Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 10:35:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ... 164 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/Cuckaroo29z miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 16.4.9  (Read 148377 times)
Coin++
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 810
Merit: 444


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:17:33 PM
 #341

This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees, 1080Ti, 1070, 1050Ti...).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.

My favorite faucets to earn real free bitcoins/satoshis : Moon BitCoin and Bit Fun.
You want some free AltCoins ? It's here : BCH (Bitcoin Cash) Moon BitCoinCash - DASH (Dash) Moon Dash - DOGE (DogeCoin) Moon DogeCoin - LTC (LiteCoin) Moon LiteCoin.
You want some free LBC (Lbry Credits) ? My LBC invite : Lbry.tv - LBC (Lbry Credits).
1711622153
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711622153

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711622153
Reply with quote  #2

1711622153
Report to moderator
1711622153
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711622153

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711622153
Reply with quote  #2

1711622153
Report to moderator
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
DES_MX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 13


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:19:41 PM
 #342

You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64.
Meaning it's not OS specific either.

For now advise caution with this miner


This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
Coin++
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 810
Merit: 444


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:26:40 PM
 #343

You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64.
Meaning it's not OS specific either.

For now advise caution with this miner


This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
Yes, Linux (Ubuntu 16.04).

My favorite faucets to earn real free bitcoins/satoshis : Moon BitCoin and Bit Fun.
You want some free AltCoins ? It's here : BCH (Bitcoin Cash) Moon BitCoinCash - DASH (Dash) Moon Dash - DOGE (DogeCoin) Moon DogeCoin - LTC (LiteCoin) Moon LiteCoin.
You want some free LBC (Lbry Credits) ? My LBC invite : Lbry.tv - LBC (Lbry Credits).
Andrey09
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:36:32 PM
 #344

Quote
Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees, 1080Ti, 1070, 1050Ti...).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
Same for me.
DES_MX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 13


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 12:54:22 PM
 #345

Additionally to all previous comments, seeing about ~1 out of 100 rejects on shares, with DTSM literally no rejects.
MagicSmoker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 182



View Profile
January 15, 2018, 05:41:23 PM
 #346

I was also averaging about 1% rejected shares with 5.0.0, and virtually 0% with dstm 0.5.7.
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 05:47:44 PM
 #347



0.0016% rejected shares.
realbminer (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 461
Merit: 49


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2018, 09:43:14 PM
 #348

This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?




How long have the miners been running?

The pool is estimating the speeds based on the number of submitted shares. Therefore you'll need at least 24 hours to get accurate results.

What are the percentages of rejected shares?

Many people have tried on nanopool / miningpoolhub / suprnova and the numbers seem pretty accurate. Can you try these pools?


When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
torstenx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 09:59:50 PM
 #349

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!

The performance regression hasn't been fixed. Instead it has been made another 0.5% worse.
realbminer (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 461
Merit: 49


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2018, 10:39:31 PM
 #350

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!

The performance regression hasn't been fixed. Instead it has been made another 0.5% worse.

I'm using 384.111 and it seems working pretty well.

Will look into it more closely.

When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
realbminer (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 461
Merit: 49


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2018, 10:41:18 PM
 #351

The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!
It actually shows all sols computed by the bminer. Note that the number remains the same even the devfee is turned off (which does not submit devfee shares but it disables *quite a few* optimizations).
Im curious what these optimizations do?

1) You can add GPU temps on miner window?
2) You can add colors to miner window for best reading?

Many of optimizations are around how to schedule CPU / GPU jobs to maximize the effective utilizations.

For the other two questions is the UI sufficient?


When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
realbminer (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 461
Merit: 49


View Profile WWW
January 16, 2018, 01:11:38 AM
 #352

The miner doesn't work on Ubuntu 14 (Ethos)

./bminer: relocation error: ./bminer: symbol _ZTTNSt7__cxx1118basic_stringstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE, version GLIBCXX_3.4.21 not defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference

What to do?


Can you please try the following?

Quote

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libstdc++6



Quote
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test

Done


Quote
sudo apt-get update

Done


Quote
sudo apt-get install libstdc++6

Already the newest version installed

The same error...


Did not have an environment to reproduce it yet -- but will look into it.

When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
hedgeez
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 16, 2018, 06:45:28 AM
 #353

could anyone post their .bat setup for slushpool? thanks in advance
flatounet
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 2


View Profile
January 16, 2018, 07:30:28 PM
 #354

i just see you today ,

im testing it on windows 10 3 rigs of 7 . 1060 3gb

on rig 1 , look a bit slower than dstm , 1940 vs 1892 for Bminer.
on rig 2 (6 card at this time) dstm 1503 vs 1547 for Bminer

this info was on dos windows on win10
but i let it work and see the diff on few days ....

thx for release ,u look have a watch dog and api ?

you look work on miner
can you add for control pool ? when pool1 not answers use pool2 ?
or include a Zproxy ?

all i want ,miner never stop ...

thank's Wink
Nexworks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 17, 2018, 03:36:10 AM
 #355

MPH shows my hash rate as substantially higher than what the miner is showing (its estimating based on last 5 minutes of shares). So for some pool appears to be lower, while for others like myself it appears to be higher. Not sure if this is related to the miner or just share luck. The amount of rejected shares does concern me a bit, its around 0.5%
hanskan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 17, 2018, 06:11:32 AM
 #356

Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
flatounet
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 2


View Profile
January 17, 2018, 08:29:44 AM
 #357

Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?

i tested it since yesterday , loook be 3% faster than dstm.

i got 301 with dstm ,and im at 310 with bminer ...  ( on flypool)
but just one night here ....

the blue line ( current effective hashrate , look more regular with bminer)
with dstm ( the blue line goes higher and lower , and average is lower ...)

bminer let me think have a "zecproxy" include  , more régular about job found .....
Yami2733
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 17, 2018, 10:59:35 AM
 #358


is 0.0016% good or bad? Huh

newbie question here Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Yami2733
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 17, 2018, 11:55:35 AM
 #359

Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?

i tested it since yesterday , loook be 3% faster than dstm.

i got 301 with dstm ,and im at 310 with bminer ...  ( on flypool)
but just one night here ....

the blue line ( current effective hashrate , look more regular with bminer)
with dstm ( the blue line goes higher and lower , and average is lower ...)

bminer let me think have a "zecproxy" include  , more régular about job found .....

Newbie here! My very second post.
Can you pls share your result one more time here tomorrow?
if this miner is so good! I will definitely try Bminer Grin Grin Grin
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
January 17, 2018, 11:58:24 AM
 #360



0.0016% rejected shares.

is 0.0016% good or bad? Huh

newbie question here Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Better than 1% and worse than 0%.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ... 164 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!