hopfi2k
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 08:36:26 AM |
|
1070ti results?
Two posts above yours... Cheers, Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
stash2coin
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 1
|
|
January 23, 2018, 09:14:21 AM |
|
@realbminer , i had a minor issue with 5.1.0 on linux, one of the cards hang and bminer exited and didn't restart although the default setting is -watchdog=true, whats the deal here?
|
|
|
|
unique83
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 09:20:31 AM |
|
I am getting 938 Sol/s with 2 Gigabyte 1070 WF2 with this version...core +150 mem +400 PL 65%. Great work!
|
|
|
|
Eterbank
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 10
|
|
January 23, 2018, 09:26:48 AM |
|
1070ti results?
Two posts above yours... Cheers, Andy sorry, I just noticed. That is a decent result, though I had some 1070s which could go above 490 with a massive overclock of course.
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
January 23, 2018, 09:32:02 AM |
|
The version 5.2.0 has been released. It brings a few improvements on NiceHash and Windows: - Introduced the option -logfile to append the logs into a file.
- Minor optimization on Windows for cards that are mounted on the risers.
- Improve compatibility for NiceHash.
Enjoy! When are you gonna fix e-mail adresses? I tested and it works for me. Can you take another look at https://www.bminer.me/examples/#escaping-characters-in-the-uri ?
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
DES_MX
Member
Offline
Activity: 216
Merit: 13
|
|
January 23, 2018, 11:47:06 AM |
|
Just tried again for fun -- still doesn't start for me on Windows 10. Not from batch file, nor on its own with any command arguments.
And that's with two different Windows 10 machines, one AMD Ryzen 7 1700, one intel i7 3770. Both with a GTX 1070.
Any way to debug this? I don't have anything strange running at the same time, as far as I can tell.
Just to confirm -- did you turn off windows defender? Windows Defender sometimes would deny the execution. What happens if you directly click on bminer.exe? Yes, I had tried disabling Windows Defender, despite it showing no indication that it cared about bminer.exe. Disabling Windows Defender had no effect. If I double-click bminer.exe a cmd-style window appears for a couple seconds, then closes. It has no contents. There are no error messages or other outputs. EDIT: same result with new 5.2.0 version. Try installing Visual Basic libraries, .NET Framework libraries, and latest CUDA SDK. 99% it will fix this for you
|
|
|
|
MiGeN
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 12:07:20 PM |
|
Just made an account just to thank you.
5.2 update made my rig of 4 1070Ti's increase hashrate from ~2000sol/s to ~2025sol/s
|
|
|
|
hav
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 01:35:09 PM |
|
lately I'm getting real hard dips on my pool's mining report (5x 1060 3g) Bminer reports steady 1560 sols/s but the pool averages out way lower, with 500 sol dips and realy low share rates of 50 (this is on suprnova)
|
|
|
|
PIR3lly
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 02:15:57 PM Last edit: January 23, 2018, 02:34:10 PM by PIR3lly |
|
Thought I would post some of my findings here. Have been using EWBF miner for some time, using 4x EVGA 1070Ti's. Settings are 63% power limit, gpu +200, mem +700, fans on 50%. With EWBF and the --fee 0.1 option on Zclassic, I get around 2030 Sol/s. Temps are around 55C. Same settings on DSTM, 2071 Sol/s, which is around 4.6 Sol/W Same settings on Bminer, 2140 Sol/s. So this is indeed the fastest. However, I get an error after about an hour of mining (sometimes shorter, other times it takes longer). It says: Get error: The semaphore timeout period has expired, resseting in 5 seconds. Connection failed due to External host closed the connection It then reconnects and starts mining again, however the results are not accepted and accepted shares stay the same. http://i66.tinypic.com/2qjm42b.jpgThis has happened a few times now, so I reverted back to DSTM. Any ideas on this? Error from my side, does it have something to do with the pool (miningspeed), or is it a Bminer issue (as it doesn't happen with DSTM or EWBF)?
|
|
|
|
cidman
|
|
January 23, 2018, 03:35:52 PM |
|
bminer might report faster in the miner but on nanopool im seeing less than ewbf first half of this is 1060 3gb on ewbf 2nd is with bminer
|
|
|
|
apiontek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 03:53:13 PM |
|
Just tried again for fun -- still doesn't start for me on Windows 10. Not from batch file, nor on its own with any command arguments.
And that's with two different Windows 10 machines, one AMD Ryzen 7 1700, one intel i7 3770. Both with a GTX 1070.
Any way to debug this? I don't have anything strange running at the same time, as far as I can tell.
Just to confirm -- did you turn off windows defender? Windows Defender sometimes would deny the execution. What happens if you directly click on bminer.exe? Yes, I had tried disabling Windows Defender, despite it showing no indication that it cared about bminer.exe. Disabling Windows Defender had no effect. If I double-click bminer.exe a cmd-style window appears for a couple seconds, then closes. It has no contents. There are no error messages or other outputs. EDIT: same result with new 5.2.0 version. Try installing Visual Basic libraries, .NET Framework libraries, and latest CUDA SDK. 99% it will fix this for you I do some very basic, minimal compiling on these machines, such as compiling xmrig & xmr-stak. So I have the CUDA SDK, and some .NET/VB libraries. Can you suggest specifics on which ones I might be missing?
|
|
|
|
GreedyBastard #1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 04:41:10 PM |
|
Can you give us some insights about what the -nofee disables ? Great miner btw, better performances than dstm I have to say.
|
|
|
|
kevdotcom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 05:20:36 PM |
|
The version 5.2.0 has been released. It brings a few improvements on NiceHash and Windows: - Introduced the option -logfile to append the logs into a file.
- Minor optimization on Windows for cards that are mounted on the risers.
- Improve compatibility for NiceHash.
Enjoy! When are you gonna fix e-mail adresses? I tested and it works for me. Can you take another look at https://www.bminer.me/examples/#escaping-characters-in-the-uri ? I did it exactly like in the link but nanopool got workerFfoo0gmail.com as worker name...
|
|
|
|
DES_MX
Member
Offline
Activity: 216
Merit: 13
|
|
January 23, 2018, 05:28:17 PM |
|
This is exactly what I had on various pools and on various equihash coins (each time testing for at least 24 hours) with v5.1 and v5.0 Lets see if this v5.2 actually improved anything *in pool* Update: first thing I do notice is so far no rejects, over multiple machines in about 15 minutes of mining. lets see what 24h test will show bminer might report faster in the miner but on nanopool im seeing less than ewbf first half of this is 1060 3gb on ewbf 2nd is with bminer
|
|
|
|
hav
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 05:32:36 PM |
|
it seems to be worse in 5.2 sometimes my sols just half.
Not sure if the devfee is secretly lots more or if this is a bug
|
|
|
|
dahasher
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 05:43:26 PM |
|
Been using bMiner now for about a week after using EWBF first and then DSTM.
Very stable and getting the most sols out of the 3 miners from bMiner although DSTM is a close second.
My 1060 6gb is running at 335-345 (avg is 339 id say) sols with OC. And yea the reject rate is very low like someone mentioned earlier.
All in all, good job to the dev and thanks!
|
|
|
|
cryptoyes
Member
Offline
Activity: 297
Merit: 10
|
|
January 23, 2018, 06:51:24 PM |
|
5.2 seems to be worse ... I don't think 5.2 fixes the problem I reported earlier about Nicehash (and miningrigrentals). I still get lots of Rejected share #152 ([1,"Share above target.",null]) and lots of Rejected share #554 ([2,"Job not found.",null]) Sometimes 5-10 of them in a row. 5 rejected shares out of 85 is bad. @realbminer: you may want to do some proper testing yourself on Nicehash, and on MiningRigRentals (with and without Nicehash as pool). Right now bminer is causing more harm than good when used on those.
|
|
|
|
Gelbstich
|
|
January 23, 2018, 07:42:48 PM |
|
@cryptoyes I'm getting less than 1% rejected shares.
|
|
|
|
emitremmus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 07:53:41 PM |
|
Any advantages regarding Hashrate between 5.2 and 5.1? Actually i am running my 1070 Ti witch 500-510s, at60% PL, +260 Core, +595 Mem with 105-109 Power Consumption.
|
|
|
|
proteus7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 08:16:20 PM |
|
Anyone have this working on Titan XP cards? Works fine on 1080ti (about 4% faster than EWBF) but doesn't even start with Titans
|
|
|
|
|