Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 05:22:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 [435] 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade  (Read 1031110 times)
Thule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 276


View Profile
June 01, 2017, 10:38:47 AM
 #8681

@thule

4+5 are easy to answer.Max didnt worked much on Quark because he released several other coins on this board.He come to quark once kolin had majority of coins from quark.Max is/was a friend of Kolin coworking with him period.
If you own 100.000.000 coins you can't dump them for $0.3 thats impossible you would need have investors for $30.000.000 which was btw at that time the trading volume for bitcoin.
So when dumping even 30-40 million coins thats already a big amount of money you need first find investors for it.
You also claim that bill still audience are holding now the coins and are not selling.You wanna really tell me that the massiv amount of 1.000.000-2.000.000 wallets belong to bill still audience ?How much you think they invested each like $200k-600k ?Thats a bit unrealistic.If you check the blockchain these accounts have been splitted from 2 or 3 main wallets .No exchange no nothing.

Next that Bill Still received a bribe from Kolin has been proofed.His wallet was posted by him and Kolin where you could see on the blockchain that he received 2 times 500.000 coins .

Maybe ask Max why all of his coins on this board were a pump and dump ......its obvious that he coworked with max and that each of his coin had a 6 month mine timeframe and after that a pump and dump where after the dump max always left the coin going to the next one.

You call that a serious dev or somebody who wants to make quick money to scam people.
Why don't you ask Max for his real name and identity ?Start asking......who he is since once quark will fall again you won't see max anymore


1. can you provide evidence max and kolin are friends colluding together.
2. how can kolin have got the majority of the coins since i told you it is provable stephen took the vast bulk in the mining even I got 1 million so others with more rigs than me (small fish) must have got multiple millions.
3. THIS IS THE KEY POINT -
a- bills people started coming at 200 sats - they could have and did accumulate a lot on the way to 30,000 sats.
b- let's look at the block explorer because I wage a lot of these big wallets were purchased on the way up to the 30,000 sats pump and for sure at way higher prices that it is now. These are not dishonest scam pumpers these are investors that thought quark was going places.

4- bill still point is new to me I never knew it was proven that kolin gave him 1 million.
However i do remember a thread coming to think about it where kolin said every donation to bill that the community gave he will match it. So yes indeed at one point DI must have had quite a lot of quark.
This in itself is not really bad. I would pay celebrities or whoever to promote my coin and several other coins have tried it. Some may have an issue with paying people to promote a coin. I personally would have no issue with that.
Even if DI had a lot of quark though he MUST have mined it fairly or bought it fairly on the marketplace. There was no other way. I mean even say he had 20 rigs he could have mined millions and millions if he left them on their solidly. But then so could anyone else.
I turned against DI when he started trying to make that other quark rip off coin. You can check my post history on this thread calling it a scam coin.

5. I know you think 1m and 2m wallets is a huge wallet but in crypto those % of the minting are not unusual in any coin. Please verify that for yourself. I am part of many communities where people commonly try to accumulate 10% of the minting. Especially in small MC projects.

6. Max is not a developer that seems to stick to one project. This is HIS mistake in my opinion. I have met many developers like this. Some far worse than him who deliberately self destruct coins after they suck all the financial gain from them. Max could have made a fortune from quark since it has so much support here but if he chose to work on many other coins for short term small rewards that is his mistake. The most wealthy developers focus on one project and one project alone building them to a very successful and widely used product.
Quark was flawed from the start because you can not have short emission pow coins without moving to POS after I said this and campaigned here in 2014 for a shift to pos and a funding mechanism for another developer.. This was quarks error not doing so and also having a developer that never posts or shows interest will eventually lead to the death of your project even though quark has functioned flawlessly for years and has received vital updates to keep it secure so far.

I am hoping for better things from MAX and these new coders from now on. I am not looking for a quick pump and dump of quark but a continued and progressive project that will bring something needed and will bring nice returns to those that invest and support the project. This is all one can ask from any project.
Many devs disappoint although they can have great skill. Take CZ for example many coders acknowledge that he is a super skilled verging on genius developer. Some have suggested he is even satoshi and they have presented argument for such. However he is flaky and bbr looks like its on a death row whilst its competition is in the top 10.

I don't expect him to divulge his real id. No more than jl777 or cz or satoshi. I respect here anon is fine.

I am not saying to people dive in on the hopes of a road map. Let's wait and see what code is produced on quark and judge then. I do not care if the developer has accumulated a large bulk of the coins cheaply now it is almost dead. This incentive is human nature and they need incentive..

All devs here are in the great position of god like powers with powers to rise of crush a project due to what they do or do not produce.


silvermetal and thule - I ask again. What are your special motivations to be anti quark more than any other project that can have these identical criticisms levelled at them but in a far more serious and flagrant manner?

How do you both know so much about quark? are you old foundation members turned anti quark or what is this about?

It seems you ask a lot of questions of me and my motives and i told you here in plain open way although you 2 refuse to tell me your history with quark and how you know so much about the personal aspects of DI especially. Also what makes you believe i mean what evidence you have that DI has returned here? He must be kept away now he had his chance to be good with quark and he displayed he went totally anti quark so he should be prevented from more destructive influence.

Quote
Are you implying people have other intentions to see projects to become successful that they do NOT own? let's be serious. Show me some people who are fighting for projects here to succeed that do not hold those tokens.

He is implying there are people who want to get investors into that coin knowing that its basicly worthless with this hughe amounts of coins.You wrote 1-2 million coins are nothing big if you compare it to other communities.However this coin has nearly no investors.A current 2.000.000 dumb and the coin is gone again.
I'm an old core member who tried last time already to protect people from the pump and dump today its similar.
You claim you have no issue a celebirty advertising a coin.You know in the real word both would be sitting in prision for that.
Quark is advertised as a decentrelaised currency.
How can it be decentralised when its being hold by few people ?These few people are the new centralisation and how can it be called a currency when used by just a few people holding it in their wallets.
And yes the 1-2 million wallets are from major wallets.We did in the past a blockchain read and cleary saw that these coins haven't been bought but splitted from bigger accounts.


You said Max didnt anything for the last 3 years.You know Max didnt mostly anything for more than 5 years.The small updates he provided 3 years ago was nothing.
Each and everytime you need to wait for any shit months to change.

Even now you can see no communication from Max.
No update no nothing not even a single reply between his and kolins relationship.

1711689772
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711689772

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711689772
Reply with quote  #2

1711689772
Report to moderator
1711689772
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711689772

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711689772
Reply with quote  #2

1711689772
Report to moderator
1711689772
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711689772

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711689772
Reply with quote  #2

1711689772
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711689772
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711689772

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711689772
Reply with quote  #2

1711689772
Report to moderator
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
June 01, 2017, 02:11:31 PM
 #8682

@thule

4+5 are easy to answer.Max didnt worked much on Quark because he released several other coins on this board.He come to quark once kolin had majority of coins from quark.Max is/was a friend of Kolin coworking with him period.
If you own 100.000.000 coins you can't dump them for $0.3 thats impossible you would need have investors for $30.000.000 which was btw at that time the trading volume for bitcoin.
So when dumping even 30-40 million coins thats already a big amount of money you need first find investors for it.
You also claim that bill still audience are holding now the coins and are not selling.You wanna really tell me that the massiv amount of 1.000.000-2.000.000 wallets belong to bill still audience ?How much you think they invested each like $200k-600k ?Thats a bit unrealistic.If you check the blockchain these accounts have been splitted from 2 or 3 main wallets .No exchange no nothing.

Next that Bill Still received a bribe from Kolin has been proofed.His wallet was posted by him and Kolin where you could see on the blockchain that he received 2 times 500.000 coins .

Maybe ask Max why all of his coins on this board were a pump and dump ......its obvious that he coworked with max and that each of his coin had a 6 month mine timeframe and after that a pump and dump where after the dump max always left the coin going to the next one.

You call that a serious dev or somebody who wants to make quick money to scam people.
Why don't you ask Max for his real name and identity ?Start asking......who he is since once quark will fall again you won't see max anymore


1. can you provide evidence max and kolin are friends colluding together.
2. how can kolin have got the majority of the coins since i told you it is provable stephen took the vast bulk in the mining even I got 1 million so others with more rigs than me (small fish) must have got multiple millions.
3. THIS IS THE KEY POINT -
a- bills people started coming at 200 sats - they could have and did accumulate a lot on the way to 30,000 sats.
b- let's look at the block explorer because I wage a lot of these big wallets were purchased on the way up to the 30,000 sats pump and for sure at way higher prices that it is now. These are not dishonest scam pumpers these are investors that thought quark was going places.

4- bill still point is new to me I never knew it was proven that kolin gave him 1 million.
However i do remember a thread coming to think about it where kolin said every donation to bill that the community gave he will match it. So yes indeed at one point DI must have had quite a lot of quark.
This in itself is not really bad. I would pay celebrities or whoever to promote my coin and several other coins have tried it. Some may have an issue with paying people to promote a coin. I personally would have no issue with that.
Even if DI had a lot of quark though he MUST have mined it fairly or bought it fairly on the marketplace. There was no other way. I mean even say he had 20 rigs he could have mined millions and millions if he left them on their solidly. But then so could anyone else.
I turned against DI when he started trying to make that other quark rip off coin. You can check my post history on this thread calling it a scam coin.

5. I know you think 1m and 2m wallets is a huge wallet but in crypto those % of the minting are not unusual in any coin. Please verify that for yourself. I am part of many communities where people commonly try to accumulate 10% of the minting. Especially in small MC projects.

6. Max is not a developer that seems to stick to one project. This is HIS mistake in my opinion. I have met many developers like this. Some far worse than him who deliberately self destruct coins after they suck all the financial gain from them. Max could have made a fortune from quark since it has so much support here but if he chose to work on many other coins for short term small rewards that is his mistake. The most wealthy developers focus on one project and one project alone building them to a very successful and widely used product.
Quark was flawed from the start because you can not have short emission pow coins without moving to POS after I said this and campaigned here in 2014 for a shift to pos and a funding mechanism for another developer.. This was quarks error not doing so and also having a developer that never posts or shows interest will eventually lead to the death of your project even though quark has functioned flawlessly for years and has received vital updates to keep it secure so far.

I am hoping for better things from MAX and these new coders from now on. I am not looking for a quick pump and dump of quark but a continued and progressive project that will bring something needed and will bring nice returns to those that invest and support the project. This is all one can ask from any project.
Many devs disappoint although they can have great skill. Take CZ for example many coders acknowledge that he is a super skilled verging on genius developer. Some have suggested he is even satoshi and they have presented argument for such. However he is flaky and bbr looks like its on a death row whilst its competition is in the top 10.

I don't expect him to divulge his real id. No more than jl777 or cz or satoshi. I respect here anon is fine.

I am not saying to people dive in on the hopes of a road map. Let's wait and see what code is produced on quark and judge then. I do not care if the developer has accumulated a large bulk of the coins cheaply now it is almost dead. This incentive is human nature and they need incentive..

All devs here are in the great position of god like powers with powers to rise of crush a project due to what they do or do not produce.


silvermetal and thule - I ask again. What are your special motivations to be anti quark more than any other project that can have these identical criticisms levelled at them but in a far more serious and flagrant manner?

How do you both know so much about quark? are you old foundation members turned anti quark or what is this about?

It seems you ask a lot of questions of me and my motives and i told you here in plain open way although you 2 refuse to tell me your history with quark and how you know so much about the personal aspects of DI especially. Also what makes you believe i mean what evidence you have that DI has returned here? He must be kept away now he had his chance to be good with quark and he displayed he went totally anti quark so he should be prevented from more destructive influence.

Quote
Are you implying people have other intentions to see projects to become successful that they do NOT own? let's be serious. Show me some people who are fighting for projects here to succeed that do not hold those tokens.

He is implying there are people who want to get investors into that coin knowing that its basicly worthless with this hughe amounts of coins.You wrote 1-2 million coins are nothing big if you compare it to other communities.However this coin has nearly no investors.A current 2.000.000 dumb and the coin is gone again.
I'm an old core member who tried last time already to protect people from the pump and dump today its similar.
You claim you have no issue a celebirty advertising a coin.You know in the real word both would be sitting in prision for that.
Quark is advertised as a decentrelaised currency.
How can it be decentralised when its being hold by few people ?These few people are the new centralisation and how can it be called a currency when used by just a few people holding it in their wallets.
And yes the 1-2 million wallets are from major wallets.We did in the past a blockchain read and cleary saw that these coins haven't been bought but splitted from bigger accounts.


You said Max didnt anything for the last 3 years.You know Max didnt mostly anything for more than 5 years.The small updates he provided 3 years ago was nothing.
Each and everytime you need to wait for any shit months to change.

Even now you can see no communication from Max.
No update no nothing not even a single reply between his and kolins relationship.



Okay so at least I know you are an old quark core member. Perhaps silver is the same. I am always interested to hear the opposite side of any story even should it be different to what I feel at the time. I like to explore and see if i must change my view.

Well to me in my opinion this is where me and you differ in opinions.

1. I feel anyone at all could have mined it or bought it cheap for months. This is more than you can say for many coins here for sure.
2. You feel these 1-2 million wallets are not bought after/during the rise but are split from larger wallets before the rise. I say though that if anyone could mine or buy fairly against anyone else that does not matter if people mined a lot or bought a lot it was equal chance for anyone. Also i would need to see a full block explorer analysis to even know when and how people got these coins. But like i said it is irrelevant to me because if the initial distribution leaves it open for anyone to mine and get a lot of quark or any one can buy a lot of quark for months. After that there is just market forces.
3. You feel max did no development on quark after release. I feel the same as you...he only did essential upgrades. Bad idea for a coin that was so famous at the time and had a large community.
4. You feel max goes around making lots of coins - I say okay that is his mistake not choosing one coin and sticking with it and making it a big success. Hopefully he can see that now since the other projects you mentioned dont seem very successful either.
5. You feel it is corrupt to get a celebrity or famous person to use their position to advertise or advise people it is a good opportunity. I don't feel it is corrupt if people know those people are endorsing it because they are getting paid. Look at all the coins advertising this famous company is interested, this bank is interested. Roger ver saying buy this and that. This point is not a big issue for me personally. For you it is. But they all do it so you have to fight on a level field.
6. You think it is corrupt to try and entice people to invest in a coin with no development and perhaps will just be pretend development so they can pump and dump again. I say that is correct. Wait until you see development happening. I myself am accumulating more because I am speculating that they will complete a new road map and upgrade quark. If i lose more money this is my problem. If you take larger risks you make larger returns. Those who need to be careful more with their BTC should await proven results from the team.
7. You say DI is bad. I agree although once i thought he was good. I thought he believed in quark and wanted it to succeed and be a long term successful project.  I called him many times a scammer near the end and we had a few issues.
8. Let's say for example the worst case - max has accumulated 20M quark. He and the new team develop quark and introduce a funding mechanism, decentralised governance and all the other tech that is being discussed. Then dumps then 20m and quark goes back to 100 sats from 30k or greater. We will still have the new tech and the funding system and we can bring on a new development team. He got paid for coding us our new tech. That is the worst that can happen. Hopefully that will not be the case and we can turn qrk into a long term project. Never sell in a flash dump unless there is no choice.
9. You will never control the power developers have on here so as long as they produce what they promise that is the most you can hope for in any project. I think all of them gradually cash out when they see the time is right. So many projects are dev less altogether right now. I don't think it is healthy to rely on one developer hence why we need a funding mechanism and voting mechanism to bring on a larger development team.


I think there will be room for 1000's of crypto currencies as it becomes more mainstream and instead of decentralisation i think having distributed many crypto currencies will spread the load best and keep crypto stronger.

I am actually more of a coin collector and I have no issue admitting my trading has lost me the opportunity to be a millionaire over and over and over again. I does not matter. I have all that I need and I find the entire thing very interesting. I am probably still of course far more wealthy that I could ever dreamed of due to crypto but I never even calculate how much fiat it is worth. I just like collecting and collecting more and more of it.

If you were a core member and put a lot of work and effort into quark and were fucked over by the intentional actions of others that were meant to be on your side then I agree you should be pissed off I would also be. However a lot of qrk holder bought fair or mined fair and there is no reason for them to have to let quark die because of the actions of a few before hand. Even the people bill brought in they are just investors looking for returns I dont say they are scammers. Most of those holding quark now for years are certainly not insiders else they would have tried to dump out at or near the top or even 15k 10k. They would not be holding now unless they are purely insane. The only people mainly holding now from years back are those that believed quark would be something long term.

Sure caution people to not invest before results are shown but to try and destroy an effort to bring quark back is actually not the right way to go about it. Sure if you don't like max's actions and you think he colluded with DI to destroy qrk then that is something pretty bad to consider. I am hoping MAX is going to realise jumping from project to project will never build something large and useful and that focusing on one project and growing a community and funding and bringing on more developers is the key to success and recognition in this arena.

The only part about max in your view that makes no sense to me is this...
1. if he somehow mined a lot himself ( he certainly didnt get more than stephen) then why he NEVER tried to use his dev powers to pump it? no road map no comment on the thread at all, no replies to questions. Just launched and made it look dead.
2. If DI mined a lot of coins or bought a lot....and says hey MAX i got a ton of quark let's pump and dump it. Why did max still never even show up and still make the coin look dead. I mean why would DI need MAX cos he got bill and why share your coins with MAX?
3. My opinion of max is that he did not mine much and was not even interested in qrk only as a hobby. Perhaps he is just short term point of view and create a lot of small projects and take some small rewards from each. This is a stupid plan. One big project like quark can make magnitudes more returns for constant hard work and good leadership.

So in conclusion i agree DI is bad or rather just wanted to extract value from qrk then kill it.
Max to me is short term POV and needs to focus on one project and be more of a leader rather than hide away and saying nothing or doing little either. That needs to change but I can not call him a scammer for this without 100% knowing how much qrk he had and when it was dumped. His actions to me logically say he didnt get much. That and stephen lamb taking a HUGE amount of all the coins and even a tiny miner like me being able to mine 1 million. I know so quite large miners i notice were there as from other launches too.

Why not rejoin the core and become positive and also you can keep a close eye on the progress and give us all a fair appraisal of it. If you see no development and it is all just talk and pump then you can inform everyone of this.

I would like coinmama and quarkfx to come back too. Let's get rid of the scammers out of this project and bring back the good people.

I take offense of people calling me a scammer and shill for DI. I mined my coins fairly and I will not suffer being called a scammer when I know 100% i mined my 1 million coins with no unfair disadvantage over anyone else.

I have a similar issue with beecoin. This was THE FAIREST pow launch out of over 100 I was on. I mean every fair launch aspect was fulfilled. Announced ahead of time, rar wallets with passwords so slow downloaders had same chance. Super fast diff so nobody could instamine much. That project has been the total train wreck due to a developer soopy actually taking 3BN beecoins and dumping them for 288LTC then immediately leaving with the funds to build NAV coin.

This is not even up for discussion or doubt there is 100% proof this took place. I am about to tackle this person head on because his actions are willful destruction of that coin and community even after the donations and funding raised by other community members.

You can see this on many projects. The community allowed him 1 billion for continued support of the project and he take 3BN and dumps it all crushing the market and then vanishes to work on NAV

If he had mined it himself there is nothing i guess anyone could say about it since it is up to him what he does then if he mined it or bought it fairly on the marketplace....but he just took it by force from the community funds.

This is the evidence you need to really pull the scam card on someone.

Now of course beecoin is not qrk and to many it is best it is dead. Also a huge amount of my beecoins were stolen by allcoin exchange and my ltc them too i am now about to start a scam campaign on too.

I do not suffer scammers. Even scammers that have no scammed me. Getgemz, and lots of scam campaigns i have launched on people. If i thought for a moment max had scammed me there would have been a scam thread on it. For sure he disappointed me with his abandonment but I can not logically see how he can have scammed me and other quark holders. I am still hoping he will redeem himself and qrk. If he does not then we will need a new dev team here.







joet3
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 01, 2017, 10:00:31 PM
 #8683

Way too cheap... starting a big bag now @ Cryptopia
hailian111
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 08:00:51 AM
 #8684

 Wink Wink Wink
hi,dev!Can you change a new LOGO for Quark?A new LOGO will make people knows a new Quark coming!~~~
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 08:10:50 AM
 #8685

Wink Wink Wink
hi,dev!Can you change a new LOGO for Quark?A new LOGO will make people knows a new Quark coming!~~~

what?? the logo is brilliant it's one of the best of any crypto project I would say anyway of course the entire community may want a change but the current one looks awesome to me.

silvermetal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 487
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 06:13:03 PM
Last edit: June 02, 2017, 06:35:26 PM by silvermetal
 #8686

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1941248.msg19279488#msg19279488

@cryptohunter , Why do you admit "not selling much Quark" is a mistake of yours?
Is there something more valuable than Quark Wink

Somebody who promotes Quark regrets he still owns Quark....for me the intentions would be clear..





Your point is lost on me. Any long term miner or holder of quark would not have the same view?? are you looking at the world in a different angle to those that employ logic and reason?

Probably yes (at least different than you). it is not logic, that you still hold your Quark after all you have experienced (Kolin, absence of dev, fall down of the foundation, dump of the bagholders, no development, the rise of more sophisticated / promising coins, and I can tell you 100 more reasons.....)


Of course it is a mistake. Why would not selling at 30,000 sats and now it is 300 sats not be a mistake? I mean i could have if i loved quark increased my position x100. Would anyone claim not selling something for x100 more is not a mistake? Let me hear any long term holder of quark say not selling at 30k sats now was not a mistake?


You have read it correct. Your mistake is not that you didn't sell on time, but that you mined the wrong coins. Why would you mine coins from developers you don't know/anonymous or are known scam developers in that time like Max and Hazard (eg DGC, SRC which you seem to want to revive as well.... and WDC).

Yes i held MOST of it but sold ENOUGH to become well off by my standards.


Good for you


However, I would like to see all the coins i have (over 150 ) become successful if they can. Why not.

Sigh. I thought I was naive.

Are you implying people have other intentions to see projects to become successful that they do NOT own? let's be serious. Show me some people who are fighting for projects here to succeed that do not hold those tokens. Why would they not support it by investing if they believed it offered something of use or they liked something about the developer or community.


Most coins created by Max are scammed by infamous scammers. For instance I met Kolin, Hilux and the UNO scammers. Not very nice people Wink

Although I can tell you quark is less than 1% of my crypto interests but I like the name and loved the old community that formed around it at one point. Hence the hint of why i did not sell my much of my quark because i like those people that were involved with it.

Same with doge I like the community and I still hold doge. Qrk was at one time 2nd only to doge in terms of community.

I mean there is never a reason to ask WHY someone wants to see a project succeed is there?

Quark had a very nice team with hard working people who believed in the potentials of Quark. I noticed you, but you didn't do anything. You were not on trello, not on reddit and you haven't donated one single Quark while you had bags full of it (you admit yourself). The only people who pledged their Quark were the hard working people, while the early miners like you were selling their Quark at exchanges for btc and dollars...and now you regret you had not sold more...shame on you! You should regret that you didn't pledge more to the projects. That's why I have my thoughts about your true intentions.

I am more interested in WHY people want to see it not succeed. I mean specifically see quark not succeed when every criticism i hear leveled at quark is applicable to many more coins in a far more serious manner?? that is actually a question that answer is not already a given is it not?

What is their motivation?  I mean even if they bought high and sold low it would have been hard for them to sell lower than it is right now. So if they are so worried about it making a comeback and missing out why not just buy back in cheap now. How can you lose? or is there some other reason?

I know DI wanted to destroy qrk at the end. So who are these accounts now that are so against it?


tjee....is there ever coming an end to this post.....

Are there projects better than quark right now you ask? Is that even a serious question? of course quark right now is below average because it was not well thought out in terms of emission schedule and it has had not updates (serious updates) in 3 years. It was at the time quite a revolutionary coin in some respects and was copied by many other coins due to the interesting random algos which for a long time made it asic proof and to this date i am not sure there are quark asics.

Check my post history. I am all over so many threads. My interests here are very varied. I would like to see the old quark foundation brought back but no DI. They tried and achieved some remarkable things and many were remarkable people.

What is your anti quark history?

Anti Quark history? You missed my post? for your convenience:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg18814451#msg18814451
I see it more as to provide people some background information about Quark because you won't tell them Wink

As to quark we will wait and see. I would like to see the old foundation back and a larger development team start working on it. The name quark is excellent. It is strange because in my post history you will see i name a project atom years ago but I even prefer quark to that really.

I see on bittrex people are no longer happy with cloning quarks algo they now try to copy the name qwark lol.

Quark will never die in crypto it is a legend of coins.

You may speculate I want a return of quark purely for financial reasons. You would be right in part but I own far greater % of mintings than I do of quark and you will not see me sticking up for them as much as i have for quark. So that is food for thought for you.



Yes I made it  (to the end of this post) Grin
CryptoCoderz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 506


Coderz of the Crypto variety


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2017, 06:46:05 PM
 #8687

Someone just dumped 100k coins and the price dropped by arround 15-20% even market is rising and the technical support line.

What would happen if cryptohunter would through in his 1.000.000 coins Smiley

Who is going to invest real money in a coin which could be shot to nirvana anytime by a single wallet ?


Btw when somebody wants to invest in Quark why not just rent for $500 some machines take the 51% control and just edit the blockchain Smiley

51% attacks aren't as straight forward as you may think, big bag holders will probably sell off eventually as most do and the coin will become redistributed... Kinda a natural occurrence in the cryptosphere




This is my first time playing around with mining. It looks like I must be mining on a fork or something. I tried to send some QRK to another wallet and it gets lost in space.

Make sure you're on the latest wallet. Smiley



LOL your poor attemtion to discredit me isnt working.You are comparing Quark to other looser and scam coins ?LOL why don't you compare Quark to a successfull coin ?
People who actually have money are smart enough to check my claims.Its enough to read the first 20 pages of that thread and everyone can see there were orphans reported by multiple users.
You call a coin which had no promotion but could mined by everyone a fair distribution ?You are pathetic.
Its like somebody opens his unknown website and publish there about the start of a new coin ,mine everyting himself and claim after 6 months it was a fair distribution since it was public on a domain nobody knew.
You know you call Quark a currency.Do you even know what a currency is ?Coins hold by 50-100 people you call a currency ?
The other guy claming about the work .......which work is he talking about ?What has Quark ?Nothing is working no infrastructur nothing only big wallets.
Your effords are quark really making a top coin.

POOR SCAM ATTEMPT and nothing more.

I warned people the first time that they will loose the money where i got bashed by coin holders and what happened everyone left the sinking ship giving a fuck about quark and people who lost their money.

You are a PARASITE and nothing more.

Wow, who pissed in your cereal this morning?

Seriously though let's think logically for a moment, when a coin goes dormant, some people will begin to collect large amounts of it in the hope that one day a cheap coin will become worth more. The coins themselves eventually redistribute unless the project completely dies which is obviously not happening with Quark.

Also a currency or even in this case a digital commodity is something that is traded for goods and services. Considering other coins/tokens are also considered as such Quark actually qualifies unlike what you've stated, perhaps it is you who needs to hit a dictionary

As for Quark having nothing... yeah the project looks like it went through a lul, that's probably why they reached out for assistance and albeit we haven't been very quick about working with the Quark dev on future updates we did agree to help and have things in the works.

Every project has it's ups and downs, saying it's "shit" because it doesn't have a fancy office building and someone you could send hate letters to is completely backwards.

As with any project you ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS RESEARCH BEFORE YOU INVEST. Doesn't make any more "scammy" than another project.






First of all Max coworked with Kolin or should i say Wetzl .
Max has a reason to not identify himself since he created many coins where each was a pump and dump and this guy is again reviving Quark where you clearly could read that Kolin and his family wanted to revive that coin using a Dev he knows.Who coworked with Kolin again?
Another issue the only guy Max heard to was Kolin,why ?Why did Max disappeared when Kolin left and why did Max came back exectly when Kolin wanted to revive Quark ?
There are these big wallets untouched for years where a single one could shoot Quark to the nirvana.
What does untouched big wallets mean for the price of quark ?It means that prices are going quickly up because there is not enough supply however should they start dumping their wallets after years the price will drop immedently.Thats a risk which other successfull coins dont have in such a big way.
The 5% Premine is no solution since a 5% premine isnt usefull for a pump and dump.Only If all coins are already mined and controlled by a few people the pump and dump can work.

Next step is the leak of interrest of the big wallet holders.Why are they not here ,rewarding good projects or pushing in any kind Quark ?Do they expect to come from alone ?
Max provides also no updates like always.So many bugs on Quark,no infrastructur,no real plan no nothing just waiting for a rise of price when Max will make the changes and nothing more.
Its like years ago where everyone waited for Max Kaiser to call the name Quark.At least during that time the community started projects about quark and really started getting people involved .....
What are you guys doing beside waiting ?

Oh an update is coming that will increase the value of quark by 10.000% because now it will be a real currency you can use everywhere

Maybe we should ask Max first how much he already gained from all the pump and dump his coins had ?Funny he is using multiple accounts .....for what reason ?
Maybe ask him first who he is since nobody knows it and you can trust me nobody will ever know it for a reason

Okay so idk who this "Kolin" is lol but CryptoCoderz were asked to come on board and work with Max to get Quark updated and continue working on use for it.

As for the pump and dump thing, no clue however I'll state this again: Coins that lul or peter out a bit are usually bought up by a few people when it gets cheap, again fairly normal. Idk if I'd be screaming about it.







He is implying there are people who want to get investors into that coin knowing that its basicly worthless with this hughe amounts of coins.You wrote 1-2 million coins are nothing big if you compare it to other communities.However this coin has nearly no investors.A current 2.000.000 dumb and the coin is gone again.
I'm an old core member who tried last time already to protect people from the pump and dump today its similar.
You claim you have no issue a celebirty advertising a coin.You know in the real word both would be sitting in prision for that.
Quark is advertised as a decentrelaised currency.
How can it be decentralised when its being hold by few people ?These few people are the new centralisation and how can it be called a currency when used by just a few people holding it in their wallets.
And yes the 1-2 million wallets are from major wallets.We did in the past a blockchain read and cleary saw that these coins haven't been bought but splitted from bigger accounts.


You said Max didnt anything for the last 3 years.You know Max didnt mostly anything for more than 5 years.The small updates he provided 3 years ago was nothing.
Each and everytime you need to wait for any shit months to change.

Even now you can see no communication from Max.
No update no nothing not even a single reply between his and kolins relationship.

Okay cool your jets lol

Firstly putting aside all this PnD accusations for moment, when we were contacted by the Quark community to assist in development we were informed that "Max" the original developer was a very busy person and  as such that the community was looking for more stable development. Again, provided that we've been slow lately as we ourselves have a few projects that must each be tended to we're still working on things and from the occasional correspondence with Max he's been working on Quark as well for a while. You know personal lives usually do come before digital ones.

Now coming back to some of thie PnD accusations and stating that Quark isn't decentralized that's honestly laughable and here's why:
Decentralized blockchains does NOT mean equal distribution... pretty sure that's called communism... lol
People who have either faith in the project or are interested in picking up coins while they are cheap may acquire a large bag, again, fairly normal in the cryptosphere. What makes Quark and other BTC based coins decentralized is the fact that everyone has a copy of the blockchain and ledger as apposed to a single entity having this, NOT how many coins are distributed where.

Oh and something else you may want to note, usually people that have something to hide would split up their balances to make the distribution seem more even where as if Quark has a few people holding a lot that just means a few people thought "hey I'll buy a crapload while it's cheap"...








Anyway on those happy notes just wanted to mention that we will be stopping by more often, things have just been absolutely nuts on our end though we haven't forgotten about Quark at all Smiley
Oh and side note - If you guys don't know already Quark is now on Novaexchange.

  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▐░▌         
▐░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▐░▌         
▐░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
           
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▐░▌         
▐░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█░▌
                  ▐░▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█░▌
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
           
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█░▌
▐░▌              ▐░▌
▐░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█░▌
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▐░▌         
▐░▌         
▐░▌         
 ▀         
           
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▐░▌         
▐░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▐░▌         
▐░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
           
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█░▌
▐░▌              ▐░▌
▐░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█░▌
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀█░█▀▀
▐░▌         ▐░▌ 
▐░▌          ▐░▌
▐░▌           ▐░▌
 ▀               ▀
           
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▐░█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▐░▌         
▐░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█░▌
                  ▐░▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█░▌
▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
           
▓▒░░ Secure Emailing
    ▓▒░░ Site-On-Blockchain
         ▓▒░░ Proof-of-Reliability
▓▒░░ HMQ1725
    ▓▒░░ CryptoCoderz
         ▓▒░░ Bitcointalk ANN
Thule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 276


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 07:52:04 PM
 #8688

Someone just dumped 100k coins and the price dropped by arround 15-20% even market is rising and the technical support line.

What would happen if cryptohunter would through in his 1.000.000 coins Smiley

Who is going to invest real money in a coin which could be shot to nirvana anytime by a single wallet ?


Btw when somebody wants to invest in Quark why not just rent for $500 some machines take the 51% control and just edit the blockchain Smiley

51% attacks aren't as straight forward as you may think, big bag holders will probably sell off eventually as most do and the coin will become redistributed... Kinda a natural occurrence in the cryptosphere




This is my first time playing around with mining. It looks like I must be mining on a fork or something. I tried to send some QRK to another wallet and it gets lost in space.

Make sure you're on the latest wallet. Smiley



LOL your poor attemtion to discredit me isnt working.You are comparing Quark to other looser and scam coins ?LOL why don't you compare Quark to a successfull coin ?
People who actually have money are smart enough to check my claims.Its enough to read the first 20 pages of that thread and everyone can see there were orphans reported by multiple users.
You call a coin which had no promotion but could mined by everyone a fair distribution ?You are pathetic.
Its like somebody opens his unknown website and publish there about the start of a new coin ,mine everyting himself and claim after 6 months it was a fair distribution since it was public on a domain nobody knew.
You know you call Quark a currency.Do you even know what a currency is ?Coins hold by 50-100 people you call a currency ?
The other guy claming about the work .......which work is he talking about ?What has Quark ?Nothing is working no infrastructur nothing only big wallets.
Your effords are quark really making a top coin.

POOR SCAM ATTEMPT and nothing more.

I warned people the first time that they will loose the money where i got bashed by coin holders and what happened everyone left the sinking ship giving a fuck about quark and people who lost their money.

You are a PARASITE and nothing more.

Wow, who pissed in your cereal this morning?

Seriously though let's think logically for a moment, when a coin goes dormant, some people will begin to collect large amounts of it in the hope that one day a cheap coin will become worth more. The coins themselves eventually redistribute unless the project completely dies which is obviously not happening with Quark.

Also a currency or even in this case a digital commodity is something that is traded for goods and services. Considering other coins/tokens are also considered as such Quark actually qualifies unlike what you've stated, perhaps it is you who needs to hit a dictionary

As for Quark having nothing... yeah the project looks like it went through a lul, that's probably why they reached out for assistance and albeit we haven't been very quick about working with the Quark dev on future updates we did agree to help and have things in the works.

Every project has it's ups and downs, saying it's "shit" because it doesn't have a fancy office building and someone you could send hate letters to is completely backwards.

As with any project you ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS RESEARCH BEFORE YOU INVEST. Doesn't make any more "scammy" than another project.






First of all Max coworked with Kolin or should i say Wetzl .
Max has a reason to not identify himself since he created many coins where each was a pump and dump and this guy is again reviving Quark where you clearly could read that Kolin and his family wanted to revive that coin using a Dev he knows.Who coworked with Kolin again?
Another issue the only guy Max heard to was Kolin,why ?Why did Max disappeared when Kolin left and why did Max came back exectly when Kolin wanted to revive Quark ?
There are these big wallets untouched for years where a single one could shoot Quark to the nirvana.
What does untouched big wallets mean for the price of quark ?It means that prices are going quickly up because there is not enough supply however should they start dumping their wallets after years the price will drop immedently.Thats a risk which other successfull coins dont have in such a big way.
The 5% Premine is no solution since a 5% premine isnt usefull for a pump and dump.Only If all coins are already mined and controlled by a few people the pump and dump can work.

Next step is the leak of interrest of the big wallet holders.Why are they not here ,rewarding good projects or pushing in any kind Quark ?Do they expect to come from alone ?
Max provides also no updates like always.So many bugs on Quark,no infrastructur,no real plan no nothing just waiting for a rise of price when Max will make the changes and nothing more.
Its like years ago where everyone waited for Max Kaiser to call the name Quark.At least during that time the community started projects about quark and really started getting people involved .....
What are you guys doing beside waiting ?

Oh an update is coming that will increase the value of quark by 10.000% because now it will be a real currency you can use everywhere

Maybe we should ask Max first how much he already gained from all the pump and dump his coins had ?Funny he is using multiple accounts .....for what reason ?
Maybe ask him first who he is since nobody knows it and you can trust me nobody will ever know it for a reason

Okay so idk who this "Kolin" is lol but CryptoCoderz were asked to come on board and work with Max to get Quark updated and continue working on use for it.

As for the pump and dump thing, no clue however I'll state this again: Coins that lul or peter out a bit are usually bought up by a few people when it gets cheap, again fairly normal. Idk if I'd be screaming about it.







He is implying there are people who want to get investors into that coin knowing that its basicly worthless with this hughe amounts of coins.You wrote 1-2 million coins are nothing big if you compare it to other communities.However this coin has nearly no investors.A current 2.000.000 dumb and the coin is gone again.
I'm an old core member who tried last time already to protect people from the pump and dump today its similar.
You claim you have no issue a celebirty advertising a coin.You know in the real word both would be sitting in prision for that.
Quark is advertised as a decentrelaised currency.
How can it be decentralised when its being hold by few people ?These few people are the new centralisation and how can it be called a currency when used by just a few people holding it in their wallets.
And yes the 1-2 million wallets are from major wallets.We did in the past a blockchain read and cleary saw that these coins haven't been bought but splitted from bigger accounts.


You said Max didnt anything for the last 3 years.You know Max didnt mostly anything for more than 5 years.The small updates he provided 3 years ago was nothing.
Each and everytime you need to wait for any shit months to change.

Even now you can see no communication from Max.
No update no nothing not even a single reply between his and kolins relationship.

Okay cool your jets lol

Firstly putting aside all this PnD accusations for moment, when we were contacted by the Quark community to assist in development we were informed that "Max" the original developer was a very busy person and  as such that the community was looking for more stable development. Again, provided that we've been slow lately as we ourselves have a few projects that must each be tended to we're still working on things and from the occasional correspondence with Max he's been working on Quark as well for a while. You know personal lives usually do come before digital ones.

Now coming back to some of thie PnD accusations and stating that Quark isn't decentralized that's honestly laughable and here's why:
Decentralized blockchains does NOT mean equal distribution... pretty sure that's called communism... lol
People who have either faith in the project or are interested in picking up coins while they are cheap may acquire a large bag, again, fairly normal in the cryptosphere. What makes Quark and other BTC based coins decentralized is the fact that everyone has a copy of the blockchain and ledger as apposed to a single entity having this, NOT how many coins are distributed where.

Oh and something else you may want to note, usually people that have something to hide would split up their balances to make the distribution seem more even where as if Quark has a few people holding a lot that just means a few people thought "hey I'll buy a crapload while it's cheap"...








Anyway on those happy notes just wanted to mention that we will be stopping by more often, things have just been absolutely nuts on our end though we haven't forgotten about Quark at all Smiley
Oh and side note - If you guys don't know already Quark is now on Novaexchange.

Reading your post i can confirm my post that you guys have no clue about crypto currencies.No wonder you guys have not created a single successfull coin in the past.Your post about communism is funny.I would recommend a dictionary and check the meaning of the word.Decentralised means that not a single or few people have the power to decide about the currencies price.Who cares if there are 100.000.000 wallets out when 70% is controlled by 5 people.You clearly have no economic understanding.
Next thing there is no such thing like a quark community.The only one who wanted to contact a dev to make an update was kolin and his friends.So this makes you instantly also as a suspicious person too.

And for your information Max is not the creator of Quark.The creator of Quark is a russian guy who started this coin under another name in russia which had no success.Max did only copy past and nothing more.

So yeah max is a great dev and surly will help Quark to become successfull.He didnt invested his personal time all he did was a copy past work and nothing more.

Quark is a clone of a russian coin and nothing more
Max Weber
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 12:07:46 AM
Last edit: June 03, 2017, 01:25:16 AM by Max Weber
 #8689

Make sure you're on the latest wallet. Smiley

I'm running v0.10.4.5

Is there a version more recent than that?

Edit:
The 3500 quarks from a week of mining is now at 1 quark (I believe the first quark I mined) so it must be correcting itself. Strange that it would mine for over a week on a bad fork. Where are most of the miners, china? I'm in California.
Waldozaur12
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1223
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 07:56:33 AM
 #8690

http://www.btc38.com/trade_en.html?mk_type=btc&btc38_trade_coin_name=qrk

This is China Quark Market ?
Thule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 276


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 08:07:33 AM
 #8691

you can instantly see its a pump going on Smiley

nuttynoah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 09:18:08 AM
 #8692

Wink Wink Wink
hi,dev!Can you change a new LOGO for Quark?A new LOGO will make people knows a new Quark coming!~~~

No way. Not a chance. The logo is perfect exactly the way it is right now. I do not think its possible to better it. Seriously its a classic.
I saw someone mention on Slack that Instant Confirmations would be good.  Is this going to be a feature of the updated Quark?
Also, when can we expect a roadmap?
Cheers
morbius55
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 109


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 11:12:53 AM
 #8693

you can instantly see its a pump going on Smiley


With your magic glasses?, we don't need you to 'save us'. Roll Eyes
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 03:04:50 PM
 #8694

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1941248.msg19279488#msg19279488

@cryptohunter , Why do you admit "not selling much Quark" is a mistake of yours?
Is there something more valuable than Quark Wink

Somebody who promotes Quark regrets he still owns Quark....for me the intentions would be clear..





Your point is lost on me. Any long term miner or holder of quark would not have the same view?? are you looking at the world in a different angle to those that employ logic and reason?

Probably yes (at least different than you). it is not logic, that you still hold your Quark after all you have experienced (Kolin, absence of dev, fall down of the foundation, dump of the bagholders, no development, the rise of more sophisticated / promising coins, and I can tell you 100 more reasons.....)


Of course it is a mistake. Why would not selling at 30,000 sats and now it is 300 sats not be a mistake? I mean i could have if i loved quark increased my position x100. Would anyone claim not selling something for x100 more is not a mistake? Let me hear any long term holder of quark say not selling at 30k sats now was not a mistake?


You have read it correct. Your mistake is not that you didn't sell on time, but that you mined the wrong coins. Why would you mine coins from developers you don't know/anonymous or are known scam developers in that time like Max and Hazard (eg DGC, SRC which you seem to want to revive as well.... and WDC).

Yes i held MOST of it but sold ENOUGH to become well off by my standards.


Good for you


However, I would like to see all the coins i have (over 150 ) become successful if they can. Why not.

Sigh. I thought I was naive.

Are you implying people have other intentions to see projects to become successful that they do NOT own? let's be serious. Show me some people who are fighting for projects here to succeed that do not hold those tokens. Why would they not support it by investing if they believed it offered something of use or they liked something about the developer or community.


Most coins created by Max are scammed by infamous scammers. For instance I met Kolin, Hilux and the UNO scammers. Not very nice people Wink

Although I can tell you quark is less than 1% of my crypto interests but I like the name and loved the old community that formed around it at one point. Hence the hint of why i did not sell my much of my quark because i like those people that were involved with it.

Same with doge I like the community and I still hold doge. Qrk was at one time 2nd only to doge in terms of community.

I mean there is never a reason to ask WHY someone wants to see a project succeed is there?

Quark had a very nice team with hard working people who believed in the potentials of Quark. I noticed you, but you didn't do anything. You were not on trello, not on reddit and you haven't donated one single Quark while you had bags full of it (you admit yourself). The only people who pledged their Quark were the hard working people, while the early miners like you were selling their Quark at exchanges for btc and dollars...and now you regret you had not sold more...shame on you! You should regret that you didn't pledge more to the projects. That's why I have my thoughts about your true intentions.

I am more interested in WHY people want to see it not succeed. I mean specifically see quark not succeed when every criticism i hear leveled at quark is applicable to many more coins in a far more serious manner?? that is actually a question that answer is not already a given is it not?

What is their motivation?  I mean even if they bought high and sold low it would have been hard for them to sell lower than it is right now. So if they are so worried about it making a comeback and missing out why not just buy back in cheap now. How can you lose? or is there some other reason?

I know DI wanted to destroy qrk at the end. So who are these accounts now that are so against it?


tjee....is there ever coming an end to this post.....

Are there projects better than quark right now you ask? Is that even a serious question? of course quark right now is below average because it was not well thought out in terms of emission schedule and it has had not updates (serious updates) in 3 years. It was at the time quite a revolutionary coin in some respects and was copied by many other coins due to the interesting random algos which for a long time made it asic proof and to this date i am not sure there are quark asics.

Check my post history. I am all over so many threads. My interests here are very varied. I would like to see the old quark foundation brought back but no DI. They tried and achieved some remarkable things and many were remarkable people.

What is your anti quark history?

Anti Quark history? You missed my post? for your convenience:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg18814451#msg18814451
I see it more as to provide people some background information about Quark because you won't tell them Wink

As to quark we will wait and see. I would like to see the old foundation back and a larger development team start working on it. The name quark is excellent. It is strange because in my post history you will see i name a project atom years ago but I even prefer quark to that really.

I see on bittrex people are no longer happy with cloning quarks algo they now try to copy the name qwark lol.

Quark will never die in crypto it is a legend of coins.

You may speculate I want a return of quark purely for financial reasons. You would be right in part but I own far greater % of mintings than I do of quark and you will not see me sticking up for them as much as i have for quark. So that is food for thought for you.



Yes I made it  (to the end of this post) Grin


I have no issue with the rest of your post .... your view is your own.

But this part is a lie

Quark had a very nice team with hard working people who believed in the potentials of Quark. I noticed you, but you didn't do anything. You were not on trello, not on reddit and you haven't donated one single Quark while you had bags full of it (you admit yourself). The only people who pledged their Quark were the hard working people, while the early miners like you were selling their Quark at exchanges for btc and dollars...and now you regret you had not sold more...shame on you! You should regret that you didn't pledge more to the projects. That's why I have my thoughts about your true intentions.

ERR this part is wrong. I gave 20k quark to a couple of projects actually. You have to trace me entire quark postings to find it. I am sure one of the old foundation members will be able to confirm it somewhere.

My true intentions? i just told you my intentions is the same as everyone else here. It is to make money. I'm not hiding that fact. If you tell me yours is any different then I will have to tell you to be more real with yourself.

HOWEVER i believe it is possible for us to create great projects and make money. You do not have to pump and dump on people and use sneaky insider knowledge and manipulation.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to make a profit. Those that say there is something wrong with it are simply either lying to you or to themselves.

Also I must have contributed more on line time to the quark thread here suggesting things, thinking of roi projects trying to get the community together than anyone else. I would expect my word count on this thread is double anyone elses.

I dont give a shit about trello, slack all this hidden secret discussions. Everything and i mean everything should be discussed in the open on this thread for everyone to see. Had enough of alll the oh wait you didnt know because it was on trello, slack, some other hidden place.
This board is where all talk should be so everyone has access to the same information.

I care nothing about your opinion of me. Why should I. If i am happy with how I act and what I want then that is all i need. I don't require validation from strangers on the internet with faux moral codes about not wanting to make a profit for efforts given.

All the other coins you mention I was mining? that is every single coin that was practically released you realise? why would i not mine them? I'll mine what I want so long as I do it with no unfair advantage over anyone else. If you have issue with it that is your own problem.

Anyway I never even heard of you before with regards to qrk so I very much doubt you put more effort in to it than myself.


Seph1roth
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 12


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 04:38:03 PM
 #8695

Hey people. Does QWARK has slack channel and github? Why nothing on their website?
morbius55
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 109


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 04:44:22 PM
 #8696

Hey people. Does QWARK has slack channel and github? Why nothing on their website?
QUARK info at website http://www.qrknet.info/
silvermetal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 487
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 05:02:51 PM
Last edit: June 03, 2017, 05:28:10 PM by silvermetal
 #8697



I have no issue with the rest of your post .... your view is your own.

But this part is a lie

Quark had a very nice team with hard working people who believed in the potentials of Quark. I noticed you, but you didn't do anything. You were not on trello, not on reddit and you haven't donated one single Quark while you had bags full of it (you admit yourself). The only people who pledged their Quark were the hard working people, while the early miners like you were selling their Quark at exchanges for btc and dollars...and now you regret you had not sold more...shame on you! You should regret that you didn't pledge more to the projects. That's why I have my thoughts about your true intentions.

ERR this part is wrong. I gave 20k quark to a couple of projects actually. You have to trace me entire quark postings to find it. I am sure one of the old foundation members will be able to confirm it somewhere.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg6322221#msg6322221
the other 19K will be in the thread as well somewhere I guess. Ok not very accurate from me. I was not aware that donations were also done in this thread, I followed reddit more.

My true intentions? i just told you my intentions is the same as everyone else here. It is to make money. I'm not hiding that fact. If you tell me yours is any different then I will have to tell you to be more real with yourself.

HOWEVER i believe it is possible for us to create great projects and make money. You do not have to pump and dump on people and use sneaky insider knowledge and manipulation.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to make a profit. Those that say there is something wrong with it are simply either lying to you or to themselves.


I skip this part, as I am not interested in your true intentions (well, that's not completely true but I am aware that you will never be completely open to me). You may or may not tell the true here. That is for everybody to judge for themselves.

Also I must have contributed more on line time to the quark thread here suggesting things, thinking of roi projects trying to get the community together than anyone else. I would expect my word count on this thread is double anyone elses.

I dont give a shit about trello, slack all this hidden secret discussions. Everything and i mean everything should be discussed in the open on this thread for everyone to see. Had enough of alll the oh wait you didnt know because it was on trello, slack, some other hidden place.
This board is where all talk should be so everyone has access to the same information.


That is your opinion. A hidden place, as you call it, works as long as there is a good and integer communication line to the open. Sometimes it is not good to discuss premature projects in the open. It can give wrong expectations.


I care nothing about your opinion of me. Why should I. If i am happy with how I act and what I want then that is all i need. I don't require validation from strangers on the internet with faux moral codes about not wanting to make a profit for efforts given.


Very healthy of you! You are the one who have to face yourself in the mirror every day.

All the other coins you mention I was mining? that is every single coin that was practically released you realise? why would i not mine them? I'll mine what I want so long as I do it with no unfair advantage over anyone else. If you have issue with it that is your own problem.


Whatever you want, but don't whine if the coins are still not a success after 3-4 years. Or didn't provide you the btc/dollars you expected. Sometimes you have to take your losses instead of trying to revive worthless coins. Quark had its chance three years ago, but the creator and his team failed hard.
By the way, why did you need to tell "baritus" he was in the wrong thread? What is your connection with him anyway?


Anyway I never even heard of you before with regards to qrk so I very much doubt you put more effort in to it than myself.



Indeed I haven't and I will never do Wink I have some morale Smiley Better to educate and point people to coins which have really potential instead of pump and dump coins with no future whatsoever. And to be honest...At the moment I would not point people to one special coin, The alt coin scene is one big gamble and a wildwest. The big bagholders are able to manipulate the market.
morbius55
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 109


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 05:20:16 PM
 #8698

 @ Silvermetal. "Better to educate and point people to coins which have really potential instead of pump and dump coins with no future whatsoever".
  Come on then crypto genius, what coins are they then ?.
silvermetal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 487
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 05:22:41 PM
Last edit: June 03, 2017, 06:08:41 PM by silvermetal
 #8699

@ Silvermetal. "Better to educate and point people to coins which have really potential instead of pump and dump coins with no future whatsoever".
  Come on then crypto genius, what coins are they then ?.

Lol, I already expected you would ask this question. I edited my post.

Thank god I can point you to another genius here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1874679.0

He can help you further

Would he also have recommended badenglishtea to invest in Quark, I haven't seem him yet...  Roll Eyes
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 06:42:51 PM
 #8700

@ Silvermetal. "Better to educate and point people to coins which have really potential instead of pump and dump coins with no future whatsoever".
  Come on then crypto genius, what coins are they then ?.

Lol, I already expected you would ask this question. I edited my post.

Thank god I can point you to another genius here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1874679.0

He can help you further

Would he also have recommended badenglishtea to invest in Quark, I haven't seem him yet...  Roll Eyes

I have not advised anyone to invest in quark at this stage. I do not ever actually say for people to invest I say please research for yourselves then make up your own mind. I have actually had several persons tell me that following my suggestion they are actually now millionaires.

I am pleased for them and although I don't know if I am actually a milionaire perhaps I am at this stage even though they made a lot more than myself on my own tips that's cool for them. I am not so greedy as you say.

If people ask me about quark (which none have as yet actually) i will tell them await and see then go in when they are ready. If tech arrives then act as you consider it to be appropriate. Quark is a fantastic name and it does have a lot of fame in the crypto world. You can say negative fame if you want but even though not selling at peak was an obvious financial mistake I still like this project and the old community was the first one i really joined and got involved with. The first one you never really forget. I will willing hold my tokens until then end even if they have zero worth and should they reach 1000 dollars per token I would not sell them all. I am as much of a collector and profiteer.

I don't actually think you and thule are that bad after reading all your posts.

If you guys sticking around this thread keep people from investing until there is proven tech here with quark that is fine by me and if you can stop what you suspect is a pump and dump in the making that is good. Please stick around I have no personal issues with either of you or what you have said really after reviewing it all.

Sure quark has been disappointing in the past considering what i thought it would be but I am hoping for better this time around. Why am I hoping that yes my motive is to make money and make profits. When you say i will never reveal my true intentions i don't see how I can be any more open. There is nothing wrong with putting effort in and making money if you don't get unfair advantage over others.

I am hopeful, only time will tell which of us will be correct. If it is you then no hard feelings. I just hold my bag of worthless quark tokens as a memory of my first BIG coin.




Pages: « 1 ... 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 [435] 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!