Bitcoin Forum
June 18, 2018, 02:00:45 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash miner for CUDA GPUs (8.0.0)  (Read 41979 times)
SPEC1AL1ST
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 07:33:42 AM
 #341

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!
It actually shows all sols computed by the bminer. Note that the number remains the same even the devfee is turned off (which does not submit devfee shares but it disables *quite a few* optimizations).
Im curious what these optimizations do?

1) You can add GPU temps on miner window?
2) You can add colors to miner window for best reading?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
sir_blacks
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 08:20:40 AM
 #342

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!

New version same thing: Miner it use 2 extra internet connection 100% of time beside mining pool & appi so agen i will say pass on using this miner

Code:
bminer.exe TCP 104.31.68.221 https
bminer.exe TCP gre14.anti-ddos.pro 6633
Coin++
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 385


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 10:08:58 AM
 #343

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!
Are you sure for the increase hashrate ?
I use GTX 1080Ti under Linux (Ubuntu 16.04) and I've not seen any hashrate increase between 5.0.0 and 5.1.0...

DES_MX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:11:51 PM
 #344

This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?


Coin++
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 385


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:17:33 PM
 #345

This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees, 1080Ti, 1070, 1050Ti...).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.

DES_MX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:19:41 PM
 #346

You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64.
Meaning it's not OS specific either.

For now advise caution with this miner


This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
Coin++
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 385


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:26:40 PM
 #347

You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64.
Meaning it's not OS specific either.

For now advise caution with this miner


This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
Yes, Linux (Ubuntu 16.04).

Andrey09
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:36:32 PM
 #348

Quote
Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees, 1080Ti, 1070, 1050Ti...).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
Same for me.
DES_MX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:54:22 PM
 #349

Additionally to all previous comments, seeing about ~1 out of 100 rejects on shares, with DTSM literally no rejects.
MagicSmoker
Member
**
Online Online

Activity: 196
Merit: 54


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 05:41:23 PM
 #350

I was also averaging about 1% rejected shares with 5.0.0, and virtually 0% with dstm 0.5.7.
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 05:47:44 PM
 #351



0.0016% rejected shares.
realbminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 16


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2018, 09:43:14 PM
 #352

This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?




How long have the miners been running?

The pool is estimating the speeds based on the number of submitted shares. Therefore you'll need at least 24 hours to get accurate results.

What are the percentages of rejected shares?

Many people have tried on nanopool / miningpoolhub / suprnova and the numbers seem pretty accurate. Can you try these pools?


When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
torstenx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 09:59:50 PM
 #353

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!

The performance regression hasn't been fixed. Instead it has been made another 0.5% worse.
realbminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 16


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2018, 10:39:31 PM
 #354

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!

The performance regression hasn't been fixed. Instead it has been made another 0.5% worse.

I'm using 384.111 and it seems working pretty well.

Will look into it more closely.

When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
realbminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 16


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2018, 10:41:18 PM
 #355

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!
It actually shows all sols computed by the bminer. Note that the number remains the same even the devfee is turned off (which does not submit devfee shares but it disables *quite a few* optimizations).
Im curious what these optimizations do?

1) You can add GPU temps on miner window?
2) You can add colors to miner window for best reading?

Many of optimizations are around how to schedule CPU / GPU jobs to maximize the effective utilizations.

For the other two questions is the UI sufficient?


When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
realbminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 16


View Profile WWW
January 16, 2018, 01:11:38 AM
 #356

The miner doesn't work on Ubuntu 14 (Ethos)

./bminer: relocation error: ./bminer: symbol _ZTTNSt7__cxx1118basic_stringstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE, version GLIBCXX_3.4.21 not defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference

What to do?


Can you please try the following?

Quote

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libstdc++6



Quote
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test

Done


Quote
sudo apt-get update

Done


Quote
sudo apt-get install libstdc++6

Already the newest version installed

The same error...


Did not have an environment to reproduce it yet -- but will look into it.

When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
hedgeez
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 16, 2018, 06:45:28 AM
 #357

could anyone post their .bat setup for slushpool? thanks in advance
flatounet
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 16, 2018, 07:30:28 PM
 #358

i just see you today ,

im testing it on windows 10 3 rigs of 7 . 1060 3gb

on rig 1 , look a bit slower than dstm , 1940 vs 1892 for Bminer.
on rig 2 (6 card at this time) dstm 1503 vs 1547 for Bminer

this info was on dos windows on win10
but i let it work and see the diff on few days ....

thx for release ,u look have a watch dog and api ?

you look work on miner
can you add for control pool ? when pool1 not answers use pool2 ?
or include a Zproxy ?

all i want ,miner never stop ...

thank's Wink
Nexworks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 17, 2018, 03:36:10 AM
 #359

MPH shows my hash rate as substantially higher than what the miner is showing (its estimating based on last 5 minutes of shares). So for some pool appears to be lower, while for others like myself it appears to be higher. Not sure if this is related to the miner or just share luck. The amount of rejected shares does concern me a bit, its around 0.5%
hanskan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 17, 2018, 06:11:32 AM
 #360

Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!