Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 10:08:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 [352] 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1079977 times)
ShroomsKit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:08:59 PM
 #7021

How can they so not give a shit?

Its price is not a very relevant factor in its adoption....
1713521298
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713521298

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713521298
Reply with quote  #2

1713521298
Report to moderator
1713521298
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713521298

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713521298
Reply with quote  #2

1713521298
Report to moderator
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2013, 08:10:10 PM
 #7022

Sad really, the chance to get out above .003 is dwindling. Way to stab your supporters in the back Labcoin.

As long as Labcoin isn't a total scam their price should go back up as soon as they start verifiably mining.

All they would need to do to fix the share price is start mining on a pool where they can show their hashrate.

limbaugh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:12:02 PM
 #7023

Sad really, the chance to get out above .003 is dwindling. Way to stab your supporters in the back Labcoin.

As long as Labcoin isn't a total scam they price should go back up as soon as they start verifiably mining.

All they would need to do to fix the share price is start mining on a pool where they can show their hashrate.

I agree, Labcoin could put an end to this downward spiral but they choose not to. I still am holding a stake albeit a much smaller one now.
kokojie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1003



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:12:59 PM
 #7024

lol I can't believe people still buying this. Solo mine with 2TH, why? because mining on a pool would leave them with no excuse to not publicly display their non-existent hashing stats.

oh and, of course, zero block found so far solo mining with their non-existent hashing hardware. LOL

btc: 15sFnThw58hiGHYXyUAasgfauifTEB1ZF6
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2013, 08:14:05 PM
 #7025

Finding a block with 2Th within 48h is pretty optimistic.

2Th/s is 465 Diff1 shares a second.

The difficulty is 86,933,018, so it should take 86933018/465 seconds, or 51 hours to find a block, on average.

aquarius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 275
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:15:53 PM
 #7026

lol I can't believe people still buying this. Solo mine with 2TH, why? because mining on a pool would leave them with no excuse to not publicly display their non-existent hashing stats.

oh and, of course, zero block found so far solo mining with their non-existent hashing hardware. LOL

+1
chenchunyu88
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2013, 08:18:05 PM
 #7027

Maybe we get better luck. Find one in 1 day.

Just be optimistic and the share price then goes up.

Finding a block with 2Th within 48h is pretty optimistic.

2Th/s is 465 Diff1 shares a second.

The difficulty is 86,933,018, so it should take 86933018/465 seconds, or 51 hours to find a block, on average.

dexX7
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2013, 08:29:40 PM
 #7028

Involving Sparmann in their project proves that labcoin management *IS* capable of making a good decision at least part of the time. At least it works for me.

Quote
Labcoin The Seven
August 8, 2013 By bcoinnews Leave a Comment
IRC conversation with [7] from FPGAmining
<jborkl>You are TheSeven from Fpgamining correct?
<[7]> yes
<jborkl> i.e.(Labcoin) they are actually developing something?
<[7]> I can’t really comment on that because I wasn’t involved in the development of them besides giving them some general hints what can be optimized etc.
<[7]> i’m mostly involved with the second generation chips
<jborkl> 65nm chips?
<[7]> yes, they are actually developing something, definitely. I just can’t comment on how successful it will be
<jborkl> Thank you. I will ask your permission to post this up.
<[7]> yes, from what i know that second generation will be 65nm, although we could technically still switch to something else at this stage
<jborkl> ok, Thank you for your time.

http://bcoinnews.com/2013/08/08/labcoin-the-seven/

Great finding.

I had the same idea and wrote TheSeven yesterday here on btctalk, but I didn't receive an answer. Sad

(which does not mean much - last time only more than a week ago)

tucenaber
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 252


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:29:54 PM
 #7029

Finding a block with 2Th within 48h is pretty optimistic.

2Th/s is 465 Diff1 shares a second.

The difficulty is 86,933,018, so it should take 86933018/465 seconds, or 51 hours to find a block, on average.

The probability of finding zero blocks in 48h is about 40%
KSGuy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:30:45 PM
 #7030

really... solo mining?

looks like my .004 sale will never be hit  Huh
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2013, 08:32:35 PM
 #7031

Finding a block with 2Th within 48h is pretty optimistic.

2Th/s is 465 Diff1 shares a second.

The difficulty is 86,933,018, so it should take 86933018/465 seconds, or 51 hours to find a block, on average.

The probability of finding zero blocks in 48h is about 40%

Yeah, that should be about right.  If you look at the CDF graph on slush's pool  You can see that the expected probability of finding a block with one 'normalized difficulty' share is (i.e. a diff 86933018 share) is 63%, so the probability of not finding a block after 51 hours would be just 37%.

Of course, things can go really badly.  Right now on Slush's pool there's a block that took 14 hours and was found after 679575861 shares were submitted, or 7.81 times the current diff. That would be the equivalent of 16 days for Labcoin. There's also a 5:44 block with 276257472 shares, or 3.1 times the current difficulty.  The equivalent of 6 days for labcoin.

tucenaber
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 252


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:37:59 PM
 #7032

Finding a block with 2Th within 48h is pretty optimistic.

2Th/s is 465 Diff1 shares a second.

The difficulty is 86,933,018, so it should take 86933018/465 seconds, or 51 hours to find a block, on average.

The probability of finding zero blocks in 48h is about 40%

How are you calculating that? It should be 50% at 51 hours, but in N 51 hour time periods you should find N blocks (again, on average)

The basic idea is you find one block per D diff one shares, where D = the current difficulty, which right now is 86933018

No. You are assuming that mean=median. That is not the case.

The probability number of blocks in 48 hours is poisson distributed with mean 0.92 = 48*3600*2e12/86933018/2^32. Prob(Zero blocks)=0.37
Rannasha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:40:33 PM
 #7033

Finding a block with 2Th within 48h is pretty optimistic.

2Th/s is 465 Diff1 shares a second.

The difficulty is 86,933,018, so it should take 86933018/465 seconds, or 51 hours to find a block, on average.

The probability of finding zero blocks in 48h is about 40%

How are you calculating that? It should be 50% at 51 hours, but in N 51 hour time periods you should find N blocks (again, on average)

The basic idea is you find one block per D diff one shares, where D = the current difficulty, which right now is 86933018

Finding blocks is a Poisson process. If the average time per block is 51 hours, then after 51 hours, the probability of finding 1 block is equal to the probability of finding 0: 1 / e, which is approximately 36.8%. The remaining ~26.2% is the probability that more than 1 block is found in 51 hours.
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2013, 08:44:20 PM
 #7034

No. You are assuming that mean=median. That is not the case.

The probability number of blocks in 48 hours is poisson distributed with mean 0.92 = 48*3600*2e12/86933018/2^32. Prob(Zero blocks)=0.37

Yeah, already I updated my post Tongue.  It's a 37% probability of finding no blocks at 51h.

Finding blocks is a Poisson process. If the average time per block is 51 hours, then after 51 hours, the probability of finding 1 block is equal to the probability of finding 0: 1 / e, which is approximately 36.8%. The remaining ~26.2% is the probability that more than 1 block is found in 51 hours.

I fixed it already guys!

kingcrimson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:44:56 PM
 #7035

Sad really, the chance to get out above .003 is dwindling. Way to stab your supporters in the back Labcoin.

As long as Labcoin isn't a total scam they price should go back up as soon as they start verifiably mining.

All they would need to do to fix the share price is start mining on a pool where they can show their hashrate.

I agree, Labcoin could put an end to this downward spiral but they choose not to. I still am holding a stake albeit a much smaller one now.

Limbaugh was caught manipulating price yesterday, don't believe a single thing he says.
Rulother
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:47:29 PM
 #7036

Sad really, the chance to get out above .003 is dwindling. Way to stab your supporters in the back Labcoin.

As long as Labcoin isn't a total scam they price should go back up as soon as they start verifiably mining.

All they would need to do to fix the share price is start mining on a pool where they can show their hashrate.

I agree, Labcoin could put an end to this downward spiral but they choose not to. I still am holding a stake albeit a much smaller one now.

Limbaugh was caught manipulating price yesterday, don't believe a single thing he says.

A Member of the LCSH
Duffer1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:48:29 PM
 #7037

you mean someone named LIMBAUGH was lying to me? 

I'M SHOCKED
limbaugh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:48:43 PM
 #7038

Sad really, the chance to get out above .003 is dwindling. Way to stab your supporters in the back Labcoin.

As long as Labcoin isn't a total scam they price should go back up as soon as they start verifiably mining.

All they would need to do to fix the share price is start mining on a pool where they can show their hashrate.

I agree, Labcoin could put an end to this downward spiral but they choose not to. I still am holding a stake albeit a much smaller one now.

Limbaugh was caught manipulating price yesterday, don't believe a single thing he says.

Nice work Scherlock. Now find the missing blocks, press releases, and lab photos.
limbaugh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:52:34 PM
 #7039

you mean someone named LIMBAUGH was lying to me? 

I'M SHOCKED

Not shocked just ignorant....
Pale Phoenix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:53:42 PM
 #7040

you mean someone named LIMBAUGH was lying to me? 

I'M SHOCKED

I LOL'd

Pages: « 1 ... 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 [352] 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!