|
dragonmike
|
 |
January 07, 2018, 02:01:41 PM |
|
1080 can make 1500+
1080ti can make 2000+
How ? i get only 1300+ with 1080ti.. ? this is the cmd that im using hsrminer1 -o stratum+tcp://pool.trezarcoin.com:6666 -u xxx -p xxx -i 7 -c 5 pause Using these parameters on my 5x1080 rig gives on average 1300kh/s (but that's with 80% tdp, core +110 and mem +650). Wonder if there's more that can be extracted... Is there any doc or guideline on which parameters are available and suggested values? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pfft
|
|
January 07, 2018, 02:56:47 PM
Last edit: January 07, 2018, 03:45:04 PM by pfft |
|
still same problem after 15-20 minutes....
INFO : [14:48:03] : Share Accepted
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1500 : unspecified launch failure.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1500 : unspecified launch failure.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1509 : unspecified launch failure.
last nvidia driver....
|
|
|
|
|
dubardo
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2018, 05:08:30 PM |
|
Got 1600+kh on a 1080ti @ 75%/+150/-300
Good job! Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
alarmod
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2018, 05:11:18 PM |
|
1080 Ti love memory overclock... 105%/+100/+700 - 2050 kH
|
|
|
|
|
matovicv
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2018, 07:39:41 PM |
|
WOW instead of 2.2kh im getting 2.8
what's your GPU and power/oc settings? I get 1.7kh/s ,1080ti 200watts, cc+100,mc+100. 1080ti - 1.7 75% PDU +130/+500 1070 - 1.1 90% PDU +140/+500 I have 1250 with gtx 1070 (75% PL, ccminer KlausT, w/o OC mem) How with 75% and W/O OC you get 1250? |
|
|
|
|
airwalker_
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2018, 09:56:27 PM |
|
I've found KlausT's ccminer to be better at neo on my 1070's as well.
|
|
|
|
|
melpheos
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 557
Merit: 5
|
|
January 07, 2018, 09:57:45 PM |
|
1080 Ti love memory overclock... 105%/+100/+700 - 2050 kH
Have you checked how low you can go on power limit and keep the memory clock ? |
|
|
|
|
|
candyiman
|
|
January 08, 2018, 03:20:06 AM |
|
1080 Ti love memory overclock... 105%/+100/+700 - 2050 kH
Thats impressive 2mhs could you Test it at Max PL and see if ou get more Hash and if its stable? |
|
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
January 08, 2018, 06:34:44 AM |
|
How with 75% and W/O OC you get 1250?
ccminer/8.15-KlausT, i-17 |
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
|
preda
|
|
January 08, 2018, 10:02:57 AM |
|
How with 75% and W/O OC you get 1250?
Which cards? ccminer/8.15-KlausT, i-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
sundownz
|
|
January 08, 2018, 11:55:40 AM |
|
I've found KlausT's ccminer to be better at neo on my 1070's as well.
For me it's not even close -- Palgin kills KlausT by ~20% |
|
|
|
|
sundownz
|
|
January 08, 2018, 11:56:37 AM |
|
NEMO is working on plugging this into his software... I am running a "prototype" NEMO on my home office PC with it & it's awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
preda
|
|
January 08, 2018, 12:09:21 PM |
|
I've found KlausT's ccminer to be better at neo on my 1070's as well.
For me it's not even close -- Palgin kills KlausT by ~20% What is the palgin one? |
|
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
January 08, 2018, 12:21:41 PM |
|
I've found KlausT's ccminer to be better at neo on my 1070's as well.
For me it's not even close -- Palgin kills KlausT by ~20% What is the palgin one? The one whose thread you're currently posting in!  |
|
|
|
|
|
Jazek
|
|
January 08, 2018, 03:43:23 PM |
|
GTX 1070 Strix +130Core with KlausT 1220Kh/S, with palgin mod 1350Kh/s
The only thing that i dont understand is: Why palgin says this mod works with gpus with CC 5.0+? and the gtx 970(5.2) doesnt work with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
preda
|
|
January 08, 2018, 04:07:59 PM |
|
I've found KlausT's ccminer to be better at neo on my 1070's as well.
For me it's not even close -- Palgin kills KlausT by ~20% What is the palgin one? The one whose thread you're currently posting in! I tried hsr miner and is slower than ccminer 815 cuda 9 |
|
|
|
|
airwalker_
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
January 08, 2018, 06:49:02 PM |
|
I tested this again and noticed something strange. When I include it into Nemosminer for autoswitching the hashrates are worse than KlausT's ccminer. However, when I run palgin's in a regular dos window the hashrates are better. The only difference that I can see is that Nemos runs it in a powershell wrapper. Can anyone else verify?
|
|
|
|
|
brenthore
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 08, 2018, 07:42:08 PM |
|
anyone knows how to fix "neoscrypt init out of memory error"? thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
papacheal
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
January 08, 2018, 08:07:11 PM |
|
anyone knows how to fix "neoscrypt init out of memory error"? thanks in advance!
Make sure your virtual memory is set high enough based on the number and type of GPUs you've got. The exact size required also depends on the algorithm you're using, but the very rough math is 8GB x # of GPUs. (e.g. 4 GPUs = 32GB Virtual Memory) You can set this via Control Panel/System/Advanced System Settings. 1. On the Advanced tab in Performance section, click Settings, pick Advanced tab and click "Change" in Virtual Memory section. 2. Uncheck "Automatically manage paging file size for all drives", select a drive you want your page file on (SSD ideally), select Custom size and use the same number you calculated above for Initial and Maximum (to avoid disk thrashing/fragmented page file). As per example above, for 32GB you'd use "32768" (1024 x 32) for both Initial and Maximum. 3. Reboot to properly initialize the page file using the new settings. 4. Try the miner again. |
|
|
|
|
LuckLurker
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
January 09, 2018, 10:43:13 AM |
|
Been using this for a while & I'm was getting less coins than what I anticipated & my average kh/s was less than what was reported on the mining software. Turns out, after looking at msi afterburner graphs theres constant drops to 0% gpu usage. These only last for a split secount before rallying back up to 99-100% but its constantly happening, which seems to be having an impact on the average mining speed. Maybe this is normal but I haven't expierenced these consistent gpu usage drops on other miners using different & algorithms
|
|
|
|
|
