Hello. Lately I have been trying to find meaningful and constructive ways of contributing to this forum to meet signature requirements. I am not a fan of 'shitposting' which I will refer to as 'quickposting' to keep things clean.
So one of the things I did was start a thread discussing word clouds as a means of identifying different types of forum members. Someone asked about what my goals were so I made a couple posts over a period of time.
Note that I actually have a graduate degree in computer science with a focus on data mining, natural language processing, and data visualization. Modeling things such as shilling within product review sets is what I do to the point of actually being published.
This one was removed "Now I have been focused on the 'shilling' side of shitposting. But shitposting also includes low information posts just for campaign requirements.
If we want to model and detect different types of shitposts we should define 'shitpost' and its subtypes.
Now it might actually be easier to classify a 'shitposter' rather than specific shitposts because there is more information there as you have an entire post history.
Lots of relevant features we could use. Semantic feature such as 'campaign', rhetorical features such as asking or offering, emotional features and features of sentiment, writing style features such as sentence length or number of adjectives and so on. Everything from topic modeling to opinion mining could be useful.
If I could collect the data we could begin the data mining process which is fortunately mostly automated.
Oh and is there a good synonym for 'shitpost' and 'shitposter'? My typing mouth feels dirty."
So I was thinking 'maybe it was because I responded to my own thread' but several other posts I made were removed by this unnamed moderator including ones which were by themselves, required research, and were constructive. The hilarious thing is posts I actually would label as 'quickposts' were not. So yeah, what does someone have against me? I am putting incredible effort in finding constructive ways to meet campaign requirements.
