HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s

[ninjarobot]

Come on Cedivad. While I agree with you on many things I do think you are going overboard with the drama sometimes. If you are going the legal route, go the legal route. No need to tell us every day on the forums.

If HF is able to achieve a stable 800GH/s with a single module that would be quite an achievement. It won't put us in the green but hey good news is good news. Let's hope this is the case and not more smoke and mirrors. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now.

[1713494385]

1713494385

[1713494385]

1713494385

[1713494385]

1713494385

[1713494385]

1713494385

[1713494385]

1713494385

[1713494385]

1713494385

[cedivad]

If you are going the legal route, go the legal route. No need to tell us every day on the forums.

Are you annoyed by that? So i guess that i can't have you to testify about the BTC refunds?

[ninjarobot]

If you are going the legal route, go the legal route. No need to tell us every day on the forums.

Are you annoyed by that? So i guess that i can't have you to testify about the BTC refunds?

When the time arrives and it makes sense. Sure I'd like to help you out FWIW. At the moment, I think you are just pounding your chest trying to intimidate HF to deliver more and disagree with that strategy. That said, I think HF should find a way to compensate for the delays and give their customers a fighting chance.

[aerobatic]

Come on Cedivad. While I agree with you on many things I do think you are going overboard with the drama sometimes. If you are going the legal route, go the legal route. No need to tell us every day on the forums.

If HF is able to achieve a stable 800GH/s with a single module that would be quite an achievement. It won't put us in the green but hey good news is good news. Let's hope this is the case and not more smoke and mirrors. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now.

i think the 800 GH was an anomaly... however hashfast is tweeting that they're proud of it hitting 600 GH over several days, so it looks like 600 GH is a number they're happy about.   And to over clock something designed for 400 (well 424) to 600 Gh is still an impressive feat.  fingers crossed its reliable running at 600 gh.  (edit: now they're tweeting that they're happy about the 700+Gh it recently hit.. so i guess it does overclock well and much better than i expected!)  Would like to know its power consumption...?  and whether the sierras will over clock as well (they may be power limited)

-- Jez

[cedivad]

I think you are just pounding your chest trying to intimidate HF to deliver more and disagree with that strategy.

No, that was months ago. After that they told me a couple of things about their CEO, i realised that everything was getting worse everyday, now i'm making it a question of principles.

Scammer's company is gonna scam. I don't expect anything else, and everyone that is sincerely positive after this "news" (was that with 1 or 2 chips, again?) will bear with me in a few months.

[jspielberg]

There are still a number of unanswered questions... but having HF providing updates and proof of progress is a very welcome change.

There most recent tweet though annoys me...

Just did the following calculation for the Baby Jet on Eligius. At 0.33 BTC per day, that is almost 7 Bitcoins in only 21 days. Exciting!

I guess whomever wrote that never heard of difficulty retarget (every 10 days recently).

Good news is, it looks like they are owning the 700+ GH performance.

Ecstatic about the Baby Jet on Eligius 700+ GH/s performance over the last few hours.

They have had more substantive communication in the last 5 hours than they have in the last 3 weeks.  Hopefully this trend continues as they head into delivery.
I am stowing my pitchfork for the time being.

[GodHatesFigs]

So no one's getting their rig delivered before 31st December - good luck getting your refunds, guys. 

[minternj]

Lol at this update. Pitchforks back out.
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/416846066068520961
"Hold on. Looks like Eligius stats is having problems. Think we are really around 400-500 GH/s. Waiting for Eligius to fix this."

[cedivad]

Are you telling me that after weeks of tests they can't detect such an incredible performance as "too good, but we are only drawing about 600W, something must be wrong".

This is the last time i will even remotely trust what the fuck they have to write. "It's the straw that breaks the camel's back."

[AussieHash]

Lol at this update. Pitchforks back out.
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/416846066068520961
"Hold on. Looks like Eligius stats is having problems. Think we are really around 400-500 GH/s. Waiting for Eligius to fix this."

They must have modified cgminer so heavily they cannot interpret the results
They earlier published a screen with WU 10,000+ despite a hashrate under 500GH

This is their second big HashOoopsy for the day

[cedivad]

Yes, and there is some secret nuclear reaction inside the BJ that accounts for the energy needed to reach 800GH. You are a f. startup made of supposedly geniuses and can't even detect such a HUGE logic bug? I really can't f. believe it. We have another useless topic to talk about in the next few days instead of the real problems. Good job, HF.

The only possible conclusion? Everything was plotted. They can't be this ignorant. Even a 14yo here in Italy doing a scientific school would have questioned that result before publishing it on Twitter. They are playing with us.

You know what? I't s a beautiful sunny day here, i'm going out to fly thinking another time what to do against them. F. U., HF. I will make your new lawyer cry like a baby.
https://i.imgur.com/URWMzcA.jpg

[jddebug]

Lol at this update. Pitchforks back out.
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/416846066068520961
"Hold on. Looks like Eligius stats is having problems. Think we are really around 400-500 GH/s. Waiting for Eligius to fix this."

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.msg4181673#msg4181673

As I suspected.

[plasmoske]

Wow such fail bahahahaha!

Thinking stats from eligius was the real one instead of what was actually shown on cgminer. LOL bloody amateurs

[DPoS]

Wow such fail bahahahaha!

Thinking stats from eligius was the real one instead of what was actually shown on cgminer. LOL bloody amateurs

Can someone send them a USBee so they have something to practice with?

[cedivad]

They cannot be and are not be that stupid. You are playing their game with their rules.

[niothor]

Lol at this update. Pitchforks back out.
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/416846066068520961
"Hold on. Looks like Eligius stats is having problems. Think we are really around 400-500 GH/s. Waiting for Eligius to fix this."

Probably FailFast staff think they are on the 1st of April. That would explain why they are so relaxed. They still have 9 months to ship those "products" ))

[JWU42]

My Eligius stats are fine (not below) - namely the 22.5 min.  

The BJ seems to be in the 700's... http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1KSZMq1L9ZWEBKEHuW7ACXWZJYdxiTdaVt

[jjiimm_64]

MPP??
If the chip is performing at that rate your MPP complaints are moot.   You are already getting more than you ever dreamed of

pretty sure the MPP is calculated at 400, no matter the actual hashrate.

[jelin1984]

What final is the speed of miner 400gh or 600gh??...

[ImI]

MPP??
If the chip is performing at that rate your MPP complaints are moot.   You are already getting more than you ever dreamed of

pretty sure the MPP is calculated at 400, no matter the actual hashrate.

pretty sure the MPP is calculated at 4x the BJ, no matter the actual hashrate.