Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 02:40:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Twitter multi-account  (Read 254 times)
BeEvil (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 131



View Profile
December 13, 2017, 01:31:27 PM
 #1

Hello all.

I have found multi-account in some twitter campaign participiants (CrowdMachine, Convesting, INS, Hdac, Adbank, bitmora, AidCoin, trade.io, Goal bonanza, maybe more)
Just take a look all this account:
Twitter link  -  BCT account :
https://twitter.com/Fatozcan11  -  OggyBesiktas
https://twitter.com/Rceylanli  -  KaraSena
https://twitter.com/YilmazBudak7  -  Devrialemci
https://twitter.com/HasanUs71863036  -  Dnagelpen
https://twitter.com/AliKart26836341  -  Faithh
https://twitter.com/orki_sinan  -  LosPollosHermanos
https://twitter.com/NiyaziKaleozu  -  KisacaYatirimUzmani
https://twitter.com/Omerstn1  -  ShadowsComeBut
https://twitter.com/ayten_celayir  -  Kurabiye1132
https://twitter.com/cavusoglu_oznur  -  ShapeofMyHeart

They all do same retweets and tweets same time. And have low (4%) audit.
They certainly have different ETH wallets , but it's enough to look at 2 any accounts and everything is immediately visible, these are probably automated multi-accounts.
If you agree with me and you bounty manager - will cancel all there stakes at the end so that his effort will be wasted!
1713883240
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713883240

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713883240
Reply with quote  #2

1713883240
Report to moderator
1713883240
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713883240

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713883240
Reply with quote  #2

1713883240
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
TheUltraElite
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1218


Call your grandparents and tell them you love them


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2017, 04:21:10 PM
 #2

Quote
They all do same retweets and tweets same time. And have low (4%) audit.
This is not enough proof that the accounts are connected. However we can get this conclusion that the user(s) operating them may be from the same time zones. But this does not confirm that the owners are the same person.

My guess is that these people are begshit third world shitposters who are found writing one-liners in the Bounties section of the forum.

Quote
They certainly have different ETH wallets , but it's enough to look at 2 any accounts and everything is immediately visible, these are probably automated multi-accounts.
If they have different wallets and no substancial proof that the wallets are connected then they will not be tagged by DT2 members.
That is best proof if not backed by other proofs. You might want to look into the post of these BCT profiles that own these accounts. That may reveal som "juicy" info.

Quote
If you agree with me and you bounty manager - will cancel all there stakes at the end so that his effort will be wasted!
If you can prove that the accounts are connected then definitely and will be neg tagged to prevent them from abusing any other campaign, otherwise not.

R


▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄
████████████████
▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████
████████▌███▐████
▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████
████████████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀
LLBIT
  CRYPTO   
FUTURES
 1,000x 
LEVERAGE
COMPETITIVE
    FEES    
 INSTANT 
EXECUTION
.
   TRADE NOW   
BeEvil (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 131



View Profile
December 13, 2017, 05:33:02 PM
 #3

This is not enough proof that the accounts are connected. However we can get this conclusion that the user(s) operating them may be from the same time zones. But this does not confirm that the owners are the same person.

Ok, I agree with you. Let my post be an assumption. However, if you watched these profiles of Twitter - then you saw that they are like two drops of water, i mean the time and order of retweets and tweets. And actually you don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand this (=
Mevz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 106


View Profile
December 19, 2017, 08:15:35 AM
 #4

This is not enough proof that the accounts are connected. However we can get this conclusion that the user(s) operating them may be from the same time zones. But this does not confirm that the owners are the same person.

Ok, I agree with you. Let my post be an assumption. However, if you watched these profiles of Twitter - then you saw that they are like two drops of water, i mean the time and order of retweets and tweets. And actually you don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand this (=

Yeah maybe those people are connected to each other or just newbies that trying to copy the work of anyone. Its possible when you join a twitter campaign your twitter profile link is putted in the spreadsheet. Its hard to register in the same time with different ETH wallets and also creating a twitter account. Its not a strong proof but the managers only could decide if they think its all a dummy accounts.
BeEvil (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 131



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 09:43:42 AM
 #5

Yeah maybe those people are connected to each other or just newbies that trying to copy the work of anyone. Its possible when you join a twitter campaign your twitter profile link is putted in the spreadsheet. Its hard to register in the same time with different ETH wallets and also creating a twitter account. Its not a strong proof but the managers only could decide if they think its all a dummy accounts.

It's easy to find proof, i'm just checked they wallets, and all these accounts send tokens to one wallet (0x403915107D919A9af3361fA5A899Ea7c5F10FF80)
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 2216


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 12:59:49 PM
 #6

Yeah maybe those people are connected to each other or just newbies that trying to copy the work of anyone. Its possible when you join a twitter campaign your twitter profile link is putted in the spreadsheet. Its hard to register in the same time with different ETH wallets and also creating a twitter account. Its not a strong proof but the managers only could decide if they think its all a dummy accounts.

It's easy to find proof, i'm just checked they wallets, and all these accounts send tokens to one wallet (0x403915107D919A9af3361fA5A899Ea7c5F10FF80)

If you write it up in this thread: Known Alts of any-one - A user Generated List Mk III https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0  I'll add to the Google Spreadsheet...

mhaecel
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 01:06:26 PM
 #7

If they only have 4% in twitter audit score I think that would be already enough reason for them to get rejected in most campaigns which requires at least 60% most of the time.
BeEvil (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 131



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 03:17:50 PM
 #8

Yeah maybe those people are connected to each other or just newbies that trying to copy the work of anyone. Its possible when you join a twitter campaign your twitter profile link is putted in the spreadsheet. Its hard to register in the same time with different ETH wallets and also creating a twitter account. Its not a strong proof but the managers only could decide if they think its all a dummy accounts.

It's easy to find proof, i'm just checked they wallets, and all these accounts send tokens to one wallet (0x403915107D919A9af3361fA5A899Ea7c5F10FF80)

If you write it up in this thread: Known Alts of any-one - A user Generated List Mk III https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0  I'll add to the Google Spreadsheet...

Well, I'll do it soon. I think that links to transactions with the specified wallets for one will be enough?
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 2216


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 11:36:04 PM
 #9

Yeah maybe those people are connected to each other or just newbies that trying to copy the work of anyone. Its possible when you join a twitter campaign your twitter profile link is putted in the spreadsheet. Its hard to register in the same time with different ETH wallets and also creating a twitter account. Its not a strong proof but the managers only could decide if they think its all a dummy accounts.

It's easy to find proof, i'm just checked they wallets, and all these accounts send tokens to one wallet (0x403915107D919A9af3361fA5A899Ea7c5F10FF80)

If you write it up in this thread: Known Alts of any-one - A user Generated List Mk III https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0  I'll add to the Google Spreadsheet...

Well, I'll do it soon. I think that links to transactions with the specified wallets for one will be enough?

Well, the more proof you have the easier it is in future for others to build on your work, but yeh, for now if you can only connect with one wallet address as you have done, then that's good enough (and it's been accepted in the past, so you won't be challenged either)

*edit*

come to think of it, one person running a campaign had multiple UID's in the campaign and was funneling the funds from a third party into their own coffers, so keep that in mind when you find examples such as this one.

readygoaw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 105



View Profile
December 29, 2017, 08:50:58 PM
 #10

It is such a timely reaction to be simultaneously in several places. It's good that you tracked them, now we can know what's going on.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!