Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 08:50:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: low hash miners: large or small pool?  (Read 1491 times)
lechuck (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 04:29:55 PM
 #1

does it make a difference for low hash miners (310mhs) if a pool has a very large hashrate or a small one? obviously blocks get solved faster with large pools, but the rewards are also smaller..
TalkImg was created especially for hosting images on bitcointalk.org: try it next time you want to post an image
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713948646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713948646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713948646
Reply with quote  #2

1713948646
Report to moderator
1713948646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713948646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713948646
Reply with quote  #2

1713948646
Report to moderator
1713948646
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713948646

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713948646
Reply with quote  #2

1713948646
Report to moderator
elrock
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 06:34:43 PM
 #2

It probably has no effect on total rewards, but I prefer to join the small- to medium-size pools.  It's just psychologically more satisfying for me to see rewards in .10 and .20 btc increments rather than .01 or .005 increments.
drawoc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100

Firstbits: 175wn


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 08:31:57 PM
 #3

It doesn't really matter, in regard to how much you earn. I would suggest a small pool simply because it's better for the network if we spread out hashrate between many smaller pools than a few giant pools.

Donate: 175WNXmJ1WVhFgVGKUqEhYtAQGRYAvqPA
pinjas
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 04, 2011, 08:34:32 PM
 #4

It doesn't really matter, in regard to how much you earn. I would suggest a small pool simply because it's better for the network if we spread out hashrate between many smaller pools than a few giant pools.

I feel similarly to this sentiment.  Being concerned about ddos, pool failure, or a pool getting 'too large' crops up in my mind and draws me to the smaller pools. 
AnnihilaT
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 04, 2011, 08:38:34 PM
 #5

come help grow my super small pool! Smiley
Jack of Diamonds
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 251



View Profile
July 05, 2011, 02:38:45 AM
 #6

Take in account the current & next difficulties (1.3-1.6m).

They are brutally hard for small pools in terms of variance.
Sure, it evens out in the long term, which is months and years statistically.

It doesn't even out in the short term. A single difficulty can change in 7-10 days.

If your pool does under 50ghash/s, your earnings might drop to literally zero if the pool has bad enough luck (i.e. it might only find a single block during a difficulty level, or none at all)

The larger a pool is, the better it's protected against massive luck swings caused by raising difficulty level & variance.
Pool luck varies about 5-15% at the most on giants like Slush and deepbit.

On pools below 500 ghash, there are daily swings upwards of 20-50% or worse.

1f3gHNoBodYw1LLs3ndY0UanYB1tC0lnsBec4USeYoU9AREaCH34PBeGgAR67fx
JoelKatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012


Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.


View Profile WWW
July 05, 2011, 02:54:09 AM
 #7

Sure, it evens out in the long term, which is months and years statistically.

It doesn't even out in the short term. A single difficulty can change in 7-10 days.
Right, but this also means you have a chance at an unusually high payoff.

Quote
The larger a pool is, the better it's protected against massive luck swings caused by raising difficulty level & variance.
Pool luck varies about 5-15% at the most on giants like Slush and deepbit.

On pools below 500 ghash, there are daily swings upwards of 20-50% or worse.
Right, but I don't want to be protected from massive good luck swings.

Smaller pools have more variance, that's true. That's good and its bad.

I am an employee of Ripple. Follow me on Twitter @JoelKatz
1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!