You know what? I'm inherently an anarchist and it is why I've fallen in love with cryptos from the first beginning (unfortunately, as a 3rd world citizen this happened not more than 2-3 years ago).
I hate establishments everywhere and specially in cryptos, I hate Core devs in btc, I hate Vitalik and Ethereum Foundation, ...
Why? As an anarchist I believe they all are threatening my freedom and my power, my will to power and it is not just about me and them, I think any establishment is a threat for the whole globe. So I say welcome to any coin just for not being thier's.
The bad side of forks is that they inherit the predecessor's distribution. It is not fair
So once I decide to fork my own coin, I'll find a way to redistribute it in a way that some 'super powers' being kicked out of the game, after all thy are the most potentially dangerous threat for such a project because of their ability to dump their airdropped coins. I understand there are more factors in stake other than just coin distribution, but in the first few weeks and months it is the most critical problem, I suppose.
A pessimistic poster here is complaining about this project for being funded poorly and OP not being a native english writer and so on ... I hate quoting garbages, so I reply here :
Forking is not a privilege exclusively given to corporates or guys who have joined the crypto party earlier and now have multiple thousands or a couple of million bitcoins in their wallets. You don't get the point? We fork just because we don't have that much resources inherited from our parents or won in a lottery and we have not arrived that early.
Actually, I'm paranoid about 'well funded' ICOs and forks. One who
investss in forking or initiating coins is looking for nothing less than a right to control the newborn baby doesn't he?
Plus, I'm strongly against the 'developer mania' that is promoted by journalists. Why in the hell a public protocol needs developers? It doesn't! The most basic idea behind a consensus based public ledger is its resistance to change! We are talking about a public protocol for the christ sake, public protocols are not developer's toys, they can not be changed, for the same reason that nobody can change english language, even developers.
So, there is no need for a 'foundation' to hire semi-genius programmers to maintain the protocol (actually, protocol 'maintains' the foundation
) , there is no need for a roadmap (fuck roadmaps), there is no need for money, for investors, fuck investors.
As of OP's english grammar being weak or broken (like mine
)
Are you serious? People should be a native english speaker or get a degree in english literature to fork a coin? Why? I read OP's posts and I understand every single concept s/he has in mind ... isn't it enough? FYI: In an international tech sphere, we use english as a transparent medium, such a device doesn't add value to what it caries around.
