rehydrogenated
|
|
January 17, 2018, 04:30:23 PM |
|
Good to see this project taking off. I felt like I was one of the only people watching it last month. Very nice score on ICO bench!
I think this project has a tried and true business plan. They will get customers and be accessible from all over the world (which is necessary when we are talking the internet).
Good luck dev team!
|
|
|
|
Amelie Poulain
|
|
January 17, 2018, 04:54:04 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. I agree, the research requires a huge amount of time, not possible if you have a full-time job. Rating websites can at least provide you with some background and bring special features to your attention. Btw, REPU looks really good, rating improved, waiting for sale dates to be announced, hope it's gonna be soon. Rating websites can help me filter out some of the unreliable ICO projects , then i research the rest project which i have the industry knowledge. I like that this raiting platform gathers all the information about the project - hard cap, ICO dates, token price and so on. This is convenient, and you don't need to spend much time searching for useful information in whitepaper. But of course always need to do your own research.
|
|
|
|
imtiazmahmood
|
|
January 17, 2018, 05:24:01 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. I agree, the research requires a huge amount of time, not possible if you have a full-time job. Rating websites can at least provide you with some background and bring special features to your attention. Btw, REPU looks really good, rating improved, waiting for sale dates to be announced, hope it's gonna be soon. Rating websites can help me filter out some of the unreliable ICO projects , then i research the rest project which i have the industry knowledge. I like that this raiting platform gathers all the information about the project - hard cap, ICO dates, token price and so on. This is convenient, and you don't need to spend much time searching for useful information in whitepaper. But of course always need to do your own research. personally i also liked this rating and feedback service in social media. really this is best opportunity for investors to Participate in repu project. as you see other social media like facebook and twitter now where are they, but repu will be top also will go because repu is unique and interested project.
|
|
|
|
Je.hitler
Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2018, 06:25:05 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you.
|
|
|
|
belechau
|
|
January 17, 2018, 06:33:32 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you. Surely no site can ever override your personal evaluations, regardless of the btct flow, which shows how successful the project will be, or the ratings that sites like this do, our independent searches need to exist
|
|
|
|
MandatoryOption
Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 12
|
|
January 17, 2018, 07:16:11 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you. Surely no site can ever override your personal evaluations, regardless of the btct flow, which shows how successful the project will be, or the ratings that sites like this do, our independent searches need to exist The problem I see with sites like ICOBench is, that you cannot know if the rating is sponsored by the project itself and so is made heavily in favour for the project.
|
|
|
|
Frank37
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
January 17, 2018, 07:19:58 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you. Surely no site can ever override your personal evaluations, regardless of the btct flow, which shows how successful the project will be, or the ratings that sites like this do, our independent searches need to exist The problem I see with sites like ICOBench is, that you cannot know if the rating is sponsored by the project itself and so is made heavily in favour for the project. Money can corrupt everybody, you will never be sure, if money was involved.
|
|
|
|
alphashotgun
|
|
January 17, 2018, 07:20:12 PM |
|
since the eta price is low now this seems to be a good time for icos am I right or wrong?
|
|
|
|
CryptoCutie
|
|
January 17, 2018, 07:29:40 PM |
|
Repu will spend over 40% of the funds for marketing to bring enough users to the plattform. Thats also a good chance we could see a working demo.
|
|
|
|
tudor_simion
Member
Offline
Activity: 349
Merit: 12
|
|
January 17, 2018, 07:37:38 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you. Surely no site can ever override your personal evaluations, regardless of the btct flow, which shows how successful the project will be, or the ratings that sites like this do, our independent searches need to exist The problem I see with sites like ICOBench is, that you cannot know if the rating is sponsored by the project itself and so is made heavily in favour for the project. Money can corrupt everybody, you will never be sure, if money was involved. Money is always involved, you can be sure of it.Competition is fairly large for most projects, there will always be a percentage of corruption in each evaluation. Repu will spend over 40% of the funds for marketing to bring enough users to the plattform. Thats also a good chance we could see a working demo.
From what I see, for a test we have to wait until after ICO-stage
|
|
|
|
loup
|
|
January 17, 2018, 07:43:25 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you. Surely no site can ever override your personal evaluations, regardless of the btct flow, which shows how successful the project will be, or the ratings that sites like this do, our independent searches need to exist The problem I see with sites like ICOBench is, that you cannot know if the rating is sponsored by the project itself and so is made heavily in favour for the project. Money can corrupt everybody, you will never be sure, if money was involved. Money is always involved, you can be sure of it.Competition is fairly large for most projects, there will always be a percentage of corruption in each evaluation. Repu will spend over 40% of the funds for marketing to bring enough users to the plattform. Thats also a good chance we could see a working demo.
From what I see, for a test we have to wait until after ICO-stage That is a very big part of the budget just for marketing. I hope they don't just focus on marketing but in developing a god platform too.
|
|
|
|
BY_ATOM
|
|
January 17, 2018, 07:49:47 PM |
|
4.1 icobench rating is good, good to hear this. after the presale starts and main round sales completed, we'll see the trust of investors to REPU definitely. Even this volatile market, REPU has a great potential raising good amount of investments.
The ICOBENCH rating of 4.1 is not good for us. That's because of 2 reasons: https://icobench.com/ico-analyzer?ico=repuIf you see the Benchy, you'll notice that the rating distribution is a little bit smaller, because of: 1. We've not yet published ICO dated and Bonus program (it will be published very soon) 2. A low activity on Facebook and Medium (we are working on it ) So, you'll see the 4.5 and more rating very soon. Stay tuned! in my opinion it is already a good result, a good score, but with little adjustments like official dates of start and end of the ico, more activity on social networks can become one of the top ico in the ranking,that can means more visibility and more trust from the investors I wish to see some sort of demo of the app soon. Yeah, I think we all would like to see something like a demo or footage etc. Support! In the words of all everything works and everything is beautiful! But in reality to see the working platform is quite another!
|
|
|
|
Scoiattolo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2018, 07:53:04 PM |
|
Is this goimg to work like the facebook "like" you find around in all the website? Or also in that way at least? Or is just a stand alone app?
|
|
|
|
Genesis07
Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2018, 08:14:39 PM |
|
Is this goimg to work like the facebook "like" you find around in all the website? Or also in that way at least? Or is just a stand alone app?
afaik, this is going to be a platform where you can rate people and write reputation related stuff.
|
|
|
|
helloal
|
|
January 17, 2018, 08:16:28 PM |
|
since the eta price is low now this seems to be a good time for icos am I right or wrong?
Depends on how the project teams do the ICO. If they fixed the amount of tokens per ETH previously then this might be a good time for the ICO, but if they are determining the token per ETH price ICO closer to the ICO date, then there won't be a difference.
|
|
|
|
bitcoin-shark
|
|
January 17, 2018, 08:27:00 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you. i think an investor should use all the means at his disposal to learn about the project before investing like read the whitepaper, the roadmap, the team structure but also read sites for ico rating as icobench where the ico of repu is well evaluated and then draw their conclusions...
|
|
|
|
tiCeR
|
|
January 17, 2018, 08:29:31 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you. I would like to add that I saw really bad ratings on icobench as well. Projects getting average ratings although they are absolutely top notch and among the most promising projects in the crypto space. You are best off with you just do your own research.
|
| | . .Duelbits│SPORTS. | | | ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄ ▄▄█████████████████▄▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ ███████████████████████████ █████████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████████ █████████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████ ▀████████████████████████ ▀▀███████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ | | | | ██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ | | | | ███▄██▄███▄█▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄██ ███▄██▀▄█▄▀███▄██████▄█ █▀███▀██▀████▀████▀▀▀██ ██▀ ▀██████████████████ ███▄███████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀▀███████████████▀▀ ▀▀▀▀█▀▀▀▀ | | OFFICIAL EUROPEAN BETTING PARTNER OF ASTON VILLA FC | | | | ██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ | | | | 10% CASHBACK 100% MULTICHARGER | │ | |
|
|
|
multinova
|
|
January 17, 2018, 09:08:20 PM |
|
People still really looking at ratings ? No way I'm gonna buy into or partecipate in a bounty based on what I read in those websites, I just do my own research on team, idea, potential and whitepaper
I agree. This days, most investors also do their homework before investing in a crypto project and that is an ideal strategy when it comes to crypto invest :)ments. Sure, as an investor you should analyse yourself the project but a site like icobench maybe is a good starting point to find ICOs in the first place that might be worth your own research. My opinion as investor you should use both ( your research and also a useful site as icobench ) because a website will not read the whitepaper or look into the team for you. I would like to add that I saw really bad ratings on icobench as well. Projects getting average ratings although they are absolutely top notch and among the most promising projects in the crypto space. You are best off with you just do your own research. Most of these ICO review sites get paid anyway so i wouldn't trust them.. only the ones where you need to pay for the info are somewhat trustworthy.
|
|
|
|
lvsca
|
|
January 17, 2018, 10:35:14 PM |
|
Is this goimg to work like the facebook "like" you find around in all the website? Or also in that way at least? Or is just a stand alone app?
afaik, this is going to be a platform where you can rate people and write reputation related stuff. this platform will good to get ratings, and fair rating.
|
|
|
|
Trrrt
|
|
January 17, 2018, 11:10:58 PM |
|
Ico bench and other rating website are really important for the visibility of a project I think. REPU is a nice and ambitious project with a huge target market. Reputation management will grow a lot in the following years I think.
|
|
|
|
|