Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 08:41:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 [640] 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1079977 times)
Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:29:16 PM
 #12781

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.
1714077674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714077674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714077674
Reply with quote  #2

1714077674
Report to moderator
1714077674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714077674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714077674
Reply with quote  #2

1714077674
Report to moderator
1714077674
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714077674

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714077674
Reply with quote  #2

1714077674
Report to moderator
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
dexX7
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2013, 08:32:50 PM
 #12782

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.

Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

Edit:

Disclaimer: this is no trading advice nor a hard-proof of Labcoin being successful, though I think it added credibility and actually cleared some things up.

JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:33:45 PM
 #12783

The honest overall picture that I have is: They're chaotic, but at least trying to release something working. No signs of any scam intent.

that's encouraging



The transcript is generally encouraging.

They sound legit, but the chaos of doing a hard thing in a short time frame is catching up to them.  So normal startup situation there.

His reaction to the board pictures is a bit worrying...



So if the stuff they have now doesn't work at all, they will start mining in Q1 2014 or something like that, but with 65nm.

So we play the waiting game.

If we have to wait Q1 2014 to see the mining start, labcoin will be a complete failure with at least 4 competitors willing to deploy 28nm processor on end 2013/ early 2014.

Labcoin needs to start hashing ASAP to be profitable to invest in

OHHH no 28nm!!! you guys do realize that 500TH in 28nm and 500TH in 128nm is still 500th? the only difference being electricity costs, which isn't that big of an issue. If they deploy 500TH with whatever nm # they will be profitable.
JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:35:10 PM
 #12784

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.

Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

LOL at the people who panic sold.
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:35:34 PM
 #12785

There is NOTHING in the transcript indicating that we will have to wait until Q1 2014 for hashing to start. That was someone's extremely poor reading.

Instead, it sounds like the problem is something they can fix quickly.  
Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:37:39 PM
 #12786

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.

Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

LOL at the people who panic sold.
Its still dropped by 60%. What do you expect people to do when the thing looked like it was going to the bottom?
dhenson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:38:31 PM
 #12787

They stated that they ordered 100k chips after the first batch came out of fab.  They wouldn't have done that if they were abandoning the Gen 1 project.  People are just overreacting and impatient.  
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:39:04 PM
 #12788

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.

Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

LOL at the people who panic sold.
Its still dropped by 60%. What do you expect people to do when the thing looked like it was going to the bottom?

Sell and buy back cheaper like the rest of us.   Grin
abuelau
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 500


www.coinschedule.com


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:39:38 PM
 #12789

There is NOTHING in the transcript indicating that we will have to wait until Q1 2014 for hashing to start. That was someone's extremely poor reading.

Instead, it sounds like the problem is something they can fix quickly.  


Exactly!!

This is the correct summary:


Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

Know what's happening in cryptoworld: www.coinschedule.com
Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:39:45 PM
 #12790

They stated that they ordered 100k chips after the first batch came out of fab.  They wouldn't have done that if they were abandoning the Gen 1 project.  People are just overreacting and impatient.  
But everything has been a lie so there isn't any reason to believe that they did so and thus no reason to draw any kind of conclusions from such statements as you just did.
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:40:05 PM
 #12791

They stated that they ordered 100k chips after the first batch came out of fab.  They wouldn't have done that if they were abandoning the Gen 1 project.  People are just overreacting and impatient.  

sorry but you lost everyones interest after you said "they stated"...

Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:41:16 PM
 #12792

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.

Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

LOL at the people who panic sold.
Its still dropped by 60%. What do you expect people to do when the thing looked like it was going to the bottom?

Sell and buy back cheaper like the rest of us.   Grin
I tried to do so but couldn't get back in at the bottom it keep just missing my bids. I've lost over half my Bitcoins in the last week between ActM and Labcoin.
Pompobit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 736
Merit: 508


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:42:35 PM
 #12793



OHHH no 28nm!!! you guys do realize that 500TH in 28nm and 500TH in 128nm is still 500th? the only difference being electricity costs, which isn't that big of an issue. If they deploy 500TH with whatever nm # they will be profitable.

You're right, but I see extremely unlikely they will deploy 500TH for december, as the things are going. I hope I'm wrong
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:43:27 PM
 #12794

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.

Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

LOL at the people who panic sold.
Its still dropped by 60%. What do you expect people to do when the thing looked like it was going to the bottom?

Sell and buy back cheaper like the rest of us.   Grin
I tried to do so but couldn't get back in at the bottom it keep just missing my bids. I've lost over half my Bitcoins in the last week between ActM and Labcoin.

I could have done much better if I'd traded at the actual top and bottom, but I was too conservative. I have more shares than I did, but I've still lost a ton of value.
JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:43:41 PM
 #12795

They stated that they ordered 100k chips after the first batch came out of fab.  They wouldn't have done that if they were abandoning the Gen 1 project.  People are just overreacting and impatient.  
But everything has been a lie so there isn't any reason to believe that they did so and thus no reason to draw any kind of conclusions from such statements as you just did.

Nice loaded BS statement. Everything has not been a lie. TheSwede is their PR guy true, TheSeven working on their 2nd gen chip true, they are delayed true confirmed by theSeven which they themselves mentioned. Updated us on friday like they said they would, posted, signed, temporarily mined on Wednesday like they said they would.
JohnyBigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:45:27 PM
 #12796

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.

Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

LOL at the people who panic sold.
Its still dropped by 60%. What do you expect people to do when the thing looked like it was going to the bottom?

Sell and buy back cheaper like the rest of us.   Grin
I tried to do so but couldn't get back in at the bottom it keep just missing my bids. I've lost over half my Bitcoins in the last week between ActM and Labcoin.

Lesson to all the people who think they can sell and have their orders filled at the bottoms.
Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:50:12 PM
 #12797

Interesting but not really much different than the email from a few days ago.

Agreed.

So the summary is: mostly PR miscommunication and they are working on the problem that they are facing and it's probably fixable rather sooner than later. 65 nm is not near a completion though, but that's not what they recently said anyway.

LOL at the people who panic sold.
Its still dropped by 60%. What do you expect people to do when the thing looked like it was going to the bottom?

Sell and buy back cheaper like the rest of us.   Grin
I tried to do so but couldn't get back in at the bottom it keep just missing my bids. I've lost over half my Bitcoins in the last week between ActM and Labcoin.

I could have done much better if I'd traded at the actual top and bottom, but I was too conservative. I have more shares than I did, but I've still lost a ton of value.
No shares here. Everything I made in the last 5 weeks is gone.


Quote
Nice loaded BS statement. Everything has not been a lie. TheSwede is their PR guy true, TheSeven working on their 2nd gen chip true, they are delayed true confirmed by the swede which they themselves mentioned. Updated us on friday like they said they would, posted, signed, temporarily mined on Wednesday like they said they would.
What planet are you on? They weren't hashing, the boards they showed are likely not actual boards for hashing, etc. Of course it has been a lie, they were covering their f-ups to make it look like everything was going according to plan. There is no reason to take anything they said at face value until they come clean and prove themselves. They put up a random address that had a a few fractions of a Bitcoin trickling in and then has gone completely dry with absolutely no word which caused huge panic sells and cleared-out many people's bitcoins.
AngelSky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 537



View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:52:58 PM
 #12798


[15:28] <[7]> given that I have not much contact to the front team, and next to zero to the 130nm team, I can't really judge how communication works between them
[15:29] <[7]> I don't have any real proof that they have chips, but I have no reason to believe the contrary either
[15:32] <[7]> they suggested something along the lines of the chips "crashing and rebooting" every couple of seconds, but I don't know details yet, not have I spoken to the engineer dealing with it yet. I'm also not sure how much information I may even release here, but I hope that this piece of information is more positive than the general sentiment here.
[15:38] <[7]> The honest overall picture that I have is: They're chaotic, but at least trying to release something working. No signs of any scam intent. However as we all know, an ASIC project can easily fail without a scam intent. You never know. Communication between me and them isn't working well, but I guess I'm considered low priority right now as I'm only working on the next generation.
[15:42] <[7]> just like me, and I have quite a bunch of other projects, pushing this one down on my todo list from time to time
[15:43] <[7]> they never even asked me for a schedule on that
[15:43] <[7]> and they're making me write HDL code, which isn't really my area of expertise
[15:55] <dexX7> sec i'll get the picture
[15:55] <dexX7> https://i.imgur.com/4yuBc9A.jpg + https://i.imgur.com/4qqgoPD.jpg
[15:56] <[7]> I've already asked them what the hell that is supposed to be, didn't receive a reply yet
[15:58] <[7]> that board design doesn't make much sense to me either
[15:58] <[7]> does somewhere know where that picture originated from?
[15:58] <[7]> did some labcoin employee post it?
[15:59] <[7]> I'm wonderin what those traces to these cap-like-looking things are good for
[15:59] <[7]> the connector pins basically go to one of these each, with one more pin for ground, or something like that

Reassuring, yes. Everything is going to be fine. Amen.

creativex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:54:58 PM
 #12799

Once a particular asset issuer is proven to be dishonest there's little reason to invest. It makes everything else meaningless.

superduh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 20, 2013, 08:59:05 PM
 #12800

at least it aint' BFL /end thread

btw even avalon fucked up (stole?) 2 months late on a product that was already working

honesty would have been so much better regardless

ok
Pages: « 1 ... 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 [640] 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!