Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q2)

[blue Snow]

2 Account Connected Merit abuser:

1. scarelia88
2. tono1988

Merit

Address connected;

ERC20 Wallet Address: 0xBA814e53bb343399e4a06e23193fa97d4df9fAD0

archived

ETH adress 0xBA814e53bb343399e4a06e23193fa97d4df9fAD0
thanks...

archived

[1713545620]

1713545620

[1713545620]

1713545620

[Kittygalore]

You are right that you admitted that you are greedy.
And the April Fool's joke was decisive for you. You originally signed up for the CryptopreneurBrainboss Rewards Program, in which he made a very subtle joke on all the bounty hunters, showing that only a few read the rules. You managed to erase your data but forgot that the information on the forum is being archived. This is a good lesson for you to take. You should not cheat where you are given some kind of earning opportunity. I checked a lot of accounts from that bounty joke, and a lot of profiles were banned, as many of them violated the ban rule for a long time. Some bounty hunters don't care which company they promote, whether it's a scam or not.
The negative tag will remain, moreover, I suspect that your two accounts did not belong to you initially.

What lesson is he going to learn now that his account is pretty much useless, he will only create a new one and learn from the mistakes on this one and not get caught again.

[lovesmayfamilis]

2 Accounts Connected:Merit abuser:
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1.dhaldanga
2.paglarhat

Proof:

Telegram: @rafiqul90

[ archive ]

Telegram Username: @rafiqul90

[ archive ]

Related Addresses:

Code:

Telegram Username: @rafiqul90

Miscellaneous:





Ban evasion https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2613277.msg56797003#msg56797003

[YOSHIE]

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Doge11
2. Tron11 (Archived)
3. Man22 (Archived)
4. bluerich230

Proof:

#Proof Of Registration
Forum Username: doge11
BSC wallet address :0xed5950f71BBE779f84ce95603A28490c666A3C5B

https://archive.vn/wip/tQ3ch

Bitcointalk username:
BSC address: 0xed5950f71BBE779f84ce95603A28490c666A3C5B

https://archive.vn/wip/O00uv

#Proof of Registration
Forum Username: man22
ETH Address: 0xed5950f71BBE779f84ce95603A28490c666A3C5B

https://archive.vn/wip/9SeIn

ETH Address: 0xed5950f71BBE779f84ce95603A28490c666A3C5B

https://archive.vn/wip/qyOTt

Related Addresses:

Code:

ETH Address: 0xed5950f71BBE779f84ce95603A28490c666A3C5B
ETH Address: 0x50976cbdD54EdC5d6e81ef100484E76DDb9aF7DF

Miscellaneous:

Related Alt account case: has Alt's account (Ban evasion) and is fraudulently involved in the campaign.

First case:

25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]

Second case:
Alt account above is associated with an account named: @See22 and @Man22.

Proof:

Based on a discovery by: @lovesmayfamilis

Trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2819175

ETH Address: 0x50976cbdD54EdC5d6e81ef100484E76DDb9aF7DF

https://archive.vn/wip/VwaGP

ETH Wallet Address: 0x50976cbdD54EdC5d6e81ef100484E76DDb9aF7DF

[Luqman]

he will only create a new one

I have no plan to create a new one, what for?
It is very difficult to rank up now. I was lucky that I joined this forum in 2015. In that year, it is not as difficult as today to rank up. I am surprised Bitcointalk forum has difficult rules as today. I regretted I didn't post more and moved up my rank higher (higher than SR) at that time.

[icopress]

I was lucky that I joined this forum in 2015. In that year, it is not as difficult as today to rank up. I am surprised Bitcointalk forum has difficult rules as today. I regretted I didn't post more and moved up my rank higher (higher than SR) at that time.

Nothing personal, but based on your false analogy, a higher rank would lead to more red tags. Say thank you for not getting banned, as I'm pretty sure that if someone takes the time to delve into your post history, plagiarism will be detected, (given the neutral tag from actmyname).

actmyname

2021-04-07

Reference

Part of the Spammer Blacklist: this user has made at least 67 replies that are not up to forum standards.

[Luqman]

Sorry, but why some members here seem trying to attack me? The latest one, @icopress. Is this your way to get merits from others? Or just post to fulfill your signature campaign? As far as I know, I have no problem with you. And looks like there is another new case of ALT account, but you all don't comment on it? While for my case, I have admitted my mistake, while others keep silent. Do you think those who keep silent better than me?

I feel like a victim here.   I suspect someone is purposely targeting my account.


This is one of the reasons why many old members no longer active in this forum anymore.
A member targets an account to be reviled, in order to get appreciation from others.
Sadly, it is allowed by the forum.


I think it is enough for my case.
I will stop here.
Thanks all

[lovesmayfamilis]

2 Accounts Connected:Merit abuser:
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1.Mulann2
2.nicecrypto

Proof:

ETH Wallet Address: 0x1EA4758d61797228DAF5cD84219462f1D17d38cF

[ archive ]

ERC-20 Wallet: 0x1EA4758d61797228DAF5cD84219462f1D17d38cF

[ archive ]

Related Addresses:

Code:

ETH Wallet Address: 0x1EA4758d61797228DAF5cD84219462f1D17d38cF

Miscellaneous:

Merit abuse.


cheating in the bounty

Despite the manager's warning, these accounts violate the terms.

✔️ No alt accounts are allowed, if spotted then I will tag both accounts.

cheating in the bounty 🔥🔥 [BOUNTY] Stobox: Securities Tokenization ✦ Assets Exchange | $112,500 💰💰
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ATSGa3XIV1Vh4S0RrgqQ4tjjQuJ50XsfM-MtmQ7QaQ0/edit#gid=1847617832

[YOSHIE]

User account named: @Salmanhasan123 was initially involved fraudulently with 3 Alt in a campaign managed by:@CryptopreneurBrainboss.

The rules clearly state it:

12. Do not enroll your own alt-accounts in this Campaign. If it is found out that you've done so, you'll be removed without notice and payment, Also you'll receive a negative feedback from me.

However: does not seem to apply to the users below: @Salmanhasan123, continue to create other accounts and get involved in the same case (cheating).

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. janson420
2. Tramp420

Proof:

Post by: janson420

please Sir accept my account

#Proof Of Authentication
Forum Username: janson420
Telegram Username: @jan_son1
Twitter profile link: https://twitter.com/Salman11223311?s=09
ETH Address : 0x17CD4Aa7d3FeDDb22E6232A48C4156E5801B22da

https://archive.vn/wip/BFLQV

Proof of Registration
Forum Username: Salmanhasan123
Telegram Username: @jan_son
ETH Address: 0x17CD4Aa7d3FeDDb22E6232A48C4156E5801B22da

https://archive.vn/wip/Sml11


Proof:

#Proof Of Authentication
Forum Username:Tramp420
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2871564
Telegram Username: @lazy3934
BSC-DAI Wallet Address: 0x3e7E7060f112F65fb62E24Bc5a9fDCC04cF9E4Ad

https://archive.vn/wip/RKTTj

#Proof Authentication
 BTT User Name : salmanhasan123
Telegram User name : @salmanbro0
 Your  ERC20 address : 0x3e7E7060f112F65fb62E24Bc5a9fDCC04cF9E4Ad

https://archive.is/wip/OdMZ9

Related Addresses:

Code:

Wallet Address: 0x3e7E7060f112F65fb62E24Bc5a9fDCC04cF9E4Ad
ETH Address : 0x17CD4Aa7d3FeDDb22E6232A48C4156E5801B22da

Miscellaneous:

Their registration page in the campaign.

Topic: [Paused] Burst.Money Bounty || Allocation 310,000 BURST ($837,000) || 60days
https://archive.vn/wip/TxuQl

[blue Snow]

2 Account Connected Merit abuser:
1. scarelia88
2. tono1988

Both accounts did not red tag yet, can anyone make it red?, or I might create a finding mistaken?.

[ChuckBuck]

Both accounts did not red tag yet, can anyone make it red?, or I might create a finding mistaken?.

No, you are not mistake in this finding. But, maybe, it's low-level abuse, or in other words, it's not enough to send a negative feedback. In this case, I think there's no need to leave feedback or simply a neutral response to warn, no negative feedback. My personal opinion 

[AnhEmXe]

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

AnhEmXe (I am the owner)
Steal data for duplicate bounties
1. scoop shot
2. ABS Space
3. vaiking eno

Proof:

PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: scoop shot
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2857155
Telegram Username: @sugarababay
Participated Campaigns: Twitter, Linkedin
ETH Wallet Address: 0x31562Ba95afb4925b5B4228bC266055E22D1f6F0

https://archive.ph/P1JY1

PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: ABS Space
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3269378
Telegram Username: @sugarababay
Participated Campaigns: Twitter, Linkedin
ETH address: 0x977EE155B2647244036C86cbB4B5C406864AdC30

https://archive.ph/31xZ1

PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: vaiking eno
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3234913
Telegram Username: @sugarababay
Participated Campaigns: Twitter, Linkedin
ETH address: 0x8be2D27556f57204969f189b5506C4C9080Db8DA

https://archive.ph/s5bJL


Miscellaneous:

Related Alt account case: has Alt's account (Ban evasion) and is fraudulently involved in the campaign.

Some newbies accounts have tried to steal with duplicate, in some bounties Detective

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5329623.0 ( GRANDLE )
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5331648.0 ( BITNORM )

[Timelord2067]

some newbies accounts have tried to steal with duplicate, in some bounties detective, I see 3 newbies accounts, and the main account
...

@AnhEmXe please go back and correct your report so that it looks a little bit more like the Submission Form contained in the first post.

At the moment your "proof" is just a link to another website and has little value on its own (not to mention most people won't go chasing external links).

Thanks.

[lovesmayfamilis]

5 Accounts Connected
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1.bobyhodob
2.Rohtox
3.monatana
4.Mr.007
5.agis50

Proof:

Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/gibra_n
Telegram username: @bulbahenz

[ archive ]

Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/gibra_n

[ archive ]

Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/gibra_n

[ archive ]

Telegram Username: @bulbahenz

[ archive ]

ERC20 Wallet Address: 0x560C1a7dD6dcD97855f9cc4eaD8f0c74DdCEeA7e

[ archive ]

ERC20 Wallet Address: 0x560C1a7dD6dcD97855f9cc4eaD8f0c74DdCEeA7e

[ archive ]



Related Addresses:

Code:

Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/gibra_n
Telegram username: @bulbahenz
Telegram Username: @rouzbon666
0x560C1a7dD6dcD97855f9cc4eaD8f0c74DdCEeA7e

Miscellaneous:

cheating in the bounty

1.bobyhodob
2.Rohtox
3.Mr.007

7. Using multiple accounts, cheating and spamming are not allowed. You will be disqualified from the bounty program immediately and all your accounts
will be banned permanently.

cheating in the bounty 🕵🏻‍♂️[BOUNTY DETECTIVE] 🎓STUDENT COIN DeFi/NFT Platform 1 Million USD Pool🎓
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uycp4sEQD8Tmo23Bfdm-BtwBvy45pmU4qVJYkmnXegU/edit#gid=722669284

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg55625459;topicseen#msg55625459

[Luqman]

3.monatana
5.agis50

I checked these accounts, they still didn't get Red-Trust. Is there any reason why they didn't get Red-Trust?
At least, the two accounts must have a note in neutral trust.
Please check again, sir. Maybe you forget to give the Red-Trust mark.  

[ChuckBuck]

I checked these accounts, they still didn't get Red-Trust. Is there any reason why they didn't get Red-Trust?
At least, the two accounts must have a note in neutral trust.
Please check again, sir. Maybe you forget to give the Red-Trust mark.  

You are confused here! He's working wonderfully and correctly! Those accounts cannot be tagged by red. Connected accounts are not tagged, only cheating accounts in bounty campaigns will be red-tagged.
You are acting selfish, you have been caught cheating, and now you are asking why others are not?

[Luqman]

You are acting selfish, you have been caught cheating, and now you are asking why others are not?

Look at it carefully!!
I don't ask the question to you.
I ask the question to @lovesmayfamilis.

I also did not use bad words at all. Nor using hate comment.
I am different from you, I ask the question purely as I don't know.

But you always commented negativity when you replied to my post in this thread.
What's wrong with you?
Are you trying to get other's attention and hope for merits?

I know well I have done a mistake. I even have admitted it.
Why mention it again? Please tell me what's your purpose?


OP @Timelord2067, please do something to an annoying member like this.
This forum will lose empathy and respect sense among members if a member like @ChuckBuck didn't get a warn.


It is not the first time he made a hate comment to others.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228825.msg53921446#msg53921446

[lovesmayfamilis]

I ask the question to @lovesmayfamilis.

You are correct, I added neutral trust to the remaining two accounts. They are inactive at this time, but let there be a warning to managers. Neutral trust doesn't matter much. And judging by your participation in the company signature, you were able to agree with the manager. So for your peace of mind, I've added a tag to all of these accounts.
Just advice, do not overreact and do not think that everyone around you is against you. Believe it or not. If you did not try to ruin your reputation, your profile would not appear in this thread. I don't see any aggression in the ChuckBuck responses. Sometimes you need to be able to properly respond to criticism

[Luqman]

You are correct, I added neutral trust to the remaining two accounts. They are inactive at this time, but let there be a warning to managers.

Thank you for the response.
Yes, they are inactive. But the warning is important to let others know. 

Just advice, do not overreact and do not think that everyone around you is against you.

I am not trying to overreact. If it is a criticism, I will accept it. But it is not like a criticism, it seems like an insult.
Please read his comment "You are acting selfish, you have been caught cheating, and now you are asking why others are not?"
I don't think it is a criticism, it is an insult.

If you did not try to ruin your reputation, your profile would not appear in this thread.

I know, it is a mistake. No one is perfect.
The most important thing that you realize it and you admit it like a gentleman.
Then, you promise to never do it again.

I have learned much from this. Trust me, I really regretted it.

[Timelord2067]

OP @Timelord2067, please do something to an annoying member like this.
This forum will lose empathy and respect sense among members if a member like @ChuckBuck didn't get a warn.


It is not the first time he made a hate comment to others.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228825.msg53921446#msg53921446

I'm not going to put up with tit-for-tat complaints on either side.  @ChuckBuck does appear to be a little confused what is acceptable and what isn't, so let me be clear:

 It does not matter if a user and their alts are scammers or not, this thread is a record of those connections.  It is up to the person making the report to choose (or not) to tag a UID.  If they feel a user is cheating and have the evidence to back it up, then their Red Paint ^TM will serve as a warning to others.

If two UID's have used the same wallet address... twitter account ... or whatever it may be, that is not proof in itself that the linked accounts are scamming.  For example - Enrolling in a SigCamp twice is dishonest and not tolerated by the CM's, so Red Paint ^TM is applicable, remembering to advise the CM with a courtesy note and link to this thread.  (BUT don't bombard a CM trivially!).

You can't rely on others to give out negative trust feedback on your behalf, you did the research, YOU leave the trust feedback.  Others will see it (even if you are not DT1 or DT2, if they do their homework, they will see it).

The Lauda's of this world are mercifully fading from memory and the Forum.  When Lauda locked the Mk II thread to start a moderated thread, I beat him to the punch and started this Mk III tread UNMODERATED - i.e. warts and all with the support of the other investigators that were around at that time as they, like me had had enough of the squabbling.  Had Lauda started a moderated thread it would have been a one sided shouting match at anyone coming along.

UNMODERATED means learning to respect other's work and opinions.  It does not mean shouting them down.  Some scammers really are down on their luck - that doesn't mean you have to kick them when they are down. 

Show some respect & be the better person.

Investigate. Tag. Move on.

Simple.