BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes)

[Lichtsucher]

POW Diff up to 11920, I havent seen this level in a long time.  I think I will add a second axis to the pools difficulty report to plot both.

The Network hash exploded, too. Wow.
And my pool now has 500 active miners. One week ago it had 100 miners.

These numbers are looking a bit strange, I don't see such a huge grows in the forums or anywhere else. What might be the reason for this "silent" grows?

[1713498587]

1713498587

[1713498587]

1713498587

[1713498587]

1713498587

[1713498587]

1713498587

[1713498587]

1713498587

[capulo]

automatic utxo staking is not working for me correctly
hour ago it staked only 380k automaticaly... i have no idea why, i didnt do anything with wallet, it is running from yesterday
Transaction ID: 26fcc106734c4619ae61c805113b1daaf2b9b94401eb4e386aa1caf42c669aff-000
whats weird also, it says that: Total debit: -10.00000000 Biblepay
Total credit: 10.00000000 Biblepay
this is not true as in details it is:
Debit: -384 807.33333333 Biblepay
Credit: 5.00000000 Biblepay
Credit: 5.00000000 Biblepay
Credit: 384 797.33213373 Biblepay

[bible_pay]

Founder of MCAP Arrested:

https://www.latestly.com/india/information/bitcoin-scam-amit-bhardwaj-who-duped-people-of-rs-2000-crore-arrested-97956.html


(I saw MCAP going down to the zeroes level on CCEX and was wondering what happened...)

Note: Bhardwag faked a heart attack at the airport to slip by the police... escaped but has been arrested.

[bible_pay]

Wait, I know the problem dude.

Before 1.1.1.7 the wallet was not smart enough to parse negative numbers.  

You need 1.1.1.7 on the 2nd and 3rd miners with 'utxooverride=-1' set, then it will actually interpret the negative number as a number, and then heed the warning not to stake  PODC update...  Yes I think you need Lights update .

I updated all the heat miners to 1.1.1.8, but unfortunately this didn't change anything. The wallet again sent out the 3 podcupdates for 1/3 of the stakebalance each. For now I stopped them again, I think I will just start BOINCing on a second CPID for this purpose, associate a second wallet with this second CPID and copy this to the heat miners. Positive side-effect: I don't have my main balance staked on permanently unlocked wallets.

Ok, thanks, I will debug the code and find an easy way to turn off UTXO updates...

I actually had the same problem, had many machines heat mining, and there were always 3 podcupdates in groups (don't know why 3 thou). After updating and adding utxooverride=-1, this was fixed. Unfortunately, my controller wallet also doesn't automatically sends podcupdates, don't know why, monitoring for now and sending manual ones...

Hmmm... on your main controller, if you wait about 4 hours then check the log... look for "PODCUpdate"... see if any error message exists.
Your getmininginfo should show a HPS reading > 0.

Ill see if I can come up with something easy to show that we tried to send them.  Possibly a global variable we increment every time we try to process one (IE TotalPODCUpdates: 3) in getmininginfo, then at least people will know they are on autopilot.

Ill also add a second key something like 'disablepodc=1' for Dave.  Although Dave the utxoooverride=-1 is working for ZNJ...

[thesnat21]

The main pool hurts my eyes now!

I personally prefer the old black/grey theme over this

[thesnat21]

The Network hash exploded, too. Wow.
And my pool now has 500 active miners. One week ago it had 100 miners.

These numbers are looking a bit strange, I don't see such a huge grows in the forums or anywhere else. What might be the reason for this "silent" grows?

I suspect people who cannot earn w/  PODC are trying to mine POBH to get started?

[bible_pay]

POW Diff up to 11920, I havent seen this level in a long time.  I think I will add a second axis to the pools difficulty report to plot both.

The Network hash exploded, too. Wow.
And my pool now has 500 active miners. One week ago it had 100 miners.

These numbers are looking a bit strange, I don't see such a huge grows in the forums or anywhere else. What might be the reason for this "silent" grows?

Other than getting 25% more popular I think most of it has to do with everyone who used to heat mine finally has a CPID now, thats all I can hypothesize.

[bible_pay]

The main pool hurts my eyes now!

I personally prefer the old black/grey theme over this

Its going to have 3 themes available in Account settings:  Biblepay, Light, and Dark (it would be hilarious if I called them ISIS and Christian but I wont do that) anyway Im not sure how many days that will take to finish.

[noxpost]

Any more thoughts on adjusting the weighting for WCG credits? I know it might not be a top priority, but since everyone agrees that the difficulty rating is higher, I'm expecting that when we DO make the adjustment, that again many more BBP will be required for full staking, and just want to be prepared.

[bible_pay]

The main pool hurts my eyes now!

I personally prefer the old black/grey theme over this

Its going to have 3 themes available in Account settings:  Biblepay, Light, and Dark (it would be hilarious if I called them ISIS and Christian but I wont do that) anyway Im not sure how many days that will take to finish.

Ok now we have 2 themes: Biblepay and Dark, and the theme is working in Edge again.

However to use the theme please follow these instructions:

Log In
Go to Account Settings
Change your Theme
Save the Record
Log Out
Log In
Press Ctrl-F5

In a couple months we will ask a Dev to automatically refresh the page so you wont be required to go through the above steps.

[bible_pay]

Any more thoughts on adjusting the weighting for WCG credits? I know it might not be a top priority, but since everyone agrees that the difficulty rating is higher, I'm expecting that when we DO make the adjustment, that again many more BBP will be required for full staking, and just want to be prepared.

In my case I have a couple 6 core servers, one running WCG @ 100% utilization one running RAH @ 100% utilization.   Although we probably will need at least a 14 day baseline, let me check on them and see how they compare ...

[bible_pay]

Any more thoughts on adjusting the weighting for WCG credits? I know it might not be a top priority, but since everyone agrees that the difficulty rating is higher, I'm expecting that when we DO make the adjustment, that again many more BBP will be required for full staking, and just want to be prepared.

In my case I have a couple 6 core servers, one running WCG @ 100% utilization one running RAH @ 100% utilization.   Although we probably will need at least a 14 day baseline, let me check on them and see how they compare ...

So far the RAH server has 3000 RAC and the WCG server has 1000 WCG RAC, meaning WCG seems to be 3.0 * harder than RAH, but Id like to leave it run longer until both graphs taper off horizontally right now they are both climbing still.

[zthomasz]

Code:

[quote author=zthomasz link=topic=2388064.msg33959622#msg33959622 date=1522889325]
[quote author=orbis link=topic=2388064.msg33956316#msg33956316 date=1522882447]
[quote author=macko20 link=topic=2388064.msg33956206#msg33956206 date=1522882264]
[quote author=zthomasz link=topic=2388064.msg33956006#msg33956006 date=1522881937]
[quote author=bible_pay link=topic=2388064.msg33955427#msg33955427 date=1522880907]
[quote author=zthomasz link=topic=2388064.msg33954424#msg33954424 date=1522879254]


No PODC Updates sent the past 4 days, other than the one I sent manually yesterday. 

How do I set the PODC Updates to be automated?

Edited: Also does gen= and genproclimit= have to be set to a positive number ... mine is set to 0.
[/quote]

- Leave controller wallet on 24 hours a day [b]it stays on 24/7 [/b]
- genproclimit=1 (note that we default this to one) [b]changed genproclimit=0 to genproclimit=1[/b]

Check your exec stakebalance, ensure it has enough funds available also... [b]funds are available[/b]

Also, verify a PODC update is going out in your tx list - monitor it until you know its automated. [b]will do[/b]

To manually trigger one: exec podcupdate  See if it sends one or is throwing error. [b]Yes it sent one[/b]

Ensure your wallet is not locked or you have been entering the password on boot. [b]checked it, all ok[/b]

[/quote]

Answers in bold above.

Also is there a way to verify that PODC Updates are automated other than waiting until they show up in Transactions?
[/quote]

addnode=node.biblepay.org  
addnode=biblepay.inspect.network  
gen=1  
genproclimit=1 

[/quote]
and remember wallet must be unlocked for automatic podc updates...
on WIN just put the password on walllet start...
on linux use "biblepay-cli -headlesspodcpassword exec podcpasswordlength" after start
[/quote]

Thank you gentlemen, we'll see how things progress over the next several hours. 
[/quote]

It was probably that genproclimit=0 setting.  We require at least one thread running to send PODC updates

We do default to 1 when the setting is non-existent, but I believe this setting overrode the default.

Apparently the genproclimit=0 setting was causing the "No automatic PODC Update" problem.

I changed it to genproclimit=1 yesterday, and today I got the first auto PODC Update since setting genproclimit=0 four days ago.

 

[dave_bbp]

Hmmm... on your main controller, if you wait about 4 hours then check the log... look for "PODCUpdate"... see if any error message exists.
Your getmininginfo should show a HPS reading > 0.

Ill see if I can come up with something easy to show that we tried to send them.  Possibly a global variable we increment every time we try to process one (IE TotalPODCUpdates: 3) in getmininginfo, then at least people will know they are on autopilot.

Ill also add a second key something like 'disablepodc=1' for Dave.  Although Dave the utxoooverride=-1 is working for ZNJ...

Yes, I read that and was wondering why it wouldn't work for me. Maybe it's a specialty to the ARMs...
Anyway, don't stress out over it; as I said I created a secondary CPID just for this purpose and associated it with a secondary wallet, which I will copy to the heat miners. Let's see how this works out over the next couple of days. Even if there the bug occurs again I couldn't care less because this CPID is not gonna get alot of BBP anyway (it's only my old trusty T500 crunching some R@H jobs and running that controller wallet).

Btw: the dark theme on the pool is much more pleasant to the eyes. ;P

[noxpost]

Any more thoughts on adjusting the weighting for WCG credits? I know it might not be a top priority, but since everyone agrees that the difficulty rating is higher, I'm expecting that when we DO make the adjustment, that again many more BBP will be required for full staking, and just want to be prepared.

In my case I have a couple 6 core servers, one running WCG @ 100% utilization one running RAH @ 100% utilization.   Although we probably will need at least a 14 day baseline, let me check on them and see how they compare ...

So far the RAH server has 3000 RAC and the WCG server has 1000 WCG RAC, meaning WCG seems to be 3.0 * harder than RAH, but Id like to leave it run longer until both graphs taper off horizontally right now they are both climbing still.

Makes sense - thanks Rob, I appreciate it. FWIW, I've seen something comparable to 3:1 myself when switching over. Maybe more like 3.25:1 - but I'm only a single data point with not-very-many machines.

[capulo]

Wait, I know the problem dude.

Before 1.1.1.7 the wallet was not smart enough to parse negative numbers.  

You need 1.1.1.7 on the 2nd and 3rd miners with 'utxooverride=-1' set, then it will actually interpret the negative number as a number, and then heed the warning not to stake  PODC update...  Yes I think you need Lights update .

I updated all the heat miners to 1.1.1.8, but unfortunately this didn't change anything. The wallet again sent out the 3 podcupdates for 1/3 of the stakebalance each. For now I stopped them again, I think I will just start BOINCing on a second CPID for this purpose, associate a second wallet with this second CPID and copy this to the heat miners. Positive side-effect: I don't have my main balance staked on permanently unlocked wallets.

this happens to me today one hour before next superblock, automatic podcupdate sent 1/3 of stake balance. i'm on 1.1.1.7 wallet, i have only one wallet, no android, i dont move with coins or so

[tmike]

Any more thoughts on adjusting the weighting for WCG credits? I know it might not be a top priority, but since everyone agrees that the difficulty rating is higher, I'm expecting that when we DO make the adjustment, that again many more BBP will be required for full staking, and just want to be prepared.

In my case I have a couple 6 core servers, one running WCG @ 100% utilization one running RAH @ 100% utilization.   Although we probably will need at least a 14 day baseline, let me check on them and see how they compare ...

So far the RAH server has 3000 RAC and the WCG server has 1000 WCG RAC, meaning WCG seems to be 3.0 * harder than RAH, but Id like to leave it run longer until both graphs taper off horizontally right now they are both climbing still.

Makes sense - thanks Rob, I appreciate it. FWIW, I've seen something comparable to 3:1 myself when switching over. Maybe more like 3.25:1 - but I'm only a single data point with not-very-many machines.

Did you set up your device profile? My scores are about even for both it seems. The score doesn't match the wgc website score however.

https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/device/viewProfiles.do

[noxpost]

Did you set up your device profile? My scores are about even for both it seems. The score doesn't match the wgc website score however.

https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/device/viewProfiles.do

What do you have yours set to? Happy to try to change it and see the difference...

[tmike]

Did you set up your device profile? My scores are about even for both it seems. The score doesn't match the wgc website score however.

https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/device/viewProfiles.do

What do you have yours set to? Happy to try to change it and see the difference...

Not sure if it makes a difference but here you go: https://file.io/x85Zsl

[jaapgvk]

Any more thoughts on adjusting the weighting for WCG credits? I know it might not be a top priority, but since everyone agrees that the difficulty rating is higher, I'm expecting that when we DO make the adjustment, that again many more BBP will be required for full staking, and just want to be prepared.

In my case I have a couple 6 core servers, one running WCG @ 100% utilization one running RAH @ 100% utilization.   Although we probably will need at least a 14 day baseline, let me check on them and see how they compare ...

So far the RAH server has 3000 RAC and the WCG server has 1000 WCG RAC, meaning WCG seems to be 3.0 * harder than RAH, but Id like to leave it run longer until both graphs taper off horizontally right now they are both climbing still.

Makes sense - thanks Rob, I appreciate it. FWIW, I've seen something comparable to 3:1 myself when switching over. Maybe more like 3.25:1 - but I'm only a single data point with not-very-many machines.

Did you set up your device profile? My scores are about even for both it seems. The score doesn't match the wgc website score however.

https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/device/viewProfiles.do

My scores seem about 1/1 also. I have two identical servers running both RAH and WCG, so I don't know if the workload is even, but the RAC they produce for both projects seem in the same ballpark.

I'll assign one to RAH and one to WCG, and report back how that plays out in about a week or so.