Thank you, you are the only one that try to explain your point of view and ask serious question.
Thekool1s is a stupid guy. He posted a picture and I stopped reading from that point.
theultralite bla bla bla bla make your own forum...who forced him to read my message?
Being a member of this forum we can participate in conversations and state our own opinions. Just like you did in your OP. Now the question is will people like it or not? But that depends on the discretion of the person commenting and the not the person reading. If someone has a view respect that and you may have your own view but that does not mean that others will agree with you.
Probably most of you don't fully understand what I mean because a few months ago I was like you. I Never had thought that I could be involved in this thread. I am a legendary member tagged from Lauda that never had any discussion, never sell or bought account, never scam people.
I highly doubt this. Most of the threads in this section of the forum are made by butthurt signature spammers, scammers and shady people trying to run potential scams. Also account sellers and potential criminals. If none of that happened to you then why are you here?
Now I feel disgusted, I feel the sensation of something deeply unfair. I feel I have no way to defend myself because the only things you can do is write to DT1 members.
So I thought about asking to every bounty manager to put ~Lauda. It could be an alternative way of defend against Lauda.
Thats the decision of the bounty manager. Its their choice and not something you can enforce upon people.
I did a lot of research and asked to a lot of user tagged by Lauda.
I hate scammers and users that have multi accounts too, but here we are beyond the limit: a member tagged because Lauda hates bitcoincash, another member tagged for the intention to do something and not for something really proven.
If tomorrow Lauda decides to tag someone because she doesn't like the nickname, you don't really have a procedure to recover your trust status because "trust is not moderated"
You are getting it wrong. At one time when I was new to the forum and was doing signature campaigns for the first then I also had this idea that Lauda was neg tagging everyone he thinks he can. It gradually turned out that this was not the case and that I was also wrong. It seems that without the DT2 members this forum would be a shitload of scammers.
Remember that Lauda isn't Mother Teresa or a charity organization. She told that she spent a lot of her time doing this for free but if you think how is important reputation I see a conflic of interest (I see an avatar selling something).
I asked to a lot of moderators about some case and all of them told me that they didn't tagged those people but they aren't surprise that Lauda did.
I discovered that Lauda was removed from staff member because she did an extortion/blackmail
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761133.20Probably the exclusion from the staff member cause her to be angry with the entire world.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761133.20This is the post where she is red tagging anyone that supports Bitcoin Cash.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2420291.0And this is the incredible thread. I can't believe:Lauda, Sold bitcointalk accounts, Giving neg for others for same reason.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410318.0To be honest I think that 99% of people tagged by Lauda deserve that negative trust, the problem is if you are in that 1%.
I prefer an unpunished guilty rather than an innocent punishment and Lauda doesn't act in this direction.
My two cents.
This proves nothing but that you are butthurt and are willing to throw everything that has happened in this section at people whose work you dont know.
If you really have something to prove that you are innocent then put in front of the public and come out with your original account. If they are solid then steps will be taken.
