FREE CoinHive FaucetHub Script - Pay your users BTC for mining!

[tungaqhd]

Hi again!

So I'm in the process of installing your script. Trying to add ad units to the site. (A-ads stuff. Just testing right now.)
However, whenever I try to hit "change" on any of the open slots, I keep getting a 403 error. (Forbidden).

I'm not sure if this is an issue on the part of my hosting, or if there is something I'm doing wrong.
Appreciate the script immensely. Quite enjoying how easy it was to set up.

Thanks.

You should contact support and ask them to check security rules 

[kevin135]

Hi again!

So I'm in the process of installing your script. Trying to add ad units to the site. (A-ads stuff. Just testing right now.)
However, whenever I try to hit "change" on any of the open slots, I keep getting a 403 error. (Forbidden).

I'm not sure if this is an issue on the part of my hosting, or if there is something I'm doing wrong.
Appreciate the script immensely. Quite enjoying how easy it was to set up.

Thanks.

Thanks!

This isn't a script problem, it must be a problem with your host. I can take a look, but the script never returns a 403 error. Does it happen when you change anything else? There are a few bugs with the admin page. Try clearing cookies and logging in again.

[shaw1]

Sorry. Been working since 3 this morning, so I'm going to blame my idiocy on that. 

(Btw, if anyone else has this issue, solution:

Code:

# Turn off mod_security filtering.
<IfModule mod_security.c>
  SecFilterEngine Off
</IfModule>

In your htaccess.)

On a side note, will quite possibly PM you later to discuss purchasing of script, to eliminate your withdrawal fee.

And last question, (I promise, but I lie a lot), is it okay to modify this stuff, as long as we don't mess with any of the code that sends fees to you?

Appreciate your time.

[kevin135]

Sorry. Been working since 3 this morning, so I'm going to blame my idiocy on that. 

(Btw, if anyone else has this issue, solution:

Code:

# Turn off mod_security filtering.
<IfModule mod_security.c>
  SecFilterEngine Off
</IfModule>

In your htaccess.)

On a side note, will quite possibly PM you later to discuss purchasing of script, to eliminate your withdrawal fee.

And last question, (I promise, but I lie a lot), is it okay to modify this stuff, as long as we don't mess with any of the code that sends fees to you?

Appreciate your time.

Sure you may modify it, but you can't remove the fees and you can't distribute it without my permission. Other than that, have at it.

[Salmen]

To be honest, it's a shame to remove the original fee license and set own fees, as it is a violation and considers as stealing.
Leaving the original fee - as others do - in the script or doing a one-time payment clears this situation.

I've contributed the script to the publicity in order for a compensation and thereby keeping the service alive.

[kevin135]

To be honest, it's a shame to remove the original fee license and set own fees, as it is a violation and considers as stealing.
Leaving the original fee - as others do - in the script or doing a one-time payment clears this situation.

I've contributed the script to the publicity in order for a compensation and thereby keeping the service alive.

No it's not considered stealing. What service are you keeping alive? I could (no offense) care less about your personal faucet. You don't deserve compensation for what is, at this point, considered to be a new application. That compensation should be, and currently is, mine. Read your own license in your GitHub if you don't believe me. I have done no wrong, and the real members of the open source community will back me up. If your license doesn't prohibit something, I am free to do it as long as it is open source. I made a legitimately useful derivative work of yours, which I believe is better, and I can do whatever I want with it. If people want to modify yours to include my functionality, they can and I have no problem with that. But if they want to use my pre-created one, that's their choice to make. It's not like nobody else can do what I have done. I am just dedicated to make it super convenient to switch.

In addition, I created more useful features that people may want in a faucet, and have fixed your buggy code quite a bit (although there is still more work I need to do on it).

[tomos81]

To be honest, it's a shame to remove the original fee license and set own fees, as it is a violation and considers as stealing.
Leaving the original fee - as others do - in the script or doing a one-time payment clears this situation.

I've contributed the script to the publicity in order for a compensation and thereby keeping the service alive.

No it's not considered stealing. What service are you keeping alive? I could (no offense) care less about your personal faucet. Read your own license in your GitHub if you don't believe me. I have done no wrong, and the real members of the open source community will back me up. If your license doesn't prohibit something, I am free to do it as long as it is open source. I made a legitimately useful derivative work of yours, which I believe is better, and I can do whatever I want with it. If people want to modify yours to include my functionality, they can and I have no problem with that. But if they want to use my pre-created one, that's their choice to make. It's not like nobody else can do what I have done. I am just dedicated to make it super convenient to switch.

In addition, I created more useful features that people may want in a faucet, and have fixed your buggy code quite a bit (although there is still more work I need to do on it).

as i said before, kevin , you are simply pain in the ass without respecting others.
end;

[Salmen]

To be honest, it's a shame to remove the original fee license and set own fees, as it is a violation and considers as stealing.
Leaving the original fee - as others do - in the script or doing a one-time payment clears this situation.

I've contributed the script to the publicity in order for a compensation and thereby keeping the service alive.

No it's not considered stealing. What service are you keeping alive? I could (no offense) care less about your personal faucet. You don't deserve compensation for what is, at this point, considered to be a new application. That compensation should be, and currently is, mine. Read your own license in your GitHub if you don't believe me. I have done no wrong, and the real members of the open source community will back me up. If your license doesn't prohibit something, I am free to do it as long as it is open source. I made a legitimately useful derivative work of yours, which I believe is better, and I can do whatever I want with it. If people want to modify yours to include my functionality, they can and I have no problem with that. But if they want to use my pre-created one, that's their choice to make. It's not like nobody else can do what I have done. I am just dedicated to make it super convenient to switch.

In addition, I created more useful features that people may want in a faucet, and have fixed your buggy code quite a bit (although there is still more work I need to do on it).

If so, I could simply delete the project and/or provide a script with a backdoor. That's why there is the fee, openly on Github and declared. However, the license (MIT) requires the license and copyright which includes the fee.
At all, part of the compensation should belong to me because the most part of the script, the structure, is coded by me and not your. Mentioning "hard work" is the wrong way.

[kevin135]

To be honest, it's a shame to remove the original fee license and set own fees, as it is a violation and considers as stealing.
Leaving the original fee - as others do - in the script or doing a one-time payment clears this situation.

I've contributed the script to the publicity in order for a compensation and thereby keeping the service alive.

No it's not considered stealing. What service are you keeping alive? I could (no offense) care less about your personal faucet. You don't deserve compensation for what is, at this point, considered to be a new application. That compensation should be, and currently is, mine. Read your own license in your GitHub if you don't believe me. I have done no wrong, and the real members of the open source community will back me up. If your license doesn't prohibit something, I am free to do it as long as it is open source. I made a legitimately useful derivative work of yours, which I believe is better, and I can do whatever I want with it. If people want to modify yours to include my functionality, they can and I have no problem with that. But if they want to use my pre-created one, that's their choice to make. It's not like nobody else can do what I have done. I am just dedicated to make it super convenient to switch.

In addition, I created more useful features that people may want in a faucet, and have fixed your buggy code quite a bit (although there is still more work I need to do on it).

If so, I could simply delete the project and/or provide a script with a backdoor. That's why there is the fee, openly on Github and declared. However, the license (MIT) requires the license and copyright which includes the fee.
At all, part of the compensation should belong to me because the most part of the script, the structure, is coded by me and not your. Mentioning "hard work" is the wrong way.

For your information:

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge (Meaning I don't owe you anything, but we continue...), to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies (Here... is where you are wrong.) of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions

No following conditions are given.

Please tell me. Would your argument hold up in court?

If you didn't want people to do what I did, you should have said so in your license. Always understand your license when you select it. After throughly reading your license for a 3rd time(!!!), I can conclude with 100% certainty that I am in the clear here.

[Djou20]

Nice so you would deserve a fee for a simple implementation and the guy who wrote everything else deserve nothing...

[kevin135]

Nice so you would deserve a fee for a simple implementation and the guy who wrote everything else deserve nothing...

I think I have said this before...
If you don't want the fee, you have 2 options. Message me and get a fixed price, or write your own script. It's just a simple implementation, how hard could it be, right?

[Djou20]

I don't want the script, i'm really not a fond of browser mining...

As i said before i already wrote my own script and didn't find it hard.

Plus if i wanted to sell anything i would write it from scratch MYSELF and credit EVERYBODY who helped me during the process...

Implementing coinhive API ( especially with their documentation ) represent maybe 1.5% of the work done by Salmen... Question of minutes, nothing compared to the actual development

of "your" (Salmen's) script.

[Dog2puppy]

Really, your just being a thief. You stole Salmen’s Script, and you kept arguing against Tomos81 about his Doge miner, because you thought it was coin hive. You took Salmen’s Script, changed the fees to go to you, and acted like it was all yours. I support open source software, but I’m not supporting this, and I never will.

[kevin135]

Really, your just being a thief. You stole Salmen’s Script, and you kept arguing against Tomos81 about his Doge miner, because you thought it was coin hive. You took Salmen’s Script, changed the fees to go to you, and acted like it was all yours. I support open source software, but I’m not supporting this, and I never will.

READ THE OP!!!
Sentence of reference:

This script started as salmen's regular faucet script, but was heavily modified. (Just wanted to give credit where it was due.)

FYI, I didn't act like it was all mine. I gave him credit even when I didn't need to. I stole NOTHING. And if you don't support me, get off my thread and don't use it.

[megarounder]

Thank you so much for sharing this script and i am going to install it on my new server website www.fbit.in I am planning to make this website based on freedom bitcoin so people can understand the importance of bitcoins and different activities related to it.

Your script is a very good example and source of what i have been looking as it will give me full access of mining as well as the other functions on my website.

[kevin135]

Thank you so much for sharing this script and i am going to install it on my new server website www.fbit.in I am planning to make this website based on freedom bitcoin so people can understand the importance of bitcoins and different activities related to it.

Your script is a very good example and source of what i have been looking as it will give me full access of mining as well as the other functions on my website.

Thank you so much for the support! Good luck!

[simons10]

Hi

Thank you for great script, i install and run it and i can see :

Estimate: 5632 hashes per 1 satoshi
Current hashes: 22272

but use balance is 0 and nothing changes ! and when i click on claim button i see : Don't abuse the system!

can you help me with that ?

my test domain : http://faucet.ircrypto.pro

Thank you

Try clearing your cache. If that doesn't work, delete the database entry for your user and try it again. For new users, this shouldn't happen.

Technical details: The CSRF security check failed.

Hi

I delete database users and test it again with different bitcoin addressee and also use another browser and disable cloudflare but same problem again, users can mine but nothing added to their balance.

Estimate: 5657 hashes per 1 satoshi
Current hashes: 36864

Balance : 0

can you please check that ?

[Djou20]

Have you a website where we can see a working example of your script?

[kevin135]

Have you a website where we can see a working example of your script?

I do not, but I know of a few websites that run it. Satoshistream being one of them.

[shaw1]

Well, thank you for the free pitch. 

http://www.satoshistream.com

The script works great. Comes highly recommended. You can honestly get this thing all set up to basic settings in like 5 minutes.

To the idiots posting about this guy "stealing". (Including the author.):

If the license allowed for redistribution, and creating commercial products using the original script, then this guy is just doing what Salmen originally gave everyone permission to do, right? And the license was MIT, right? Well. 'Nuff said.

But getting back on topic, the only thing I can think of, to make this better, would be to see support for other faucethub currencies. Hoping for a future release... 

Also, if I end up with time, might just convert it myself. If I keep the fee ratio the same, is that all cool? (Would need addys to put in though...)

Anyhow, thanks for the plug, and right back at you. You need a site for this script, so I can backlink to you...