Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 01:29:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: hash160 VS sha256 ?  (Read 648 times)
directoryio (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 06:30:06 PM
 #1

Number of hash160 = 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976
Number of sha256 = 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936

I do not understand why there is more hash in 256 than in 160.

thanks for responses and sorry for my bad english  Wink .
1714699758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714699758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714699758
Reply with quote  #2

1714699758
Report to moderator
Activity + Trust + Earned Merit == The Most Recognized Users on Bitcointalk
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714699758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714699758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714699758
Reply with quote  #2

1714699758
Report to moderator
1714699758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714699758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714699758
Reply with quote  #2

1714699758
Report to moderator
MJunioR
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 06:39:36 PM
 #2

RipeMD160 is more efficient when doing transactions, however, Sha256 will provide the security that MD160 can't. Both are used on BlockChains and both are useful to make it work properly.
directoryio (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 06:46:51 PM
 #3

RipeMD160 is more efficient when doing transactions, however, Sha256 will provide the security that MD160 can't. Both are used on BlockChains and both are useful to make it work properly.

but why 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976 address in hash160 and 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936 address in sha256  Huh
MJunioR
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 07:45:12 PM
 #4

RipeMD160 is more efficient when doing transactions, however, Sha256 will provide the security that MD160 can't. Both are used on BlockChains and both are useful to make it work properly.

but why 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976 address in hash160 and 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936 address in sha256  Huh

Sha256 is more complex, consequently, more secure, but at the same time requires more characters in it's encryption method. MD160 efficiency comes from this, less characters, shorter address, but less secure.
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3388
Merit: 4615



View Profile
November 14, 2017, 08:01:12 PM
Merited by ABCbits (2)
 #5

but why 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976 address in hash160 and 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936 address in sha256  Huh

The first one is a 160 bit hash.  That means that the hashing formula creates a 160 bit digest of the input data.  Since a "bit" is a binary digit (can have one of two possible values), the total number of possible values that can result is 2160.

2160 means to multiply 2 times itself 160 times.


The second one is a 256 bit hash.  That means that the hashing formula creates a 256 bit digest of the input data. Since a "bit" is a binary digit (can have one of two possible values), the total number of possible values that can result is 2256.

2256 means to multiply 2 times itself 256 times.
davinci6845
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 15, 2017, 12:49:02 AM
 #6

but why 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976 address in hash160 and 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936 address in sha256  Huh

The first one is a 160 bit hash.  That means that the hashing formula creates a 160 bit digest of the input data.  Since a "bit" is a binary digit (can have one of two possible values), the total number of possible values that can result is 2160.

2160 means to multiply 2 times itself 160 times.


The second one is a 256 bit hash.  That means that the hashing formula creates a 256 bit digest of the input data. Since a "bit" is a binary digit (can have one of two possible values), the total number of possible values that can result is 2256.

2256 means to multiply 2 times itself 256 times.

clear explanation. thank you for this
directoryio (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 15, 2017, 07:55:53 AM
 #7

Possible to reduce hash ?

Sha256====>ripemd160====>md5
blocklife
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 0

Look around you , nothing is secure


View Profile WWW
November 15, 2017, 10:59:32 AM
 #8

but why 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976 address in hash160 and 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936 address in sha256  Huh

The first one is a 160 bit hash.  That means that the hashing formula creates a 160 bit digest of the input data.  Since a "bit" is a binary digit (can have one of two possible values), the total number of possible values that can result is 2160.

2160 means to multiply 2 times itself 160 times.


The second one is a 256 bit hash.  That means that the hashing formula creates a 256 bit digest of the input data. Since a "bit" is a binary digit (can have one of two possible values), the total number of possible values that can result is 2256.

2256 means to multiply 2 times itself 256 times.


BEST ANSWER (check this directoryio)

The purpose of humanity : Genesis Chapter 1 (Rule)
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3388
Merit: 4615



View Profile
November 15, 2017, 02:38:33 PM
Merited by ABCbits (1)
 #9

Possible to reduce hash ?
Sha256====>ripemd160====>md5

Yes.  But if you want md5, then just use md5.  Why waste time with SHA256 and RIPEMD160 first?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!