Bitcoin Forum
October 19, 2017, 08:49:58 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 [508] 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 864806 times)
Ilan1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 01:41:52 PM
 #10141

We could start collecting signatures to show the judge that we are against the sale for x reasons. He will be the one making the final call.

Btw, on the dream side of things, if the 16nm design is ready for tapeout, and we only need the money, and we collect say $5M from the sale of chips and another $5M from an external investor, that could be a better use for the money rather the the proposed "hold bitcoin to pay back our creditors, our estimates are saying so" (they didn't knew bitcoin was going up so they didn't hold it, but now they do and they will be betting our money on it).

Good idea, if we don't express our opinion on this they will get want they want and stuff the rest of us, the committee could use our petition to support the case! I suggest we put a simple form on Dropbox and every one should sign in and upload it again?

What do you think?

LTCgear.com Review http://ltcgear.co.ukhttp://ltcgear.com/?apage=120 - 160mh/s for $850 use coupon code "anniversary1yr" - Active Multi Algorithm cloud mining in Scrypt, X11 and Scrypt-N - ROI in 5 Weeks
1508446198
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508446198

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508446198
Reply with quote  #2

1508446198
Report to moderator
1508446198
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508446198

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508446198
Reply with quote  #2

1508446198
Report to moderator
1508446198
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508446198

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508446198
Reply with quote  #2

1508446198
Report to moderator
"Apparently, so I am told, there exist "people" who prefer to wipe sitting down. From the front. Initial research indicates it could be up to half the population." -- benjamindees
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508446198
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508446198

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508446198
Reply with quote  #2

1508446198
Report to moderator
HardwareReviewer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 256


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 02:43:37 PM
 #10142

We could start collecting signatures to show the judge that we are against the sale for x reasons. He will be the one making the final call.

Btw, on the dream side of things, if the 16nm design is ready for tapeout, and we only need the money, and we collect say $5M from the sale of chips and another $5M from an external investor, that could be a better use for the money rather the the proposed "hold bitcoin to pay back our creditors, our estimates are saying so" (they didn't knew bitcoin was going up so they didn't hold it, but now they do and they will be betting our money on it).

Good idea, if we don't express our opinion on this they will get want they want and stuff the rest of us, the committee could use our petition to support the case! I suggest we put a simple form on Dropbox and every one should sign in and upload it again?

What do you think?

Yes good idea

Prepare to enter a world of stress
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 03:08:30 PM
 #10143

We could start collecting signatures to show the judge that we are against the sale for x reasons. He will be the one making the final call.

Btw, on the dream side of things, if the 16nm design is ready for tapeout, and we only need the money, and we collect say $5M from the sale of chips and another $5M from an external investor, that could be a better use for the money rather the the proposed "hold bitcoin to pay back our creditors, our estimates are saying so" (they didn't knew bitcoin was going up so they didn't hold it, but now they do and they will be betting our money on it).

Good idea, if we don't express our opinion on this they will get want they want and stuff the rest of us, the committee could use our petition to support the case! I suggest we put a simple form on Dropbox and every one should sign in and upload it again?

What do you think?

The committee is going to oppose this deal.  Ray Gallo, who claimed to 'facilitate' the deal in court, is another question.  If Gallo clients are opposed, it would help to have them say so - to Ray, and if he doesn't listen, to the judge.
Minor Miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


★ BitClave ICO: 08/11/17 ★


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 03:43:36 PM
 #10144

We could start collecting signatures to show the judge that we are against the sale for x reasons. He will be the one making the final call.
Btw, on the dream side of things, if the 16nm design is ready for tapeout, and we only need the money, and we collect say $5M from the sale of chips and another $5M from an external investor, that could be a better use for the money rather the the proposed "hold bitcoin to pay back our creditors, our estimates are saying so" (they didn't knew bitcoin was going up so they didn't hold it, but now they do and they will be betting our money on it).
Good idea, if we don't express our opinion on this they will get want they want and stuff the rest of us, the committee could use our petition to support the case! I suggest we put a simple form on Dropbox and every one should sign in and upload it again?
What do you think?
The committee is going to oppose this deal.  Ray Gallo, who claimed to 'facilitate' the deal in court, is another question.  If Gallo clients are opposed, it would help to have them say so - to Ray, and if he doesn't listen, to the judge.
So, TO BE PERFECTLY CLEAR, Ray Gallo (we keep hearing this name), is the one who negotiated this deal on behalf of his clients?   I, personally, would like to hear from his 40 to 50 clients (he keeps seeming to cite different numbers when he is in the hearings) about why they think this is a good deal and why they asked their lawyer to pursue a deal like this.   If he is your lawyer, he obviously is doing what the clients asked him to do.
If the committee is opposed and Ray represents committee member Hee, how is this lawyer representing his clients?   Which clients is Gallo representing?


                  ,'#██+:                 
              ,█████████████'             
            +██████████████████           
          ;██████████████████████         
         ███████:         .███████`       
        ██████               ;█████'      
      `█████                   #████#     
      ████+                     `████+    
     ████:                        ████,   
    ████:    .#              █     ████   
   ;███+     ██             ███     ████  
   ████     ███'            ███.    '███, 
  +███     #████           ,████     ████ 
  ████     █████ .+██████: █████+    `███.
 ,███     ███████████████████████     ████
 ████     ███████████████████████'    :███
 ███:    +████████████████████████     ███`
 ███     █████████████████████████`    ███+
,███     ██████████████████████████    #███
'███    '██████████████████████████    ;███
#███    ███████████████████████████    ,███
████    ███████████████████████████.   .███
████    ███████████████████████████'   .███
+███    ███████████████████████████+   :███
:███    ███████████████████████████'   +███
 ███    ███████████████████████████.   ███#
 ███.   #██████████████████████████    ███,
 ████    █████████████████████████+   `███
 '███    '████████████████████████    ████
  ███;    ███████████████████████     ███;
  ████     #████████████████████     ████ 
   ███#     .██████████████████     `███+ 
   ████`      ;██████████████       ████  
    ████         '███████#.        ████.  
    .████                         █████   
     '████                       █████    
      #████'                    █████     
       +█████`                ██████      
        ,██████:           `███████       
          ████████#;,..:+████████.        
           ,███████████████████+          
             .███████████████;            
                `+███████#,               
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
July 20, 2014, 04:12:12 PM
 #10145

Uniquify would get cash upfront for the chips. Are they opposing as well?

And btw, I'm the most optimist of the thread, because I dont see any reason why a trustee wouldn't give HF trustworthiness to take new preorders for a 16nm gen.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Minor Miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


★ BitClave ICO: 08/11/17 ★


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 04:16:39 PM
 #10146

If you read Liquidbits offer, it is clear they do not have the capital to do what they want to accomplish,   So, they are making a very complicated "deal" in order to get something for free.

They state there is 5.7 Million Dollars of components (possibly understated) held by suppliers.   Instead of offering to buy the inventory, they form a convoluted plan that should demonstrate to everyone that they do not have enough cash to do what they claim they can.   Otherwise, they would propose the FAR more simple deal of paying $5.7M for the chips, boards and components and let the rest of the bankruptcy progress.    That would allow the court to compile a list (I DO NOT SEE ONE) of exactly what these assets are and then seek other public bidders.    If LB's offer was the highest, the estate would have $5.7M to start paying the expenses and some of the creditors, and perhaps prove that it could become an on going concern.

But, if LB does not have enough money to do that, why would creditors want to become subordinated lenders to a company that is obviously undercapitalized and will likely never repay them?

Better still for creditors, let's get a list of these assets that LB wants, break them into 5 -10 lots and see what demand in the market is for them.   Maybe 20 lots so that people like Teal and others may be able to bid on a lot and we get the maximum value.   Keep the IP to sell later or to use to keep producing chips and boards and send every creditor some percentage of what they are owed.   Then we all feel a little better as we continue to pursue the truth about what happened and try and maximize the value of the estate.

It states that the debtors have not shopped the assets, does the committee even have a list of these assets that would allow them to shop them around to bidders?   Or is it just Eduardo shopping them in his own personal interest.

They also say Hashfast has showed these assets to over 20 (?) potential bidders (I find if VERY interesting that Liquidbits has been told exactly how many people HF has shown a deal to and that HF would also give them the information that no one is interested?  That is not how a negotiation works).    I have not been contacted in order to bid on these assets, and I am a large miner and also have the financial resources to purchase them.   No one has attempted to contact me.   So, the statement that these assets have been widely shown is false.   I am easily found and known by HF since they spent months lying to me about their production status and they know how many miners I ended buying from their competitors because of HF's failure to deliver on Nov 15.

I was never shown a list of assets and asked to bid.   I am sure there are tons of others like me that have not seen the list.   Mr Teal, have you seen this list?   Aerobatic have you seen this list?


                  ,'#██+:                 
              ,█████████████'             
            +██████████████████           
          ;██████████████████████         
         ███████:         .███████`       
        ██████               ;█████'      
      `█████                   #████#     
      ████+                     `████+    
     ████:                        ████,   
    ████:    .#              █     ████   
   ;███+     ██             ███     ████  
   ████     ███'            ███.    '███, 
  +███     #████           ,████     ████ 
  ████     █████ .+██████: █████+    `███.
 ,███     ███████████████████████     ████
 ████     ███████████████████████'    :███
 ███:    +████████████████████████     ███`
 ███     █████████████████████████`    ███+
,███     ██████████████████████████    #███
'███    '██████████████████████████    ;███
#███    ███████████████████████████    ,███
████    ███████████████████████████.   .███
████    ███████████████████████████'   .███
+███    ███████████████████████████+   :███
:███    ███████████████████████████'   +███
 ███    ███████████████████████████.   ███#
 ███.   #██████████████████████████    ███,
 ████    █████████████████████████+   `███
 '███    '████████████████████████    ████
  ███;    ███████████████████████     ███;
  ████     #████████████████████     ████ 
   ███#     .██████████████████     `███+ 
   ████`      ;██████████████       ████  
    ████         '███████#.        ████.  
    .████                         █████   
     '████                       █████    
      #████'                    █████     
       +█████`                ██████      
        ,██████:           `███████       
          ████████#;,..:+████████.        
           ,███████████████████+          
             .███████████████;            
                `+███████#,               
Minor Miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


★ BitClave ICO: 08/11/17 ★


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 04:21:35 PM
 #10147

On Line Petition:
Sorry, I reported the link as you did not have any text with it just the link and thought it was suspicious.  You may have to re-post.

I would add to the petition an extra line that any creditor could sign stating whether they would be interested in bidding on a portion of the assets.   More money can likely be realized if the current assets are sold to many parties instead of one.   And then if liquid bits wants the right to the IP with no royalties, they can pay for it (I would think the estate would be better off just selling them chips in the future and not giving them the right to IP for free since that significantly lowers the value of selling the IP to someone else).


                  ,'#██+:                 
              ,█████████████'             
            +██████████████████           
          ;██████████████████████         
         ███████:         .███████`       
        ██████               ;█████'      
      `█████                   #████#     
      ████+                     `████+    
     ████:                        ████,   
    ████:    .#              █     ████   
   ;███+     ██             ███     ████  
   ████     ███'            ███.    '███, 
  +███     #████           ,████     ████ 
  ████     █████ .+██████: █████+    `███.
 ,███     ███████████████████████     ████
 ████     ███████████████████████'    :███
 ███:    +████████████████████████     ███`
 ███     █████████████████████████`    ███+
,███     ██████████████████████████    #███
'███    '██████████████████████████    ;███
#███    ███████████████████████████    ,███
████    ███████████████████████████.   .███
████    ███████████████████████████'   .███
+███    ███████████████████████████+   :███
:███    ███████████████████████████'   +███
 ███    ███████████████████████████.   ███#
 ███.   #██████████████████████████    ███,
 ████    █████████████████████████+   `███
 '███    '████████████████████████    ████
  ███;    ███████████████████████     ███;
  ████     #████████████████████     ████ 
   ███#     .██████████████████     `███+ 
   ████`      ;██████████████       ████  
    ████         '███████#.        ████.  
    .████                         █████   
     '████                       █████    
      #████'                    █████     
       +█████`                ██████      
        ,██████:           `███████       
          ████████#;,..:+████████.        
           ,███████████████████+          
             .███████████████;            
                `+███████#,               
Ilan1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 04:35:33 PM
 #10148

On Line Petition:
Sorry, I reported the link as you did not have any text with it just the link and thought it was suspicious.  You may have to re-post.

I would add to the petition an extra line that any creditor could sign stating whether they would be interested in bidding on a portion of the assets.   More money can likely be realized if the current assets are sold to many parties instead of one.   And then if liquid bits wants the right to the IP with no royalties, they can pay for it (I would think the estate would be better off just selling them chips in the future and not giving them the right to IP for free since that significantly lowers the value of selling the IP to someone else).


OK no problem well here it is again with some text, hope they don't remove it again now though.

Hello!

I've started the petition "HASHFAST LLC AND HASHFAST TECHNOLOGIES LLC. & LIQUIDBITS CORP.: CREDITORS ONLINE PETITION AGAINST THE TERM SHEET FOR EMERGENCY SECTION 363 SALE" and need your help to get it off the ground.

Will you take 30 seconds to sign it right now? Here's the link:

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/hashfast-llc-and-hashfast-technologies-llc-liquidbits-corp-creditors-online-petition-against-the-term-sheet-for-emergency-section-363-sale

Here's why it's important:


THIS PETITION IS TO VOICE ALL THE CREDITORS THAT ARE AGAINST THE EMERGENCY SECTION 363 SALE BETWEEN HASHFAST LLC AND HASHFAST TECHNOLOGIES LLC (HASHFAST) & LIQUIDBITS CORP. (LIQUIDBITS) WE THE CREDITORS OF HASHFAST DO NOT AGREE WITH THE TERMS OF THE PROPOSED ASSET PURCHASE, AS WE BELIEVE IT DOES NOT SERVE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF ALL CREDITORS.

You can sign my petition by clicking the link above.

Thanks!


LTCgear.com Review http://ltcgear.co.ukhttp://ltcgear.com/?apage=120 - 160mh/s for $850 use coupon code "anniversary1yr" - Active Multi Algorithm cloud mining in Scrypt, X11 and Scrypt-N - ROI in 5 Weeks
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
July 20, 2014, 04:40:48 PM
 #10149

Before starting to promote a single petition, I would suggest to write it properly and to understand if a more formal one would have a better grip on th judge. I'm quite sure it would.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Ilan1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 04:43:37 PM
 #10150

Before starting to promote a single petition, I would suggest to write it properly and to understand if a more formal one would have a better grip on th judge. I'm quite sure it would.

I am happy to change the wording, please let me know what you would like me to put  Smiley

LTCgear.com Review http://ltcgear.co.ukhttp://ltcgear.com/?apage=120 - 160mh/s for $850 use coupon code "anniversary1yr" - Active Multi Algorithm cloud mining in Scrypt, X11 and Scrypt-N - ROI in 5 Weeks
stan258
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 440



View Profile
July 20, 2014, 05:39:02 PM
 #10151

Liquidshits can kiss off.  Is Uniquify on with holding out on this deal? 
armyof1ne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 05:46:19 PM
 #10152

*snickering intensifies*  not to toot my own horn... but *FOGHORN*  this look like something i said a while back?   I don't think this "deal" is going to work well for creditors, but hey... it will work out for at least someone, lol.
Minor Miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


★ BitClave ICO: 08/11/17 ★


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 05:52:39 PM
 #10153

*snickering intensifies*  not to toot my own horn... but *FOGHORN*  this look like something i said a while back?   I don't think this "deal" is going to work well for creditors, but hey... it will work out for at least someone, lol.
Would that be you Ray?   


                  ,'#██+:                 
              ,█████████████'             
            +██████████████████           
          ;██████████████████████         
         ███████:         .███████`       
        ██████               ;█████'      
      `█████                   #████#     
      ████+                     `████+    
     ████:                        ████,   
    ████:    .#              █     ████   
   ;███+     ██             ███     ████  
   ████     ███'            ███.    '███, 
  +███     #████           ,████     ████ 
  ████     █████ .+██████: █████+    `███.
 ,███     ███████████████████████     ████
 ████     ███████████████████████'    :███
 ███:    +████████████████████████     ███`
 ███     █████████████████████████`    ███+
,███     ██████████████████████████    #███
'███    '██████████████████████████    ;███
#███    ███████████████████████████    ,███
████    ███████████████████████████.   .███
████    ███████████████████████████'   .███
+███    ███████████████████████████+   :███
:███    ███████████████████████████'   +███
 ███    ███████████████████████████.   ███#
 ███.   #██████████████████████████    ███,
 ████    █████████████████████████+   `███
 '███    '████████████████████████    ████
  ███;    ███████████████████████     ███;
  ████     #████████████████████     ████ 
   ███#     .██████████████████     `███+ 
   ████`      ;██████████████       ████  
    ████         '███████#.        ████.  
    .████                         █████   
     '████                       █████    
      #████'                    █████     
       +█████`                ██████      
        ,██████:           `███████       
          ████████#;,..:+████████.        
           ,███████████████████+          
             .███████████████;            
                `+███████#,               
pmorici
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 471


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2014, 09:15:27 PM
 #10154

Liquidshits can kiss off.  Is Uniquify on with holding out on this deal? 

The creditor's committee is made up of 7 creditor's Uniquify is only one vote of the 7.

Gigampz: Adapter Boards for Server Power Supplies 50% cheaper than ATX power supplies.  DPS-800GBA, DPS-1200FBA, Common Slot, CRPS, DPS-1200TBA, DPS-2000bb, Dell z750p
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


View Profile
July 20, 2014, 10:11:33 PM
 #10155

Does anyone have a small amount (5-10) of golden nonce chips to sell?

A guy I know has some technicians at hand who could design an asic board.

Hashfast will sell you chips.
perezoso
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile
July 21, 2014, 02:19:10 AM
 #10156

*snickering intensifies*  not to toot my own horn... but *FOGHORN*  this look like something i said a while back?   I don't think this "deal" is going to work well for creditors, but hey... it will work out for at least someone, lol.
Would that be you Ray?  

No, he's a fool that believes that if everyone just left Eddie and Simon alone, they would have shipped all of us our miners in time to profit.

I'm currently selling him a bridge over the Thames.

Where are all of Ray's clients, who used to be abundant here? 
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
July 21, 2014, 09:24:53 AM
 #10157

A guy I know has some technicians at hand who could design an asic board.
Hashfast will sell you chips.
And especially the design files. No need to develop a new board when the existing one is working decently.

I would like to have more informations about the new board design that more than halves the costs. Because its something I would be probably interested into investing. They give us the chips for free and we pay less than $0.4/GH to have working hardware. Maybe we could oraganise a big group buy among existing creditors. Everyone has everything to gain from it.

Barber, Monica, etc, you are reading and you know my email address.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
dentro
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91


View Profile
July 21, 2014, 11:35:09 AM
 #10158

I think everybody already completed the form regarding the proof of claim? I think i need some help (my english isn't that good, so also the help page is hard to understand https://ecf.canb.uscourts.gov/help/b10-instructions.htm), would be nice if somebody could help me (PM or reply, both welcome).

Point 1: Amount of Claim: I received my BJ Batch 1, but no MPP, so what's the value for Batch 1 MPP?
Point 2: What did you fill in for "Basis for Claim"
Point 3: What do i have to fill for "Last Four Digits of Any Number by Which Creditor Identifies Debtor"?
DjPxH
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
July 21, 2014, 01:48:31 PM
 #10159

Does anyone have a small amount (5-10) of golden nonce chips to sell?

A guy I know has some technicians at hand who could design an asic board.

Are they even worth the trouble anymore? Even ASICMiner's current gen 3 chip is selling at cost because it's not that efficient anymore. These chips have in in the making for a year now. They're garbage now!

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE
The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134



View Profile
July 21, 2014, 02:03:21 PM
 #10160

It depends on the total costs. If they are at $0.4/GH with immediate delivery they are not garbage at all.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Pages: « 1 ... 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 [508] 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!