716340c3b6745c4   0.135   0   100   1   211   1101   0   1101   3   16

I did not receive anything for ARM either (unbanked).

Someone said some sanctuaries got back-to-back payment.

Something is amiss.

Also, for orphans, why sell everything in 7 days? Does it make more sense to sell in 28 days (a little bit each day)? Is it too much administrative burden? Can this be scheduled ahead of time at market rate each day? Or is there no difference selling a little each day versus selling the month's worth in 7 days?
noxpost
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 03:58:25 AM
 #7606

Anyone else seeing that every masternode just got changed to watchdog_expired?

masternode count enabled now returns 8
noxpost
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 04:03:36 AM
 #7607

Anyone else seeing that every masternode just got changed to watchdog_expired?

masternode count enabled now returns 8

Strange - my windows machine returns 8. It dropped right before my eyes.

Going over to my sancs, each of them show 148. So I restarted the windows client and now everything is good again...odd.
bible_pay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 114



View Profile WWW
May 09, 2018, 04:29:05 AM
 #7608

Hey guys, I just noticed something odd. In the last superblock, my ARM wallet for some reason didn't receive anything. It has been working fine for weeks, then at 45510, the UTXOWeight dropped to 0 in the pool superblock view. It is listed as unbanked, the task weight is 100%, it had 211 staked with 1101 RAC. I checked exec testvote and I see that the wallet is in the next superblock, but just curious if anyone has an idea how to diagnose what happened? Seems like a one-off behaviour. Here's a copy of the report from the pool superblock view. Thanks!

45510   5/8/2018 4:28:45 PM   cryptocadxyzARM   5b24af355537cdfea716340c3b6745c4   0.135   0   100   1   211   1101   0   1101   3   16

I did not receive anything for ARM either (unbanked).

Someone said some sanctuaries got back-to-back payment.

Something is amiss.

Also, for orphans, why sell everything in 7 days? Does it make more sense to sell in 28 days (a little bit each day)? Is it too much administrative burden? Can this be scheduled ahead of time at market rate each day? Or is there no difference selling a little each day versus selling the month's worth in 7 days?

I see your cpid in exec unbanked, and dont see a problem.  We'll have to look at this deeper if it happens again.

As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way. 

🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇  Announcement | ForumSlackDiscordRedditTwitter | C-CEXCoinsMarkets  🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
sunk818
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 110


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 04:55:03 AM
 #7609

I see your cpid in exec unbanked, and dont see a problem.  We'll have to look at this deeper if it happens again. As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way.  

If no unbanked got paid, isn't that a problem? I didn't get paid either...? I should have gotten ~386 BBP last superblock. I get it though, it is only a handful of people that use unbanked, so it isn't a big priority...

https://explorebiblepay.com/address/BNgMnng7mBtCcnKs8orJT5peWkj6nsCAoG
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1992796/

For the last superblock, is the budget 1165971.783? It is not 1,161,612.18? That's a difference of 4,359.61... is 4k more being paid out? I get maybe the explorer is truncating some decimals or there is a rounding error, but 4k is a big difference from 1165 vs 1161.
https://explorebiblepay.com/tx/7471bed4c45df129da8c3b0ee19d13c2bd6f80cd70d7be0786dcfe891bce601f
jaapgvk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 103



View Profile
May 09, 2018, 06:01:03 AM
 #7610

I see your cpid in exec unbanked, and dont see a problem.  We'll have to look at this deeper if it happens again. As far as back-to-back sancs can get back to back payments if their order is established that way.  

If no unbanked got paid, isn't that a problem? I didn't get paid either...? I should have gotten ~386 BBP last superblock. I get it though, it is only a handful of people that use unbanked, so it isn't a big priority...

https://explorebiblepay.com/address/BNgMnng7mBtCcnKs8orJT5peWkj6nsCAoG
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1992796/

For the last superblock, is the budget 1165971.783? It is not 1,161,612.18? That's a difference of 4,359.61... is 4k more being paid out? I get maybe the explorer is truncating some decimals or there is a rounding error, but 4k is a big difference from 1165 vs 1161.
https://explorebiblepay.com/tx/7471bed4c45df129da8c3b0ee19d13c2bd6f80cd70d7be0786dcfe891bce601f

I didn't get an unbanked payment either, so I guess that maybe it's something on the pool-side, since that is handling the unbanked I guess?

CPID: 8791a036b545f35e9ebd9333922738ac
https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/podc/user/1986929/

🕇 BiblePay 🕇
🕇 Announcement | ForumDiscordRedditTwitter | C-CEXQIEX 🕇
🕇 A Christian cryptocurrency | Supporting orphans through a decentralized autonomous charity 🕇
MIP
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 06:51:09 AM
 #7611

My windows wallet can't do podc updates either. It didn't do any automatically for more than 24h and if I try to force exec podcupdate it says this:



{
  "Command": "podcupdate",
  "PODCUpdate": "Processed 0 tasks for CPID 96892ec0fc8a2710fa84f26c9c84cd3e"
}

Edit: I tried "exec podcupdate true" with the same negative result, but surprisingly this worked

exec podcupdate true debuginfowhatever
{
  "Command": "podcupdate",
  "PODCUpdate": "Processed (1) over 1 CPID(s) successfully."
}

Weird
Lichtsucher
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 3


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 07:44:02 AM
 #7612

Light, everytime that I add some new miners to PurePool, it seems that my Ratio (%) is increased artificially and I see how the old miners decrease their numbers of Shares. Probably your pool is increasing the difficulty due to the 150% threshold that was artificially increased due to the new miners just added.
1) How can I see my current difficulty assigned to my workers by your pool?
1) How can I see my ratio? I know that you have hidden this because most of the accounts were in the safe zone (but not mine).
2) How long does it take the % to stabilize after adding new miners?
Thanks in advance.

Hi afeno,

my plan is to remove the legacy code for the rating this weekend, as it is no longer needed.
Hadn't seen anything unusual in the last days regarding any miner and this old rating code.
I hadn't seen anything you describe, but the system is rate the miners every hour, so it might be possible in theory and I had missed it. But it would require a miner that is already close to the 150% and then add a miner that is worst then the old one.
But as said, this (theoretical) situation should no longer be a problem after the weekend.


Purepool Biblepay Pool (https://www.purepool.org)
Mining How-To (https://www.biblepay-central.org/en/mining-how-to/)
noxpost
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 04:07:10 PM
 #7613

Slightly different topic here -

I am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.
sunk818
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 110


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 04:14:51 PM
 #7614

Strange - my windows machine returns 8. It dropped right before my eyes.
Going over to my sancs, each of them show 148. So I restarted the windows client and now everything is good again...odd.

I can only guess that because of Windows 10 patches and automatic reboots yesterday, many Windows based BiblePay QT wallets dropped off.
BtcMan2009
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 311



View Profile
May 09, 2018, 04:35:33 PM
 #7615

I was very touched by the fact that such a avid time, where everyone thinks only about how to fill their pockets with money and driven by greed. The team finds time and opportunity to do charity work for the present. Monthly sponsoring of orphans. That's commendable.  Smiley


GLOBAL DECENTRALIZED ADVERTISING EXCHANGE

Token sale: MAY 21

                                  ▄█▄      ▄█▄        
                                 █████    █████       
                        ▄██▄     ▀█▀      ▀█▀        
                ▄█▄    ▀██▀                           
         ▄     ▀█▀                        ▄█▄        
        ▀█▀                      ▄█▄     █████       
                        ▄██▄    █████     ▀█▀        
   ██          ▄█▄    ▀██▀     ▀█▀                  
         ▄     ▀█▀                        ▄█▄        
        ▀█▀                      ▄█▄     █████       
                        ▄██▄    █████     ▀█▀        
   ██          ▄█▄    ▀██▀     ▀█▀                  
                ▀█▀                                    
          ▄                      ▄█▄      ▄█▄        
         ▀█▀           ▄██▄    █████    █████       
   ██          ▄█▄    ▀██▀     ▀█▀      ▀█▀        
                ▀█▀                                    
           ▄                      ▄█▄     ▄█▄        
          ▀█▀            ▄██▄   █████   █████       
    ██            ▄█▄   ▀██▀    ▀█▀     ▀█▀        
             ▄    ▀█▀                                 
            ▀█▀                         ▄█▄           
       ██              ▄█▄   ▄██▄    █████          
                  ▄    ▀█▀   ▀██▀     ▀█▀           
                 ▀█▀                                   
            ██                   ▄██▄                 
                    ▄     ▄█▄   ▀██▀                 
                   ▀█▀    ▀█▀                          

▄█   ▄█  ▄█        ▄█████▄   ▀█▄     ▄█▀
██   ██  ██▄▄▄▄▄   ██▀   ▀██    ▀█▄  ▄█▀
██   ██  ██▀▀▀▀██  ██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀      ████   
██   ██  ██   ██  ██▄   ▄█    ▄██▀▀██▄   
▀██████▀  ▀██████▀  ▀███████▀   ▄██▀   ▀██▄
Telegram
Facebook
ANN Thread
Youtube
LinkedIn
Twitter
Medium
Reddit
Github
vahtis
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 05:11:27 PM
 #7616

Slightly different topic here -

I am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.

Sounds interesting. Wish I had more freetime.
sunk818
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 110


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 05:33:39 PM
 #7617

I was very touched by the fact that such a avid time, where everyone thinks only about how to fill their pockets with money and driven by greed. The team finds time and opportunity to do charity work for the present. Monthly sponsoring of orphans. That's commendable.  Smiley

Deuteronomy 15:7-8,10-11 English Standard Version (ESV)

7 “If among you, one of your brothers should become poor, in any of your towns within your land that the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother, 8 but you shall open your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be.

10 You shall give to him freely, and your heart shall not be grudging when you give to him, because for this the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake. 11 For there will never cease to be poor in the land. Therefore I command you, ‘You shall open wide your hand to your brother, to the needy and to the poor, in your land.’
BivanF
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 6

Open and Transparent Science


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 05:49:45 PM
 #7618

when this coin started i thought that it was one big joke , but i have to say that i underestimated thisone , and still asicresistant , not much coins are that

  ORVIUM            Open and Transparent Science
『 https://orvium.io/ 』   Powered By Blockchain
slovakia
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 09, 2018, 07:05:10 PM
 #7619

Slightly different topic here -

I am ALMOST certain that at one point - can't remember where I saw this, though - there had been an investigation into making a Ledger Nano app for BBP - and if I remember correctly, the conclusion was that it was super expensive and difficult if we didn't have a grassroots campaign supporting it. But we could get access to the SDK and build it ourselves, I think...what do we think about doing that? I feel like that would be pretty cool exposure for BBP. A small team of people with dev skills could probably knock it out relatively quickly if we thought it was worthwhile.
im asked LEDGER NANO TEAM via email and i received from them PM



ANSWER from NANO LEDGE S HW WALLET about BBP

There are a lot of altcoins and as Ledger has limited resources it cannot integrate them all. The conditions to integrate an altcoin are one of the following: - massive general support and high market cap (ex: Ethereum) - development sponsored by the coin's community (ex: Litecoin) - direct developer integration using Ledger's SDK

For information, the "altcoin package" costs 78,000 EUR and includes: - development of altcoin's Nano S / Blue app - altcoin support added to the Ledger Wallet Chrome app - altcoin explorer API development for the backend - 1,000 Ledger Nano S unit with altcoin's logo laser engraving

We can also do only the firmware/software part without the 1,000 Nano S for 20,000 EUR.

This price is valid only for blockchains inheriting from already supported coins (Bitcoin, Peercoin, Ethereum...) If your blockchain is 100% original, then pricing can be much higher.

In any case it's best to join our Slack http://slack.ledger.co to discuss integration with our engineers.

🕇 BiblePay | Masternodes | CPU only | ROSETTA@HOME Curing diseases | 10% goes to charity 🕇

BiblePay (BBP) | Reddit - Twitter - Forum - Slack - Discord | C-CEX - CoinsMarkets
afeno
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 09, 2018, 09:15:55 PM
 #7620

Light, everytime that I add some new miners to PurePool, it seems that my Ratio (%) is increased artificially and I see how the old miners decrease their numbers of Shares. Probably your pool is increasing the difficulty due to the 150% threshold that was artificially increased due to the new miners just added.
1) How can I see my current difficulty assigned to my workers by your pool?
1) How can I see my ratio? I know that you have hidden this because most of the accounts were in the safe zone (but not mine).
2) How long does it take the % to stabilize after adding new miners?
Thanks in advance.

Hi afeno,

my plan is to remove the legacy code for the rating this weekend, as it is no longer needed.
Hadn't seen anything unusual in the last days regarding any miner and this old rating code.
I hadn't seen anything you describe, but the system is rate the miners every hour, so it might be possible in theory and I had missed it. But it would require a miner that is already close to the 150% and then add a miner that is worst then the old one.
But as said, this (theoretical) situation should no longer be a problem after the weekend.


Thank you Light for the work you will do during the weekend. Based on my testing, when I was adding new miners to the pool, it was taking around 3 days to stabilize. I am glad that this pool will also follow the standard mining rules.
Pages: « 1 ... 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 [381] 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 ... 456 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!