[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[bal3wolf]

wish i could figure out why i get such bad getwork errors both the 5870 and 6950 are only running at 20-40% eff by cgwatcher but my 7970x2 runs at 98+ i played with alot of sittings none helped it seemed.  Right now running on the eu server and seems to be doing good let it run for a hr and see just makes no sence sence the 5870 is on same network as the 7970s that have no problems.


fixed my problem i think downgraded to cgminer 3.5 and removed the eu pool and now the 5870 and 6950 dont have so many getwork errors.

[1714058259]

1714058259

[1714058259]

1714058259

[1714058259]

1714058259

[Firebug24k]

Another great day on MC!  Thanks H20!

[jk1985]

Sorry guys. Temporary disabled the balance tool "http://bitcoinideal.eu/middlecoin/index.php?username=". My hosting provider does not like the load.  

If someone has a place to host the tool let me know (PM)

Toot is back online 

Check your balance with http://bitcoinideal.eu/middlecoin/index.php?username=1JDHbrQLXegdQX8gyreMmd4A2oK6zHpYg (just put your own BTC address after username). Will update every 5 minutes (mobile friendly)

[Kluge]

After adding in a time difference check for python mdc watcher between local and server time, it appears middlecoin JSON data is always outdated by 5+ minutes and only updates roughly once per thirty minutes. Is this in line with others' findings?

[foroplus]

For me it's not working fine.  Yesterday I've received half the previous day, and the lowest amount of the whole week.

[coin123123]

For me it's not working fine.  Yesterday I've received half the previous day, and the lowest amount of the whole week.

for me was the opposite,
yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week.

[Chello]

for me was the opposite,
yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week.

+1

[phrozenspite]

for me was the opposite,
yesterday received more than previous day and definitely not lowest this week.

+1

+2

[mattd83]

If you wish, your options are to investigate further, or try something like Multipool if you are around more and wish to be more in-control of your mining and trading. It's ultimately your choice, after all.

[eric89]

I think that if more people mine the same coin, it becomes less valuable because the market becomes saturated and therefore profits are reduced. (That's just my understanding of it, I'm not claiming to be an expert or anything)
If you go to page 1, even H2o says:

You should show the current mined coin.

Unfortunately I think that showing the current coin would make a bunch of people switch to mining that, lowering our profits.

I have toyed with the idea of giving coins aliases. I might do that.

If you can think of any ways to give miners more information, without spilling the beans on the coins, let me know.

So by this logic, more users = less profit, correct? or am I misunderstanding?

More hash rate to compete with us is what he meant.  If someone else is finding the blocks it does us no good

Another point is that hashcows and Middlecoin are probably both mining the same coin most of the time anyway

so them coming over here probably won't change things too much

[coin123123]

its no secret everyone mining doge now,
it can be seen in all comparison sites and it can be seen by mining difficulty

[CaptainBeck]

Doge is becoming stable and there is alot of talk about it so it makes sense to stay for a while.

[ilpirata79]

Is it convienent to mine on this pool with low hashrate, say 300kh/s?

Best regards,
ilpirata79

[jamesc760]

Is it convienent to mine on this pool with low hashrate, say 300kh/s?

Best regards,
ilpirata79

it's convenient to mine on this pool, just not with the low hash rig like yours. Diff on mc is 512, you won't benefit from the pool with 300KHs.

[ja5ka]

Is it convienent to mine on this pool with low hashrate, say 300kh/s?

Best regards,
ilpirata79

it's convenient to mine on this pool, just not with the low hash rig like yours. Diff on mc is 512, you won't benefit from the pool with 300KHs.

Im mining with 200 KHs and im doing fine. Tried hashcows but got better results here.

My payout history: http://middlecoin2.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/reports/1QB78XQfYm26NicPjrv4PGdEucPjQT428s.html

[Gamer67]

300kh/s is 300kh/s no matter where you mine.

It has been mentioned numerous times before in this thread that the 512 diff evens out in the long run.


Dare I say that the reason people might get slightly better results here as opposed to Hashcows is all down to the operator and his skills at exchanging and such.

Also your account is much more secure here than it would be at other multipools.

[phrozenspite]

300kh/s is 300kh/s no matter where you mine.

It has been mentioned numerous times before in this thread that the 512 diff evens out in the long run.


Dare I say that the reason people might get slightly better results here as opposed to Hashcows is all down to the operator and his skills at exchanging and such.

Also your account is much more secure here than it would be at other multipools.

hashcows, security problems aside had server issues. i dont think they had any problems with the coins themselves.

[coinGeek]

After adding in a time difference check for python mdc watcher between local and server time, it appears middlecoin JSON data is always outdated by 5+ minutes and only updates roughly once per thirty minutes. Is this in line with others' findings?

Are you sure about the thirty minute finding? Interesting.

I'm not saying this isn't what's happening right now, but I've been collecting data from the JSON every ten minutes and I know I've seen changes happening at about that scale in the recent past.

[phzi]

After adding in a time difference check for python mdc watcher between local and server time, it appears middlecoin JSON data is always outdated by 5+ minutes and only updates roughly once per thirty minutes. Is this in line with others' findings?

Are you sure about the thirty minute finding? Interesting.

I'm not saying this isn't what's happening right now, but I've been collecting data from the JSON every ten minutes and I know I've seen changes happening at about that scale in the recent past.

Any reason my user chart hasn't updated in over 12 hours?  Haven't seen anything mentioned in this thread.

[coinGeek]

Any reason my user chart hasn't updated in over 12 hours?  Haven't seen anything mentioned in this thread.

The continued growth in the number of users on Middlecoin in the last week is the short answer. Also, over the holidays there is less server babysitting going on. 

The graphs are updated in the order the data files were created and the JSON, like the home page, is sorted by hash rate.

The newer users and users with lower hash rates will be processed later in each run. If the process hangs or the server needs a reboot, it's more likely that these users don't get run for several rounds. That's been happening lately so, if that's you, that's why. Sorry about that.

I'm building out a new server this morning so look for improvement soon.