Bitcoin Forum
April 18, 2024, 10:49:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 [507] 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1079977 times)
Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 01:55:21 AM
 #10121

Another avalanche tonight? Was there news?
Why would there be news, nothing new has been shown since the IPO.
1713437348
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713437348

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713437348
Reply with quote  #2

1713437348
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713437348
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713437348

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713437348
Reply with quote  #2

1713437348
Report to moderator
1713437348
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713437348

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713437348
Reply with quote  #2

1713437348
Report to moderator
velacreations
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 02:00:44 AM
 #10122

Lets not got ahead of ourselves here. It's likely going to come Wednesday evening, US time (previous announcement was 9pm Central Time).

Don't get fooled by the countdown to 12:0AM China time.  

I believe 8 pm Central time is about 9 am the next day in China, so beginning of the work day. 9pm is certainly not within work hours (in the US).  

If we don't hear anything by the end of the work day on Weds in China, then I think this thing will tank, regardless.

JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 02:02:10 AM
 #10123

BET ME YOUR NAME SHILL FUD
You're still not wagering anything of value.
Your excuse does not stand, you can buy Bitcoins easily, you still have two weeks.

Looks like your scared, if your so sure why wouldn't you bet? Nah actually buying bitcoins is quite complicated dumbass, don't plan on giving my bank information to GOX or any exchange, and am not going to waste 2 hours to go through different payment methods to get some BitCoin. All my bitcoin has been mined, and all invested in LabCoin and very little in IceDrill.

You still have two weeks to wager me your name, but you won't cause your a shill pussy FUD
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2013, 02:11:41 AM
 #10124

It would have been interesting if they'd given their mining address before mining any blocks. Then people would be sitting around, waiting for them to find a block, and likely seeing the stock spike as soon as they did.

BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 02:16:06 AM
 #10125

It would have been interesting if they'd given their mining address before mining any blocks. Then people would be sitting around, waiting for them to find a block, and likely seeing the stock spike as soon as they did.
That wait could be quite long considering they are solo mining.
JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 02:17:25 AM
 #10126

Nah actually buying bitcoins is quite complicated dumbass
It's not.

Quote
All my bitcoin has been mined, and all invested in LabCoin and very little in IceDrill.
I even said you could bet 0.1. Can't even mine that?

Quote
You still have two weeks to wager me your name, but you won't cause your a shill pussy FUD
Again, you're not providing anything of value. Your yellow-ignore account has absolutely no value, and you will just create yet another account. Why should I value it?

Keep in mind I have no doubt you're lying - but at least try to make your lies believable.

I don't mine anymore hence buying securities. Yes my yellow ignored account good one. It became yellow and ignored from the FUDS on here lol. You don't need to value my account just like I don't give a shit about your worthless account.

What matters is I can feel good about the fact that you will never get to post with that account ever again.

This name is also my nickname that I use everywhere, so it's the same value as yours, you've used that name for 10 years I've used the same name. Therefore equal value.

If your so sure that LabCoin is a scam bet your name, your not going to lose anything since they are a scam, but you won't because your just a SHILL.

I'm willing to bet my name your not cause your a FUD.
jnada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 310
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 02:18:01 AM
 #10127



I would like to point out that I am not calling anyone FUDsters, I am also not saying that labcoin has not had 2th hashing. My statement is just based on the info I have and that is that more tweaking and calibrating is needed before Labcoin feels comfortable with stating a stable hash rate.
simply you are FUD

NEM                                        NEM                                          NEM                            launch on 22nd November 2014 !                                          TAQDPC-BT35MC-YAWTKQ-OFEZOS-CMBKHM-F5Q3L6-YEYL
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 03:02:53 AM
 #10128

Labcoin made the announcement of announcement in a time it was not expected and not necessary at all, when the price was already stabilized around 0.0018. Therefore, if he was not sure that he could keep his promise, he could just keep quite that time. Therefore, I don't think there's any reason for him to pull back the news this time (unless they really want to take the advantage of pump and dump).
Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 03:07:25 AM
 #10129

Labcoin made the announcement of announcement in a time it was not expected and not necessary at all, when the price was already stabilized around 0.0018. Therefore, if he was not sure that he could keep his promise, he could just keep quite that time. Therefore, I don't think there's any reason for him to pull back the news this time (unless they really want to take the advantage of pump and dump).
One reason could be that they are not hashing anything.
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 03:55:57 AM
 #10130

Labcoin made the announcement of announcement in a time it was not expected and not necessary at all, when the price was already stabilized around 0.0018. Therefore, if he was not sure that he could keep his promise, he could just keep quite that time. Therefore, I don't think there's any reason for him to pull back the news this time (unless they really want to take the advantage of pump and dump).
One reason could be that they are not hashing anything.

If they are not hashing, why labcoin made that announcement? I already said that announcement is not necessary and it's unexpected. Why did he give us a rope to hang himself if there's no hashing? It does not make sence. 
Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 04:28:05 AM
 #10131

Labcoin made the announcement of announcement in a time it was not expected and not necessary at all, when the price was already stabilized around 0.0018. Therefore, if he was not sure that he could keep his promise, he could just keep quite that time. Therefore, I don't think there's any reason for him to pull back the news this time (unless they really want to take the advantage of pump and dump).
One reason could be that they are not hashing anything.

If they are not hashing, why labcoin made that announcement? I already said that announcement is not necessary and it's unexpected. Why did he give us a rope to hang himself if there's no hashing? It does not make sence.  
Because that is what Labcoin has always done. Labcoin has handed the rope over for weeks and no one has the common sense to hang them with it. They make announcements that there will be an announcement on some date and then they just stall and/or offer some lie. Sometimes the price plummets because they don't provide the info when they say they will or because they delay and promise info at some future time; or they throw a random vague bone for which the price jumps and comes back down. Then they do it all over again. Where have you been?
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 04:42:32 AM
 #10132

Labcoin made the announcement of announcement in a time it was not expected and not necessary at all, when the price was already stabilized around 0.0018. Therefore, if he was not sure that he could keep his promise, he could just keep quite that time. Therefore, I don't think there's any reason for him to pull back the news this time (unless they really want to take the advantage of pump and dump).
One reason could be that they are not hashing anything.

If they are not hashing, why labcoin made that announcement? I already said that announcement is not necessary and it's unexpected. Why did he give us a rope to hang himself if there's no hashing? It does not make sence.  
Because that is what Labcoin has always done. Labcoin has handed the rope over for weeks and no one has the common sense to hang them with it. They make announcements that there will be an announcement on some date and then they just stall and/or offer some lie. Sometimes the price plummets because they don't provide the info when they say they will or because they delay and promise info at some future time; or they throw a random vague bone for which the price jumps and comes back down. Then they do it all over again. Where have you been?

I've said if they do it again, then no doubt they are manipulating the market so someone will benefit from it. Then the best strategy is just put orders in both sides and bet on they will not stop this game soon. No one will kill a hen laying eggs.
limbaugh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 05:04:16 AM
 #10133

I've said if they do it again, then no doubt they are manipulating the market so someone will benefit from it. Then the best strategy is just put orders in both sides and bet on they will not stop this game soon. No one will kill a hen laying eggs.

If they do it again I don't believe the price will ever recover above 002.

If Labcoin sincerely believes they will hit 500TH by year end, he could care less what you think. And the share price will reflect this. No matter how hard you wish it wasn't so.
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 05:23:21 AM
 #10134


I have a new theory-

 Maybe the chips and boards worked fine in isolation, but they're having trouble with actual deployment.  Maybe whatever datacenter they're using is full of idiots or has power issues or something.

If that's the case, maybe they really will announce they have 4TH operational this week, as promised.  But we might get a mining address that's empty at first. So a mixed bag.


Just another random guess in the absence of actual information.
foxykah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 05:41:56 AM
 #10135

BET ME YOUR NAME SHILL FUD

I bet my name that they WILL deliver, and WILL show us a mining address before Wednesday.

Good things come to those who wait.
KCBitcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 05:58:46 AM
 #10136

its already tuesday 2pm in china
lets see if we will see any div coming within 10 hours.
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 06:03:05 AM
 #10137


You asked for it:
Timer removed. End time: 2013-09-17+16:00:00UTC
KCBitcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 06:10:05 AM
 #10138

i bet they've already forgotten about it.
jeffhuys
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 06:34:11 AM
 #10139


That's probably why it's quoted again. It gets buried rather fast in a thread as huge as this.

Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2013, 08:34:18 AM
 #10140

That countdown clock is completely ridiculous. They have until 10:59 AM UTC on Thursday to post. That's just some completely arbitrary point in time when most of the world will still be on Tuesday.




But really we can't be sure.  Also for whatever reason, that clock thing gets messed up if it's loaded multiple times per page.

Pages: « 1 ... 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 [507] 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!