Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 10:56:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 [244] 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 880232 times)
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 24, 2013, 12:08:27 AM
 #4861

how long will the chips last running at 78C?

More than the 10 days warranty? (thanks for the update).

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
HashFast_CL
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100

HashFast Community Liaison


View Profile WWW
December 24, 2013, 12:23:12 AM
 #4862

Jesus Christ, I thought I made it more than ludicrous enough that no one would believe it, especially since it's just a copy and paste of the last update. I guess I should have added a line or two about the new Dyson Sphere that's going to power the Sierra arriving for testing.

HashFast_CL, people wouldn't have to waste time messing around with jokes if you would actually give productive updates on where shipping is at and when you plan to start moving out the units. I'd also like to know who you are and what your relationship is to HashFast. I can't help but feel that we've been thrown another random poster like cypherdoc who supposes to speak for HashFast but when push comes to shove does not actually represent them and can't speak for them.
Are you directly employed by HashFast and do you have the authorization to speak for them as their agent?

"Dyson Sphere powered Sierra"   Cheesy 

I started as a contractor and from today go full time to assist with technical support.

I can only relay what I hear/am authorized to and so can't speak for customer service with regard to refund type stuff.

The "CL" stands for community liaison; my role is to facilitate communication between the community and the company.

I don't have any new information about shipping dates, but am as eager as everyone else to start hashing!

Best,

-HF_CL

"Bitcoin enables ordinary people to fight back, to avoid and evade snooping governments, which enact, use and abuse laws that allow them, without due process, to investigate, tax, control and seize privately owned assets."  -   Leon Louw

“We can say without equivocation that firms like MasterCard, Visa and the TBTF banks like JPMorgan and Goldman hate the idea of ever having to compete for business again. They have grown comfortable in their corrupt world of writing laws for themselves without any regulatory oversight. They enjoy the exorbitant privilege of bilking the American economy with extortionary transaction rates. They are scared of Bitcoin. And they should be. It offers transparency, cost efficiency and anonymity.” - Max Kaiser
perezoso
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 12:29:38 AM
 #4863

I started as a contractor and from today go full time to assist with technical support.

Why don't you start a thread specifically for questions and answers.  People post questions, you post answers. If you don't know the answer or are not authorized to divulge it, then you can reply and say "I don't know" or "I can't say".  This would create clarity about the situation and your position.

"Hashfast Community Liaison - Question and Answer Thread"

Questions and answers only.

Other discussion can stay here.
Minor Miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1011


Be A Digital Miner


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 12:33:55 AM
 #4864

I started as a contractor and from today go full time to assist with technical support.

Why don't you start a thread specifically for questions and answers.  People post questions, you post answers. If you don't know the answer or are not authorized to divulge it, then you can reply and say "I don't know" or "I can't say".  This would create clarity about the situation and your position.

"Hashfast Community Liaison - Question and Answer Thread"

Questions and answers only.

Other discussion can stay here.

Now there is a really good and sane suggestion.

gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 8382



View Profile WWW
December 24, 2013, 12:37:31 AM
 #4865

We permit self-moderated threads for a reason— too.
RHA
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 01:12:45 AM
 #4866

I was just looking at the cgminer image posted by gateway a few days ago and the work utility value on that screen seems really high for 422GH/s.

I would expect 422GH/s to show WU at about 6K, not the ~11K that is shown.  From the other stats on the screen it appears that it had been hashing for at least 10 minutes, so that should have been enough time for WU to stabilize.

It looks like the cgminer code was modified here a bit too much. On purpose?
miaviator
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 519


It's for the children!


View Profile WWW
December 24, 2013, 01:32:00 AM
 #4867

Jesus Christ, I thought I made it more than ludicrous enough that no one would believe it, especially since it's just a copy and paste of the last update. I guess I should have added a line or two about the new Dyson Sphere that's going to power the Sierra arriving for testing.

HashFast_CL, people wouldn't have to waste time messing around with jokes if you would actually give productive updates on where shipping is at and when you plan to start moving out the units. I'd also like to know who you are and what your relationship is to HashFast. I can't help but feel that we've been thrown another random poster like cypherdoc who supposes to speak for HashFast but when push comes to shove does not actually represent them and can't speak for them.
Are you directly employed by HashFast and do you have the authorization to speak for them as their agent?

"Dyson Sphere powered Sierra"   Cheesy 

I started as a contractor and from today go full time to assist with technical support.

I can only relay what I hear/am authorized to and so can't speak for customer service with regard to refund type stuff.

The "CL" stands for community liaison; my role is to facilitate communication between the community and the company.

I don't have any new information about shipping dates, but am as eager as everyone else to start hashing!

Best,

-HF_CL

So you voluntarily took a role getting shat on by everyone?  Smiley


Biffa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3220
Merit: 1220



View Profile
December 24, 2013, 01:37:00 AM
 #4868

To stop the "lawsuit", all they have to do is pay off the litigious complainers with extra hashpower, shower them with BJ's and the pain will go away and no-one will be the wiser.

Mine @ pools that pay Tx fees & don't mine empty blocks :: kanopool :: ckpool ::
Should bitmain create LPM for all models?
:: Dalcore's Crypto Mining H/W Hosting Directory & Reputation ::
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 8382



View Profile WWW
December 24, 2013, 01:53:57 AM
 #4869

The problem with "give more hashpower" is that its expensive and doesn't assure the company that the risk of lawsuits will go away.

A better path would be to offer the a choice of a full 1:1 refund in BTC as if the sale had never been made or enough additional hashpower that most customers would choose the latter.

The problem is that the 1:1 refund at this point would be a hard deal to match and I suspect that many people now believe the original October claims were flat out dishonest, making promises of further hash-power later unattractive.

This is what I was referring to earlier on the thread about there being potentially no clean solution. A half measure doesn't remove hashfast's legal exposure, and a full measure may not be within their ability to afford.
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 02:09:47 AM
 #4870

I started as a contractor and from today go full time to assist with technical support.

Why don't you start a thread specifically for questions and answers.  People post questions, you post answers. If you don't know the answer or are not authorized to divulge it, then you can reply and say "I don't know" or "I can't say".  This would create clarity about the situation and your position.

"Hashfast Community Liaison - Question and Answer Thread"

Questions and answers only.

Other discussion can stay here.

+1

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
Rawrkanos
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 02:30:14 AM
 #4871

Anyone else notice how the network hashrate jumped by over a petahash just a few days after HashFast really got down to testing their chips?
calichomp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 02:52:09 AM
 #4872

Breakout the pitchforks.
bitcoinermax
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 03:06:33 AM
 #4873

If HF were self mining, then they can afford to refund everyone the BTCs!   Smiley
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
December 24, 2013, 03:07:41 AM
 #4874

Anyone else notice how the network hashrate jumped by over a petahash just a few days after HashFast really got down to testing their chips?
No because it didn't happen.
RickJamesBTC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 03:14:17 AM
 #4875

Hash Rate is right on trend.
miaviator
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 519


It's for the children!


View Profile WWW
December 24, 2013, 03:30:31 AM
 #4876

Anyone else notice how the network hashrate jumped by over a petahash just a few days after HashFast really got down to testing their chips?
No because it didn't happen.

Lol.  Slap in the face....

Easy2Mine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 500


einc.io


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 03:47:28 AM
 #4877

Still no tracking number for me.
I guess Santa Claus is not coming this year.

dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 24, 2013, 03:55:21 AM
 #4878

Anyone else notice how the network hashrate jumped by over a petahash just a few days after HashFast really got down to testing their chips?
No because it didn't happen.

The network jumped from 7.5PH to 9.7PH without any  major new shipments.  How do you justify your statement?
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
December 24, 2013, 04:03:14 AM
 #4879

Anyone else notice how the network hashrate jumped by over a petahash just a few days after HashFast really got down to testing their chips?
No because it didn't happen.

The network jumped from 7.5PH to 9.7PH without any  major new shipments.  How do you justify your statement?

Although I haven't been following the hashrate as closely as many I still noticed it jump back and forth between 8-10 the past month. You cant possibly think you know of every asic being shipped/being brought online. Could be more bitfurys/knc/butterflylabs. Hashrate is not climbing more than average.

1ph would be an incredible test. Maybe HF contributed to the rise but assuming HF alone caused any substancial rise with test units seems a bit far fetched imo.

I am sure if they were having such success we would hear about it.
Xian01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067


Christian Antkow


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 05:00:45 AM
 #4880

network jumped from 7.5PH to 9.7PH without any  major new shipments.  How do you justify your statement?

 Bitmain recently shipped several TH of 180GH/s Antminers.
Pages: « 1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 [244] 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!