Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 04:54:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 [399] 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade  (Read 1031106 times)
digitalindustry
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
January 25, 2015, 09:44:02 AM
 #7961

And suddenly all the FUDers re-appear.


- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
1710824065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824065
Reply with quote  #2

1710824065
Report to moderator
1710824065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824065
Reply with quote  #2

1710824065
Report to moderator
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710824065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710824065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710824065
Reply with quote  #2

1710824065
Report to moderator
digitalindustry
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
January 25, 2015, 09:46:20 AM
 #7962

indeed beautiful like a watch in fact -

so we can always tell the fake stuff from the real stuff, my only issue is ha ha the FBI running silkroad 2.0 ?

but hey if you know they aren't rock out, i have no info either way its really not any of my business.

also this means the continued support for Quark and neutral control in a real market place these natural forces are irresistible.

- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
digitalindustry
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
January 25, 2015, 11:15:53 AM
 #7963

Quark 0.9.2.2

* Checkpoint added
* Github updated with patches for backward incompatibility in OpenSSL 1.0.1k/l.
* Windows version built using OpenSSL 1.0.1j until Bitcoin Core finalises its changes for OpenSSL 1.0.1k/l.

You might have to run your wallet with the -reindex option the first time after upgrading to ensure you are on the correct chain.

Windows Qt wallet 0.9.2.2 (zip)

Win32
Mega - https://mega.co.nz/#!F8tFAZKA!2lXc7tm25q-6zdt5IhvRGq8xBvMRNSCGqjEH6TMPeck
Dropbox - https://www.dropbox.com/s/oyjfdw7ebfxcu2o/quark0.9.2.2win32.zip?dl=0
File hash: SHA1 37E17FCA0746EFAF7D2813FC9307012C78183B92

Win64
Mega - https://mega.co.nz/#!1hMljbQL!4iEuJrQF1waGQfmnuW49e0awSyjNoL98BS5Cp3k4g_M
Dropbox - https://www.dropbox.com/s/4r8kfia9ovp61rb/quark0.9.2.2win64.zip?dl=0
File hash: SHA1 8EEAC99F22F23DC6951A798536B03D8E1DA65E78

Edit: Superseded by 0.9.2.3


OK so apparently the windows wallet works, I have my Quarks on Mac though where there is no working wallet, much like the android wallet, who is able to update it?
agreed a Mac / mobile support for would be greatly helpful -

- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
thunderjet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 312


View Profile
January 25, 2015, 04:10:42 PM
 #7964

Why is Quark wallet on Cryptsy still down Huh
nuttynoah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 27, 2015, 01:02:31 PM
 #7965

Why is Quark wallet on Cryptsy still down Huh
It's up and running, I know, I just bought some more.
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
January 27, 2015, 01:03:48 PM
 #7966

At the current hashrate of the coin , how many i7 processors it will take to do a 51%?

Few days ago you would have needed only 80M to perform a 51% attack, if someone had really been interested to knock down the network he could do that by temporarily ordering a few number of virtual machines. It would probably have costed less than 1000$. Even that was too much to perform an attack, noone cares.

The Hashrate hasn´t been that low since December 2013, still in December the situation was better because it wasn´t that centralized - even though it was really bad:

As you can read from this post the Hashrate of Coinmine in December 2013 was about 90%. Today it has 98.96% with 406M Hashrate (don´t believe it? click here). There is basically noone solo mining. Quark IS coinmine.pl.

Waiting for Digitalindustry or Hillux to come and claim that Quark is the best and most decentralized currency.

I´d be interested in an explanation how Quark could ever get away from being centralized at coinmine.pl




bump

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
coinerer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 588



View Profile WWW
January 27, 2015, 11:34:04 PM
 #7967


One player from this chat http://pastebin.com/jviD91wL is playing the main role in pricing the quark Smiley



        █████████████████      ███████████████    ██████████  ████████    █████████████
    █    ███████   ███████  ████████      █████  ███████████ ████████    ██████   ██████  
        █████████   ███████  ████████      █████  ████████████████████  ████████   ▀▀▀▀▀▀
   ▅▅  ████████   ███████  ████████      █████  ████████████████████  ████████
  █  ▀▀  ████████████████    ████████      █████  ████████████████████    ██████████████
     ▅▅████████   ███████  ████████      █████  ████████████████████              █████    
       ▀▀████████   ███████  ████████      █████  ████████████████████  ▄▄▄▄▄▄      █████
▅▅▅▅▄ ████████   ███████  ████████      █████  ████████ ███████████  ▀▀██████████████
       █████████████████     ████████████████   ████████ ███████████    ▀▀▀██████████


Your Intro
Telegram Casino
to Fun & Entertainment
The Next-Gen
Gaming Space
    ▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃
  ▄▄█████████████▄▄
██▀               ▀████▄
                       ██
   ██            ■■    ██
 ██████        ■■  ■■  ███
   ██    ▀ ▀     ■■    ███      
     ▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃        ██
    █████████████      ██
    ██          ████████▀
████▀           ▀█████▀
Hilux74
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 912
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 28, 2015, 12:01:20 AM
 #7968

Hm, are there connections between Maxcoin and Quark Huh
I thought those 2 coins didn't like each other very much Cheesy

Since Maok joined it looks like Quark copies some projects from Maxcoin:

1.
The cryptobullion project at startcoin:
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/29ebpl/maxcoin_silver_cryptobullion_startjoin_project/
(initiated by mako (or better known as mr solomon at maxcoin:P) http://forums.silverstackers.com/topic-57342-startcoin-silver-cryptobullion.html
And Quark also did an attempt:
http://quarktalk.org/threads/cryptobullion-minted-coins.236/

2.
And a new forum for Maxcoin; MaxTalk.org
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/220xsd/ann_opening_of_the_official_maxcoin_community/
Didn't Quark also have its own forum what was the name.... QuarkTalk.org Cheesy

 Cheesy

Wow those are some weak items even for you to try and build an argument around.  What even is your argument?  Looks like an attack on Maok but it is so weak it makes no sense.  You are going to get fired from your job as a paid troll soon with posts that useless. 

Considering we are at BitcoinTalk.org you might notice the general pattern of [coinname]Talk.org for forums...that is called a trend.  Also you might notice if you were not so busy trying to ATM yourself between antiQuark posts, that many coins including Litecoin and Bitcoin have physical bullion rounds of themselves...again that is called a trend.  What point is there in indicating that among the many coins that followed those trends that Maxcoin and Quark did as well? 

What's next for you silvermetal...discovering that both Bitcoin and Quark have a blockchain...therefore Satoshi is Adam who is DigitalIndustry who is Maok who is Me who is married to Coinmama who's midget 10ft tall lesbian son is Quarkfx...it all makes sense now!!!!!!!!!!!!1 

In this crazy world of unexpected things happening it is nice to know that we can all trust in one constant...that silvermetal gets stupider and stupider each day.

WillowRosenberg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2015, 12:52:28 AM
 #7969

Hm, are there connections between Maxcoin and Quark Huh
I thought those 2 coins didn't like each other very much Cheesy

Since Maok joined it looks like Quark copies some projects from Maxcoin:

1.
The cryptobullion project at startcoin:
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/29ebpl/maxcoin_silver_cryptobullion_startjoin_project/
(initiated by mako (or better known as mr solomon at maxcoin:P) http://forums.silverstackers.com/topic-57342-startcoin-silver-cryptobullion.html
And Quark also did an attempt:
http://quarktalk.org/threads/cryptobullion-minted-coins.236/

2.
And a new forum for Maxcoin; MaxTalk.org
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/220xsd/ann_opening_of_the_official_maxcoin_community/
Didn't Quark also have its own forum what was the name.... QuarkTalk.org Cheesy


C'mon, I know you can come up with better conspiracy theories than this, I've heard some of them before.
quarkfx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 28, 2015, 10:09:45 AM
 #7970

@silvermetal

Hm, are there connections between Maxcoin and Quark Huh
I thought those 2 coins didn't like each other very much Cheesy

Since Maok joined it looks like Quark copies some projects from Maxcoin:

1.
The cryptobullion project at startcoin:
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/29ebpl/maxcoin_silver_cryptobullion_startjoin_project/
(initiated by mako (or better known as mr solomon at maxcoin:P) http://forums.silverstackers.com/topic-57342-startcoin-silver-cryptobullion.html
EDIT: http://forums.silverstackers.com/message-760718.html

And Quark also did an attempt:
http://quarktalk.org/threads/cryptobullion-minted-coins.236/

2.
And a new forum for Maxcoin; MaxTalk.org
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/220xsd/ann_opening_of_the_official_maxcoin_community/
Didn't Quark also have its own forum what was the name.... QuarkTalk.org Cheesy




Silvermetal, sorry, I think you´re getting lost in conspiracy theories here. Point is, there are dozens of forums that called themself fancycoinametalk.org, because btctalk. Same with the silly cryptobullion stuff. If you want to criticise, you should better focus on facts that you can prove. What you present here are anything but correlations -  and they are very very loose.

@maok

Quote
The points in low hashrate has been the subject from as long as I found out about Quark, back in June last year people were worried, now again you are worried(why I wonder as you're not involved in anything anymore)

I answered that question several times. I put some money and a lot of time into Quark, I helped building up the community, that´s why I am still related to it in a way. When I look back at what happened in this time, it is obvious that issues were silenced by a cheering fanboys and people were listening to charlatans like DigitalIndustry. This way newcomers like me had the impression that everything was fine when actually anything happened in terms of development and community building. With recreating the Foundation we tried to work against that. We used time, brain and money to bring stuff forward and to be honest with the weaknesses that Quark has due to is centralization and low hashrate. Unfortunately this endeavor failed for several reasons, including tricking the community with B9/Mimiccoin by DigitalIndustry, McPhervi but also the active and trustful developers MaxGuevara and Shakezula. This alone should be enough to be sceptical when it comes to Quark. I prefer to talk about those weaknesses, so newcomers will now what they are buying than not talking about any of this stuff at all. Anyway, same as you, I am a free human being and I am not spreading false information, so I should ask you in reverse, why are you bothering?


Quote
if you bother to read I said I am concerned but thing is that, the coin pool or anyone who gathers sufficient mining power can only do as much harm as delay transactions.

If the network is down e.g. because the pool went offline it is really easy to find the checkpointing node. Once you know which one it is, you can DDOS it and there you go automatic checkpointing. So, no, delaying is NOT the only thing that can be done - and there are many people outside who like to do this stuff just for fun. Just look at the Auroracoin fork. It doesn´t make sense at all, but yeah, someone did it.


Quote
an army of thousands of botnets (...) that pool has a solid majority, more than 50% which is enough (not 99% like you exagerate )

Thousands of botnets? You don´t need thousands of botnets. Please check out the numbers, I also linked some on Reddit. The Top10 miners at coinmine.pl own more than 50% of the global hashrate. You can compare the daily Hashrate with the pool hashrate and will find that most of the time it is at 98-99%. Why do you think Max is asking Quarkers to spread their Hashrate to other pools?

Quote
Once quark or any crypto currency gathers more adopters you will see or have seen in other crypto currencies that the hashrate will also raise because the value will raise and so on.

That really doesn´t matter as long as it is centralised at one pool.

Quote
Thing is once Quark is a worthy currency for real use, if ever, will be strongly protected by the decentralization in mining power.

Yeah, sure...why? Even Bitcoin was centralized at GHash.io with over 50%. There is no incentive not to mine at GHash - there is only a high incentive in telling others not to mine there. Your mining results will always be better at the largest pool and that´s particularly why there is no reason to believe that real decentralization will ever take place, because solo-miners are always in large-slight disadvantage. Quark is not the only currency who deals with this issue. Most PoW coins do and there have been LOTs of discussion how this problem can be solved, but none as far as I can see with Quark but your mining contest (a fancy thing for the moment, but doesn´t solve the issue longterm).
brookefinancial
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 28, 2015, 11:51:54 PM
 #7971

Thanks! The 3D Printer we are showcasing on the website right now is a very early prototype of the ISG 11 that we are releasing in 2 weeks.

We will have the chance to keep you updated on that matter, but we are releasing a brand new line of printers with very high print quality.

i'll be interested and check it out for sure - i know many people around the free world are interested in 3D printing.  : )

Hey, quick update, we have officially launched at Shopify www.ISG3D.com and the ShapeShift Button is now working to pay using QRK on the 3D printing webstore! We are releasing a new 3D printer in 1-2 weeks and more products will be uploaded soon!


3D Printing and Bitcoin, that's pretty cool.
WillowRosenberg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 11:04:10 AM
 #7972

At the current hashrate of the coin , how many i7 processors it will take to do a 51%?

Few days ago you would have needed only 80M to perform a 51% attack, if someone had really been interested to knock down the network he could do that by temporarily ordering a few number of virtual machines. It would probably have costed less than 1000$. Even that was too much to perform an attack, noone cares.

The Hashrate hasn´t been that low since December 2013, still in December the situation was better because it wasn´t that centralized - even though it was really bad:

As you can read from this post the Hashrate of Coinmine in December 2013 was about 90%. Today it has 98.96% with 406M Hashrate (don´t believe it? click here). There is basically noone solo mining. Quark IS coinmine.pl.

Waiting for Digitalindustry or Hillux to come and claim that Quark is the best and most decentralized currency.

I´d be interested in an explanation how Quark could ever get away from being centralized at coinmine.pl



bump

congrats, looks like this coin has 2 full-power forks now:

https://www2.coinmine.pl/qrk/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks

http://yaamp.com/site/block?id=305


Yaamp difficulty is 0.9, everybody else's difficulty is 900. Yaamp probably hasn't upgraded to the latest version.
altsay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 359
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 12:36:13 PM
 #7973

Hey, quick update, we have officially launched at Shopify www.ISG3D.com and the ShapeShift Button is now working to pay using QRK on the 3D printing webstore! We are releasing a new 3D printer in 1-2 weeks and more products will be uploaded soon!

Cool. And consider the int. shipping as well.
maok
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 01:31:23 PM
 #7974

Yaamp difficulty is 0.9, everybody else's difficulty is 900. Yaamp probably hasn't upgraded to the latest version.
yes they were on the same fork with the rest of us http://yaamp.com/explorer?id=305&height=1623695 before 11th january, right about when we first had our first report of this issue: http://quarktalk.org/threads/mining-drop.1059/

They need to upgrade to 0.9.2.3 version which is the most popular at the moment: https://bitinfocharts.com/quarkcoin/ with 40% nodes using it, or at least downgrade to 0.8.x version

Where are the pool owners of yaamp ??

QRKHn6UK3ToS53V6jD1rYWRYS4mxQ1mako
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▀▄▀▄▀ Quark core wallet updates  ▀▄▀▄▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
BitQuark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 716
Merit: 501



View Profile WWW
January 30, 2015, 04:52:45 AM
 #7975

New Quarkcoin pool, 1% fee, min cash out 1 QRK.
Quarkcoin : http://qrk.bitquark.info
Litecoin : http://ltc.bitquark.info
LitecoinX : http://ltcx.bitquark.info
BitQuark : http://www.WeMineBTQ.com
Bitcoin-sCrypt : http://www.WeMineBTCS.com

dragonseer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 611
Merit: 500


Anglo Saxon Crypto Enthusiast


View Profile
January 31, 2015, 09:13:33 AM
 #7976

There is a lot of petty nonsense on this thread but I want to update about my recent Quark testing on the 'Old' 0.8x client.

I bought some Quark on Cryptsy and sent to an android wallet on the 10th of Jan. At first I thought the wallet did not work but then I chose the option to 'Reset Blockchain' in the settings menu. After waiting a considerable time for this reset then the transaction went through. So the android wallet lists the compatibility at 0.8.3.15 and above, and as far as I know, resetting the block chain did not put the wallet on the new 'fork' and make it compatible with the new 0.9x client.

To check on this, I sent some Quarks just now from my Mac client (running 0.8.3.22) and the android wallet received them just fine.

So why would I update to the new client that is running a new fork? Cryptsy must still be on the 0.8x client, the android wallet works on this 0.8x client, as does my older Mac client, if the new 0.9x client is compatible with these then it isn't a hard fork?

Crypto sales and more here: https://www.ebay.com.au/usr/dragon-seer
iGotAIDS
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 02, 2015, 03:55:32 AM
 #7977

And suddenly all the FUDers re-appear.


And your sock puppet account, eh Max?
WillowRosenberg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 02, 2015, 04:32:13 AM
 #7978

And suddenly all the FUDers re-appear.


And your sock puppet account, eh Max?

Uh no, but that surely is one of your trolling accounts Wink
Monopoly
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 02, 2015, 05:06:51 AM
 #7979

What are your predictions for Quark. Could it possibly hit $0.1??
silvermetal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 487
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 02, 2015, 07:40:11 AM
Last edit: February 13, 2015, 05:18:31 PM by silvermetal
 #7980

And suddenly all the FUDers re-appear.


And your sock puppet account, eh Max?

If you look to the post history of hilux74 and willow it is not a surprise that they are sockpuppets.; zero contribution to any Quark related projects, only active when somebody post something "negative" about the coin (eg when I post something) to create confusion, and there is never anything wrong with the coin. not very realistic...It would be interesting if willow is Max Smiley.

Edit: Lol (see posts below).

hilux, hilux you'll never learn... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg9895334#msg9895334

And everybody knows who "digitalindustry" is : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781954.0 Therefore it makes no sense to react on his message below.

And Max....he created at least the following coins: JouleCoin, Myriad, Zeta, Mimic, Quark, skeincoin, chaincoin and is involved with "woodcoin" (created the wallet).
with the following accounts: "WillowRosenberg", "JohnJoule", "Rolihlahla", "Red Kendra", "Giskard", "8bitcoder" and "MaxGuevara"
Pages: « 1 ... 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 [399] 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!