|
DPoS (OP)
|
 |
June 26, 2013, 11:30:59 PM |
|
So that big dive just went back on... thoughts?
Did someone trip over the ASICminer plug yesterday?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
k9quaint
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 26, 2013, 11:37:12 PM |
|
So that big dive just went back on... thoughts?
Did someone trip over the ASICminer plug yesterday?
ASICMiner is the only known colocation of mining gear large enough to cause a 30TH/s swing in the hash rate. |
Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
|
|
|
|
cp1
|
|
June 26, 2013, 11:40:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPoS (OP)
|
|
June 27, 2013, 12:16:15 AM |
|
What a beast...
|
|
|
|
|
cp1
|
|
June 27, 2013, 01:44:31 AM |
|
Anyone have a rough idea of what their costs were to build that? ( and what the total dollar cost of shares was? )
|
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
June 27, 2013, 08:51:36 AM |
|
And here http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/, more 'live' version. I monitored that page for a while yesterday, and noticed a jump in that green column (6 hour average) from 12 Thash to 50 Thash and then back down to 34 Thash! Also, I checked the mining pools stats at http://blockchain.info/pools, and that unknown slice was at 22% yesterday. I'm thinking that 30 Thash switching is not only from ASICMiner. |
|
|
|
|
|
Zephir
|
|
June 27, 2013, 09:04:00 AM |
|
The max network hashrate were 197 Th/s yesterday.
The graphs on the charts doesn´t show it now, just the counter on bitcoincharts showed it live yesterday.
This is more than 59 Th/s more than todays 138 Th/s.
I find it a bit disturbing, that someone has that hashpower or maybe Avalon just tested their batch 3 before shipping.
|
Signatures lead to paid signature programs which leads to spam!
Clearly we must eliminate the signatures... or ban the paid sig programs
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
June 27, 2013, 01:33:59 PM |
|
Notice this - last two retarget periods (25.5.-16.6) hashrate increased by 60 Thash!
In that time ASICMiner charts are showing increase from 20 to 40 Thash. So, 20 Thash increase is from ASICMiner, but where did the rest of 40 Thash came from?
In that time Avalon shipped a few units from batch #2, and BFL a couple hundreds(?) Jalapenos. But that's maybe 5-10 Thash. There is still more then 30 Thash of new power unacounted! Some unknown company developed an ASIC in secret?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
June 27, 2013, 02:12:57 PM |
|
Anyone have a rough idea of what their costs were to build that? ( and what the total dollar cost of shares was? )
Take a look at the original AM thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.0"IPO The GLBSE ticker is ASICMINER. 200,000 shares are issued. Initially, 30,000 are for public sale. 170,000 are for private bulk purchase via PMs and the asset transfer system of GLBSE. The ratio may be adjusted but the total number is always 200,000. The price per share is set at 0.1BTC." The price per share is set at 0.1BTC. <--!!! (august 2012) |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 27, 2013, 03:15:57 PM |
|
Notice this - last two retarget periods (25.5.-16.6) hashrate increased by 60 Thash!
In that time ASICMiner charts are showing increase from 20 to 40 Thash. So, 20 Thash increase is from ASICMiner, but where did the rest of 40 Thash came from?
In that time Avalon shipped a few units from batch #2, and BFL a couple hundreds(?) Jalapenos. But that's maybe 5-10 Thash. There is still more then 30 Thash of new power unacounted! Some unknown company developed an ASIC in secret?
bingo something is pushing hash rates through the roof but the SHIPPED ASIC's are only a drop in the bucket either unknown ASIC or BFL is mining using customer gear |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
cp1
|
|
June 27, 2013, 05:17:38 PM |
|
It must be that miner that uses lightning. Can't wait to get one!
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 27, 2013, 06:09:12 PM |
|
You guys know you can't just use a 6 hour windows to estimate hashrate, right? Right?!
|
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
June 27, 2013, 06:43:04 PM |
|
You guys know you can't just use a 6 hour windows to estimate hashrate, right? Right?!
Why? The point is on 'estimate', not to be exact to the last (M)hash. And what if that site http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/ is showing ASICMiners hashrate as reported directly by the blades? (BTW, now at 73 Thash 6 hour average) |
|
|
|
|
|
GodHatesFigs
|
|
June 29, 2013, 07:07:31 PM |
|
^ Variance, you tard
|
|
|
|
|
k9quaint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 29, 2013, 07:39:11 PM |
|
You guys know you can't just use a 6 hour windows to estimate hashrate, right? Right?!
Of course you can. You can use a 6 second window to estimate hash rate. It just won't be very accurate.  |
Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
|
|
|
|
Perseus353
|
|
June 30, 2013, 07:01:16 PM |
|
So that big dive just went back on... thoughts?
Did someone trip over the ASICminer plug yesterday?
ASICMiner is the only known colocation of mining gear large enough to cause a 30TH/s swing in the hash rate. Has ASICMiner been DDOS'ed lately? |
1CkV1H1CA67CjpG5QMxEgVU9tNto51DBHd
|
|
|
|
|
|
oaxaca
|
|
July 07, 2013, 05:30:57 AM |
|
I remember reading that that chart estimate is based on blocks found, not hashing power. A run of good luck would spike the number. |
|
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
July 07, 2013, 10:20:54 AM |
|
I remember reading that that chart estimate is based on blocks found, not hashing power. A run of good luck would spike the number.
Right. If chart is based on blocks found. What if it's based on number of shares submitted by workers? Like in pools? |
|
|
|
|
|
oaxaca
|
|
July 07, 2013, 07:07:25 PM |
|
I remember reading that that chart estimate is based on blocks found, not hashing power. A run of good luck would spike the number.
Right. If chart is based on blocks found. What if it's based on number of shares submitted by workers? Like in pools? They are solomining. |
|
|
|
|
|
