|
BitCsByBit
|
 |
September 19, 2013, 05:09:06 AM |
|
And we are hashing!!!
Kind of a low amount for 1~2 let alone 5+ GH though. They are still tweaking! EDIT: Welcome to page number 600!!! |
Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duffer1
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:11:18 AM |
|
And we are hashing!!!
Kind of a low amount for 1~2 let alone 5+ GH though. wait a second, that's .1277 for 3 blocks? 75btc payed out, could be ya. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:11:51 AM |
|
And we are hashing!!!
Kind of a low amount for 1~2 let alone 5+ GH though. They are still tweaking! EDIT: Welcome to page number 600!!! Slush is a particularly bad pool to hash on if you're unstable. There is an exponential falloff for old shares, only the most recent shares 'count'. So if you go offline for a while you lose out on reward. It's done to prevent pool hopping, but it will also punish people if they're equipment is having issues. A PPS or PPLNS system like BTCGuild would be better, IMO. |
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:13:41 AM |
|
And we are hashing!!!
Kind of a low amount for 1~2 let alone 5+ GH though. wait a second, that's .1277 for 3 blocks? 75btc payed out, could be ya. so, I don't get it, they get 3.2 btc for 1 block, and then .128 btc for 3 blocks? OR, does it mean that slush's pool has a max threshold of 5 btc, and the troller doesn't have much hash, so they directed what they could. I'm honestly asking, is that a possibility? |
|
|
|
|
KCBitcoin
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:13:47 AM |
|
And we are hashing!!!
Kind of a low amount for 1~2 let alone 5+ GH though. wait a second, that's .1277 for 3 blocks? 75btc payed out, could be ya. 75 payed out, we only got 0.1277?! wtf? |
|
|
|
|
|
szmarco
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:13:51 AM |
|
And we are hashing!!!
Kind of a low amount for 1~2 let alone 5+ GH though. They are still tweaking! EDIT: Welcome to page number 600!!! Slush is a particularly bad pool to hash on if you're unstable. There is an exponential falloff for old shares, only the most recent shares 'count'. So if you go offline for a while you lose out on reward. It's done to prevent pool hopping, but it will also punish people if they're equipment is having issues. A PPS or PPLNS system like BTCGuild would be better, IMO. +1 what's about the new 0.001337 and the gif? |
|
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:14:48 AM |
|
+1
what's about the new 0.001337 and the gif?
that's a troll |
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:15:22 AM |
|
75 payed out, we only got 0.1277?! wtf?
smells fishy to me... |
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:19:03 AM |
|
Well, that's not a good payout. Not even for 1 block, much less 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VolanicEruptor
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:22:32 AM |
|
Well, that's not a good payout. Not even for 1 block, much less 3.
Sell!!! |
|
|
|
|
KCBitcoin
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:22:51 AM |
|
Well, that's not a good payout. Not even for 1 block, much less 3.
which can be interpreted as they've had the miner on and off for some tweaking. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:23:32 AM |
|
Well, that's not a good payout. Not even for 1 block, much less 3.
which can be interpreted as they've had the miner on and off for some tweaking. Or that it was in fact a troll. So frustrating when the company we paid for could clear up all ambiguity with one sentence. |
|
|
|
|
|
Duffer1
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:27:08 AM |
|
Well, that's not a good payout. Not even for 1 block, much less 3.
which can be interpreted as they've had the miner on and off for some tweaking. Or that it was in fact a troll. They could just post the api token.................. |
|
|
|
|
|
velacreations
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:28:44 AM |
|
Or that it was in fact a troll.
+1 set the threshold for 3 btc, pay to LC address. you don't have much hash, so the next payment is small (.128 btc), but it generates massive buy where you could easily sell thousands of shares. If he bought at ~.0023 earlier, and just sold at .0029, it would take less than 6,000 share to pay that investment. 75,000 share were just purchased/sold from .0026 to .003 |
|
|
|
huhai0978
Member
 Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:29:10 AM |
|
100 pages in 2 days. Some people are trolling really hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:29:53 AM |
|
Eligus would be the best place to mine to prove their hashrate.
|
|
|
|
cottoneyeJoe
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:31:10 AM |
|
Amazing thread! Amazing company!
buy x2!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:31:13 AM |
|
This whole 'get your feelings hurt so you stop talking to us' thing is childish.
Act like responsible adults, Labcoin. Tell us what's going on.
|
|
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024
|
|
September 19, 2013, 05:31:16 AM |
|
Next slush payout soon.
If it's Labcoin, then we already know that they allegedly had issues, thus a tiny payout of 0.1227 is possible. Keep in mind that this is from blocks mined approx. 15 hours ago.
|
|
|
|
|
